Treatment Of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Research Articles

Establishing of Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Treatment Program: Background in Ukraine, Patient Selection, Staff Schedule, Perioperative Outcomes of First 28 Patients.

A combination of cytoreductive intervention with the intrahepatic hyperthermic chemotherapy is a well-established treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis. There are many challenges in establishing a new peritoneal surface malignancy program in a low-income country regarding perioperative safety and resource allocation. We analyzed the retrospective database to determine the immediate surgical outcomes of the first 28 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis and the impact of the program on allocation of general hospital and human resources. During the preparatory stage, web conferences with international experts established the goals and general requirements of the program, formalized in a written document; and a peritoneal surface malignancy multidisciplinary team was established. The team created the patient selection criteria, perioperative management checklists, and suggested material and staff requirements for surgical and anesthesia services. Twenty-nine cytoreduction were carried out, of which 18 were followed by HIPEC. The average operative time was 6.2h. The median blood loss was 350mL, which did not result in additional blood transfusion requirements for the blood bank. No additional nursing and supportive staff were provided for the ICU and the surgical unit. The average postoperative stay was 8.7days. One patient died with 30-day mortality rate of 3%. Ten patients (34.5%) developed postoperative complications, of which 6 (20.6%) had grade III and higher Clavien-Dindo complications. Establishing a peritoneal surface malignancy program is possible via staged planning, liberal use of international mentors, and thoughtful resource allocation. This new program did not result in a significant redistribution of resources among other service lines of cancer care within the same institution.

In vivo Spectroscopic Evaluation of the Intraperitoneal Cavity in Canines.

As part of a preclinical trial for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) with photodynamic therapy (PDT), we have assessed changes in optical properties, tissue oxygenation and drug concentration as a result of benzoporphyrin derivative (BPD)-mediated PDT using diffuse reflectance and fluorescence measurements. PDT can effectively treat superficial disease spread, but treatment efficacy is influenced by physical properties of the treated tissue which can change over the treatment time. In this study, healthy canines were given BPD and irradiated with 690nm light during a partial bowel resection, and spectroscopic and fluorescence measurements were made using an in-house built spectroscopic probe. Hemoglobin concentration, oxygenation and optical properties were determined to be highly heterogeneous between canines and at different anatomical locations within the same subject, so further development of PDT dosimetry systems will need to address this patient and location-specific dose optimization. Compared to other photosensitizers, we found no apparent BPD photobleaching after PDT.

HIPEC-Closed Technique with CO2 Recirculation (PRS/Biosurgical®) in The Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis.

Background: Cytoreductive surgery asociated with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) is turning out to be the recommended treatment of peritoneal carcinomatois especially in types of tumors where its efficacy has been demonstrated. Traditionally two types of application of the intaperitoneal chemotherapy are known: the open or so called “Coliseum technique” and the traditional closed technique, each technique with its advantages and inconveniences.

PIPAC versus HIPEC: cisplatin spatial distribution and diffusion in a swine model

Purpose Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a novel approach for delivering intraperitoneal chemotherapy and offers perspective in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Concept is based on a 12 mmHg capnoperitoneum loaded with drug changed in microdoplets. It was postulated to guarantee a more homogeneous drug distribution and tissular uptake than hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The aim of this study was to compare cisplatin peritoneal distribution and pharmacokinetic between HIPEC and PIPAC procedures in a healthy swine model. Methods Two groups of eight pigs underwent either HIPEC with cisplatin (70 mg/m2) at 43 °C for 60 min, or PIPAC with cisplatin (7.5 mg/m2) for 30 min. Postoperatively, peritoneal areas were biopsied allowing peritoneal cavity cartography. Tissular and plasmatic cisplatin concentrations were analyzed. Results Cisplatin distribution was heterogeneous in both the groups with higher concentrations obtained closed to the delivery sites. Median total platinum peritoneal concentration by pig was higher in the HIPEC group than in the PIPAC group (18.0 μg/g versus 4.3 μg/g, p < .001) but the yield was 2.2 times better with PIPAC. Platinum concentrations were higher in the HIPEC group in all stations. At each time-point, cisplatin plasmatic concentrations were higher in the HIPEC group (p < .001) but beneath the toxicity threshold. Conclusions With doses used in clinical practice, HIPEC guaranteed a higher cisplatin peritoneal uptake than PIPAC in this swine model. Spatial drug distribution was heterogeneous with both technics, with hotspots closed to the drug delivery sites. Nevertheless, considering the dose ratio, IP drug uptake yield was better with PIPAC.

Locoregional peritoneal hyperthermia to enhance the effectiveness of chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis: a simulation study comparing different locoregional heating systems

Introduction Intravenous chemotherapy plus abdominal locoregional hyperthermia is explored as a noninvasive alternative to hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). First clinical results demonstrate feasibility, but survival data show mixed results and for pancreatic and gastric origin results are not better than expected for chemotherapy alone. In this study, computer simulations are performed to compare the effectiveness of peritoneal heating for five different locoregional heating systems. Methods Simulations of peritoneal heating were performed for a phantom and two pancreatic cancer patients, using the Thermotron RF8, the AMC-4/ALBA-4D system, the BSD Sigma-60 and Sigma-Eye system, and the AMC-8 system. Specific absorption rate (SAR) distributions were optimized and evaluated. Next, to provide an indication of possible enhancement factors, the corresponding temperature distributions and thermal enhancement ratio (TER) of oxaliplatin were estimated. Results Both phantom and patient simulations showed a relatively poor SAR coverage for the Thermotron RF8, a fairly good coverage for the AMC-4/ALBA-4D, Sigma-60, and Sigma-Eye systems, and the best and most homogeneous coverage for the AMC-8 system. In at least 50% of the peritoneum, 35–45 W/kg was predicted. Thermal simulations confirmed these favorable peritoneal heating properties of the AMC-8 system and TER values of ∼1.4–1.5 were predicted in at least 50% of the peritoneum. Conclusion Locoregional peritoneal heating with the AMC-8 system yields more favorable heating patterns compared to other clinically used locoregional heating devices. Therefore, results of this study may promote the use of the AMC-8 system for locoregional hyperthermia in future multidisciplinary studies for treatment of PC.

Cytoreductive surgery with or without perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis: Our initial experience

Aim: We studied to present our initial experience of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) or early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Material and Methods: The results of 20 consecutive patients treated with CRS±HIPEC or EPIC for peritoneal carcinomatosis in our hospital between November 2014 and February 2019 were evaluated retrospectively. Demographic, clinical and histopathological data of the patients were analyzed. The patients were also divided into two groups as PCI score 10 and PCI score ≥ 10 and a comparison was made between the groups.Results: There were 20 patients in our study. Fifteen patients were female and 5 were male. The mean age was 52.2±15.7 years. Primary tumor was ovarian cancer in 8 patients, colorectal cancer in 8 patients, malignant mesothelioma in 3 patients and gastric cancer in 1 patient. In the ovarian cancer group, CRS alone was applied in 4 patients, CRS+HIPEC in 3 patients and CRS+EPIC in 1 patient. All patients with colorectal cancer underwent CRS+HIPEC. Two of the patients with malignant mesothelioma were treated with CRS+HIPEC and one with CRS+EPIC. The patient with gastric cancer received CRS+HIPEC. The mean peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) was 12.35±7.71. The median completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score was 0 (0-1). The mean operating time was 292.5±59.9 minutes. Perioperative morbidity was developed in 11 patients, and HIPEC-induced toxicity occured in 2 patients. Perioperative mortality was seen in 1 patient. The median overall survival was 17.7 (1.1-56) months. In addition, when two groups were compared, there was no statistically significant difference in terms of age, gender, origin of tumor, surgical method, CC score, operative time, Clavien-Dindo score, postoperative hospital stay and survival (p>0.05). Conclusion: Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy provide satisfactory results in the treatment of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Good preoperative evaluation, appropriate patient selection and multidisciplinary approach are essential for the success of the curative approach to peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Short-termoutcome of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy used as treatment of colo-rectal carcinomatosis: a multicentric study.

The aim of this study is to assess the morbidity and mortality related to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with colo-rectal carcinomatosis. A retrospective multi-institutional study from seven Italian Centers was performed. One hundred and seventy-two patients, submitted to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to treat carcinomatosis of colorectal origin, were recorded. Postoperative morbidity was evaluated in accordance with the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03. Post-operative mortality was evaluated as patients' death within 60days from surgical procedures. Predictors of morbidity were evaluated with univariate and multivariate analyses. Post-operative morbidity occurred in 83 patients (48.3%): grades 1-2 in 29 cases (16.9%), and grades 3-4 in 54 (31.4%). Mortality occurred in four cases (2.3%). Number of anastomoses (OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.05-2.00; p = 0.024), number of blood transfusions (OR 1.31; 95% CI 1.11-1.54; p = 0.001) and chemotherapy regimen [Oxaliplatin (OX): OR 2.87; 95% CI 1.22-6.75; p = 0.015] remained, in multivariate analysis, in a statistically significant correlation with overall morbidity. The only variable that was proven to have statistically significant correlation with 3-4 morbidity was the number of blood transfusions (OR 1.25; 95% CI 1.07-1.46; p = 0.005). Morbidity and mortality do not preclude the use of CRS plus HIPEC in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin.

ASO Author Reflections: Current Status of Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis from Gastric Cancer Origin in Spain: Is It Possible to Cure These Patients?

ASO Author Reflections: Current Status of Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis from Gastric Cancer Origin in Spain: Is It Possible to Cure These Patients?

Identifying the incidence of respiratory complications following diaphragmatic cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

In patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), the incidence of respiratory complications following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is not well established. We aimed to describe the center-specific incidence and patient characteristics associated with respiratory complications following CRS and HIPEC in patients receiving treatment for PC. We used the University Hospital of Arrixaca study database to identify patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC for PC. Patients who experienced a post-operative respiratory complication were categorized according to the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Multivariable regression methods were used to identify independent risk factors for developing a respiratory complication following CRS and HIPEC. Between 2008 and 2017, we identified 247 patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC for PC. A total of eight patients (3.2%) were categorized as having a post-operative respiratory complication. A diaphragmatic peritonectomy and a PC index of > 14 were identified as independent risk factors for developing a respiratory complication. Radiographic evidence of a pleural effusion was identified in 72 patients who had CRS of the diaphragmatic peritoneum; however, only 6 (8.3%) of these patients required pleural drainage. Only 3.2% of patients developed a symptomatic respiratory complication following CRS and HIPEC. A pleural effusion was identified in almost all patients requiring a diaphragmatic peritonectomy as part of their CRS; however, less than one in ten of these patients required pleural drainage. Prophylactic insertion of a pleural drainage tube is, therefore, not indicated following CRS and HIPEC.

COMPUTED AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF PERITONEAL CARCINOMATOSIS

Peritoneal carcinomatosis is a common variant of metastasis of malignant tumors of the abdominal cavity and pelvis. Modern methods of complex and combined treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis can significantly increase the survival of patients with this pathology. Determining the prevalence of peritoneal lesions is crucial for both planning and evaluating treatment. The lecture presents the anatomy and function of the peritoneum, the epidemiology of peritoneal carcinomatosis, the analysis of the capabilities of existing methods of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting signs of tumor dissemination of the peritoneum, reflects the principles for assessing the peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) and its role in choosing a treatment strategy in cancer patients.

Surgical management for peritoneal carcinomatosis of appendiceal origin with a high-tumor burden.

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) is the active treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis of appendiceal origin. However, surgical management is sometimes difficult in patients with a high-tumor burden. A high-tumor burden was defined as a peritoneal cancer index (PCI) ≥ 28. Among 49 patients receiving CRS + HIPEC, 29 had a PCI ≥ 28. Complete cytoreduction (CC-0/1) was achieved in 20 of the 29 patients with a PCI ≥ 28 and in all 20 patients with a PCI < 28. Among the patients achieving CC-0/1, gastrectomy or total colectomy was performed more frequently, the hospital stay was longer and postoperative complications were more frequent in those with a PCI ≥ 28 than in those with a PCI < 28. If CC-0/1 was achieved, the overall survival was comparable between patients with a PCI ≥ 28 and a PCI < 28. However, the recurrence-free survival was significantly worse for patients with a PCI ≥ 28 than for those with a PCI < 28 (5-year survival: 73.7% vs. 5.9%). Patients with recurrence who underwent repeat CRS showed a better overall survival than those without repeat CRS. Among patients with a PCI ≥ 28, a performance status (PS) of 2/3 was a significant prognostic factor (hazard ratio = 5.132). In patients with a high-tumor burden undergoing CRS + HIPEC, postoperative complications were more frequent, and the recurrence rate was higher than in those without a high-tumor burden. Repeat CRS improved the survival of patients with recurrence. The PS was a key indicator when selecting patients suitable for aggressive resection.

Abstract 3273: CMP-001, a virus-like particle containing immunostimulatory CpG-A, for treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis of gastrointestinal and pancreatic cancers

Abstract Peritoneal carcinomatosis is a common form of metastasis occurring in approximately 10% of gastrointestinal and pancreatic cancers with life expectancy often less than 6-12 months. Due to the limited options for treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis, there is a significant need for novel therapeutic strategies. We explored the therapeutic potential of CMP-001, a novel virus-like particle composed of the Qβ bacteriophage capsid protein encapsulating an immunostimulatory CpG-A oligodeoxynucleotide (CpG-A ODN) in this cancer. CpG-A ODN is a known activator of toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9), which is expressed by human and murine plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs). Initial studies evaluated the effect of CMP-001 in vitro on cells obtained from the ascitic fluid of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. These studies demonstrated that pDCs are present in the ascitic fluid and produce IFN-α in response to CMP-001 stimulation. A mouse model of peritoneal carcinomatosis was used to further explore the therapeutic potential of CMP-001. C57BL/6 mice were challenged intraperitoneally (i.p.) with Panc02 mouse pancreatic cancer cells. On days 5, 9, and 13 post-tumor challenge mice were treated i.p. with either saline or 100 μg CMP-001. Mice treated with CMP-001 had a median survival of 35 days compared to mice treated with saline alone with a median survival of 28 days (n = 10 per group, p = 0.028). Examination of the immune response demonstrated CMP-001 induced an influx of dendritic cells (CMP- 001 8.99% ± 0.95 vs saline 4.57% ± 0.7, p = 0.0015), NK cells (CMP-001 0.26% ± 0.052 vs saline 0.087% ± 0.0085, p = 0.006), and CD4+ T cells (CMP-001 3.29% ± 0.85 vs saline 0.95% ± 0.097, p = 0.0168) into the ascitic fluid. In addition, CMP-001 induced a significant increase in antigen-experienced, effector and memory, CD11ahiCD44hi CD4+ T cells (CMP-001 54.55% ± 6.52 vs saline 28.12% ± 3.68, p = 0.0028) and CD11ahiCD8αlo CD8+ T cells (CMP-001 58.49% ± 4.47 vs saline 23.04% ± 2.86, p &amp;lt; 0.0001) in the ascites. These data demonstrate that CMP-001 treatment activates pDCs in the peritoneal fluid of patients with carcinomatosis. In addition, CMP-001 stimulates a robust immune response in the peritoneal cavity of mice with peritoneal carcinomatosis. This robust immune response likely contributes to the enhanced survival and decreased disease progression in these mice. Collectively, these promising preclinical results suggest that CMP-001 may have potential as an immunotherapy for the treatment of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis and is worthy of further evaluation. Citation Format: Ann M. Miller, Caitlin Lemke-Miltner, Sue Blackwell, Ann Tomanek-Chalkley, Kristen Coleman, George Weiner, Carlos Chan. CMP-001, a virus-like particle containing immunostimulatory CpG-A, for treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis of gastrointestinal and pancreatic cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3273.

Improved Survival with Experience: A 10-Year Learning Curve in Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy and Cytoreductive Surgery.

Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is an aggressive locoregional treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Studies demonstrate improved perioperative and oncologic outcomes at high-volume centers. This study retrospectively analyzed all patients with PC from various malignancies who underwent attempted CRS/HIPEC at the authors' institution from 2007 to 2017. Clinicopathologic, perioperative, and oncologic outcomes of early (2007-2012) and late (2012-2017) experience were compared, and multivariate analyses for factors predictive of perioperative and oncologic outcomes were performed. The study enrolled 388 patients (157 early and 231 late). The late experience contained more appendiceal low-grade mucinous neoplasms (LGMNs; 21% vs 9%) and had a lower Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI; 10 vs 16). Moreover, achieving a similar rate of CC-0/1 required fewer organ resections, involved shorter operations (298 vs 347min), and had lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (400 vs 200ml) (p < 0.05). More procedures were aborted (20% vs 3%; p < 0.01). The late experience had fewer ICU admissions (13% vs. 55%) and a lower perioperative mortality rate (0% vs 3%) (p < 0.05). In the multivariate analyses, PCI and number of organ resections were independent predictors of multiple perioperative outcomes [EBL, operating room time, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, ICU length of stay (LOS), overall LOS]. Survival was significantly longer in the late cohort (median overall survival: NR vs 31months; progression-free survival: 22 vs 11months; p < 0.01), even after control for tumor histology. At the authors' high-volume center, with increased surgeon and institutional experience over time, perioperative and oncologic outcomes have improved significantly for patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for PC.

Максимальная циторедуктивная операция и гипертермическая интраперитонеальная химиотерапия в лечении перитонеального канцероматоза: первый опыт внедрения и техника

Objective: The aim of this study is to present our initial implementation experience in peritoneal carcinomatosis treatment and the technical details of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the light of current literature. Material and methods: Data of 7 consecutive patients who were treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis in the National Research Center for Oncology and Transplantology, between October 2016 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Treatment indication and management were evaluated at the multidisciplinary oncology council. All patients underwent cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with the aim of complete cytoreduction. Patients with unresectable disease and/or palliative surgery were excluded from analysis. Perioperative complications were classified according to Clavien-Dindo classification, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy-related side effects were identified using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) criteria. Demographic, clinical and histopathological data of the patients were analyzed. Results: The mean age was 47 (30-62). Three patients were female. The origin of peritoneal carcinomatosis was colorectal cancer in 3 patients, ovarian cancer in 2 patients and pseudomyxoma peritonei in 2 patients. The mean Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index was 17 (3-32), with a mean operative time of 517 (366-710) minutes. Perioperative morbidity and mortality were observed in 2 (28,5%) and one patient (14.2%), respectively. During a mean follow up of 9,6 (3-26) months, overall and disease-free survival rates were 85,7% and 83,3%, respectively. One patient with colorectal cancer (after 12 months) had retro-abdominal recurrence. The remaining patients are being followed-up without any recurrence. Conclusion: Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy have favorable results in the treatment of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Compatible with the literature, surgical outcomes of the presented series are encouraging for this treatment modality. Careful perioperative evaluation, proper patient selection and multidisciplinary approach are essential for success in curative treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Patient involvement in comprehensive, complex cancer surgery: Perspectives of patients, relatives and health professionals.

We investigated the perspectives of patients, relatives and health professionals on the drivers and barriers to patient involvement (PI) in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). During 2016-2017, individual and focus group interviews were conducted with purposively selected participants during CRS and HIPEC, supplemented by field observations. This material was analysed using meaning condensation (Kvale). Fifteen patients, eight relatives and nine health professionals participated in 31 individual and two focus group interviews, supplemented by 37 observations. The findings were structured into themes concerning treatment decisions, organisation of pathways, knowledge of the patient and life during treatment. Deciding to treat was determined not only by preoperative biomedical information, personal preferences but also findings during surgery. This circumstance put the patients under mental pressure and affected their ability to process the offered information. They furthermore perceived the pathway as complex and occasionally unclear, leading them to attempt to coordinate transitions themselves. The study has highlighted barriers to, rather than drivers of, PI. To promote PI during comprehensive complex cancer surgery, we suggest that patients and relatives are offered patient-centred care, such as support in posing questions, overview of their treatment pathway and coherent transitions.

Mineralization of the Peritoneum — a New Target in the Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

Introduction. This article presents data on the manifestations of changes in the microenvironment of the peritoneal cavity in patients with carcinomatosis, expressed by the mineralization of the peritoneum, which in turn leads to functional changes in drainage of the peritoneal cavity. Materials and methods . We examined autopsy tissue of the peritoneum with symptoms of carcinomatosis and intact peritoneum using comparative scanning electron microscopy. Results and discussion . The study of the ultrastructure of peritoneum in patients with PC, revealed the phenomenon of SLL mineralization. The resulting elemental composition profile showed a high content of Ca, P, Na. Conclusions . 1. Carcinomatosis is not a local, but rather a systemic process. Determining the role of mineralization in carcinomatosis is of fundamental importance in carcinogenesis. 2. The serous membranes mineralization in patients with carcinomatosis can become a new treatment target, the impact on which may increase life expectancy and improve the quality of life. 3. The serous membranes demineralization can serve as a part of a combination treatment that includes the subsequent endolymphatic anti-tumour drug therapy.

Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Diagnosis and Treatment in China: Focusing on Training and Collaboration.

Cancer has become the number one killer. The most difficult part of cancer treatment is the treatment of metastasis, particularly the peritoneal metastasis, generally referred to as peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Internationally, the integrated treatment strategy of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been developed to be the standard treatment for PC. Although the development in this field has been relatively slow, as a result of the hard work put in over the last 20years, there has been outstanding progress and gratifying achievements in both the diagnosis and treatment of PC in China. Our center (Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University) focuses on the research in diagnostic methods for PC, CRS+HIPEC, and management of perioperative adverse events. Based on these, "Chinese expert consensus on cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal malignancies" is developed. Our center that is the pioneering center for this treatment in China has accumulated a wealth of experiences and achievements with more than 1000 cases of CRS+HIPEC. Additionally, our center establishes a nationwide professional training program to promote and standardize the practice of CRS+HIPEC gradually.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC Compared With Systemic Chemotherapy in Isolated Peritoneal Carcinomatosis From Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Cost-effectiveness evaluations of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the United States are lacking. The authors developed a Markov model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CRS/HIPEC compared with systemic chemotherapy for isolated PC from mCRC from a societal perspective in the United States. The systemic treatment regimens consisted of FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, bevacizumab, cetuximab, and pantitumumab. The model inputs including costs, probabilities, survival, progression, and utilities were taken from the literature. The cycle length for the model was 2weeks, and the time horizon was 7years. A discount rate of 3% was applied. The model was tested for internal and external validation, and robustness was established with univariate sensitivity and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA). The primary outcomes were total costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), life-years (LYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). A willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $100,000 per QALY was assumed. The ICER for treatment with CRS/HIPEC compared with systemic chemotherapy was $91,034 per QALY gained ($74,098 per LY gained). The univariate sensitivity analysis showed that the total costs for treatment with CRS/HIPEC had the largest effect on the calculated ICER. The CRS/HIPEC treatment was a cost-effective strategy during the majority of simulations in the PSA. The average ICER for 100,000 simulations in the PSA was $70,807 per QALY gained. The likelihood of CRS/HIPEC being a cost-effective strategy at the WTP threshold was 87%. The CRS/HIPEC procedure is a cost-effective treatment for isolated PC from mCRC in the United States.

Cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis from rare etiologies

BackgroundCytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) are commonly used in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) originating from colorectal, appendiceal and ovarian cancers. It is unclear what benefit CRS/HIPEC might have for PC from uncommon etiologies, therefore we sought to describe local practice patterns and evaluate overall survival (OS). MethodsAll patients who had CRS/HIPEC between 2000 and 2016 were identified using our institutional cancer database. Patients with appendiceal, colorectal, and ovarian pathologies were excluded. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate and demonstrate 5-year OS. Cox regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with OS. ResultsOf all patients treated with CRS/HIPEC at our institution, 38 were treated for PC of rare origin. Etiologies included 23 patients with mesothelioma, 8 with primary peritoneal carcinoma, 4 with small bowel tumours and 3 with gastric cancer. Median OS of 35.4, 20.8, 25.4, and 20.2 months were obtained for each group respectively. 5-year OS for each pathology was 8.7%, 0.0%, 25.0%, and 33.3% respectively with corresponding mean PCI of 31.3, 23.6, 21.5, and 12.7. No independent prognostic factors were significant on Cox regression analysis. Median length of stay was 19 days. Readmission rate within 30 days of discharge was 7.9%. Rate of Grade III/IV complications was 34.2%. No thirty-day mortality. ConclusionSurvivals beyond 20 months can be obtained with the use of CRS/HIPEC for rare PC etiologies aligning with results of other groups. CRS/HIPEC in well-selected patients demonstrates a clinical benefit and this could be confirmed with a multi-institutional study.

Mucinous appendiceal neoplasms: classification, imaging, and HIPEC.

Recent advances, specifically cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC), offer advantages compared to the traditional therapeutic approach of systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from mucinous appendiceal neoplasms (MAN). This review provides an up-to-date, comprehensive summary of the histologic classification of MAN, reviews common imaging findings of mucoceles and pseudomyxoma peritonei, and describes the radiologist's role in the multidisciplinary care team in quantifying disease and in helping select patients for definitive surgery.