Treatment Of Early Esophageal Carcinoma Research Articles

Progress in endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of early esophageal carcinoma: experience of Fujian province

Progress in endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of early esophageal carcinoma: experience of Fujian province

Endoscopic mucosal resection for staging and treatment of early esophageal carcinoma: a single institution experience.

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has emerged for evaluation and treatment of esophageal nodules. We report our initial experience with EMR for T staging and management of early esophageal cancer. We reviewed patients undergoing EMR for esophageal adenocarcinoma between 2008 and 2013. The primary outcome measure was needed for esophagectomy. Secondary outcomes included complete eradication of adenocarcinoma, recurrence or persistence of cancer, nodal status for those undergoing esophagectomy, and complications of endoscopic treatment. During the study period, 24 patients underwent EMR demonstrating carcinoma, and a grossly margin negative endoscopic resection was achieved in all cases. Ten patients (42 %) had evidence of submucosal invasion and were referred for esophagectomy. Patients with margin negative EMR (n = 10, 42 %) or positive radial margins (n = 4, 16 %) underwent endoscopic surveillance and treatment with radiofrequency ablation or repeat EMR as needed. Thirteen patients (93 %) with intramucosal cancer (IMC) have been successfully managed with ongoing endoscopic surveillance and treatment with a median follow-up of 15.5 months. One patient underwent esophagectomy due to recurrent IMC in the setting of long-segment multifocal high-grade dysplasia. There were no esophageal perforations, one patient developed a self-limited gastrointestinal hemorrhage following EMR, and one had an esophageal stricture following endoscopic management. IMC can be successfully managed endoscopically and thus esophagectomy is avoided in a significant proportion of patients. Endoscopic management may be utilized in the setting of complete resection or radial margin involvement without evidence of submucosal invasion. Close endoscopic follow-up is of paramount importance even in those with negative margins, because recurrent disease may occur following EMR in these patients.

PD-0013 - Endoscopic Treatment of Early Esophageal Carcinoma: A Prospective Evaluation of 40 Consecutive Cases with Promising Results in Patients with T1B Cancers

Introduction: Endoscopic therapy has become an accepted treatment option for T1a esophageal carcinoma (adenocarcinoma or squamous carcinoma) while for T1b cancers, surgery is still considered as a treatment of choice. Endoscopic resection (or dissection) allows precise histopathologic staging which is used to guide therapeutic decisions (surgery or continuation with endoscopic treatment).

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for the Treatment of Early Esophageal Carcinoma: a Meta-analysis

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was originally developed for en bloc resection of large, flat gastrointestinal lesions. Compared with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), ESD is considered to be more time consuming and have more complications for treatment of early esophageal carcinoma, such as bleeding, stenosis and perforation. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ESD and EMR for such lesions. We searched databases, such as PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Science Citation Index updated to 2013 for related trials. In the meta-analysis, the main outcome measurements were the en bloc resection rate, the histologically resection rate and the local recurrence rate. We also compared the operation time and the incidences of procedure-related complications. Five trials were identified, and a total of 710 patients and 795 lesions were included. The en bloc and histologically complete resection rates were higher in the ESD group compared with the EMR group (odds ratio (OR) 27.3; 95% CI, 11.5-64.8; OR 18.4; 95% CI, 8.82-38.59). The local recurrence rate was lower in the ESD group (OR 0.13, 95 % CI 0.04-0.43). The meta-analysis also showed ESD was more time consuming, but did not increase the complication rate (P=0.76). The results implied that compared with EMR, ESD showed better en bloc and histologically resection rates, and lower local recurrence, without increasing the incidence of procedure-related complications in the treatment of early esophageal carcinoma.

Fabricated autologous epidermal cell sheets for the prevention of esophageal stricture after circumferential ESD in a porcine model

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an accepted treatment for early esophageal carcinoma. However, resection of a large mucosal area, as with circumferential ESD, induces severe stricture formation. To evaluate the efficacy of cultured autologous epidermal cell sheets to prevent severe esophageal constriction after circumferential ESD. Animal study. University institute. Eight pigs underwent circumferential esophageal ESD while under general anesthesia. In 4 pigs, fabricated autologous epidermal cell sheets were endoscopically transplanted to the central ESD sites immediately after the ESD. The other 4 pigs underwent circumferential ESD only. Necropsy and histological assessment were performed at 1 and 2 weeks post-ESD. Weight gain, degree of mucosal constriction, and histological assessments. All pigs in the control group showed severe esophageal constriction after 2 weeks. The control and transplanted groups had weight gains of -10.3% and 0.3% (P = .03), respectively, and the mean degrees of constriction were 88% and 56% (P < .01), respectively. Early re-epithelialization and mild fibrosis in the muscularis were observed in the transplanted group. Animal study, small sample size. Fabricated autologous skin epidermal cell sheets would be useful in preventing severe esophageal constriction after circumferential ESD.

How Radical Should Surgery Be for Early Esophageal Cancer?

We have compared the oncologic effectiveness of limited resection (LR) techniques such as transhiatal (TH) or limited resection of the esophagogastric junction with intestinal interposition (LREGJ) in the treatment of early esophageal carcinoma with that of the extended resection such as the classical thoracoabdominal (TA) en bloc esophagectomy. We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 113 patients with T1 esophageal cancer (57 adeno- and 56 squamous cell carcinomas) who had surgical resection with systematic lymphadenectomy. Forty-one underwent extensive (TA) and 72 limited resection (51 TH and 21 LREGJ). Complete resection (R0) was achieved in all cases. Lymphatic metastases were seen in none of the mucosal but in 26.8% of the submucosal T1 cancers. The median lymph node yield was significantly higher in patients with extensive resection (24 vs. 15 lymph nodes; p=0.036), but this did not affect the overall survival (median=88 vs. 102 months, 5-year survival probability=57.8 vs. 67.7%; log rank=0.578). The median hospital stay and ICU stay were significantly shorter in the LR group (p=0.039 and p = 0.044, respectively). Limited resection leads to lower lymph node yield but similar oncologic effectiveness as the extensive surgery. It may represent a valuable alternative in the treatment of patients with early (submucosal) esophageal carcinoma.

Use of adipose tissue-derived stromal cells for prevention of esophageal stricture after circumferential EMR in a canine model

EMR is an accepted treatment for early esophageal carcinoma. However, resection of a large mucosal area often causes postoperative esophageal stricture. To investigate the efficacy of autologous adipose tissue-derived stromal cells (ADSCs) for prevention of stricture formation after EMR in dogs. Animal study. University research center. Ten beagle dogs were randomized into a control group and an ADSCs-injected (ADSC) group. The ADSCs were isolated from autologous adipose tissue. Immediately after circumferential esophageal EMR, about 5 × 10(6) ADSCs suspended in 8 mL of phosphate-buffered saline solution were injected endoscopically into the residual submucosa of the ADSC group, whereas the control group received only 8 mL of phosphate-buffered saline solution. Dysphagia score, weight loss, rate of mucosal constriction, and histologic assessments. In the control and ADSC groups, the median dysphagia scores were 4 and 1 (P < .043), the mean degrees of mucosal constriction were 75.7% and 45.3% (P < .008), and the numbers of nascent microvessels in the submucosal layer were 7.4 and 16.2 per unit area (P = .007), respectively. Atrophy and fibrosis of the muscularis propria layer were observed in the control group. Animal study, small sample size. Injection therapy with autologous ADSCs suppresses constriction of the esophageal mucosa and improves clinical symptoms after circumferential EMR in this canine model.

Reliability of endoscopic esophageal mucosectomy using TxHood, a multipurpose treatment hood

Endoscopic mucosectomy, comprising both endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), is a minimally invasive treatment for patients with early esophageal carcinoma. The use of ESD is appropriate for mucosal lesions of any size. However, ESD techniques are relatively difficult and can lead to serious complications such as perforation and massive bleeding, which have been reported more frequently after ESD than after EMR. This study describes a novel technique for ESD using a newly designed multipurpose treatment hood (TxHood) as well as basic experiments to ensure its safety. The TxHood includes various therapeutic tools such as an electric needleknife, a snare wire, and an injection needle, and the lines can be selected freely before insertion of an enodoscope covered by a TxHood. The main techniques for ESD are endoscopic submucosal saline injections on demand through a working channel of the endoscope or TxHood and a cut or swing cut with a needleknife attached to the TxHood. Moreover, the target area can be grasped with a grasping forceps through a working channel of the endoscope to obtain effective countertraction. In these experiments, an electric needleknife set parallel to the shaft of the endoscope offered safety and ease of handling for the dissecting procedures. Altogether, 16 resections of mucosa with an average size of 3.5 x 2.5 cm (range, 2 x 2 to 7 x 4 cm) were performed. The average time required for each targeted endoscopic resection area was about 15 min. No perforations or instances of uncontrollable bleeding occurred. In conclusion, this basic study demonstrates that the new ESD technique with the TxHood provides a useful treatment for early esophageal carcinoma and may be applicable for all mucosal or submucosal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract.

Complete Circumferential Endoscopic Mucosal Resection as a Treatment for Early Esophageal Carcinoma or Barrett's Esophagus with High-Grade Dysplasia

Complete Circumferential Endoscopic Mucosal Resection as a Treatment for Early Esophageal Carcinoma or Barrett's Esophagus with High-Grade Dysplasia

Early esophageal carcinoma treated with intracavitary irradiation.

Five patients with early esophageal carcinoma were treated by 6-12 Gy of intracavitary irradiation following 50-60 Gy of external irradiation as a boost therapy. Surgery was not performed in these cases. None of the patients had local recurrence after radiation therapy, as demonstrated by esophagography and endoscopy. Three patients have been alive for 1-3 years 10 months. Esophageal ulceration induced by intracavitary irradiation has occurred in three of the five patients; however, intracavitary irradiation is still a beneficial treatment because of its efficacy in controlling local lesions and because radiation ulceration can eventually be cured. Intracavitary irradiation is recommended to follow external irradiation as a boost therapy for the treatment of early esophageal carcinoma.