Treatment Of Metastatic Prostate Cancer Research Articles

Docetaxel plus cis-platinum chemotherapy for the posterior line treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer with elevated neuron specific enolase.

e17042 Background: This Study is to figure out the efficacy of docetaxel plus cis-platinum (DC) chemotherapy as the posterior line treatment for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with elevated neuron specific enolase (NSE). Methods: We performed a retrospective study of men suffered mCRPC with elevated NSE from December 2019 to August 2022. All men were treated with DC after resistance to previous therapy. Biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS) were depicted using Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: 10 mCRPC patients aged 65.8 ± 7.0 (Median: 66.5, Range: 52-77) received DC for 1 to 10 cycles (Median: 7). Of the 10 patients, 2, 1 and 7 patients underwent DC as the 2nd, 3rd and 4th line therapy, respectively. 3 patients received previous chemotherapy and 9 patients underwent new endocrine therapy. All patients suffered bone metastases, 6 patients suffered distal lymph node metastases and 3 patients suffered visceral metastases. 6.1 ± 2.8 cycles (Median: 7, Range: 1-10) of DC were finished. Median follow-up time was 6.5 (Range: 2-11) months. After DC, Prostate specific antigen (PSA) response rate (>50%) was 90% and NSE response rate (>50%) was 60%. Median BPFS was 10 (Range: 4-18) months. Pain score declined from 6.6 ± 3.1 to 3.9 ± 2.4 evidently (P < 0.05) and Karnofsky (KPS) score increased from 80 ± 14.9 to 91 ± 16.0 significantly (P < 0.05). Of the 6 patients assessed by radiological examinations, 5 patients experienced partial response and 1patient achieved stable disease. Conclusions: Our pilot study showed docetaxel plus cis-platinum chemotherapy was effective for the mCRPC patients with elevated NSE resistant to multi-line therapies, indicating the potential value of DC for mCRPC with neuroendocrine differentiation.

Phase 1 clinical trial of AMG 340, a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted T-cell engager with a novel low-affinity CD3 binding domain designed to mitigate toxicity for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

e14587 Background: PSMA, a transmembrane protein highly expressed on the surface of prostate cancer cells, is a validated target in prostate cancer; however, achieving a favorable therapeutic index has been challenging for PSMA-directed T-cell engagers (TCE’s). AMG 340, a PSMA-targeted TCE with a novel low-affinity CD3 binding domain specifically engineered to mitigate cytokine release syndrome (CRS) toxicity and maintain efficacy was investigated in a phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study (NCT04740034). Methods: Patients (pts) with mCRPC who had received ≥2 prior lines of therapy were treated with AMG 340 monotherapy (1.5–800 mg intravenously every 3 weeks [Q3W]) during dose escalation. The primary outcome measures were dose-limiting toxicities, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and pharmacokinetic profile. Secondary outcomes included prostate antigen specific (PSA) response and objective response per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST). Results: As of September 6, 2023, a total of 42 pts (mean ± SD age, 68.5±7.8 years) received AMG 340 step up dosing across 11 cohorts. At doses up to 800 mg Q3W, AMG 340 had a manageable side effect profile. Any grade TEAEs reported in ≥30% of pts included CRS (52%), nausea (52%), vomiting (52%), fatigue (48%), diarrhea (38%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (36%), increased alanine aminotransferase (33%), and hypocalcemia (31%). Treatment-related toxicities included CRS (52%; Grade 1, 26%; Grade 2, 24%; Grade ≥3, 2%) and thrombocytopenia (24%; Grade 2, 10%; Grade ≥3, 14%). Step dosing was implemented at doses >40 mg and successfully mitigated CRS incidence and severity after the first dose. The maximal tolerated dose was not reached, as increasing the dose beyond 800 mg was predicted to minimally increase the potential AMG 340 activity. Exposure increased in an approximately dose-proportional manner with no evidence of clinically significant anti-drug antibodies. AMG 340 demonstrated evidence for pharmacodynamic engagement as shown by cytokine induction. Of the 41 PSA evaluable pts, PSA responses were seen across dose levels (PSA50, n=4), but were not dose dependent. Eight of 42 pts remained on treatment after 6 months. Among 27 RECIST evaluable pts, no RECIST responses were observed (n=14 stable disease, n=0 partial or complete response). Conclusions: Despite reaching high doses, no dose response was observed, and AMG 340 did not generate sufficient clinical activity to warrant further exploration. However, AMG 340 demonstrated manageable CRS toxicity showing that decreased CD3-binding strength mitigates CRS, the main toxicity of TCEs. Clinical studies are ongoing evaluating the PSMA protein as a molecular target for prostate cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT04740034 .

Plasma microRNA Signature as Companion Diagnostic for Abiraterone Acetate Treatment in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Pilot Study.

Abiraterone acetate (AA) serves as a medication for managing persistent testosterone production in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, its efficacy varies among individuals; thus, the identification of biomarkers to predict and follow treatment response is required. In this pilot study, we explored the potential of circulating microRNAs (c-miRNAs) to stratify patients based on their responsiveness to AA. We conducted an analysis of plasma samples obtained from a cohort of 33 mCRPC patients before and after three, six, and nine months of AA treatment. Using miRNA RT-qPCR panels for candidate discovery and TaqMan RT-qPCR for validation, we identified promising miRNA signatures. Our investigation indicated that a signature based on miR-103a-3p and miR-378a-5p effectively discriminates between non-responder and responder patients, while also following the drug's efficacy over time. Additionally, through in silico analysis, we identified target genes and transcription factors of the two miRNAs, including PTEN and HOXB13, which are known to play roles in AA resistance in mCRPC. In summary, our study highlights two c-miRNAs as potential companion diagnostics of AA in mCRPC patients, offering novel insights for informed decision-making in the treatment of mCRPC.

Treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: from doublet therapy to triplet therapy.

For metastatic prostate cancer, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the key strategy to control the disease. However, after 18-24months of treatment, most patients will progress from metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) even with ADT. Once patients enter into mCRPC, they face with significant declines in quality of life and a dramatically reduced survival period. Thus, doublet therapy, which combines ADT with new hormone therapy (NHT) or ADT with docetaxel chemotherapy, substitutes ADT alone and has become the "gold standard" for the treatment of mHSPC. In recent years, triplet therapy, which combines ADT with NHT and docetaxel chemotherapy, has also achieved impressive effects in mHSPC. This article provides a comprehensive review of the recent applications of the triplet therapy in the field of mHSPC.

Comparative effectiveness of first-line systemic treatments for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

No head-to-head trials had been performed to estimate the relative effectiveness of poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) and androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSi) in the first-line treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We aimed to perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of various systemic treatment agents for patients with mCRPC. A comprehensive literature search was conducted for abstracts and full-text articles from the database's inception through April 27, 2023. The study concentrated on assessing radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) for both overall and homologous recombination repair mutation (HRRm) population, with overall survival (OS) as the secondary measure. Under the Bayesian framework, the overall effect was pooled using the fixed-effects model in base case analysis. Scenario analysis using restricted mean survival time (RMST) methods was performed to test the robustness of the results. Nine studies with 6,830 patients and 8 unique treatment options were included. Network meta-analysis demonstrated that talazoparib in combination with enzalutamide (TALA + ENZA; overall population, hazard ratio [HR], 0.20; 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.16-0.26; RMST, 3.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.46-4.60; HRRm population, HR, 0.15; 95% CrI: 0.09-0.23; RMST, 4.14; 95% CI 2.84-5.39) was superior to other treatments in the first-line setting in terms of rPFS. The results of Bayesian framework and RMST models showed consistent efficacy ranks. When extrapolated to overall survival benefit, within the Bayesian framework, olaparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone (OLAP + AAP) achieved the highest OS benefit for the overall population, which was not statistically significant when compared to TALA + ENZA. However, TALA + ENZA achieved the highest OS benefit at 3years by applying RMST. We suggest that talazoparib in combination with enzalutamide is probably a preferred treatment agent for the overall population and HRRm patients with mCRPC. Given the limitations of network framework and the modeling assumptions undertaken to finalize the analyses, results should be cautiously interpreted.

Recommendations on the treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: Patient selection

The standard treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) is now a combination of androgen deprivation therapy plus an androgen receptor-targeted therapy (abiraterone, apalutamide, enzalutamide or darolutamide), with or without chemotherapy (docetaxel). The selection of suitable patients for each therapeutic approach has become a determining factor to ensure efficacy and minimize side effects. This article combines recent clinical evidence with the accumulated experience of experts in medical oncology, radiation oncology and urology, to provide a comprehensive view and therapeutic recommendations for mHSPC.

Evolution of hormonal therapy for prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy after skin cancer in men in Australia. Its management varies according to tumour stage. Due to the significant dependence on androgen receptor signalling, agents that interfere with this pathway (most commonly medical castration in the form of androgen deprivation therapy [ADT]) are the mainstay treatment of advanced disease. This review provides a contemporary update on ADT, withfurther discussion of emerging novel therapies for primary care. ADT is currently indicated for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer, disease recurrence following attempted local curative therapy, as well as combined use with radiotherapy for intermediate/high-risk disease. There has been rapid development of new pharmaceuticals targeting the androgen receptor. These are reviewed historically with an emphasis placed on emerging therapies, their common side effects, and how to managethem in the general practice setting.

Sequence of androgen receptor-targeted vaccination with androgen deprivation therapy affects anti-prostate tumor efficacy

RationaleAndrogen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the primary treatment for recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer. In addition to direct antitumor effects, ADT has immunomodulatory effects such as promoting T-cell infiltration and...

Homologous Recombination Repair Deficiency in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: New Therapeutic Opportunities.

More than 20% of metastatic prostate cancer carries genomic defects involving DNA damage repair pathways, mainly in homologous recombination repair-related genes. The recent approval of olaparib has paved the way to precision medicine for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer with PARP inhibitors in this subset of patients, especially in the case of BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants. In face of this new therapeutic opportunity, many issues remain unsolved. This narrative review aims to describe the relationship between homologous recombination repair deficiency and prostate cancer, the techniques used to determine homologous recombination repair status in prostate cancer, the crosstalk between homologous recombination repair and the androgen receptor pathway, the current evidence on PARP inhibitors activity in metastatic prostate cancer also in homologous recombination repair-proficient tumors, as well as emerging mechanisms of resistance to PARP inhibitors. The possibility of combination therapies including a PARP inhibitor is an attractive option, and more robust data are awaited from ongoing phase II and phase III trials outlined in this manuscript.

Current state of theranostics in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related death in the world. There have been significant advances in chemotherapy, hormonal therapy and targeted therapy options for patients with castrate-resistant disease. However, these systemic treatments are often associated with unwanted toxicities. Targeted therapy with radiopharmaceuticals has become of key interest to limit systemic toxicity and provides a more precision oncology approach to treatment. Strontium-89, Samarium-153 EDTMP and Radium-223 have been trialled with mixed results. Strontium-89 and Samarium-153 EDTMP have shown benefits in palliating metastatic bone pain but with no impact on survival outcomes. Early therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals targeting PSMA that were developed were beta-emitting agents, but recently alpha-emitting agents are being investigated as potentially superior options. Radium-223 is the first alpha-particle emitter therapeutic agent approved by the FDA, with phase III trial evidence showing benefits in overall survival and delay in symptomatic skeletal events for patients. Recently, 177-Lutetium-PSMA-617 has demonstrated significant survival advantages in pre-treated metastatic castrate-resistant cancer patients in a number of phase II and III studies. Furthermore, 225-Actinium-PSMA-617 also showed promise even in patients pre-treated with 177-Lutetium-PSMA-617. Hence, there has been an explosion of radiopharmaceutical treatment options for patients with prostate cancer. This review explores past and current theranostic capacities in the radiopharmaceutical treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer.

[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (ENZA-p): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial

Enzalutamide and lutetium-177 [177Lu]Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-617 both improve overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Androgen and PSMA receptors have a close intracellular relationship, with data suggesting complementary benefit if targeted concurrently. In this study, we assessed the activity and safety of enzalutamide plus adaptive-dosed [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus enzalutamide alone as first-line treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. ENZA-p was an open-label, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial done at 15 hospitals in Australia. Participants were men aged 18 years or older with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer not previously treated with docetaxel or androgen receptor pathway inhibitors for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, gallium-68 [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-PET-CT (PSMA-PET-CT) positive disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and at least two risk factors for early progression on enzalutamide. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) by a centralised, web-based system using minimisation with a random component to stratify for study site, disease burden, use of early docetaxel, and previous treatment with abiraterone acetate. Patients were either given oral enzalutamide 160 mg daily alone or with adaptive-dosed (two or four doses) intravenous 7·5 GBq [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 every 6-8 weeks dependent on an interim PSMA-PET-CT (week 12). The primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival, defined as the interval from the date of randomisation to the date of first evidence of PSA progression, commencement of non-protocol anticancer therapy, or death. The analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population, using stratified Cox proportional hazards regression. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04419402, and participant follow-up is ongoing. 162 participants were randomly assigned between Aug 17, 2020, and July 26, 2022. 83 men were assigned to the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group, and 79 were assigned to the enzalutamide group. Median follow-up in this interim analysis was 20 months (IQR 18-21), with 32 (39%) of 83 patients in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and 16 (20%) of 79 patients in the enzalutamide group remaining on treatment at the data cutoff date. Median age was 71 years (IQR 64-76). Median PSA progression-free survival was 13·0 months (95% CI 11·0-17·0) in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and 7·8 months (95% CI 4·3-11·0) in the enzalutamide group (hazard ratio 0·43, 95% CI 0·29-0·63, p<0·0001). The most common adverse events (all grades) were fatigue (61 [75%] of 81 patients), nausea (38 [47%]), and dry mouth (32 [40%]) in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and fatigue (55 [70%] of 79), nausea (21 [27%]), and constipation (18 [23%]) in the enzalutamide group. Grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 32 (40%) of 81 patients in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and 32 (41%) of 79 patients in the enzalutamide group. Grade 3 events that occurred only in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group included anaemia (three [4%] of 81 participants) and decreased platelet count (one [1%] participant). No grade 4 or 5 events were attributed to treatment on central review in either group. The addition of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 to enzalutamide improved PSA progression-free survival providing evidence of enhanced anticancer activity in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with risk factors for early progression on enzalutamide and warrants further evaluation of the combination more broadly in metastatic prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Research Alliance (Movember and Australian Federal Government), St Vincent's Clinic Foundation, GenesisCare, Roy Morgan Research, and Endocyte (a Novartis company).

Preclinical Efficacy of a PSMA-Targeted Actinium-225 Conjugate (225Ac-Macropa-Pelgifatamab): A Targeted Alpha Therapy for Prostate Cancer.

Initially, prostate cancer responds to hormone therapy, but eventually resistance develops. Beta emitter-based prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radionuclide therapy is approved for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Here we introduce a targeted alpha therapy (TAT) consisting of the PSMA antibody pelgifatamab covalently linked to a macropa chelator and labeled with actinium-225 and compare its efficacy and tolerability with other TATs. The in vitro characteristics and in vivo biodistribution, antitumor efficacy, and tolerability of 225Ac-macropa-pelgifatamab (225Ac-pelgi) and other TATs were investigated in cell line- and patient-derived prostate cancer xenograft models. The antitumor efficacy of 225Ac-pelgi was also investigated in combination with the androgen receptor inhibitor darolutamide. Actinium-225-labeling of 225Ac-pelgi was efficient already at room temperature. Potent in vitro cytotoxicity was seen in PSMA-expressing (LNCaP, MDA-PCa-2b, and C4-2) but not in PSMA-negative (PC-3 and DU-145) cell lines. High tumor accumulation was seen for both 225Ac-pelgi and 225Ac-DOTA-pelgi in the MDA-PCa-2b xenograft model. In the C4-2 xenograft model, 225Ac-pelgi showed enhanced antitumor efficacy with a T/Cvolume (treatment/control) ratio of 0.10 compared with 225Ac-DOTA-pelgi, 225Ac-DOTA-J591, and 227Th-HOPO-pelgifatamab (227Th-pelgi; all at 300 kBq/kg) with T/Cvolume ratios of 0.37, 0.39, and 0.33, respectively. 225Ac-pelgi was less myelosuppressive than 227Th-pelgi. 225Ac-pelgi showed dose-dependent treatment efficacy in the patient-derived KuCaP-1 model and strong combination potential with darolutamide in both cell line- (22Rv1) and patient-derived (ST1273) xenograft models. These results provide a strong rationale to investigate 225Ac-pelgi in patients with prostate cancer. A clinical phase I study has been initiated (NCT06052306).

PDIA2 has a dual function in promoting androgen deprivation therapy induced venous thrombosis events and castrate resistant prostate cancer progression.

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the first line of treatment for metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) that effectively delays the tumor progression. However, it also increases the risk of venous thrombosis event (VTE) in patients, a leading cause of mortality. How a pro-thrombotic cascade is induced by ADT remains poorly understood. Here, we report that protein disulfide isomerase A2 (PDIA2) is upregulated in PCa cells to promote VTE formation and enhance PCa cells resistant to ADT. Using various in vitro and in vivo models, we demonstrated a dual function of PDIA2 that enhances tumor-mediated pro-coagulation activity via tumor-derived extracellular vehicles (EVs). It also stimulates PCa cell proliferation, colony formation, and xenograft growth androgen-independently. Mechanistically, PDIA2 activates the tissue factor (TF) on EVs through its isomerase activity, which subsequently triggers a pro-thrombotic cascade in the blood. Additionally, TF-containing EVs can activate the Src kinase inside PCa cells to enhance the AR signaling ligand independently. Androgen deprivation does not alter PDIA2 expression in PCa cells but enhances PDIA2 translocation to the cell membrane and EVs via suppressing the clathrin-dependent endocytic process. Co-recruitment of AR and FOXA1 to the PDIA2 promoter is required for PDIA2 transcription under androgen-deprived conditions. Importantly, blocking PDIA2 isomerase activity suppresses the pro-coagulation activity of patient plasma, PCa cell, and xenograft samples as well as castrate-resistant PCa xenograft growth. These results demonstrate that PDIA2 promotes VTE and tumor progression via activating TF from tumor-derived EVs. They rationalize pharmacological inhibition of PDIA2 to suppress ADT-induced VTE and castrate-resistant tumor progression.

Impact of disease volume on survival efficacy of triplet therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis.

Triplet therapy, androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) plus docetaxel plus androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), is a novel guideline-recommended treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). However, the optimal selection of the patient most likely to benefit from triplet therapy remains unclear. We performed a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis to assess the oncologic benefit of triplet therapy in mHSPC patients stratified by disease volume and compare them with doublet treatment regimens. Three databases and meeting abstracts were queried in March 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating patients treated with systemic therapy for mHSPC stratified by disease volume. Primary interests of measure were overall survival (OS). We followed the PRISMA guideline and AMSTAR2 checklist. Overall, eight RCTs were included for meta-analyses and network meta-analyses (NMAs). Triplet therapy outperformed docetaxel plus ADT in terms of OS in both patients with high-(pooled HR: 0.73, 95%CI 0.64-0.84) and low-volume mHSPC (pooled HR: 0.71, 95%CI 0.52-0.97). There was no statistically significant difference between patients with low- vs. high-volume in terms of OS benefit from adding ARSI to docetaxel plus ADT (p = 0.9). Analysis of treatment rankings showed that darolutamide plus docetaxel plus ADT (90%) had the highest likelihood of improved OS in patients with high-volume disease, while enzalutamide plus ADT (84%) had the highest in with low-volume disease. Triplet therapy improves OS in mHSPC patients compared to docetaxel-based doublet therapy, irrespective of disease volume. However, based on treatment ranking, triplet therapy should preferably be considered for patients with high-volume mHSPC while those with low-volume are likely to be adequately treated with ARSI + ADT.

Abstract CT224: Preliminary efficacy and safety results from the (TATCIST) trial: A PSMA-directed targeted alpha therapy with FPI-2265 (225Ac-PSMA-I&amp;T) for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Targeted α therapy (TAT) in mCRPC is a rapidly advancing class of radiotherapeutics that can effectively deliver potent and local radiation selectively to cancer cells while sparing the surrounding normal cells. Retrospective studies of 225Ac PSMA-RLT (radioligand therapy), have shown promise in pts with mCRPC, where activity correlates with disease characteristics and prior therapies. FPI-2265 (225Ac-PSMA-I&amp;T) consists of a small-molecule PSMA-targeting ligand coupled with a 225Ac radionuclide. Here we present the initial results from TATCIST, an ongoing, open-label, single-arm study (NCT05219500) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FPI-2265 in pts with mCRPC that was initiated as an investigator-sponsored study then converted into an industry-sponsored trial with more stringent eligibility criteria. METHODS: Eligible pts are required to have progressive mCRPC with PSMA-positive PET. Prior radioligand therapy is permitted. Pts with skeletal metastases presenting as a superscan were excluded upon protocol amendment and excluded from this analysis. Four doses of FPI-2265 at 100 kBq/kg (±10%) are administered at 8-week intervals; de-escalation in cycle 2 and beyond is allowed. Proportion of pts with PSA ≤50%, maximum %PSA decrease, and safety and tolerability of FPI-2265 were assessed. RESULTS: At the time of the data cut (30Jan2024) 30 pts have received ≥1 dose FPI-2265, with 25 pts having ≥12 weeks follow up. For this analysis, 21 pts were evaluable for safety and 20 pts were evaluable for PSA response: 4 pts with superscan were excluded and 1 pt was excluded due to uninterpretable PSA data. In general, pts were heavily pretreated in terms of prior lines of therapy. Most pts (17/21 [81%]) had received a prior taxane, including 8 pts who received ≥2 lines of taxanes. Eight pts received prior 177Lu PSMA-RLT (Lu). PSA50 was achieved in 10/20 pts (50%); In a subset of pts with the baseline PSMA SUVmean &amp;gt;6 (n=13 overall; post-Lu, n=6), PSA50 was achieved in 9 pts (69%). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) included dry mouth (18/21 [86%]), fatigue (10/21 [48%]) dry eye (6/21 [28%]), and anemia (6/21 [28%]). All were Grade 1-2 in severity, expect anemia Grade 3 which was observed in (5/21 [24%]). Other Grade 3 TRAEs included decreased platelet count (3/21 [14%]). No Grade 4 or 5 TRAEs were reported. Dry mouth was primarily Grade 1 (13/21 [62%]) with only 5 patients (24%) experiencing Grade 2 dry mouth; there were no related discontinuations. CONCLUSION: Preliminary efficacy and safety data as of 30Jan24 suggest that FPI-2265 is active in heavily pretreated pts with progressive mCRPC, including pts who received prior Lu therapy. Higher PSMA SUVmean was associated with improved PSA responses, Safety and tolerability were consistent with other published studies of 225Ac-PSMA-RLTs. These initial results support further investigation of FPI-2265 and a new phase 2/3 trial will begin enrolling soon. Citation Format: Ebrahim S. Delpassand, Mohammad Jawed Hashmi, Julia Kazakin, Omer Nawaz, Gabriella Garufi, Joanne Schindler, Luke Nordquist. Preliminary efficacy and safety results from the (TATCIST) trial: A PSMA-directed targeted alpha therapy with FPI-2265 (225Ac-PSMA-I&amp;T) for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT224.

Genomic profiling and clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA in metastatic prostate cancer: SCRUM-Japan MONSTAR SCREEN project

BackgroundCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing has emerged as a novel tool for cancer precision medicine. This study investigated the genomic profiling and clinical utility of ctDNA in metastatic prostate cancer.MethodsThis is a nation-wide prospective observational study. Patients treated with systemic treatment for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) were included. ctDNA was analyzed using FoundationOne Liquid®CDx at enrollment. In a subset of patients, ctDNA after disease progression and tissue prior to the initiation of treatment were examined using FoundationOne Liquid®CDx and FoundationOne®CDx, respectively.ResultsThe frequency of AR alterations and homologous recombination repair (HRR) defect was higher in mCRPC compared with mCSPC. Tumor mutational burden was correlated between tissue and ctDNA at pre-treatment, as well as ctDNA between at pre-treatment and at post-treatment. Patients with HRR defect were associated with shorter time to castration resistance in androgen deprivation therapy/combined androgen blockade, but not in androgen receptor pathway inhibitor, compared with patients without HRR defect in mCSPC. Time to treatment failure in patients with AR amplification or AR mutation was shorter compared with patients without AR alterations in mCRPC.ConclusionsThis study revealed valuable findings for the clinical care of metastatic prostate cancer. Especially, predictive factors such as HRR defect in mCSPC should be validated in the future.

Targeted interleukin-2 enhances the in vivo anti-cancer activity of Pluvicto™.

Pluvicto™ ([177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617), a radioligand therapeutic targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), has been recently approved for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPR). The drug suffers from salivary gland and kidney uptake that prevents its dose escalation to potentially curative doses. In this work, we sought to potentiate the in vivo anti-cancer activity of Pluvicto™ by combining it with L19-IL2, a clinical-stage investigational medicinal product based on tumor-targeted interleukin-2. We established a new PSMA-expressing model (HT-1080.hPSMA) and validated it using a fluoresceine analogue of PSMA-617 (compound 1). The HT-1080.hPSMA model was used to study the saturation and tumor retention of Pluvicto™ (compound 2) and to run combination therapy studies with L19-IL2. To complement our understanding of the mechanism of action of this novel combination, we conducted proteomics experiments on tumor samples after therapy with Pluvicto™ alone or in combination with the immunocytokine. High, selective, and long-lived tumor uptake was observed for Pluvicto™ (2) in the novel HT-1080.hPSMA model. Therapy studies in HT-1080.hPSMA tumor-bearing mice revealed that the combination of Pluvicto™ (2) plus L19-IL2 mediated curative and durable responses in all animals. Potent in vivo anti-cancer activity was observed solely for the combination modality, at doses that were well tolerated by treated animals. Proteomics studies indicated that L19-IL2 boosts the activation of the immune system in animals pre-treated with Pluvicto™. The therapeutic efficacy of Pluvicto™ at low radioactive doses can be effectively enhanced by the combination with L19-IL2. Our findings warrant further clinical exploration of this novel combination modality.

Recomendaciones de tratamiento en el cáncer de próstata hormonosensible metastásico: selección de pacientes

The standard treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) is now a combination of androgen deprivation therapy plus an androgen receptor-targeted therapy (abiraterone, apalutamide, enzalutamide or darolutamide), with or without chemotherapy (docetaxel). The selection of suitable patients for each therapeutic approach has become a determining factor to ensure efficacy and minimize side effects. This article combines recent clinical evidence with the accumulated experience of experts in medical oncology, radiation oncology and urology, to provide a comprehensive view and therapeutic recommendations for mHSPC.

Tolerability of Olaparib Combined with Abiraterone in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Further Results from the Phase 3 PROpel Trial

BackgroundThe PROpel study (NCT03732820) demonstrated a statistically significant progression-free survival benefit with olaparib plus abiraterone versus placebo plus abiraterone in the first-line metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) setting, irrespective of homologous recombination repair mutation status. ObjectiveWe report additional safety analyses from PROpel to increase clinical understanding of the adverse-event (AE) profiles of olaparib plus abiraterone versus placebo plus abiraterone. Design, setting, and participantsA randomised (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at 126 centres in 17 countries (October 2018–January 2020). Patients had mCRPC and no prior systemic mCRPC treatment. InterventionOlaparib (300 mg bid) or placebo with abiraterone (1000 mg od) plus prednisone/prednisolone (5 mg bid). Outcome measurements and statistical analysisThe data cut-off date was July 30, 2021. Safety was assessed by AE reporting (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03) and analysed descriptively. Results and limitationsThe most common AEs (all grades) for olaparib plus abiraterone versus placebo plus abiraterone were anaemia (46.0% vs 16.4%), nausea (28.1% vs 12.6%), and fatigue (27.9% vs 18.9%). Grade ≥3 anaemia occurred in 15.1% versus 3.3% of patients in the olaparib plus abiraterone versus placebo plus abiraterone arm. The incidences of the most common AEs for olaparib plus abiraterone peaked early, within 2 mo, and were managed typically by dose modifications or standard medical practice. Overall, 13.8% versus 7.8% of patients discontinued treatment with olaparib plus abiraterone versus placebo plus abiraterone because of an AE; 3.8% versus 0.8% of patients discontinued because of anaemia. More venous thromboembolism events were observed in the olaparib plus abiraterone arm (any grade, 7.3%; grade ≥3, 6.8%) than in the placebo plus abiraterone arm (any grade, 3.3%; grade ≥3, 2.0%), most commonly pulmonary embolism (6.5% vs 1.8% for olaparib plus abiraterone vs placebo plus abiraterone). ConclusionsOlaparib plus abiraterone has a manageable and predictable safety profile. Patient summaryThe PROpel trial showed that in patients who had not received any previous treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, olaparib combined with abiraterone was more effective in delaying progression of the disease than abiraterone alone. Most side effects caused by combining olaparib with abiraterone could be managed with supportive care methods, by pausing olaparib administration for a short period of time and/or by reducing the dose of olaparib.

Symptoms and quality of life among men starting treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer – a prospective multicenter study

BackgroundMen with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have an incurable disease. Along with prolonging life, symptom management is one of the main goals with treatment. This is also important from a palliative care perspective where the life prolonging outcomes should be balanced with quality of life (QoL) in this late phase. It is also essential in symptom management to view different dimensions of symptoms, for example how severe or distressing symptoms are, to support best QoL. Therefore, more knowledge is needed about the symptom experience when these treatments are initiated and thus the aim of this study was to describe different dimensions of symptoms in men with mCRPC starting their first-line of life-prolonging treatment, and to describe the association between symptom burden and QoL.MethodsBaseline data from a prospective longitudinal study of 143 men with mCRPC starting their first-line life-prolonging treatment were used. Symptoms were measured using the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS) and global QoL was measured by the EORTC QLQ C-30. Data was analyzed using descriptive- and multivariable linear regression analyses.ResultsOn average, the men had more than 10 symptoms (range 0–31 of 33). 50% or more reported sweats, lack of energy, pain, problems with sexual activity and sexual desire. The symptoms they reported as most severe, or most distressing were not always the ones that were reported as most frequent. There was an association between QoL and physical symptoms, and also between QoL, and analgesic use and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values.ConclusionEven if some men with mCRPC report many symptoms, the dimensions of severity and distress levels vary, and the most frequent symptoms was not always the most burdensome or distressing. There was an association between high physical symptom burden and QoL, suggesting that it is not the number of symptoms that affects QoL but rather the subjective perceived impact of the physical symptoms experienced. The knowledge of how men with mCRPC experience and perceive their symptoms may help health care professionals in symptom management aiming to improve QoL, which is a cornerstone in integrating early palliative care.