Transmembrane Domains Of Fusion Proteins Research Articles

Transmembrane Domains of Highly Pathogenic Viral Fusion Proteins Exhibit Trimeric Association In Vitro.

Enveloped viruses require viral fusion proteins to promote fusion of the viral envelope with a target cell membrane. To drive fusion, these proteins undergo large conformational changes that must occur at the right place and at the right time. Understanding the elements which control the stability of the prefusion state and the initiation of conformational changes is key to understanding the function of these important proteins. The construction of mutations in the fusion protein transmembrane domains (TMDs) or the replacement of these domains with lipid anchors has implicated the TMD in the fusion process. However, the structural and molecular details of the role of the TMD in these fusion events remain unclear. Previously, we demonstrated that isolated paramyxovirus fusion protein TMDs associate in a monomer-trimer equilibrium, using sedimentation equilibrium analytical ultracentrifugation. Using a similar approach, the work presented here indicates that trimeric interactions also occur between the fusion protein TMDs of Ebola virus, influenza virus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS CoV), and rabies virus. Our results suggest that TM-TM interactions are important in the fusion protein function of diverse viral families.IMPORTANCE Many important human pathogens are enveloped viruses that utilize membrane-bound glycoproteins to mediate viral entry. Factors that contribute to the stability of these glycoproteins have been identified in the ectodomain of several viral fusion proteins, including residues within the soluble ectodomain. Although it is often thought to simply act as an anchor, the transmembrane domain of viral fusion proteins has been implicated in protein stability and function as well. Here, using a biophysical approach, we demonstrated that the fusion protein transmembrane domains of several deadly pathogens-Ebola virus, influenza virus, SARS CoV, and rabies virus-self-associate. This observation across various viral families suggests that transmembrane domain interactions may be broadly relevant and serve as a new target for therapeutic development.

Hendra virus fusion protein transmembrane domain contributes to pre-fusion protein stability

Enveloped viruses utilize fusion (F) proteins studding the surface of the virus to facilitate membrane fusion with a target cell membrane. Fusion of the viral envelope with a cellular membrane is required for release of viral genomic material, so the virus can ultimately reproduce and spread. To drive fusion, the F protein undergoes an irreversible conformational change, transitioning from a metastable pre-fusion conformation to a more thermodynamically stable post-fusion structure. Understanding the elements that control stability of the pre-fusion state and triggering to the post-fusion conformation is important for understanding F protein function. Mutations in F protein transmembrane (TM) domains implicated the TM domain in the fusion process, but the structural and molecular details in fusion remain unclear. Previously, analytical ultracentrifugation was utilized to demonstrate that isolated TM domains of Hendra virus F protein associate in a monomer-trimer equilibrium (Smith, E. C., Smith, S. E., Carter, J. R., Webb, S. R., Gibson, K. M., Hellman, L. M., Fried, M. G., and Dutch, R. E. (2013) J. Biol. Chem. 288, 35726-35735). To determine factors driving this association, 140 paramyxovirus F protein TM domain sequences were analyzed. A heptad repeat of β-branched residues was found, and analysis of the Hendra virus F TM domain revealed a heptad repeat leucine-isoleucine zipper motif (LIZ). Replacement of the LIZ with alanine resulted in dramatically reduced TM-TM association. Mutation of the LIZ in the whole protein resulted in decreased protein stability, including pre-fusion conformation stability. Together, our data suggest that the heptad repeat LIZ contributed to TM-TM association and is important for F protein function and pre-fusion stability.

Viral fusion protein transmembrane domain adopts β-strand structure to facilitate membrane topological changes for virus–cell fusion

The C-terminal transmembrane domain (TMD) of viral fusion proteins such as HIV gp41 and influenza hemagglutinin (HA) is traditionally viewed as a passive α-helical anchor of the protein to the virus envelope during its merger with the cell membrane. The conformation, dynamics, and lipid interaction of these fusion protein TMDs have so far eluded high-resolution structure characterization because of their highly hydrophobic nature. Using magic-angle-spinning solid-state NMR spectroscopy, we show that the TMD of the parainfluenza virus 5 (PIV5) fusion protein adopts lipid-dependent conformations and interactions with the membrane and water. In phosphatidylcholine (PC) and phosphatidylglycerol (PG) membranes, the TMD is predominantly α-helical, but in phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) membranes, the TMD changes significantly to the β-strand conformation. Measured order parameters indicate that the strand segments are immobilized and thus oligomerized. (31)P NMR spectra and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) data show that this β-strand-rich conformation converts the PE membrane to a bicontinuous cubic phase, which is rich in negative Gaussian curvature that is characteristic of hemifusion intermediates and fusion pores. (1)H-(31)P 2D correlation spectra and (2)H spectra show that the PE membrane with or without the TMD is much less hydrated than PC and PG membranes, suggesting that the TMD works with the natural dehydration tendency of PE to facilitate membrane merger. These results suggest a new viral-fusion model in which the TMD actively promotes membrane topological changes during fusion using the β-strand as the fusogenic conformation.

Beyond Anchoring: the Expanding Role of the Hendra Virus Fusion Protein Transmembrane Domain in Protein Folding, Stability, and Function

While work with viral fusion proteins has demonstrated that the transmembrane domain (TMD) can affect protein folding, stability, and membrane fusion promotion, the mechanism(s) remains poorly understood. TMDs could play a role in fusion promotion through direct TMD-TMD interactions, and we have recently shown that isolated TMDs from three paramyxovirus fusion (F) proteins interact as trimers using sedimentation equilibrium (SE) analysis (E. C. Smith, et al., submitted for publication). Immediately N-terminal to the TMD is heptad repeat B (HRB), which plays critical roles in fusion. Interestingly, addition of HRB decreased the stability of the trimeric TMD-TMD interactions. This result, combined with previous findings that HRB forms a trimeric coiled coil in the prefusion form of the whole protein though HRB peptides fail to stably associate in isolation, suggests that the trimeric TMD-TMD interactions work in concert with elements in the F ectodomain head to stabilize a weak HRB interaction. Thus, changes in TMD-TMD interactions could be important in regulating F triggering and refolding. Alanine insertions between the TMD and HRB demonstrated that spacing between these two regions is important for protein stability while not affecting TMD-TMD interactions. Additional mutagenesis of the C-terminal end of the TMD suggests that β-branched residues within the TMD play a role in membrane fusion, potentially through modulation of TMD-TMD interactions. Our results support a model whereby the C-terminal end of the Hendra virus F TMD is an important regulator of TMD-TMD interactions and show that these interactions help hold HRB in place prior to the triggering of membrane fusion.

Residues in the hendra virus fusion protein transmembrane domain are critical for endocytic recycling.

Hendra virus is a highly pathogenic paramyxovirus classified as a biosafety level four agent. The fusion (F) protein of Hendra virus is critical for promoting viral entry and cell-to-cell fusion. To be fusogenically active, Hendra virus F must undergo endocytic recycling and cleavage by the endosomal/lysosomal protease cathepsin L, but the route of Hendra virus F following internalization and the recycling signals involved are poorly understood. We examined the intracellular distribution of Hendra virus F following endocytosis and showed that it is primarily present in Rab5- and Rab4-positive endosomal compartments, suggesting that cathepsin L cleavage occurs in early endosomes. Hendra virus F transmembrane domain (TMD) residues S490 and Y498 were found to be important for correct Hendra virus F recycling, with the hydroxyl group of S490 and the aromatic ring of Y498 important for this process. In addition, changes in association of isolated Hendra virus F TMDs correlated with alterations to Hendra virus F recycling, suggesting that appropriate TMD interactions play an important role in endocytic trafficking.

Synaptobrevin Trans-Membrane Domain forms a Complex that Enhances the Rate of “Stalk” and Pore Formation in PEG-Mediated Vesicle Fusion

Synaptobrevin (SB), a membrane anchored protein in the neuronal cell membrane, complexes with syntaxin (SX) and SNAP-25 to facilitate membrane fusion in neurotransmitter release. SB and SX promote Poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-mediated fusion whether or not they are assembled into a SNARE complex (Dennison et al., BJ, 2006, 1661). Viral fusion protein trans-membrane domains (TMDs) enhance the fusion. Thus, we hypothesized that the SB-TMD may also affect fusion kinetics. The kinetics of PEG-mediated fusion of DOPC/DOPE/sphingomyelin/cholesterol/DOPS (32/25/15/20/8) 25 nm vesicles (SUVs) was examined in the presence and absence of SB TMD. Lipid mixing (LM), contents mixing (CM) and leakage (L) time courses were fitted globally to a 3-state sequential model (Weinreb & Lentz, BJ, 2007, 4012), from which we obtained estimates of rate constants for conversion between states as well as probabilities of LM, CM and L for each state. SB TMD enhanced the rates of “stalk” and fusion pore (FP) formation in a cooperative fashion (maximum effect at 3 peptide/vesicle). TMD ordered the bilayer interior in a similarly cooperative fashion. The effects of hexadecane and TMD on fusion kinetics were quite distinct and not mutual. SB TMD increased the probability of both LM and CM in the initial intermediate, suggesting that it promoted formation of transient pores before the final pore state. Transition state thermodynamic changes indicate that the effects on “stalk” and FP formation involved different mechanism, although both showed that in presence of TMD the change in entropy is always greater than enthalpy. Supported by NIH grant GM32707 to BRL.

Conserved conformational dynamics of membrane fusion protein transmembrane domains and flanking regions indicated by sequence statistics

SNARE proteins and fusogenic viral membrane proteins represent the major classes of integral membrane proteins that mediate fusion of eukaryotic lipid bilayers. Although both classes have different primary structures, they share a number of basic architectural features. There is ample evidence that the fusogenic function of representative fusion proteins is influenced by the primary structure of the single transmembrane domain (TMD) and the region linking it to the soluble assembly domains. Here, we used comprehensive non-redundant datasets to examine potential over- and underrepresentation of amino acid types in the TMDs and flanking regions relative to control proteins that share similar biosynthetic origins. Our results reveal conserved overall and/or site-specific enrichment of β-branched residues and Gly within the TMDs, underrepresentation of Gly and Pro in regions flanking the TMD N-terminus, and overrepresentation of the same residue types in C-terminal flanks of SNAREs and viral fusion proteins. Furthermore, the basic Lys and Arg are enriched within SNARE N-terminal flanking regions. These results suggest evolutionary conservation of key structural features of fusion proteins and are discussed in light of experimental findings that link these features to the fusogenic function of these proteins.

Valine-Induced Packing Deficiencies of Transmembrane Domains Promote Helix Flexibility and Membrane Fusion

The helical transmembrane domains of fusion proteins are known to be functionally important and display an overabundance of helix-destabilizing Ile and Val residues. In an effort to systematically study the relationship of helix flexibility and fusogenicity, synthetic LV-peptides were designed whose hydrophobic core consists of Leu and Val residues at different ratios and at different positions (Hofmann et al., 2004; Poschner et al., 2009). The ability of the LV-peptides to fuse membranes increases with the content of helix-destabilizing residues. Molecular dynamics simulations were performed in order to characterize the backbone dynamics of these peptides in membrane-mimicking 80% TFE solvent and to relate the hydrogen-bond dynamics to experimental deuterium/hydrogen exchange kinetics. The analysis revealed that (i) the backbone dynamics of the helices increases systematically with Val content, (ii) that the impact of Val is due to stereochemical constraints within the helical structure and (iii) that side-chain packing mainly determines exchange kinetics. As a consequence, VxxV and VVxVV motifs promote helix destabilization whose relevance for membrane fusogenicity will be discussed.Hofmann, M.W., K. Weise, J. Ollesch, A. Agrawal, H. Stalz, W. Stelzer, F. Hulsbergen, H. deGroot, K. Gerwert, J. Reed, and D. Langosch. 2004. De novo design of conformationally flexible transmembrane peptides driving membrane fusion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 101:14776-14781.Poschner, B.C., S. Quint, M. Hofmann, and D. Langosch. 2009. Sequence-specific conformational dynamics of model transmembrane domains determines their membrane fusogenic function. J. Mol. Biol. 386:733-741.

Structural features of fusogenic model transmembrane domains that differentially regulate inner and outer leaflet mixing in membrane fusion

The transmembrane domains of fusion proteins are known to be important for their fusogenic activity. In an effort to systematically investigate the structure/function relationships of transmembrane domains we had previously designed LV-peptides that mimic natural fusion protein TMDs in their ability to drive fusion after incorporation into liposomal membranes. Here, we investigate the impact of different structural features of LV-peptide TMDs on inner and outer leaflet mixing. We find that fusion driven by the helical peptides involves a hemifusion intermediate as previously seen for natural fusion proteins. Helix backbone dynamics enhances fusion by selectively promoting outer leaflet mixing. Furthermore, the hydrophobic length of the peptides as well as covalent attachment of long acyl chains affects outer and inner leaflet mixing to different extents. Different structural features of transmembrane domains thus appear to differentially influence the rearrangements of lipids in fusion initiation and the hemifusion-to-fusion transition. The relevance of these findings in respect to the function of natural fusion proteins is discussed.

Sequence-Specific Conformational Dynamics of Model Transmembrane Domains Determines Their Membrane Fusogenic Function

The transmembrane domains of fusion proteins are known to be functionally important and display an overabundance of helix-destabilizing Ile and Val residues. In an effort to systematically study the relationship of fusogenicity and helix stability, we previously designed LV peptides, a low-complexity model system whose hydrophobic core consists of Leu and Val residues at different ratios. The ability of LV peptides to fuse membranes increases with the content of helix-destabilizing residues. Here, we monitored the kinetics of amide deuterium/hydrogen exchange of LV-peptide helices to probe their conformational dynamics. The kinetics indeed increases strongly with the content of helix-destabilizing residues and is likely to reflect local fluctuations of the helix backbones as all peptides exhibit uncorrelated exchange and contain subpopulations of amide deuterium atoms that exchange with different velocities. Interestingly, helices whose amide deuterium atoms are shifted from slower to faster subpopulations are more fusogenic. Novel peptide variants in which Val residues are concentrated at peripheral or central domains of the hydrophobic core were designed to map functionally relevant helix subdomains. Their structural and functional analysis suggests that dynamic domains close to the helix termini are more relevant for fusogenicity than central domains but cooperate with the latter to achieve strong fusogenicity.

Fusion Peptides and Transmembrane Domains of Fusion Proteins are Characterized by Different but Specific Structural Properties

Membrane fusion is essential for many biological processes. Though there have been many structure and fusion studies of cellular and viral fusion proteins in the last years, their functional mechanism remains elusive. In particular, the structural modes of operation of the transmembrane domains and viral fusion peptides of fusion proteins during membrane fusion have not been elucidated, although work on de novo designed fusogenic peptides suggested that conformational flexibility was necessary. In addition, the use of different and incompatible measurement criteria has made a comparative overview difficult. Here, we report a systematic structural analysis of viral fusion peptides from different fusion protein classes and transmembrane domains of viral and cellular fusion proteins by using circular dichroism spectroscopy. The data that were obtained demonstrate that class I viral fusion peptides show a structural flexibility between helix and irregular secondary structures, whereas fusion peptides of class II viral fusion proteins are characterized by a stable random coil and turn structure. Thus, conformational flexibility does not seem to be a universal criterion for the fusion activity of a fusion peptide. On the contrary, the transmembrane domains of fusion proteins are distinguished by a structural flexibility between helix and sheet structure that is similar to de novo designed unnatural peptides with high fusion activities (M. W. Hofmann et al. PNAS 2004, 101, 14 776-14 781). Thus, the conformational behavior of the fusogenic unnatural peptides most closely resembles that of fusion protein transmembrane domains, and allows them to be used to gain a deeper understanding of the membrane fusion process.

Secondary structure and distribution of fusogenic LV-peptides in lipid membranes

LV-peptides were designed as membrane-spanning low-complexity model structures that mimic fusion protein transmembrane domains. These peptides harbor a hydrophobic core sequence that consists of helix-promoting and helix-destabilizing residues at different ratios. Previously, the fusogenicity of these peptides has been shown to increase with the conformational flexibility of their hydrophobic cores as determined in isotropic solution. Here, we examined the secondary structure, orientation, and distribution of LV-peptides in membranes. Our results reveal that the peptides are homogeneously distributed within the membranes of giant unilamellar liposomes and capable of fusing them. Increasing the valine content of the core up to the level of the beta-branched residue content of SNARE TMDs (approximately 50%) enhances fusogenicity while maintaining a largely alpha-helical structure in liposomal membranes. A further increase in valine content or introduction of a glycine/proline pair favors beta-sheet formation. In planar bilayers, the alpha-helices adopt oblique angles relative to the bilayer normal and the ratio of alpha-helix to beta-sheet responds more sensitively to valine content. We propose that the fusogenic conformation of LV-peptides is likely to correspond to a membrane-spanning alpha-helix. Beta-sheet formation in membranes may be considered a side-reaction whose extent reflects conformational flexibility of the core.

PH-Activated Fusogenic Transmembrane LV-Peptides

LV-peptides mimic the in vitro fusogenicity of synthetic fusion protein transmembrane domains. The original versions of these peptides consist of a variable hydrophobic core (containing leucine and/or valine residues (LV)) that is flanked by invariant lysine triplets at both termini. Previously, peptide fusogenicity was correlated with the structural plasticity of their hydrophobic cores. Here, we examined the functional importance of positively charged flanking residues. To this end, we determined the fusogenicities of peptide variants that contain terminal His and/or Lys triplets. Interestingly, liposome fusion by peptides with His triplets was triggered by acidic pH. The pH dependence of fusion is reflected by a sigmoidal titration curve whose midpoint is close to the pKa value of histidine. Thus, only peptides with positively charged residues at both termini are fusogenic. The previously established dependence of fusogenicity on the sequence of the hydrophobic peptide core of Lys-flanked LV-peptides was preserved with the His-flanked versions at low pH. We propose that the structural flexibility of the core region as well as positive terminal charges are required for LV-peptide function in lipid mixing. In a potential practical application, the pH-dependent LV-peptides might prove to be useful in the lipofection of eukaryotic cells.