Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Research Articles

Standalone transcatheter left atrial appendage closure or combined with cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation

Abstract Background Head-to-head comparisons between stand-alone left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) and a same-procedure LACC + cryoballoon (CB) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) (combined procedure) are currently lacking. Purpose To compare acute and long-term outcomes between stand-alone LAAC vs a LAAC+CB-PVI combined procedure. Methods All patients undergoing LAAC at our institution, having at least 2 years follow-up, were analyzed to assess the impact of additional CB-PVI. The primary efficacy and safety endpoints of our study were the acute procedural success rate and the peri-procedural complications rate. As secondary endpoints, major bleeding, and ischemic events, as well as sinus rhythm rate at 2 years follow-up were assessed. Results Among 126 LAAC patients meeting inclusion criteria (males=64.2%), n=55 (43.7%) underwent a combined procedure. LAAC-only patients were older (72.5±7.2 vs 68.9±8.6, p<0.05) and less frequently having paroxysmal AF (23.9% vs 47.3%, p<0.05). Baseline CHA2DS2-VASc was similar among groups (3.3±1.3 vs 2.9±1.1, p=0.07) while LAAC-only patients had higher HAS-BLED at enrollment (3.4±1.1 vs 3.0±1.0, p=0.04). Additional CB-PVI was not a risk factor for incomplete LAA occlusion (OR 0.24–3.78, p=0.96), presence of residual lateral flow (OR 0.26–4.05; p=0.96), intraprocedural need for occluder device resizing compared to pre-procedural assessment (OR 0.27–3.05; p=0.884), and peri-procedural complications (OR 0.25–6.74, p=0.749). At 3-month post-procedural trans-esophageal echocardiography, a combined procedure was not associated with higher risk of incomplete occlusion (OR 0.33–1.59, p = 0.432), nor larger peri-device leakages (coefficient k: -0.65–+0.20, p=0.291). Overall and by-group ischemic (red) and bleeding (blue) relative risk reduction from CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED predicted yearly rates during follow-up was reported in Figure1. Over a median follow-up of 40 [26–56] months, a combined procedure was not a risk factor for major bleeding (OR 0.31–5.48, p=0.715) or ischemic (OR 0.11–3.56, p=0.599) events. As expected, additional CB-PVI was strongly associated with a reduction of AF recurrences (OR 0.16–0.86, p<0.05), after excluding permanent AF patients from the analysis. Conclusion Combined LAAC + CB-PVI procedure does not appear to be a risk factor for worse LAAC-related outcomes, while reducing AF recurrences in non-permanent AF patients.Figure 1

Incidence, progression, and predictors of left atrial appendage sealing after Watchman FLX device implantation with computed tomographic assessment.

Limited data exists regarding incidence, progression, and predictors of left atrial appendage (LAA) sealing after transcatheter LAA closure. We aimed to evaluate the incidence, progression, and predictive factors associated with LAA sealing after LAA closure. This study includes patients who underwent successful LAA closure with Watchman FLX device and had both pre- and postprocedural computed tomography (CT). Postprocedural CT was performed 45 days after LAA closure and used to evaluate residual LAA patency. Patient who had residual LAA patency at 45 days underwent 1-year follow-up CT. A total of 105 patients (mean age: 75.2 ± 9.6 years; 53.3% female) who underwent successful LAA closure with Watchman FLX device and had pre- and postprocedural CT at 45 days were included. Residual patency was observed in 35 (33.3%) patients: 21 (20.0%) patients showed complete contrast opacification in LAA (complete LAA patency) while 14 (13.3%) patients showed contrast opacification only in the distal LAA (distal LAA patency). Among patients with residual LAA patency at 45 days, the rate of LAA sealing at 1 year was significantly higher in the distal LAA patency group than in the complete LAA patency group (75.0% vs. 16.7%; p = 0.019). Increased depth oversizing was associated with both distal LAA patency and complete LAA patency. Postprocedural CT at 45 days detected patent LAA in one-third of patients after LAA closure. LAA sealing was more frequently observed at 1 year among the distal LAA patency group than the complete LAA patency group.

Patient Characteristics Associated With Using Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Versus Oral Anticoagulants for Atrial Fibrillation.

Transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an alternative to oral anticoagulants (OACs) for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation, but the predictors of LAAO use in routine care are unclear. We aimed to assess the utilization trends of LAAO and compare the change in characteristics of LAAO users versus OACs since its marketing. Using the US Medicare claims database (March 15, 2015, to December 31, 2020), we identified patients with atrial fibrillation, ≥65 years, and CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2 (men) or ≥3 (women), with either first implantation of an LAAO device or initiation of OACs, including apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, or warfarin. Patient characteristics, measured 365 days before the first LAAO or OAC use date, were compared using logistic regression. There were 30 058 LAAO recipients (mean age, 77.74 years; female, 42.1%) and 792 600 OAC initiators (mean age, 78.48; female, 53.3%). In 2020, patients had higher odds of initiating LAAO use than in 2015 (0.52 versus 9.32%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 13.64 [95% CI, 12.56-14.81]). Old age (ie, >85 versus 65-75 years; aOR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.80-0.88]), female sex (aOR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.71-0.76]), Black race (aOR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.58-0.68]) versus White race, and Medicaid eligibility (aOR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.58-0.64]) were associated with lower odds of receiving LAAO. Among clinical characteristics, frailty, cancer, fractures, and venous thromboembolism were associated with lower odds of LAAO use, while history of intracranial and extracranial bleeding, coagulopathy, and falls were associated with higher odds of receiving LAAO. Among patients with atrial fibrillation receiving stroke-preventive therapy, LAAO use increased rapidly from 2015 to 2020 and was positively associated with the risk factors for OAC complications but negatively associated with old age, advanced frailty, and cancer. Black race and female sex were associated with a lower likelihood of receiving LAAO.

Predicting Major Adverse Events in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.

The National Cardiovascular Data Registry Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Registry (LAAO) includes the vast majority of transcatheter LAAO procedures performed in the United States. The objective of this study was to develop a model predicting adverse events among patients undergoing LAAO with Watchman FLX. Data from 41 001 LAAO procedures with Watchman FLX from July 2020 to September 2021 were used to develop and validate a model predicting in-hospital major adverse events. Randomly selected development (70%, n=28 530) and validation (30%, n=12 471) cohorts were analyzed with 1000 bootstrapped samples, using forward stepwise logistic regression to create the final model. A simplified bedside risk score was also developed using this model. Increased age, female sex, low preprocedure hemoglobin, no prior attempt at atrial fibrillation termination, and increased fall risk most strongly predicted in-hospital major adverse events and were included in the final model along with other clinically relevant variables. The median in-hospital risk-standardized adverse event rate was 1.50% (range, 1.03%-2.84%; interquartile range, 1.42%-1.64%). The model demonstrated moderate discrimination (development C-index, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.65-0.70] and validation C-index, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.62-0.70]) with good calibration. The simplified risk score was well calibrated with risk of in-hospital major adverse events ranging from 0.26% to 3.90% for a score of 0 to 8, respectively. A transcatheter LAAO risk model using National Cardiovascular Data Registry and LAAO Registry data can predict in-hospital major adverse events, demonstrated consistency across hospitals and can be used for quality improvement efforts. A simple bedside risk score was similarly predictive and may inform shared decision-making.

Association of transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion with acute changes in left atrial pressure: An invasive hemodynamic study

BackgroundThe hemodynamic effects of transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) remain unclear. ObjectiveWe sought to assess the effect of LAAO on invasive hemodynamics and their correlation with clinical outcomes. MethodsWe recorded mean left atrial pressure (mLAP) before and after device deployment. We assessed the prevalence and predictors of mLAP increase after deployment, the association between significant mLAP increase after deployment and 45-day peridevice leak (PDL), and the association between mLAP increase and heart failure (HF) hospitalization. A significant mLAP increase was defined as one equal to or greater than the mean percentage increase in mLAP after deployment (≥28%). ResultsWe included 302 patients (36.4% female; mean age, 75.8 ± 9.5 years). After deployment, mLAP increased in 48% of patients, 38% of whom experienced significant mLAP increase. Independent predictors of mLAP increase were baseline mLAP ≤14 mm Hg, nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation, and age per 5 years (odds ratios: 3.66 [95% CI, 2.21–6.05], 1.81 [95% CI, 1.08–3.02], and 0.85 [95% CI, 0.73–0.99], respectively). Significant mLAP increase was an independent predictor of 45-day PDL (odds ratio, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.04–6.26). There was no association between mLAP increase and HF hospitalization. ConclusionAfter deployment, mLAP acutely rises in 48% of patients, although this is not associated with increased HF hospitalizations. PDL is more likely to develop at 45 days in patients with significant increase in mLAP after deployment, although most leaks were small (<5 mm). These findings suggest that mLAP increase after deployment is not associated with major safety concerns. Additional studies are warranted to explore the long-term hemodynamic effects of LAAO.

State-of-the-Art of Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an increasingly used alternative to oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation, especially in patients with absolute/relative contraindications to these therapies. This review will cover three main aspects of the procedure. In the fist part of the manuscript, we focus on patient selection. We describe three main categories of patients with primary indication to LAAO, namely patients with previous or at a high risk of intracerebral bleeding, patients with a history of major gastrointestinal bleeding and patients with end-stage renal disease and absolute contraindication to novel oral anticoagulants. Some other potential indications are also described. In the second part of the manuscript, we review available devices, trying to highlight different aspects and potential specific advantages. The last section overviews different ways for pre-, intra- and postprocedural imaging, in order to improve procedural safety and efficacy and ameliorate patient outcome. The characteristics of available contemporary devices and the role of imaging in procedural planning, intraprocedural guidance and follow-up are described.

Transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a risk factor for embolic stroke, and many nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients have concomitant CKD. Anticoagulation therapy can be challenging in CKD due to increased bleeding risk, and left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) may be a promising alternative. This systematic review aimed to consolidate current evidence on the safety and effectiveness of transcatheter LAAO in patients with CKD and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Medline, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched from inception to September 2, 2022. We conducted a meta-analysis if an outcome was evaluated in at least two similar studies. We included 15 studies with 77,780 total patients. Of the 15 studies, 11 had a cohort design (five prospective and six retrospective), and four were case series. Patients with CKD were older and had a higher prevalence of comorbidities than non-CKD patients. The two groups did not differ in procedural failure rate, vascular complications, or pericardial tamponade. CKD patients exhibited higher odds of in-hospital acute kidney injury (AKI) and bleeding, longer-term bleeding, and mortality than those without CKD. The risk of in-hospital and longer-term cardioembolic events was similar between CKD and non-CKD populations (odds ratio = 1.01 [95% CI 0.70-1.15] and 1.05 [95% CI 0.55-2.00], respectively). Patients with ESRD had higher odds of in-hospital mortality and cardioembolic events than non-ESRD patients, with no differences in risk of pericardial tamponade. Based on observational studies, LAAO may be an effective option to prevent cardioembolic events in CKD. However, CKD patients may have higher odds of AKI and in-hospital and long-term bleeding and mortality. The adverse clinical outcomes observed in CKD patients may be attributed to this population's high burden of comorbidities, especially among those with ERSD, rather than the LAAO procedure itself. To ensure maximum clinical benefit, careful patient selection, management, and surveillance involving multidisciplinary teams are essential for CKD patients undergoing LAAO. Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion (laao) Can Prevent Cardioembolic Events In Chronic Kidney Disease (ckd) Patients. However, Ckd Patients, Particularly Those With End-stage Renal Disease/dialysis (esrd), May Face Increased Odds Of Acute Kidney Injury, In-hospital And Long-term Bleeding, And Mortality. Notably, These Adverse Outcomes In Ckd Patients May Be Linked To Their High Comorbidity Burden, Particularly In Those With Esrd, Rather Than The Laao Procedure Itself. Careful Patient Selection, Management, And Surveillance Involving Multidisciplinary Teams Are Essential For Ckd Patients Undergoing Laao To Ensure Maximum Clinical Benefit Transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) can prevent cardioembolic events in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. However, CKD patients, particularly those with end-stage renal disease/dialysis (ESRD), may face increased odds of acute kidney injury, in-hospital and long-term bleeding, and mortality. Notably, these adverse outcomes in CKD patients may be linked to their high comorbidity burden, particularly in those with ESRD, rather than the LAAO procedure itself. Careful patient selection, management, and surveillance involving multidisciplinary teams are essential for CKD patients undergoing LAAO to ensure maximum clinical benefit.

Imaging Evaluation Following Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Imaging Evaluation Following Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Feasibility of contrast-free left atrial appendage closure with WATCHMAN FLX device for patients with chronic kidney disease.

Contrast media are generally necessary for transcatheter left atrial appendage closure (LAAC), however, it should be avoided in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of contrast-free LAAC with WATCHMAN FLX device for patients with CKD. Among 141 patients undergoing LAAC using the WATCHMAN FLX between May 2021 and March 2023, we performed LAAC without contrast media in 10 patients. Procedural and follow-up results were evaluated. The device size was selected based on the transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) measurements. The device shape was assessed by fluoroscopy, and the device position was adjusted by TEE images. The mean age was 78 ± 4.9years, CHADS2 score was 3.2 ± 1.1, and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 28 ± 12mL/min/1.73m2. The procedure was completed without contrast media in ten patients. Partial recapture of the device was required in four patients, but the initially selected device was finally implanted in all patients. Mean procedure time was significantly shorter in the contrast-free LAAC than in the contrast-use LAAC (41.6 ± 14.1min vs 30.3 ± 7.6min, p = 0.01). Postprocedural eGFR did not change from baseline, and there were no adverse events during the hospital stay. Follow-up TEE or cardiac computed tomography performed within 3months after the procedure revealed no device-related thrombus or peri-device leak > 3mm, and oral antithrombotic therapy was discontinued in all patients. Our experience shows that contrast-free LAAC using the WATCHMAN FLX device was safe and feasible. Non-contrast LAAC is one of the therapeutic options for patients with severe CKD.

Intracardiac echocardiography is a promising strategy for guiding closure of the left atrial appendage.

Percutaneous transcatheter left atrial appendage (LAA) closure (LAAC) is an effective approach for preventing ischemic stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), a new imaging modality, is a promising strategy for guiding LAAC. This review highlights the various strategies for ICE-guided-LAAC as an option for clinical policy. A comprehensive literature search was conducted of PubMed, ScienceDirect, Ovid Web of Science, SpringerLink, and other notable databases to identify recent peer-reviewed clinical trials, reviews, and research articles related to ICE and its application in the guidance of LAAC. Various methods are used to evaluate the spatial structure and dimensions of the LAA. The main techniques for guiding LAAC are transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), cardiac computed tomography (CTA), and ICE. Among these techniques, the advantages of ICE typically include (1) multiangle and real-time assessment of intracardiac structure, (2) a reduction in procedural fluoroscopy, (3) reduced operation time and improved workflow in the catheterization laboratory, and (4) the avoidance of general anesthesia and the early detection of complications. ICE is a promising strategy for the guidance of LAAC. Among the most advanced and recent technological innovations in cardiovascular imaging in general and volume imaging in particular, ICE offers greater efficacy and safety.

Pacing for better visualization of the left atrial appendage prior to transcatheter left atrial appendage closure.

Pacing for better visualization of the left atrial appendage prior to transcatheter left atrial appendage closure.

Intracardiac vs Transesophageal Echocardiography for Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion With Watchman FLX in the U.S.

BackgroundIntraprocedural imaging is critical for device delivery in transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). Although pivotal trials of LAAO devices were conducted using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is an emerging imaging modality. ObjectivesThis study compared outcomes after ICE- and TEE-guided Watchman FLX implantation in the SURPASS (SURveillance Post Approval AnalySiS Plan) nationwide LAAO registry. MethodsBaseline characteristics were compared using chi-square and t-tests. Outcomes were reported in unadjusted and adjusted comparisons via propensity weighting. ResultsBetween August 2020 and September 2021, LAAO was attempted in 39,759 patients at 698 sites, including 2,272 cases (5.7%) with ICE and 31,835 (80.0%) with TEE. ICE and TEE patients had similar baseline characteristics and mean procedural times (ICE 82 minutes vs TEE 78 minutes). ICE patients were less likely to receive general anesthesia (54% vs 98%, P < 0.01). Successful device implantation (98.3% vs 97.6%) and complete seal rates at 45 days were similar (n = 25,280; 83% vs 82%). Most adverse event rates were similar; unadjusted mortality rates at 45 days were 1.1% for ICE vs 0.8% for TEE (P = 0.14), and 1.0% vs 0.7% (P = 0.27) in adjusted analyses. Even after adjustment, pericardial effusion rates requiring intervention were significantly higher with ICE at 45 days (1.0% vs 0.5%; P = 0.02). This rate decreased as operators performed more ICE-guided procedures, although 82% of operators had performed <10 ICE-guided procedures overall. ConclusionsIn the largest comparison to date, ICE use was infrequent. ICE and TEE both achieved high rates of complete LAAO. ICE was associated with significantly higher rates of pericardial effusion requiring intervention.

TCT-125 Contemporary Trends, Characteristics, and Outcomes of Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Among Nonagenarians

TCT-125 Contemporary Trends, Characteristics, and Outcomes of Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Among Nonagenarians

TCT-65 Association of Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion With Acute Changes in Left Atrial Pressure: An Invasive Hemodynamic Study

TCT-65 Association of Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion With Acute Changes in Left Atrial Pressure: An Invasive Hemodynamic Study

Physicians' perspectives on percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion for patients with atrial fibrillation

There has been an increasing uptake of transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) for stroke reduction in atrial fibrillation. To investigate the perceptions and approaches among a nationally representative sample of physicians. Using the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile, we selected a random sample of 500 physicians from each of the specialties: general cardiologists, interventional cardiologists, electrophysiologists, and vascular neurologists. The participants received the survey by mail up to three times from November 9, 2021 to January 14, 2022. In addition to the questions about experiences, perceptions, and approaches, physicians were randomly assigned to 1 of the 4 versions of a patient vignette: white man, white woman, black man, and black woman, to investigate potential bias in decision-making. The top three reasons for considering LAAO were: a history of intracranial bleeding (94.3%), a history of major extracranial bleeding (91.8%), and gastrointestinal lesions (59.0%), whereas the top three reasons for withholding LAAO were: other indications for long-term oral anticoagulation (87.7%), a low bleeding risk (77.0%), and a low stroke risk (65.6%). For the reasons limiting recommendations for LAAO, 59.8% mentioned procedural risks, 42.6% mentioned "limiting efficacy data comparing LAAO to NOAC" and 32.8% mentioned "limited safety data comparing LAAO to NOAC." There was no difference in physicians' decision-making by patients' race, gender, or the concordance between patients' and physicians' race or gender. In the first U.S. national physician survey of LAAO, individual physicians' perspectives varied greatly, which provided information that will help customize future educational activities for different audiences. Although diverse practice patterns of LAAO have been documented, little is known about the reasoning or perceptions that drive these variations. Unlike prior surveys that were directed to Centers that performed LAAO, the current survey obtained insights from individual physicians, not only those who perform the procedures (interventional cardiologists and electrophysiologists) but also those who are closely involved in the decision-making and referral process (general cardiologists and vascular neurologists). The findings identify key evidence gaps and help prioritize future studies to establish a consistent and evidence-based best practice for AF stroke prevention.

Complex venous disease in transcatheter left atrial appendage closure

Complex venous disease in transcatheter left atrial appendage closure

Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion: Preclinical and Early Clinical Results With the Laminar Device

BackgroundThe Laminar device rotates and closes the left atrial appendage (LAA) using an integrated ball and lock that excludes and eliminates the LAA pouch. There is a low device surface area, minimizing the risk of peridevice leak (PDL) and device-related thrombus (DRT) formation. ObjectivesThis study evaluates the safety and efficacy of the Laminar LAA exclusion device in healthy animals and human subjects with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation at risk of ischemic stroke and systemic thromboembolism. MethodsThe preclinical study implanted the Laminar device into canine subjects that underwent transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and fluoroscopic evaluation, followed by necropsy and histological assessment at 45 and 150-days post-implant. The early clinical study implanted the device in human subjects, followed to 12 months postimplantation. Procedural success was defined as device implantation in the intended location without residual LAA leak >5 mm as seen by TEE. Safety endpoints included freedom from stroke, systemic embolism, pericardial effusion, or tamponade, life-threatening/major bleeding, or death. ResultsThe Laminar device was successfully implanted in 10 canines. In all animals at 45 days and 150 days, no PDL or DRT was found, and histological examination showed fully closed LAAs covered with neo-endocardium. The device was successfully implanted in 15 human subjects with no safety events out to 12 months postimplantation. All subjects had successful protocol-defined LAA closure without DRT at 45 days by TEE and computed tomography, which remained stable through 12 months’ follow-up. ConclusionsThe preclinical and early clinical results demonstrate a promising safety and efficacy profile for the Laminar LAA exclusion device.

Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Devices Available, Pitfalls, Advantages, and Future Directions

Transcatheter left atrial appendage closure has emerged as a non-pharmacological alternative to long-term anticoagulation for stroke prevention in appropriately selected patients with AF. In this concise review article, the Food and Drug Administration-approved and some other left atrial appendage closure devices that are under investigation are discussed. Currently, Watchman Flx and Amplatzer Amulet are the only two devices that have been approved for commercial use by the Food and Drug Administration. A brief overview of device designs, clinical data on efficacy and safety, major limitations of left atrial appendage closure devices, and perspectives on future direction are provided. The current generation of devices is effective; however, efforts should continue on innovations and refinement of device technology.

Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia worldwide, placing a large population at risk for potentially disabling ischemic strokes, yet an estimated 50% of eligible patients cannot tolerate or are contraindicated to receive oral anticoagulation. Within the last 15 years, transcatheter options for left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) have provided a valuable alternative to chronic oral anticoagulation for reducing risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. With newer generation devices such as Watchman FLX and Amulet gaining approval from the US Food and Drug Administration in recent years, several large clinical trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of transcatheter LAAC in a population intolerant to systemic anticoagulation. In this contemporary review, we discuss the indications for transcatheter LAAC and the evidence evaluating the use of various device therapies currently available or in development. We also examine current unmet challenges in intraprocedural imaging and controversies in postimplantation antithrombotic regimens. Several ongoing seminal trials are hoping to clarify the role of transcatheter LAAC as a safe, first-line option for all patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Surgical and transcatheter left atrial appendage closure in patients with atrial fibrillation and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are at increased stroke risk in comparison to those with non-valvular AF not affected by HCM. To investigate the role of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in patients with HCM and AF. We identified patients with HCM and AF using the National Readmission Dataset. Patients were stratified based on LAAC status. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke, TIA, and all-cause mortality. The primary safety outcome was a composite of major bleeding and pericardial complications. Patients were matched using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Cox-proportional hazard regression was applied to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) on matched cohorts. We identified 71 980 patients with HCM and AF. 1351 (1.9%) patients underwent LAAC. Two hundred and eighty-seven (21.2%) underwent transcatheter LAAC. LAAC was associated with a lower risk of the primary efficacy outcome (2.5% vs. 5.4%, HR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.17-0.88; P = 0.024), the primary safety outcome (2.9% vs. 6.8%, HR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.23-0.66, P = 0.001), and reduced major bleeding. The LAAC group trended towards a lower risk of ischaemic stroke and all-cause mortality. Surgical and transcatheter LAAC was associated with a lower risk of haemorrhagic stroke and major bleeding.