As settler-colonial studies makes inroads into methodologies shaping evolving field of global Indigenous studies, curious thing has happened. Where once local and discrete marked singularity of disciplined studies, there are now calls for trans- and inter-cultural, indigenous, minoritarian, and disciplinary analyses to account for differences that subjectivities and subject positions make within violences of racialization and colonization. In context of United States, nation-state formation that makes comparative scope of essays gathered here cohere, histories of racialization and colonization have often been assumed to signify same thing. Regardless of specific label used to describe historical oppression, both are assumed to be same systematic process of othering that leads to incarceration, dispossession, disenfranchisement, and alienation within and away from larger sociopolitical communities reser ved for only select few.Certainly, as authors within this special issue can attest, what unifies transoceanic and transcontinental scope of United States' fifty states is violence through which those lands, along with people who have inhabited them, have been captured within larger political, economic, and cultural nomos of continental governmentality that has been under development since discovery of New World. Within these circuits of comparative logics that these essays have charted, then, are number of embedded assumptions. First, that settler colonialism provides conditions of possibility for encounters and that those encounters have potential to be resistant. Second, that histories of militarism and incarceration in United States build affective relationships across those experiences, especially through horizontal vectors that operate outside and beside machinations of state-sponsored land grabs. Third, that multiculturalism collapses difference into smooth trajectories of inclusion and asylum that have depended upon narratives of vanishing and indigenous dispossession. And finally, that quotidian experiences of exclusion have intimate implications that structure and suture desire, identification, and relationship with and across divisions and fractures created through discrete and local experiences of oppressions.By prioritizing sites of alternative between Asian Americans and indigenous peoples whose lands now comprise United States, including Hawai'i and Alaska, authors here seek to theorize those moments of convergence where specific histories of internment, labor, and dispossession collide with realities of an ongoing colonialism. In introduction, editors of this special issue suggest that methodological questions shaping their call for interrogating contrapuntal (after Edward Said and Mary Louise Pratt) zones (14) of United States empire center upon the move beyond settler-indigenous binary to more fruitful consideration of other forms of contact (9). Proposing juxtaposition as a hermeneutic of alternative contact, Carpenter and Yoon demonstrate that such methodology allows us to arrange and test different meanings that occur when put side by side and to clear space for subaltern voices perceived to be silent or foreclosed to peek through cracks, between lines of reportage and representation (10). Such cacophonous simultaneity, one might be tempted to observe, helps scholars consider how colonization of indigenous lands and peoples by United States functions not so much as binary between settlers and natives but through series of recognitions and misrecognitions that coerce settlers, arrivants, and natives into service as proxies, agents, and at times beneficiaries, however undesired and unwanted, of processes that have stripped land, lives, and nations away from indigenous peoples who have always been here. …
Read full abstract