General Surgery Training Research Articles

A comparison of general surgery training programmes across 11 countries: improving understanding of the experience level of international medical graduates in the UK.

Within the past five years there has been a significant increase in the number of international medical graduates (IMGs) joining the United Kingdom's (UK) workforce. Having mentors and supervisors who understand the needs of IMGs and clinical and cultural differences in the workplace can benefit in the transition to working in a new country. Improving knowledge of and understanding differences between general surgical training programmes and grades across different countries could therefore aid in the support of IMGs within the UK. Data on general surgical training programmes of the top ten countries for the primary medical qualifications of IMGs in the UK were collected to provide comparison with the UK training programme. The following countries were included: UK, India, Pakistan, Nigeria, Egypt, Ireland, Sudan, Sri Lanka, Romania, Iraq and South Africa. Training programme lengths ranged from 3 to 10 years. Only some training programmes provide additional training and qualification in sub-specialisation in general surgery. Other differences included a requirement for internship/non specialist training prior to training, differences in lengths of time spent in other surgical specialties and a requirement for research. Understanding the training programmes of other countries may help UK surgeons to understand the prior experience of IMGs and enable them to provide better training and support.

Surgical training trends in the Americas: A cross-continental assessment of minimally invasive surgery and open surgery among surgical trainees.

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has become standard of care in many high-income countries, but its adoption in low- and middle-income countries (LICs/MICs) has been impeded by resource- and training-related barriers. We hypothesized that trainees in MICs perform MIS procedures less often, and that as procedure complexity increases, the rate of MIS decreases. A 22-question survey, distributed to representative leaders across Latin America, collected country-specific graduating trainee case requirements and volumes for four index procedures (cholecystectomy, appendectomy, inguinal hernia repair, colectomy) using MIS or open surgery (OS). USA data was obtained from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were performed to determine whether the rate of MIS differed across all countries, procedure complexity classes, and high income countries (HICs)/MICs. Seven experts (70% response rate) completed the survey, representing: Brazil, Chile, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico, Panama, and Paraguay. The percentage of MIS completed by trainees varied with mean and interquartile ranges as follows: cholecystectomy (60%±54%), appendectomy (41%±69%), inguinal hernia repair (19%±23%), colectomy (16%±29%). There was a significant difference in mean MIS experience across the eight countries (H=17.6, p=0.014) and between most complex and least complex procedures (p=0.039). No difference was found between MICs and HICs (p=0.786). We found a significant difference of general surgery trainee exposure to MIS versus OS across the Americas, but the difference was not significantly associated with World Bank Income Groups. Different trainee experiences with MIS and OS may highlight an opportunity for international and bidirectional collaboration.

It's not that SIMPL—Identifying deficiencies in general surgery trainees' autonomy and competence performing parathyroidectomy and thyroidectomy

BackgroundAlthough many parathyroid and thyroid operations are performed by nonfellowship-trained general surgeons in the United States, there is growing uncertainty of whether graduating residents can perform these procedures competently. This study investigates trends in competency and autonomy among general surgery residents performing parathyroid and thyroid operations using a national survey-based dataset. MethodsA retrospective analysis of the Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning database was performed. Case data from categorical general surgery residents performing parathyroidectomy or thyroidectomy between 2015 and 2023 were included. Competent performance and meaningful autonomy were dichotomized on the basis of faculty surgeon responses. Agreement between resident and faculty evaluations were assessed. Logistic regression was used to examine resident performance and autonomy using postgraduate year level and case complexity as covariates. ResultsThe study included 907 parathyroidectomies and 1,555 thyroidectomies from 724 residents at 77 residency programs. Competent performance was observed in 34.0% of parathyroidectomies and 38.6% of thyroidectomies. Meaningful autonomy was observed in 31.6% of parathyroidectomies and 32.3% of thyroidectomies. Residents and faculty agreed on performance (50.3%) and autonomy (59.1%) in most cases, however when discordant residents often underestimated their performance (44.7%) or autonomy (25.3%). The likelihood of postgraduate year 5 residents demonstrating competent performance or meaningful autonomy was 65.9% and 51.6%, respectively for parathyroidectomy and 77.2% and 58.4%, respectively for thyroidectomy. ConclusionMany graduating residents do not demonstrate competent performance or meaningful autonomy in parathyroidectomy and thyroidectomy. Further initiatives are needed to improve graduating general surgeons' competence for these operations, given access disparities to high-volume endocrine surgeons.

The state of affairs: Assessing the scope of endocrine surgery exposure in general surgery residencies across the United States

BackgroundEndocrine surgery is a core component of general surgery training. The landscape of endocrine surgery education in surgical residency and association with entrance into endocrine surgery fellowships is unknown. MethodsIn total, 353 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education–accredited general surgery program websites were identified and categorized by US region, program type and size, and endocrine surgery educational experience type. Self-identified endocrine surgeons were defined as American Association of Endocrine Surgeons members or fellowship graduates (American Association of Endocrine Surgeons surgeons) or having a thyroid/parathyroid/adrenal practice. Programs that graduated an American Association of Endocrine Surgeons fellow from 2012 onwards were identified, and characteristics associated with endocrine surgery-experience type, self-identified endocrine or American Association of Endocrine Surgeons faculty, and entrance into endocrine surgery fellowship were assessed. ResultsIn total, 353 programs were studied. The median number of general surgery residents per program was 25, with 165 (46.7%) small programs (<25 residents) and 188 (53.3%) large (≥25) programs. There were 122 (34.6%) university-based programs, 82 (23.2%) community-based, 139 (39.4%) community-based/university-affiliated, and 10 (2.8%) military. A total 665 self-identified endocrine surgeons were identified at 303 (85.8%) programs; 15 (14.2%) programs had no self-identified endocrine surgeon. There were 361 American Association of Endocrine Surgeons surgeons located at 163 (46.2%) residency programs. In total, 323 (91.5%) programs had information on curriculum/rotations available, 58 (17.9%) with dedicated endocrine surgery educational experiences, 226 (70%) with rotations mixed with other subspecialties, and 39 (12.1%) with none reported. A total 113 (35%) general surgery programs produced a future endocrine surgery fellow and were most likely to be large (81%, P < .001), university-based (64%, P < .001) programs and were more likely to have a self-identified endocrine (102, 90.3%, P = .016) or an American Association of Endocrine Surgeons surgeon (82, 72.6%, P = .004). ConclusionProgram size and type were strongly associated with endocrine surgery exposure, presence of a self-identified endocrine surgeon, and same-site American Association of Endocrine Surgeons fellowship. Endocrine surgery educational experiences are inconsistent across residencies, and efforts are needed to ensure that surgical residents receive comprehensive, equitable endocrine surgery education.

SP8.7 - The Impact of Covid-19 on ARCP Outcomes issued to Higher Specialty Trainees in General Surgery

Abstract Aims To quantify the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the Annual Review of Competency Progression (ARCP) outcomes of higher specialty trainees in General Surgery in the UK. Methods All ARCP outcomes awarded to higher specialty trainees in General Surgery between 2017 and 2022 were collated from Intercollegiate Surgical Curriculum Programme (ISCP). Associations between year, trainee sex, age, stage of training, and outcome were explored using multivariate logistic regression models. Results A total of 7,414 outcomes issued to 1,874 trainees were analysed. The Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) of receiving a non-standard outcome in 2020 (compared to 2017) was 3.07 (95% CI:2.47–3.81, P&amp;lt;0.001) and this remained elevated through 2022 (2.11, 95% CI:1.69–2.64, P&amp;lt;0.001). Female (AOR 1.27 (95% CI: 1.13–1.43, P&amp;lt;0.001) and older trainees (1.51 (95% CI:1.34–1.70, P&amp;lt;0.001) were more likely to receive non-standard outcomes. Being at a later stage of training during the pandemic did not increase the chances of receiving non-standard outcomes (AOR 1.09, 95% CI:0.97-1.22, P=0.134), but more outcomes advising extra training time were issued to this group (15.5% versus 4.3% in 2021). There was significant regional difference in the use of Covid-19 outcomes. The awarding of non-standard outcomes rose most years, even outside of the pandemic. Conclusions The Covid-19 pandemic had significant impact on the training trajectory of UK General Surgical trainees. Female and older trainees were more likely to receive non-standard ARCP outcomes before and during Covid-19. Urgent efforts are required to restore surgical training, and addressing differential attainment is essential for success.

ThP7.8 - What is the gap in operative trauma surgical skills needed for humanitarian and military deployment? A systematic narrative review of surgeons in high-income countries

Abstract Aims The incidence of armed conflict, terrorist attacks and environmental disaster is increasing and death from traumatic injury remains a leading cause of mortality globally, posing complex challenges in surgical care. Despite advancements in trauma systems development, practice in high-income countries (HICs) is characterised by low trauma volumes, evolving non-operative strategies and increasing sub-specialisation, raising concerns about surgical preparedness for managing diverse injuries. This systematic review aims to assess the operative trauma skills of surgeons in HICs mapped against core military and humanitarian procedures. Examination of the breadth of skills acquired and identification of areas where further experience is required will inform the development of more comprehensive and adaptable surgical training programs. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted under the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using MEDLINE and EMBASE. Inclusion criteria targeted general and trauma surgery consultants or trainees in HICs, analysing quantitative and qualitative data on operative workload and skills acquisition. Results Twelve studies from the USA, UK, Netherlands, Ireland, Australia, and New Zealand were included. Trainees demonstrated experience in general surgical trauma but lack exposure to critical skills in orthopaedic, vascular and obstetric and gynaecological surgery. Conclusion This review highlights a gap in the operative trauma surgical skills of surgeons in HICs and the need for re-evaluation of surgical training curricula to address the dynamic challenges posed by contemporary trauma care. Emphasising a versatile skillset and exploring avenues for enhanced exposure through didactic courses and global surgery partnerships might prove crucial for better preparing surgeons for the diverse and demanding scenarios in the field of trauma care

FP5.2 - Skills-fade pilot study, inclusion of Return to Training Trainees in the ST3 General Surgical Bootcamp

Abstract Aims The concept of skills fade after time out of training is well recognised but there is a paucity of objective assessment of this in returning trainees. We sought to assess the utility of inclusion of returning trainees in a bootcamp by measuring performance and confidence. Methods In this pragmatic pilot study 8 General Surgery trainees returning from time out were offered a place on the ST3 Bootcamp of whom 3 agreed to participate. These trainees had been out of programme for a medical education fellowship, non-clinical research and parental leave respectively. Trainees received a 3 day period of intensive reskilling, covering open and laparoscopic skills, proctology, endoscopy, ward round managing the OP list and stressful environment. Their confidence and competence were assessed pre and post Bootcamp completion. Results Returning trainee confidence improved across the board. Trainees fed back that they found the open and laparoscopic simulation sessions most useful. All trainees objectively improved in laparoscopic skills although not in open skills or endoscopy and proctoscopy. The pressure of being assessed may have affected these finding or this may reflect a need for consistency of faculty and a more robust method of objectively assessing competence. Conclusion Inclusion of RTT trainees in surgical bootcamp improves confidence and enhances their return. Simulation should be included in a return to training programme. If objective assessment is used to evaluate their progress then this should be with predefined criteria or computer software to ensure that the evaluation is unbiased.

WP6.4 - General Surgery Bootcamp: Improving Induction for Higher General Surgery Training

Abstract Aim To create an introductory course or “bootcamp” to assist new ST3s transition from working at core trainee to General Surgical Registrar level. Method Using previous expertise of “bootcamps” delivered in the region in similar specialities, a 3-day programme was designed to offer training in areas aligned to the curriculum and considered useful to newly starting higher surgical trainees. The course involved a mix of simulation-based workshops, lectures and skill-based labs. The programme was delivered by a senior faculty directing activity with support from industry partners and medical education/simulation expertise. A range of skills were targeted using animal, virtual and augmented reality models, low and high-fidelity simulation, and non-operative technical skills (NOTSS) in simulated ward and theatre environments. Results 26 trainees (23 new General Surgery ST3s, 3 returning to training) completed the bootcamp. Feedback questionnaires using a likert scale demonstrated clear improvements in trainees’ own skill perception in endoscopy, laparoscopy, open surgery and NOTSS. 100% of responding trainees’ were confident or strongly confident post course, compared to 69% before. We also showed an increase in confidence in laparoscopic suturing (77%), duodenal ulcer repair (69%) and operating in a stressful environment. Conclusions A transitional “bootcamp” can provide both tangible and intangible benefits. This project showed clear improvement in trainee confidence both in key practical and non-practical skills such as communication. It also enabled registrars to familiarise themselves with new colleagues, facilitating an early welcome from the region and embedded support network.

The Predictive Performance of General Surgery Milestones on Post-Graduation Outcomes.

To establish whether Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones predict future performance of general surgery trainees. Milestones provide bi-annual assessments of trainee progress across six competencies. It is unknown whether the Milestones predict surgeon performance after the transition to independent practice. We performed a retrospective cohort study of surgeons with complete Milestone assessments in the fourth and fifth clinical years who treated patients in acute care hospitals within Florida, New York, and Pennsylvania, 2015-2018. To account for the multiple ways in which the Milestone assessments might predict post-graduation outcomes, we included 120 Milestones features in our elastic net machine learning models. The primary outcome was risk-adjusted patient death or serious morbidity. 278 general surgeons were included in the study. Milestone assessments 6-months into the fourth clinical year displayed a normal score distribution while multicollinearity and low score discrimination at the final assessment period were detected. Individual Milestones features from the Patient Care, Professionalism, and Systems-based Practice domains were most predictive of patient-related outcomes. For example, surgeons with worse patient outcomes had significantly lower scores in Patient Care 3 when compared to surgeons with better patient outcomes (High DSM, yes: 2.86 vs. no: 3.04, P=0.011). The Milestones features that were most predictive of better patient outcomes related to intraoperative skills, ethical principles, and patient navigation and safety, measured 12-18 months prior to graduation. The development of a parsimonious set of evidence-based Milestones that better correlate with surgeon experience could enhance surgical education.

Where are they now? An analysis of integrated cardiothoracic surgery residency applicants

Changes in cardiothoracic surgery (CTS) workforce trends have affected training paradigms to include the establishment of integrated six-year CTS residency (I6) programs. This study aimed to determine commitment of selected I6 program applicants to the specialty.Internal archives at a single institution were accessed to identify applicants interviewed for an I6 position from 2014 to 2016. A systematic internet search of publicly available information was performed to identify the trainee's current specialty. Descriptive analysis was performed.Forty-seven applicants were identified. Successful search results were achieved for 97.9 % of the applicants. One applicant was excluded, resulting in a cohort of 45. 48.9 % of the applicants successfully matched into I6 programs. Of the 23 who did not match into an I6 program, 91.3 % began a General Surgery (GS) residency. When looking solely at the GS trainees, 71.4 % sought and matched into a traditional or 4/3 CTS residency. In total, 77.8 % of the cohort are currently pursuing careers in cardiothoracic surgery.The study identified a strong continued interest in the field of CT Surgery among those interviewed for integrated residency. The methodology used in this study provided an effective way to follow career choice of applicants interviewed and could be applied by additional programs to further elucidate career choice and levels of commitment.

Development and validation of a simulation-based assessment of operative competence for higher specialist trainees in general surgery

BackgroundSimulation is increasingly being explored as an assessment modality. This study sought to develop and collate validity evidence for a novel simulation-based assessment of operative competence. We describe the approach to assessment design, development, pilot testing, and validity investigation.MethodsEight procedural stations were generated using both virtual reality and bio-hybrid models. Content was identified from a previously conducted Delphi consensus study of trainers. Trainee performance was scored using an equally weighted Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) tool and a modified Procedure-Based Assessment (PBA) tool. Validity evidence was analyzed in accordance with Messick’s validity framework. Both ‘junior’ (ST2–ST4) and ‘senior’ trainees (ST 5–ST8) were included to allow for comparative analysis.ResultsThirteen trainees were assessed by ten assessors across eight stations. Inter-station reliability was high (α = 0.81), and inter-rater reliability was acceptable (inter-class correlation coefficient 0.77). A significant difference in mean station score was observed between junior and senior trainees (44.82 vs 58.18, p = .004), while overall mean scores were moderately correlated with increasing training year (rs = .74, p = .004, Kendall’s tau-b .57, p = 0.009). A pass-fail score generated using borderline regression methodology resulted in all ‘senior’ trainees passing and 4/6 of junior trainees failing the assessment.ConclusionThis study reports validity evidence for a novel simulation-based assessment, designed to assess the operative competence of higher specialist trainees in general surgery.Graphical abstract

Near-Peer Coaching to Enhance Operative Learning: An Educational Innovation for Surgical Training.

To design, implement, and evaluate a near-peer coaching model to enhance operative learning in general surgery training. There is an urgent need to maximize operative learning in surgical education. Trainees find barriers to operative learning difficult to navigate and often sacrifice educational opportunities for the sake of impression management. A prospective cohort study was conducted over a 6-month period following design and implementation of a trainee-led near-peer coaching model; "SPICE" (Set goals, Plan, Imagine, Comment and feedback, Evaluate and reflect). Semistructured interviews were conducted to explore trainees' experiences of the model. Twelve trainees participated in the study. The near-peer coaching encounters provided trainees with the psychological safety to be honest about learning needs, validated insecurities, and mitigated the pressures associated with impression management that consistently shaped consultant-trainee relationships. Trainees described improved operative performance, increased self-confidence, and a greater ability to adapt to the unexpected. Trainees adapted the use of the SPICE model to conventional consultant-trainee dynamics, which facilitated learning conversations and negotiation of operative opportunities. On a broader scale, trainees noticed an improvement in the teaching culture of the unit, describing that the use of the model legitimized the importance of perioperative learning conversations and increased consultant enthusiasm for teaching. Near-peer coaching created a unique psychological safety that facilitated authentic reflection and goal setting and improved trainee confidence. The benefits of the SPICE model were translated to other contexts and facilitated entrustment in conventional consultant-trainee relationships.

Perceptions of general surgery residents at military treatment facilities: Excellent training with crisis of confidence.

The declining operative volume at Military Treatment Facilities (MTFs) has resulted in Program Directors finding alternate civilian sites for resident rotations. The continued shift away from MTFs for surgical training is likely to have unintended negative consequences. An anonymous survey was generated and sent to the program directors of military general surgery training programs for distribution to their residents. A total of 42 residents responded (response rate 21%) with adequate representation from all PGY years. Ninety-five percent of residents believed that their programs provided the training needed to be a competent general surgeon. However, when asked about career choices, only 30.9% reported being likely/extremely likely to remain in the military beyond their initial service obligation, while 54.7% reported that it was unlikely/extremely unlikely and 19% reported uncertainty. Eighty-eight percent reported that decreasing MTF surgical volume directly influenced their decision to stay in the military, and half of respondents regretted joining the military. When asked to assess their confidence in the military to provide opportunities for skill sustainment as a staff surgeon, 90.4% were not confident or were neutral. Although military surgical residents have a generally positive perception of their surgical training, they also lack confidence in their future military surgical careers. Our findings suggest that declining MTF surgical volume will likely negatively impact long-term retention of military surgeons and may negatively impact force generation for Operational Commander. Prognostic and Epidemiological, Level IV.

A Multidisciplinary Curriculum to Standardize Chest Procedures Training for Trainees in General Surgery, Emergency Medicine, and Critical Care.

Critical care, emergency medicine, and surgical trainees frequently perform surgical and Seldinger-technique tube thoracostomy, thoracentesis, and thoracic ultrasound. However, approaches to teaching these skills are highly heterogeneous. Over 10 years, we have developed a standardized, multidisciplinary curriculum to teach these procedures. Emergency medicine residents, surgical residents, and critical care fellows, all in the first year of their respective programs, underwent training in surgical and Seldinger chest tube placement and securement, thoracentesis, and thoracic ultrasound. The curriculum included preworkshop instructional videos and 45-minute in-person practice stations (3.5 hours total). Sessions were co-led by faculty from emergency medicine, thoracic surgery, and pulmonary/critical care who performed real-time formative assessment with standardized procedural steps. Postcourse surveys assessed learners' confidence before versus after the workshop in each procedure, learners' evaluations of faculty by station and specialty, and the workshop overall. One hundred twenty-three trainees completed course evaluations, demonstrating stable and positive responses from learners of different backgrounds taught by a multidisciplinary group of instructors, as well as statistically significant improvement in learner confidence in each procedure. Over time, we have made incremental changes to our curriculum based on feedback from instructors and learners. We have developed a unique curriculum designed, revised, and taught by a multidisciplinary faculty over many years to teach a unified approach to the performance of common chest procedures to surgical, emergency medicine, and critical care trainees. Our curriculum can be readily adapted to the needs of institutions that desire a standardized, multidisciplinary approach to thoracic procedural education.

Satisfaction and wellbeing of general surgery trainees in the Saudi Arabian residency educational environment: A mixed-methods study

BackgroundSurgical residency training is prominently demanding and stressful. This can affect the residents' wellbeing, work-life balance and increase the rates of burnout. We aimed to assess rates of satisfaction and burn-out among GS residents in the national training programs and provide a subsequent in-depth analysis of the potential reasons. MethodA sequential explanatory mixed-methods study was conducted using an online survey and virtual interviews. The validated abbreviated Maslach Burnout Inventory (aMBI) was used to assess burnout while satisfaction was assessed via 5-points Likert scale. ResultsAfter excluding incomplete responses from the total 74 received, 53 were analyzed. The average participant age was 27.4 ± 2 years, with females comprising 52 % of the sample. Junior residents made up 58.5 %, and nearly half −45 %- considered quitting GS training. Moderate to high burnout rates were noted on each aMBI subscale, ranging from 41.7 % to 62.5 %. The majority of residents expressed dissatisfaction with the level of research engagement (81.1 %), supervision, and mentorship. However, operative exposure was a source of satisfaction. Dissatisfaction rates with intra-operative learning, academia, teaching, and clinical exposure were 62.3 %, 52.8 %, 50.9 %, and 35.8 %, respectively. Interviews revealed surgical case flow and a friendly work environment as major satisfaction sources. Conversely, lack of academic supervision and suboptimal hands-on training were major dissatisfaction sources. ConclusionDissatisfaction and burn-out is prevalent among national GS training programs. Sub-optimal educational delivery and low-quality hands-on operative exposure -rather than lack of exposure to cases- seem to be the culprit.

Resident and Fellow Performance and Supervision in Surgical Oncology Procedures.

Previous research has highlighted concerns among trainees and attendings that general surgery training and fellowship are inadequately preparing trainees for practice. Providing trainees with supervision that matches their proficiency may help bridge this gap. We sought to benchmark operative performance and supervision levels among senior surgery residents (post-graduate year 4 or 5) and fellows performing general surgical oncology procedures. Observational data were obtained from the Society for Improving Medical Procedural Learning (SIMPL) OR application for core general surgical oncology procedures performed at 103 unique residency and fellowship programs. Procedures were divided into breast and soft tissue, endocrine, and hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB). Case evaluations completed by trainees and attendings were analyzed to benchmark trainee operative performance and level of supervision. There were 4,907 resident cases and 425 fellow cases. Practice-ready performance, as assessed by trainees and faculty, was achieved by relatively low proportions of residents and fellows for breast and soft tissue cases (residents: 38%, fellows: 48%), endocrine cases (residents: 22%, fellows: 41%), and HPB cases (residents: 10%, fellows: 40%). Among cases in which trainees did achieve practice-ready performance, supervision only was provided for low proportions of cases as rated by trainees (residents: 17%, fellows: 18%) and attendings (residents: 21%, fellows 25%). In a sample of 103 residency and fellowship programs, attending surgeons rarely provided senior residents and fellows with levels of supervision commensurate to performance for surgical oncology procedures, even for high performing trainees. These findings suggest a critical need for surgical training programs to prioritize providing greater levels of independence to trainees that have demonstrated excellent performance.

Laparoscopy experience in East, Central, and Southern Africa: insights from operative case volume analysis

BackgroundWith the primary objective of addressing the disparity in global surgical care access, the College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa (COSECSA) trains surgeons. While sufficient operative experience is crucial for surgical training, the extent of utilization of minimally invasive techniques during COSECSA training remains understudied.MethodsWe conducted an extensive review of COSECSA general surgery trainees' operative case logs from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2020, focusing on the utilization of minimally invasive surgical procedures. Our primary objective was to determine the prevalence of laparoscopic procedures and compare this to open procedures. We analyzed the distribution of laparoscopic cases across common indications such as cholecystectomy, appendicitis, and hernia operations. Additionally, we examined the impact of trainee autonomy, country development index, and hospital type on laparoscopy utilization.ResultsAmong 68,659 total cases, only 616 (0.9%) were laparoscopic procedures. Notably, 34 cases were conducted during trainee external rotations in countries like the United Kingdom, Germany, and India. Gallbladder and appendix pathologies were most frequent among the 582 recorded laparoscopic cases performed in Africa. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy accounted for 29% (276 of 975 cases), laparoscopic appendectomy for 3% (76 of 2548 cases), and laparoscopic hernia repairs for 0.5% (26 of 5620 cases). Trainees self-reported lower autonomy for laparoscopic (22.5%) than open cases (61.5%). Laparoscopy usage was more prevalent in upper-middle-income (2.7%) and lower-middle-income countries (0.8%) compared with lower-income countries (0.5%) (p < 0.001). Private (1.6%) and faith-based hospitals (1.5%) showed greater laparoscopy utilization than public hospitals (0.5%) (p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe study highlights the relatively low utilization of minimally invasive techniques in surgical training within the ECSA region. Laparoscopic cases remain a minority, with variations observed based on specific diagnoses. The findings suggest a need to enhance exposure to minimally invasive procedures to ensure well-rounded training and proficiency in these techniques.

Entrustable Professional Activities in Postgraduate General Surgery Training: A Scoping Review.

To provide an overview of the current use of Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) in postgraduate general surgery training internationally. Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) were introduced to connect clinical competencies and the professional activities to be entrusted to trainees on graduation. The popularity of EPAs as a framework for assessment is growing globally, including in general surgery. Anecdotally, there appears to be substantial variation in how they are implemented, yet a formal comparison of their use in postgraduate general surgery training is lacking. A scoping review was performed, based on the original five-stage approach described by Arksey and O'Malley with the addition of protocol-specific items from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Twenty-nine published and grey literature sources were included in the review. Entrustable Professional Activity use in postgraduate general surgery training was identified in 11 unique contexts, including from North America, South America, Europe, Asia, Africa, and Australia. There were substantial differences in the scope and number of EPAs, tools used for EPA assessment, and how EPAs were sequenced through training. Despite wide variation, eight distinct EPAs were common to the majority (>80%) of countries. Several articles described findings of EPA use in postgraduate general surgery training, allowing identification of multiple barriers and facilitators to integration. This review provides guidance for certification and regulatory bodies, program directors, and institutions with ambitions to implement EPAs for assessment and curricular design. In settings where EPAs are already used, the data may facilitate refinement of programs and strategies.

The Effect of Intersectionality on Attrition among US General Surgery Trainees.

To examine the association between intersectionality of race, ethnicity, and sex on retention of U.S. general surgery residents. There are limited data on the role that intersectionality plays on the US general surgery resident experience. Analysis was performed using Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) data for general surgery residents who started their training between 2005-2015 (followed through completion). Regression analyses were used to assess demographic associations with time to attrition or successful completion of residency training. Associations between faculty and resident demographics were assessed. 25,029 residents were included. Over the decade-long study period, the number of underrepresented in medicine (UIM) residents as a percentage of all residents remained similar from 17% to 19% (P=0.24). The percent of UIM males starting training in 2005 was 11% and 12% in 2015 (P-value=0.38). UIM females comprised 5.5% of trainees in 2005 and increased to 6.9% (P-value=0.003) in 2015; and female non-UIM residents increased from 23 to 28% (P-value<0.001). The overall rate of resident attrition was 15%. UIM females had the highest yearly attrition rate at 21% compared to non-UIM males at 13% (HR 1.7, P<0.001). UIM females were more likely to leave residency compared to UIM males (HR: 1.5; P<0.001). The percent of UIM faculty was positively correlated with percent of UIM residents (r=0.64, P<0.001). Increasing intersectionality is positively associated with attrition during surgery residency. The diversity of faculty appears to be associated with resident diversity.

The state of vascular surgery education in the United States.

With the growing proportion of elderly population in the US and a relatively fixed supply of well-trained vascular surgeons, there is a serious concern that we will be facing a shortage of vascular surgery workforce in the near future. One of the main reasons why there is a shortage of vascular surgeons in the US is due to the fact that many students don't get exposed to this field throughout their student lives and a recent survey of medical students from a non-urban tertiary care academic institution showed that early exposure of the medical students to the surgical careers is correlated with an increased interest in the surgical field. This review of the state of vascular surgery education in the US at the undergraduate level describes in detail the importance of an early introduction to vascular surgery in the education curricula, the current state of the education, potential avenues to improve the exposure of students to the field of vascular surgery and the importance of this effort in matching the increasing need for vascular surgeons for an aging population which is likely to require dedicated care by vascular surgeons of the future. At the present time, the two pathways by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) to obtain dedicated vascular surgery training in the US include either enrolling in a two year clinical fellowship after completion of general surgery training or to match in a five year vascular surgery integrated residency program after successful completion of medical degree.