Background: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) after Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS) has shown to improve outcomes in multiple large clinical trials. Most participating centers, however, were large academic hospitals. We studied EVT use in a community setting covering a population of 3.2 million that includes 16 teaching and non-teaching facilities of variable sizes across San Diego County. This provides one of the first comprehensive community-based analyses on early adoption of EVT. Methods: We included all AIS cases treated at an EVT-capable stroke receiving center from the San Diego County EMS Stroke Registry from July 2016 through June 2017. Documented groin puncture date and time indicated EVT treatment. We analyzed the frequency of EVT by center, baseline demographics, admission source, treatment times, use of tPA and discharge disposition. Results: In total, 3,033 AIS patients were treated from July 2016 through June 2017; 266 (8.8%) underwent EVT. The rate per center varied from 1.7 to 17.5%. The mean (±SD) initial NIHSS was 18.0 (±8.4); mean age 74.4(±14.2) years; 48.9% women, 64.7% arrived by EMS, 29.0% by interfacility transfer, 55.3% received tPA, in-hospital mortality was 15.0%, discharge to home 20.7%, to nursing facility 24.4%. Last known well (LKW) was documented in 249 cases (93.6%) of which 201 (80.7%) received EVT within 6 hours of LKW. Mean (±SD) LKW to EVT time for EMS cases was 4.9(±5.9) hours versus 5.8(±6.4) hours for interfacility transfers. The range of mean LKW to EVT was 0.7 hours to 71.4 hours (IQR=2.7-5.3 hours). Arrival to EVT time was documented in 253 cases (95.1%), of which 40.3% received EVT within 90 minutes of arrival at the treating center. The frequency of treatment within 90 minutes from arrival varied between centers from 0.0% to 63.0%. The mean (±SD) time from arrival to EVT was 2.5(±3.9) hours, ranging from 1.6 hours to 11.5 hours between centers (IQR=1.2-2.5 hours). Conclusion: Endovascular thrombectomy treatment rates vary across centers within San Diego County. The overall treatment rate is 8.8%. Nearly three in ten patients arrived to an embolectomy capable center via interfacility transfer, with slightly longer last known well to treatment times. Continued analysis will provide data to support future policy and protocol changes.
Read full abstract