Sir: We read with great interest the article entitled “Nasal Reconstruction after Malignant Tumor Resection: An Algorithm for Treatment” by Moolenburgh et al. (Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:97–105).1 This article reviews the surgical options for nasal defects and proposes an algorithm based on the authors' personal experience with 788 cases and a literature review. We would like to congratulate the authors for this excellent article that provides guidelines for nasal defects after skin cancer ablation. The authors' algorithm emphasizes various reconstructive techniques for skin only; skin and cartilage defects; and skin, cartilage, and mucosa defects. Reconstructive options were categorized also based on the location of nasal defect (i.e., dorsum, lateral sidewall, ala, columella, vestibulum nasi, and tip). Although their algorithm is invaluable, we would like to emphasize the fact that selection of a particular reconstructive option is at the discretion of the reconstructive surgeon and depends on a variety of factors such as surgical knowledge and skill, simplicity versus complexity of the procedure, patient motivation, patient comorbidities, and other factors. Obviously, the authors attempted to include the most commonly used reconstructive options for nasal defects. However, we believe that another very common technique, the banner flap,2–5 should be included among the reconstructive techniques used for nasal defects. The banner flap is a triangular skin flap that is transposed 90 degrees to cover skin-only defects less than or equal to 1.2 cm in the lateral aspect of the nose, domal-alar groove, and nasal tip (Fig. 1). However, by basing the flap opposite the defect, the flap reach is increased and larger defects can be effectively closed. The amount of skin available should be judged by pinching the skin between the index finger and thumb before its design. The banner flap is simple to use. However, there is often a need to correct the dog-ears, and maximum caution should be taken to avoid compromising the pedicle base. Also, there may be a tendency toward pincushioning, as with all rounded flaps.Fig. 1.: Application of a banner flap in a 45-year-old female patient. The banner flap is designed for use as a transposition flap to reconstruct a nasal tip defect after excision of a skin lesion as outlined.We would also like to take this opportunity to comment on skin-only defects of a specific region in the distal third of the nose, an area known as the infratip. This area that can be better observed from the basal projection of the nose is located between the tip and the apex of the nostrils. Bilobed flaps may provide coverage for the infratip area; however, dorsal scarring caused by multiple incisions on the leading surface of the nose makes the procedure less attractive. Instead, two triangular skin flaps designed to include the remaining skin of the infratip lobule and the anteroinferior surfaces of the alar sidewalls based on the columella can be used for isolated defects (Fig. 2). These flaps are suitable for defects 10 to 12 mm in diameter in both the tip and the infratip regions. However, in some individuals, the width of the columella and infratip lobule may not be sufficient to raise these flaps.6Fig. 2.: The design of two triangular flaps after excision of a basal cell carcinoma in a 65-year-old female patient. These two triangular flaps are raised to be used as transposition-advancement flaps to reconstruct the nasal defect.Raffi Gurunluoglu, M.D., Ph.D. Susan A. Williams, P.A.-C. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Denver Health Medical Center University of Colorado Health Sciences Denver, Colo.
Read full abstract