Abstract Introduction The 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines recommend stringent low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets of ≤55 mg/dL for very high-risk patients and ≤40 mg/dL for those with multiple events within two years. Despite the availability of potent lipid-lowering therapies (LLT), therapeutic inertia—a failure to intensify treatment in patients not achieving targets—remains a major barrier to achieving these goals. Objective This study assessed the proportion of secondary cardiovascular prevention patients meeting LDL-C targets and evaluated the adequacy of proposed LLT modifications for those not at target. The role of percentage distance from LDL-C targets as a predictor of therapeutic inertia was also analyzed. Methods A multicenter, cross-sectional observational study was conducted, retrospectively analyzing medical records of 1909 ambulatory outpatients evaluated in 9 Italian cardiac rehabilitation/secondary cardiovascular prevention clinics from January 2023 to June 2024. Inclusion criteria included a prior history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and recent LDL cholesterol levels. Data collected included demographics, ASCVD presentation, lipid profiles, and LLT. Patients were considered at very high cardiovascular risk, with LDL cholesterol targets of ≤55 mg/dL, or ≤40 mg/dL for those with recurrent events within two years. For patients not at target, the clinician’s approach to LLT modification was recorded. The efficacy of LLT changes was estimated using established reduction percentages for different therapies. Results Among 1909 patients, 41.3% achieved the LDL cholesterol target. Multivariate analysis identified male gender, cardiac rehabilitation participation, recent acute coronary syndrome, diabetes mellitus, and triple therapy (statin + ezetimibe + PCSK9 inhibitors) as predictors of achieving LDL targets. Conversely, a target level of ≤40 mg/dL, absence of therapy, and monotherapy were negative predictors. Among 1074 patients not at target, only 48.6% had LLT modifications proposed. Positive independent predictors for LLT modification included recent ASCVD events, participation in cardiac rehabilitation, and a greater percentage distance from the LDL target, while advanced age and an LDL target of ≤40 mg/dL were negative predictors. Despite therapy modifications, only 42.3% were predicted to be appropriate and to achieve their LDL targets. Conclusion Despite the diffusion of 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines, a significant proportion of high-risk patients still did not achieve LDL cholesterol targets, and proposed LLT modifications were often insufficient to reach the desired levels. More aggressive or optimized therapy adjustments are necessary to improve outcomes in this population.
Read full abstract- All Solutions
Editage
One platform for all researcher needs
Paperpal
AI-powered academic writing assistant
R Discovery
Your #1 AI companion for literature search
Mind the Graph
AI tool for graphics, illustrations, and artwork
Journal finder
AI-powered journal recommender
Unlock unlimited use of all AI tools with the Editage Plus membership.
Explore Editage Plus - Support
Overview
276 Articles
Published in last 50 years
Articles published on Absence Of Therapy
Authors
Select Authors
Journals
Select Journals
Duration
Select Duration
240 Search results
Sort by Recency