A classical problem in the theory of minimal submanifolds of Euclidean spaces is to understand whether a minimal submanifold exists with a prescribed behavior at infinity, or to determine from the asymptotes the geometry of the whole submanifold. Beyond the intrinsic interest of these questions, they are also of crucial importance when studying the possible singularities of minimal submanifolds in general Riemannian manifolds. For minimal surfaces, i.e., two-dimensional submanifolds, the standard tool to solve these problems is given by the Weierstrass representation formula, which relates the geometry of the minimal surface to complex analytic properties of holomorphic 1-forms on Riemann surfaces. Recently gluing techniques have been developed that provide an abundant number of new examples of minimal hypersurfaces in Euclidean space. For higher-dimensional minimal submanifolds such a link clearly disappears and no complex analysis can be put into play. Although gluing techniques have been extensively used in the study of minimal hypersurfaces, they have not been adapted to handle higher codimensional submanifolds. The aim of this paper is to use a gluing technique for minimal submanifolds to make a step toward understanding these questions in higher codimension. More precisely, we will restrict ourselves to the case of real n-dimensional submanifolds of Cn . There are two main reasons for doing so. The first one comes from the fact that when trying to desingularize the intersection, for example, of a pair of n-planes that give the desired asymptotic behavior, one needs a model of a minimal submanifold with this behavior at infinity to rescale and to glue into the pair of planes where a neighborhood of the intersection is removed. This local model needs to be sufficiently simple to allow a detailed study of the linearized mean curvature operator. In our situation this is provided by a generalization of an area-minimizing submanifold found by Lawlor in [12], while in more general cases such an example is not known. The second reason is that, among minimal n-submanifolds ofCn , there is a
Read full abstract