Objective: To compare the benefits of teacher training between graduates of the Institutional Scholarship Program for Teaching Initiation (PIBID) and interns, analyzing their experiences, learning processes, and impacts on teaching practice. Theoretical Framework: Based on authors such as Tardif, Zeichner, and Gatti, who discuss the need to integrate theory and practice in teacher education. The gap between universities and schools and the emphasis on practical experience are central issues. Programs like PIBID emerge as strategies to bridge the gap between theoretical training and real-world practice, providing concrete classroom experiences. Method: A cross-sectional survey study with a qualitative approach, in which 40 participants answered a questionnaire, and 5 were interviewed. Data analysis was conducted using the Theory of Meaningful Nuclei, grounded in Socio-Historical Psychology. Results and Discussion: Mandatory internships are mostly observational and bureaucratic, offering little autonomy to pre-service teachers. In contrast, PIBID provides more active and formative experiences, promoting greater engagement in teaching practice. The lack of articulation between universities and schools limits the effectiveness of internships, whereas PIBID strengthens this connection. Research Implications: This study contributes to the improvement of initial teacher training, supporting curricular reforms and educational policies that value teaching practice and mitigate the precarization of the profession. Originality/Value: This research stands out for its comparative analysis of PIBID and traditional internships, addressing pedagogical impacts and working conditions. The results reinforce the need to reformulate internships and expand programs that integrate theory and practice.
Read full abstract