In 1984, Abbott Laboratories introduced a radiative energy attenuation (REA) assay for the determination of ethanol on the TDX analyzer. The author's laboratory evaluated this method and compared its results with those obtained by a commonly used gas-liquid chromatographic (GLC) technique and the Du Pont aca. The REA method was found to be accurate, reproducible, and easy to use (1). Recently, Abbott reformulated the ethanol assay by replacing the iodonitrotetrazolium violet (INT) dye with thiazolyl blue (3-[4,5-dimethyl thiazol-2yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide). The reason for this reformulation, according to the manufacturer, was to eliminate the probe wash protocol recommended after every run with the original REA ethanol assay. This wash, which used a 10% tetraethylammonium hydroxide solution, was necessary to remove small amounts of dye retained in the probe following the use of the INT-based assay. The introduction of the thiazolyl blue (MTT) notwithstanding, the Abbott REA ethanol assay using the linked enzymecatalytic reactions of alcohol dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.1) and diaphorase (EC 1.6.4.3, dihydrolipoamide reductase (NAD +)] is identical to the original assay. The reduced MTT yields a purple color with an absorbance peak at 565 nm which overlaps the excitation and emission spectrum of fluorescein (a fluorescent indicator added to the reaction having an excitation peak at 485 nm and an emission peak at 525 nm). The fluorescence intensity decreases logarithmically with increasing concentrations of reduced MTT making the concentration of ethanol proportional to the degree of inner filter effect on the fluorophore. The new REA formulation for determining ethanol was evaluated and its results compared with those obtained by GLC and an ethanol-specific enzymatic method performed on the Du Pont aca. Ethanol concentrations obtained by the MTT reagent system were also compared directly to results obtained by the original REA ethanol assay. The sample collection protocols and the analytical procedures used in this evaluation were identical to those used in the previous evaluation (1). Correlations between the various methods were determined by least-squares linear regression analysis of the experimentally obtained values using NWA Statpak | (Northwest Analytical, Inc.) on an Apple Macintosh TM computer (Apple Computer, Inc.).
Read full abstract