Target Vessel Failure Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of bioresorbable vascular scaffold Absorb: 6-month outcomes of GABI-R: Russia registry

Aim. The paper demonstrates the interim analysis of efficacy and safety after everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) Absorb implantation in “real-world patients” with coronary artery disease.Methods. A cohort of 500 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for stable chest pain or acute coronary syndrome with implantation of at least one BVS (Absorb, Abbott Vascular) and followed up by telephone interview and review of medical charts were included in a singlecenter, prospective, all-comers, first in Russia registry. The primary endpoint, target vessel failure, defined as the combination of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target vessel revascularization and secondary endpoints, MACCE (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass surgery, target vessel revascularization, stroke) and stent thrombosis, were assessed during 6-month follow-up.Results. A total of 500 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) (stable CAD 54.4%, acute coronary syndrome 45.6%) and different amount of affected vessels (1 vessel CAD 40.8%, n = 204; 2-vessel CAD 32.8%, n = 164; 3-vessel CAD 26.4%, n = 132) received 664 scaffolds and 55 stents in 603 stenoses. Procedure success, defined as a residual stenosis less than 30% and TIMI 3 flow in target vessel at the end of procedure, was observed in 98.51% (n = 594). At the moment of 6-month follow-up 4.2% (n = 24) of patients were lost to contact. After 6 months, incidence of target vessel failure and MACCE was 4.2% (n = 21) and 5% (n = 25). The cumulative rate of definite/probable scaffold thrombosis was 1.6% (n = 8).Conclusion. The interim analysis of Gabi-R: Russia registry, the largest trial of BVS Absorb implantation in routine clinical practice, showed high procedural success and low incidence of adverse events during follow-up. However, a tendency to high incidence of scaffold thrombosis compared to drug-eluting stents can be observed. Considering the long-term results of randomized trials retrospective registries, safety in terms of BVS routine use is of big concern. Longterm 24-month data regarding safety endpoints are required to test the afore-mentioned suggestion. Received 5 January 2019. Revised 28 March 2019. Accepted 29 March 2019.Funding: The study did not have sponsorship.Conflict of interest: Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Three-year outcome of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus everolimus-eluting metallic stents: a comprehensive updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

ABSTRACTIntroduction: In recent years, everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold stents (EE-BRS) were developed as alternative to everolimus-eluting metallic stents (EES) for coronary artery disease (CAD) treatments.Areas covered: Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, EBSCO, Springer, Ovid, TCTMD, Cardiosource, Clinical Trial Results and the Cochrane Library with combined key words such as bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS), everolimus-eluting metallic stents, EES, coronary artery disease, CAD and randomized-Controlled Trials.Finally, 5,474 patients were enrolled for comparison of device-induced thrombosis, ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR), device-oriented composite endpoints (DOCE), patient-oriented composite endpoints (POCE), and target vessel failure (TVF) between EE-BRS and EES treatments. The primary literature search retrieved 200 records.Expert Opinion: There was no difference regarding DOCEs, POCEs and ID-TLRs for 1 or 2 years, whereas there were significant differences regarding thrombosis between EE-BRS and EES interventions in the 1-year (pooled HR, 2.15, 95%CI: 1.11, 4.18) and 2-year follow-ups (pooled HR, 2.02, 95%CI: 1.08, 3.78), but not in the 3-year follow-up (pooled HR, 1.57, 95%CI: 0.66, 3.75) anymore. The results of this study showed no inferiority of EE-BRS regarding TVF, DOCE, POCE and ID-TLR 1-year and 2-years after interventions, but enhanced risk of thrombosis in the EE-BRS patients, which disappeared in 3-year follow-ups.

A Systematic Literature Review of Three Stenting Strategies for Bifurcation Lesions in Coronary Artery Disease.

BackgroundBifurcation lesions represent 15–20% of all patients undergoing a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary artery disease. The provisional 1-stent stenting strategy is the preferred strategy to treat bifurcation lesions. Other strategies used to treat bifurcation lesions include 2-stent complex stenting strategies and the Tryton Side Branch Stent® (TSB)—a dedicated side-branch stent for bifurcation lesions, which gained FDA approval in March 2017.ObjectivesTo conduct a systematic literature review of the safety and effectiveness of three stenting strategies (provisional, complex, and Tryton Side Branch Stent®) for bifurcation lesions with a side-branch diameter ≥2.25 mm, undergoing PCI.MethodsLiterature searches in Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Embase were conducted to identify prospective clinical trials from January 2007–July 2017.Results602 articles were identified. Nine articles (6275 patients) met all inclusion criteria. Seven studies (5282 patients) compared provisional to complex stenting strategies. Two studies (993 patients) compared provisional to the TSB. Outcomes of interest reported were target vessel failure in 2 studies, major adverse cardiac event (MACE) (cardiac death, all myocardial infarction, ischemic driven target legion revascularization TLR) in 5 studies. For target vessel failure, the provisional strategy ranged from 5.6% to 15.6 %; complex at 7.2% (one study); and TSB from 11.3% to 17.4%. For MACE, provisional strategy ranged from 8%–13.2%; complex from 11.9%–15.2%; and TSB from 8.2%–18.6%.ConclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first review comparing three bifurcation lesion stenting strategies. Significant heterogeneity in the study design of the nine studies reviewed prevented a meta-analysis. A clinical trial comparing the TSB to both the provisional and complex strategies would provide better inference on the safety and effectiveness when comparing strategies.

A Systematic Literature Review of Three Stenting Strategies for Bifurcation Lesions in Coronary Artery Disease

Background: Bifurcation lesions represent 15-20% of all patients undergoing a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary artery disease. The provisional 1-stent stenting strategy is the preferred strategy to treat bifurcation lesions. Other strategies used to treat bifurcation lesions include 2-stent complex stenting strategies and the Tryton Side Branch Stent® (TSB)—a dedicated side-branch stent for bifurcation lesions, which gained FDA approval in March 2017. Objectives: To conduct a systematic literature review of the safety and effectiveness of three stenting strategies (provisional, complex, and Tryton Side Branch Stent®) for bifurcation lesions with a side-branch diameter ≥2.25 mm, undergoing PCI. Methods: Literature searches in Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Embase were conducted to identify prospective clinical trials from January 2007-July 2017. Results: 602 articles were identified. Nine articles (6275 patients) met all inclusion criteria. Seven studies (5282 patients) compared provisional to complex stenting strategies. Two studies (993 patients) compared provisional to the TSB. Outcomes of interest reported were target vessel failure in 2 studies, major adverse cardiac event (MACE) (cardiac death, all myocardial infarction, ischemic driven target legion revascularization TLR) in 5 studies. For target vessel failure, the provisional strategy ranged from 5.6% to 15.6 %; complex at 7.2% (one study); and TSB from 11.3% to 17.4%. For MACE, provisional strategy ranged from 8%-13.2%; complex from 11.9%-15.2%; and TSB from 8.2%-18.6%. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first review comparing three bifurcation lesion stenting strategies. Significant heterogeneity in the study design of the nine studies reviewed prevented a meta-analysis. A clinical trial comparing the TSB to both the provisional and complex strategies would provide better inference on the safety and effectiveness when comparing strategies.

Fractional flow reserve guided percutaneous coronary intervention optimization directed by high-definition intravascular ultrasound versus standard of care: Rationale and study design of the prospective randomized FFR-REACT trial

Post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a significant predictor of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). The rationale for low post procedural FFR values often remains elusive based on angiographic findings alone, warranting further assessment using an FFR pullback or additional intravascular imaging. It is currently unknown if additional interventions intended to improve the PCI, decrease MACE rates. The FFR REACT trial is a prospective, single-center randomized controlled trial in which 290 patients with a post PCI FFR <0.90 will be randomized (1:1) to either standard of care (no additional intervention) or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-directed optimization of the FFR (treatment arm). Eligible patients are those treated with angiographically successful PCI for (un)stable angina or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (MI). Assuming 45% of patients will have a post PCI FFR <0.90, approximately 640 patients undergoing PCI will need to be enrolled. Patients with a post PCI FFR ≥ 0.90 will be enrolled in a prospective registry. The primary end point is defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel MI and clinically driven target vessel revascularisation (target vessel failure) at 1 year. Secondary end points will consist of individual components of the primary end point, procedural success, stent thrombosis and correlations on clinical outcome, changes in post PCI Pd/Pa and FFR and IVUS derived dimensions. All patients will be followed for 3 years. The FFR-REACT trial is designed to explore the potential benefit of HD-IVUS-guided PCI optimization in patients with a post PCI FFR <0.90 (Dutch trial register: NTR6711).

Randomised evaluation of a novel biodegradable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the MASTER study.

The MASTER study was designed to compare the performance of a new biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) with a bare metal stent (BMS) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The study was a prospective, randomised (3:1), controlled, single-blind multicentre trial that enrolled 500 STEMI patients within 24 hours of symptom onset during 2013-2015. Three hundred and seventy-five patients were treated with BP-SES and 125 with BMS. One hundred and four (104) randomised patients underwent angiographic follow-up at six months. The primary clinical endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF), defined as cardiac death, MI not clearly attributable to a non-target vessel, or clinically driven target vessel revascularisation (TVR) at 12 months. The primary angiographic endpoint was in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) at six months in the angiographic cohort. The major secondary endpoint for safety was a composite of all-cause death, recurrent MI, unplanned infarct-related artery revascularisation, stroke, definite stent thrombosis (ST) or major bleeding at one month. At 12 months, TVF had occurred in 6.1% of BP-SES and 14.4% of BMS patients (pnon-inferiority=0.0004), mainly driven by a higher rate of repeat revascularisation in BMS patients. The safety endpoint occurred in 3.5% of BP-SES and 7.2% of BMS patients (p=0.127). In-stent LLL demonstrated the superiority (p=0.0125) of BP-SES (0.09±0.43 mm) over BMS (0.79±0.67 mm). The study showed clinical non-inferiority and angiographic superiority of BP-SES versus a comparator BMS, suggesting that this novel DES may be a potential treatment option in STEMI.

The Adverse Events Rate of Endothelial Progenitor Cell Capturing Stent in the Treatment of CAD Patients.

Circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) have regenerative capacities and play an important role in vessel wall homeostasis. When attracted to the site of vessel wall injury, EPCs rapidly differentiate into a functional layer as part of the healing process. The Genous TM endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) capturing stent is coated with anti-human CD34+ antibodies which combine with circulating EPCs from the peripheral blood to the stent surface. This meta-analysis aims to explore the Genous TM endothelial progenitor cell capturing stent in coronary artery disease (CAD) adverse event rate after one-year follow-up. PubMed, EMBASE and, Google Scholar databases were searched for eligible studies. CAD survival data and clinicopathological features were analyzed by expected shortfall (ES) and 95% CI. Fixed-effect model and random-effect model are used for summary statistics. 12 studies, including 15985 coronary artery disease (CAD) patients who received PCI treatment were included in this study. After 1-year follow-up, the rate of adverse event showed that the target vessel failure (TVF) was 8.5% (7.6%-17.4%), target vessel revascularization was 4.1% (TVR, 0-15.6%), target lesion revascularization was 4.2% (TLR, 3.7%-22%), myocardial infarction was 2.0% (MI, 1.8%-5.2%), major adverse cardiac events was 8.7% (MACE, 6.4%-28%), and the all-cause death was 4.0% (0-9.2). After one-year follow-up, the incidence rate of Genous stent adverse events was stable in CAD patients. The study showed a better evaluation of Genous stent, and it provides a better reference for CAD clinical treatment.

Clinical Outcomes at 2 Years Between Beta-Blockade with ACE Inhibitors or ARBs in Patients with AMI Who Underwent Successful PCI with DES: A Retrospective Analysis of 23,978 Patients in the Korea AMI Registry.

Data concerning the clinical impact of combination therapy with β-blockers (BBs) + angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) compared with BBs + angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) are limited. We compared the clinical outcomes at 2years between these two combination therapies. We enrolled 23,978 patients with AMI who underwent successful PCI with DES between January 2005 and June 2015 from the Korea AMI Registry (KAMIR) and divided them into the two groups: BB + ACEI (n = 17,310) and BB + ARB (n = 6668). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (re-MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and non-TVR. The secondary endpoints were the cumulative incidences of individual components of MACE and target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of death related to the target vessel, re-MI, or clinically driven TVR. The relative risk of MACE was higher in the BB + ARB group than in the BB + ACEI group after propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 1.204; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.057-1.370; p = 0.005). The relative risks of all-cause death (HR 1.435 [95% CI 1.117-1.845]; p = 0.005), cardiac death (HR 1.733 [95% CI 1.253-2.396]; p = 0.001), TVR (HR 1.437 [95% CI 1.157-1.784]; p = 0.001), and TVF (HR 1.231 [95% CI 1.065-1.424]; p = 0.005) were also higher in the BB + ARB group after PSM. The BB + ACEI group demonstrated reduced cumulative incidences of MACE, all-cause death, cardiac death, TVR, and TVF compared with the BB + ARB group in patients with AMI who underwent successful PCI with DES during a 2-year follow-up period.

Adverse events in patients with high platelet reactivity following successful chronic total occlusion PCI: The Assessment of Dual AntiPlatelet Therapy with Drug-Eluting Stents (ADAPT-DES) study

Chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) typically requires a greater number of stents and longer stent length than non-CTO PCI, placing these patients at greater risk for adverse ischemic events. We sought to determine whether the association between high platelet reactivity (HPR) and the risk of ischemic events is stronger after CTO than non-CTO PCI. Patients undergoing successful PCI in the multicenter ADAPT-DES study were stratified according to whether they underwent PCI of a CTO. HPR was defined as VerifyNow platelet reaction units >208. The study primary endpoint was the 2-year risk target vessel failure ([TVF] defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization). CTO PCI was performed in 400 of 8448 patients. HPR was present in 34.5% of CTO PCI patients and 43.1% of non-CTO PCI patients (P = .0007). Patients undergoing CTO PCI with versus without HPR had significantly higher 2-year rates of TVF (15.0% versus 8.3%, P = .04) without significant differences in bleeding. HPR was an independent predictor of 2-year TVF (adjusted HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.34, P = .03) whereas CTO PCI was not (adjusted HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.65-1.22, P = .48). There was a significant interaction between CTO versus non-CTO PCI and PRU as a continuous variable for 2-year TVF (Pinteraction = 0.02). In ADAPT-DES, HPR was associated with an increased 2-year risk of TVF after PCI, an association that was at least as strong after CTO PCI compared with non-CTO PCI.

Frailty score for elderly patients is associated with short-term clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

ObjectiveConsistent with the aging population in the Western world, there is a growing number of elderly patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the recommended reperfusion strategy in elderly patients; risk models to determine which of these patients are prone to have poor clinical outcomes are, however, essential. The purpose of this study was to assess the association between frailty and short-term mortality and PCI-related serious adverse events (SAE) in elderly patients.MethodsAll STEMI patients (aged ≥70 years) treated with primary PCI in 2013–2015 at the Leiden University Medical Centre were assessed. The Safety Management Programme (VMS) score was used to identify frail elderly patients. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality; the secondary endpoint included 30-day clinical death, target vessel failure, major bleeding, contrast induced kidney insufficiency and stroke.ResultsA total of 206 patients were included (79 ± 6.4 years, 119 [58%] male). The VMS score was ≥1 in 28% of all cases. Primary and secondary endpoint rates were 5 and 23% respectively. VMS score ≥1 was an independent predictor for both 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR] 9.6 [95% confidence interval, CI 1.6–56.9] p-value = 0.013) and 30-day SAE (OR 2.9 [95% CI 1.1–7.9] p-value = 0.038).ConclusionsVMS score for frailty is independently associated with short-term mortality and PCI-related SAE in elderly patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI. These results suggest that frailty in elderly patients is an important feature to measure and to be taken into account when developing risk models.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s12471-019-1240-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Differential cutoff points and clinical impact of stent parameters of various drug-eluting stents for predicting major adverse clinical events: An individual patient data pooled analysis of seven stent-specific registries and 17,068 patients

BackgroundStent parameters (length and diameter) are well-known risk factors for adverse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting. This study aimed to investigate the differential cutoff criteria and clinical impact of the length and diameter of various drug-eluting stents (DES) for predicting major cardiovascular events. MethodsUsing patient-level data from seven stent-specific, prospective DES registries, we evaluated 17,068 patients who underwent PCI with either various contemporary DES or first-generation DES between July 2007 and July 2015: 3053 treated with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES), 2976 with platinum-chromium EES (PtCr-EES), 2888 with Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (Re-ZES), 782 with Biomatrix biolimus-eluting stents (Bi-BES), 1868 with Nobori BES (No-BES), 1934 with Xience Prime cobalt-chromium EES (Pr-CoCr-EES), and 3567 with first-generation sirolimus-eluting stents (SES). Two clinical outcomes were assessed: target-vessel failure (TVF; a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization [TVR]) and TVR. ResultsStent length and stent diameter were important factors for predicting TVF or TVR in the entire cohort and in each DES cohort. For TVF risk prediction, the Youden index-based cutoff of stent length was highest with Bi-BES (45.0 mm) and lowest with No-BES (29.0 mm), and the cutoff of stent diameter was smallest with Pr-CoCr-EES (2.78 mm) and largest with No-BES (3.20 mm). For TVR risk prediction, the cutoff of stent length was the highest with PtCr-EES (48.0 mm) and the lowest with No-BES (29.0 mm), and the cutoff of stent diameter was smallest with CoCr-EES (2.72 mm) and largest with first-generation SES (3.30 mm). The 3-year TVF and TVR rates were substantially different according to the presence or absence of long lesions and small vessels determined using these cutoff points. ConclusionsFor contemporary PCI practice involving diverse types of DES, we identified differential cutoff points of stent length and diameter for predicting adverse clinical outcomes. The clinical impact of these stent parameters on outcomes and its magnitude varied according to different DES.Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01186133.

Temporal changes in characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes of coronary bifurcation lesion interventions.

Coronary bifurcations are common in daily practice of percutaneous coronary intervention and remain one of the most challenging lesions, but it is still unknown how characteristics, treatment strategy, and outcomes have changed over the last decade of drug-eluting stents (DES) era. We evaluated characteristics of treatment pattern and outcomes for patients with bifurcation disease over time in real-world clinical practice. A total of 7282 patients with coronary bifurcation lesions were pooled from the Interventional Cardiology Research Incorporation Society-Drug-Eluting Stents registry and the Interventional Research Incorporation Society-Left MAIN registry. Primary outcome was a target-vessel failure (TVF), defined as a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target-vessel revascularization. Among the total population, 2232 (30.7%) had left main bifurcation lesions. The use of one-stent strategy was more frequent in conjunction with second-generation DES (86.2 vs. 13.8%) than with first-generation DES (65.4 vs. 34.6%). Two-stent strategy was associated with a higher risk of TVF as compared with one-stent strategy [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12-1.47, P<0.001]. However, the risk of TVF with two-stent strategy relative to one-stent strategy has decreased from the first-generation DES (HR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.22-1.99, P<0.001) to the second-generation DES (HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.94-1.34, P=0.19). For patients with bifurcation disease, stenting strategy has become more simpler and percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes have more improved over time. One-stent strategy relative to two-stent strategy was associated with better clinical outcomes, but the advantage of one-stent strategy was less pronounced with the use of second-generation DES.

Trends and outcomes of optical coherence tomography use: 877 patients single-center experience.

Optical-coherence-tomography (OCT) is an emerging invasive coronary imaging with still undefined clinical value. Recent data have underlined daily impact of such technique in several clinical settings such as acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guidance. We aimed at assessing the trends and outcomes of OCT use in a high-volume percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI)-center. Over 6 years, 1025 coronary artery segments in 877 patients underwent OCT evaluation. Clinical and procedural characteristics were prospectively collected. Clinical setting for OCT was: "Diagnostic OCT" (OCT for lesion evaluation after coronary angiography without further PCI); "PCI-guidance OCT" (OCT as a guidance for complex PCI, both by intention or after diagnostic OCT). Primary study end-point was the occurrence of target-vessel-failure (TVF) during the follow-up. Overall, OCT was successful in 99.1% of attempted lesions. Only one complication (coronary dissection requiring urgent PCI) occurred during OCT. After a follow-up of 695 ± 562 days, TVF occurred in 8.2% of cases. Despite similar baseline characteristics, TVF-free survival curves were different in the two populations (5.4% after diagnostic OCT and 9.9% after PCI-guidance OCT). Minimal-lumen-area (MLA) of target lesion was independently associated with TVF (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.8). This was mainly driven by a significant impact of MLA in patients not revascularized (HR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.9). TVF did not change according to the study period despite the selection of patients with increasing complexity. OCT has a good safety profile across a broad spectrum of patients encountered in daily practice. The easy-to-assess MLA parameter may help stratify prognosis of patients undergoing OCT. These data call for further evaluations of OCT clinical impact. OCT is a light-based imaging tool which had subvert the quite ordinary world of coronary imaging and the present study evaluates OCT use in a high-volume center. Our results suggest that application of OCT in "real world" patients presenting higher risk has a good safety profile. Several factors could predict a worse long-term outcome in patients undergoing OCT evaluation, mostly related to more complex clinical conditions. These findings could encourage even low-to intermediate volume centers to improve their OCT use in daily practice.

Outcomes of the Tryton-dedicated bifurcation stent for the treatment of true coronary bifurcations: Individual-patient-data pooled analysis.

We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the dedicated Tryton side branch (SB) stent for the treatment of true bifurcations involving large SBs. Bifurcation lesions are associated with lower procedural success and a higher risk of adverse cardiac events. Provisional stenting (PS) is currently the default approach for the treatment of bifurcation lesions. The Tryton stent is a dedicated bifurcation stent system for the treatment of true bifurcation lesions. We performed an individual-patient-data pooled post-hoc analysis of the Tryton Pivotal randomized controlled trial and post-approval Confirmatory Study. Only patients with true bifurcations involving a SB ≥ 2.25 mm in diameter were included. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of Tryton compared with PS for target vessel failure (TVF) at 1 year. Of the 411 patients meeting the criteria for enrolment, 287 patients were treated with the Tryton stent and 124 with PS. Procedural success was higher in the Tryton group (95.4 versus 82.3%, P < 0.0001). TVF at 1 year was 8.1% in the Tryton group and 9.7% in the PS group, meeting the pre-specified criteria for non-inferiority established for the randomized controlled trail (pnon-inferiority = 0.02). At 9-month angiographic follow-up, SB diameter stenosis was significantly lower in the Tryton group (29.3 ± 21.9 versus 41.1 ± 17.5, P = 0.0008) and in-segment binary restenosis (diameter stenosis ≥ 50%) was higher in the PS group (19.0 versus 34.2%, respectively, P = 0.052). In patients with true bifurcations involving a large SB, treatment with the Tryton SD Stent was clinically non-inferior to PS and showed favorable angiographic outcomes.

Clinical outcomes in unselected patients treated with the PROMUS Element platinum-chromium, everolimus-eluting stent: Final five-year results from the PE PROVE Study.

The goal of this analysis was to evaluate the final 5-year safety and effectiveness of the PROMUS Element platinum-chromium everolimus-eluting stent in unselected patients treated in routine clinical practice. The prospective, open-label PROMUS Element™ European Post-Approval Surveillance Study (PE-PROVE) enrolled 1,010 "real-world" patients who received the PROMUS Element stent. Adverse event rates were low at 1-year, and the incidence of stent thrombosis was 0.6%. The primary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF; overall and PE stent-related), a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) related to the target vessel, or target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 1-year post-implantation. Five-year clinical outcomes were evaluated in overall as well as high-risk patient subgroups. The overall 5-year TVF rate was 14.9%, with 7.0% being related to the study stent. Cardiac death, MI and TVR related to the study stent occurred in 0.5%, 3.2%, and 5.7%, respectively. Stent thrombosis through 5-year follow-up was 1.0%. The rates of overall and study stent related TVF were numerically higher in patients with medically treated diabetes, long lesions (≥28 mm), and small diameter vessels (≤2.5 mm) compared to the overall study population. Additionally, favorable stent thrombosis rates through 5 years were reported for the PROMUS Element stent in these high-risk subgroups. The final 5-year data from the PE-PROVE study demonstrate favorable outcomes and low rates of adverse events with the PE stent when used in "real-world" patients with coronary artery disease.

Prognostic Implications of Relative Increase and Final Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Stent Implantation

ObjectivesThe study sought to investigate the prognostic implications of relative increase of fractional flow reserve (FFR) with PCI in combination with post–percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) FFR. BackgroundFFR, measured after PCI has been shown to possess prognostic implications. The relative increase of FFR with PCI can be determined by the interaction of baseline disease pattern, adequacy of PCI, and residual disease burden in a target vessel. However, the role of relative increase of FFR with PCI has not yet been evaluated. MethodsA total of 621 patients who underwent PCI using second-generation drug-eluting stents based on low pre-PCI FFR (≤0.80) and available post-PCI FFR were analyzed. The relative increase of FFR was calculated by %FFR increase with PCI ([post-PCI FFR – pre-PCI FFR]/pre-PCI FFR × 100). Patients were divided according to the optimal cutoff values of post-PCI FFR (<0.84) and %FFR increase (≤15%). The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF) (a composite of cardiac death, target vessel–related myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target vessel revascularization) at 2 years. ResultsAmong the total population, 66.0% showed high post-PCI FFR (≥0.84) and 69.2% showed high %FFR increase (>15%). Patients with low post-PCI FFR showed a higher risk of 2-year TVF than did those with high post-PCI FFR (9.1% vs. 2.6%; hazard ratio [HR]: 3.367; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.412 to 8.025; p = 0.006). Patients with low %FFR increase also showed a higher risk of 2-year TVF compared with those with high %FFR increase (9.2% vs. 3.0%; HR: 3.613; 95% CI: 1.543 to 8.458; p = 0.003). Among the high post-PCI FFR group, there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes according to %FFR increase. Conversely, among the low post-PCI FFR group, those with low %FFR increase showed a significantly higher risk of TVF than did those with high %FFR increase (14.3% vs. 4.1%; HR: 4.334; 95% CI: 1.205 to 15.594; p = 0.025). Percent FFR increase significantly increased discriminant and reclassification ability for the occurrence of TVF when added to a model with clinical risk factors and post-PCI FFR (C-index 0.783 vs. 0.734; relative integrated discrimination improvement 0.702; p = 0.009; category-free net reclassification index 0.479; p = 0.031). ConclusionsPercent FFR increase with PCI showed similar prognostic implications with post-PCI FFR. Adding the relative increase of FFR to post-PCI FFR would enable better discrimination of high-risk patients after stent implantation. (Influence of FFR on the Clinical Outcome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PERSPECTIVE]; NCT01873560)

Outcomes of the amphilimus-eluting polymer-free stent for chronic total occlusion treatment: a multicentre experience.

Late stent thrombosis and delayed vessel wall healing remain an important issue in coronary vessels treated with drug-eluting stents (DES), especially when long-vessel segments need to be covered, like in chronic total occlusions (CTO). Avoiding polymer use to avoid chronic inflammatory responses is a potential solution to reduce target vessel failure (TVF). We aimed to validate the clinical safety and efficacy at 1 year of the polymer-free Cre8 DES vs. nonpolymer-free DES for the percutaneous treatment of CTO. Between September 2011 and August 2016, patients were prospectively enrolled in three CTO centres. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), including cardiac death, any myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, TVF and target vessel revascularization. A total of 102 Cre8 and 133 non-Cre8 patients were enrolled. At 1 year, a low cumulative MACCE was observed in the Cre8 group (6.9%, respectively). Moreover, a numerical trend towards better MACCE was observed in the Cre8 group vs. the non-Cre8 group (6.9 vs. 14.3%; P = 0.065). The clinically driven TVF rate was not statistically different between Cre8 and non-Cre8 patients (6.9 vs. 9.8%; P = 0.373). A borderline significant difference regarding mortality was observed in favour of Cre8 patients (0 vs. 3.8%; P = 0.049). Low rates of MACCE and TVF up to 1 year were observed in the Cre8 group, supportive of the use of polymer-free DES for lesions with high complexity.

Two-year clinical outcome of all-comers treated with three highly dissimilar contemporary coronary drug-eluting stents in the randomised BIO-RESORT trial.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the two-year clinical outcome of all-comer trial participants who were treated with two very different thin-strut biodegradable polymer versus thin-strut durable polymer drug-eluting stents (DES). Prolonged clinical outcome after discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy is of particular interest, given the highly dissimilar polymer types, amount, distribution, and degradation speed of both biodegradable polymer DES. The BIO-RESORT trial (NCT01674803) randomly assigned 3,514 patients to treatment with biodegradable polymer SYNERGY everolimus-eluting stents (EES) or Orsiro sirolimus-eluting stents (SES), or durable polymer Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES). At two-year follow-up (available in 98.8%), the rate of the primary composite endpoint target vessel failure (TVF) was 8.3% in ZES versus 6.8% in EES (p=0.19) and 6.6% in SES (p=0.12). Landmark analyses at one year revealed differences between SES and ZES in the rates of target lesion revascularisation and target lesion failure (0.6% vs. 1.5%, p=0.04, and 1.1% vs. 2.4%, p=0.02, respectively) as well as other composite secondary endpoints that reached statistical significance. At two-year follow-up, there was no significant between-DES difference in the rates of the primary endpoint. Landmark analyses provided a signal that the use of SES versus ZES might reduce the risk of repeat revascularisation after one-year follow-up.

Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Angiography-Guided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: The ULTIMATE Trial

BackgroundIntravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is associated with fewer major adverse cardiovascular events compared with angiography guidance for patients with individual lesion subset. However, the beneficial effect on major adverse cardiovascular event outcome of IVUS guidance over angiography guidance in all-comers who undergo DES implantation still remains understudied. ObjectivesThis study aimed to determine the benefits of IVUS guidance over angiography guidance during DES implantation in all-comer patients. MethodsA total of 1,448 all-comer patients who required DES implantation were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to either an IVUS guidance or angiography guidance group. The primary endpoint was target-vessel failure (TVF) at 12 months, including cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target-vessel revascularization (TVR). The procedure was defined as a success if all IVUS-defined optimal criteria were met. ResultsAt 12 months follow-up, 60 TVFs (4.2%) occurred, with 21 (2.9%) in the IVUS group and 39 (5.4%) in the angiography group (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.530; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.312 to 0.901; p = 0.019). In the IVUS group, TVF was recorded in 1.6% of patients with successful procedures, compared with 4.4% in patients who failed to achieve all optimal criteria (HR: 0.349; 95% CI: 0.135 to 0.898; p = 0.029). The significant reduction of clinically driven target-lesion revascularization or definite stent thrombosis (HR: 0.407; 95% CI: 0.188 to 0.880; p = 0.018) based on lesion-level analysis by IVUS guidance was not achieved when the patient-level analysis was performed. ConclusionsThe present study demonstrates that IVUS-guided DES implantation significantly improved clinical outcome in all-comers, particularly for patients who had an IVUS-defined optimal procedure, compared with angiography guidance. (Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Drug Eluting Stents Implantation in “All-Comers” Coronary Lesions [ULTIMATE]; NCT02215915)

Thin composite wire strut, durable polymer-coated (Resolute Onyx) versus ultrathin cobalt–chromium strut, bioresorbable polymer-coated (Orsiro) drug-eluting stents in allcomers with coronary artery disease (BIONYX): an international, single-blind, randomised non-inferiority trial

During the past decade, many patients had zotarolimus-eluting stents implanted, which had circular shape cobalt-chromium struts with limited radiographic visibility. The Resolute Onyx stent was developed to improve visibility while reducing strut thickness, which was achieved by using a novel composite wire with a dense platinum-iridium core and an outer cobalt-chromium layer. We did the first randomised clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of this often-used stent compared with the Orsiro stent, which consists of ultrathin cobalt-chromium struts. We did an investigator-initiated, assessor-blinded and patient-blinded, randomised non-inferiority trial in an allcomers population at seven independently monitored centres in Belgium, Israel, and the Netherlands. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older and required percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents. After guide wire passage with or without predilation, members of the catheterisation laboratory team used web-based computer-generated allocation sequences to randomly assign patients (1:1) to either the Resolute Onyx or the Orsiro stent. Randomisation was stratified by sex and diabetes status. Patients and assessors were masked to allocated stents, but treating clinicians were not. The primary endpoint was target vessel failure at 1 year, a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel-related myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularisation, and was assessed by intention to treat (non-inferiority margin 2·5%) on the basis of outcomes adjudicated by an independent event committee. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02508714. Between Oct 7, 2015, and Dec 23, 2016, 2516 patients were enrolled, 2488 of whom were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (28 withdrawals or screening failures). 1243 participants were assigned to the Resolute Onyx group, and 1245 to the Orsiro group. Overall, 1765 (70·9%) participants presented with acute coronary syndromes and 1275 (51·2%) had myocardial infarctions. 1-year follow-up was available for 2478 (99·6%) patients. The primary endpoint was met by 55 (4·5%) patients in the Resolute Onyx group and 58 (4·7%) in the Orsiro group. Non-inferiority of Resolute Onyx to Orsiro was thus established (absolute risk difference -0·2% [95% CI -1·9 to 1·4]; upper limit of the one-sided 95% CI 1·1%; pnon-inferiority=0·0005). Definite or probable stent thrombosis occurred in one (0·1%) participant in the Resolute Onyx group and nine (0·7%) in the Orsiro group (hazard ratio 0·11 [95% CI 0·01-0·87]; p=0·0112). The Resolute Onyx stent was non-inferior to Orsiro for a combined safety and efficacy endpoint at 1-year follow-up in allcomers. The low event rate in both groups suggests that both stents are safe, and the very low rate of stent thrombosis in the Resolute Onyx group warrants further clinical investigation. Biotronik and Medtronic.