Populations of marine animals vary significantly in abundance over a broad range of time and space scales. It is almost certainly the case that the time and space scales of biological and physical processes are related but are so in a highly complex and nonlinear manner. Documenting and understanding the dynamics of this linkage has become a major intellectual focus for biological oceanography. The technical challenge implicit is the development of appropriate sampling and measurement systems. Although fisheries acoustics has received considerable attention, acoustic sampling of microzooplankton, macrozooplankton, and micronekton (organisms ranging from ca. 0.05 mm to a few centimeters) is in its comparative infancy. Nonetheless, results obtained to date have both stimulated the biological oceanographic community and occasioned major new funding initiatives within the federal agencies. Perhaps the potential that has most greatly contributed to the general excitement is the possibility of sampling biological structure on scales heretofore beyond reach, of sampling biological variability concomitantly with physical variability. Not surprisingly, once these possibilities were explored, a set of inherent difficulties became obvious. Perhaps the least tractable of all is the problem of target identification. For some ecological inquiries this is a critical lacuna of acoustical methodology. For others it may turn out to be less critical than first thought. To some degree, our community has converged upon the notion that if acoustical methods can be efficiently combined with alternative technologies (and the principal candidates have to date been optical) the target identification problem can be contained if not overcome.
Read full abstract