You have accessJournal of UrologyStone Disease: Medical Therapy1 Apr 2015MP41-05 PERINATAL OUTCOMES WITH TAMSULOSIN THERAPY FOR SYMPTOMATIC UROLITHIASIS George Bailey, Lisa Vaughan, Eric Bergstralh, Carl Rose, and Amy Krambeck George BaileyGeorge Bailey More articles by this author , Lisa VaughanLisa Vaughan More articles by this author , Eric BergstralhEric Bergstralh More articles by this author , Carl RoseCarl Rose More articles by this author , and Amy KrambeckAmy Krambeck More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.1633AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Medical expulsive therapy (MET) has been demonstrated to be safe and effective in the nonpregnant stone former. Tamsulosin is classified by the FDA as a category B medication, with no published data on human pregnancy. Our objective was to explore the safety of tamsulosin as MET for symptomatic urolithiasis during pregnancy. METHODS We retrospectively identified patients with documented tamsulosin treatment for stone disease during pregnancy managed at Mayo Clinic during the 2000-2014 interval through a minimum of 90 days postpartum (MET group). The MET cohort was matched 2:1 with a group of pregnant women with symptomatic urolithiasis during pregnancy who did not receive MET (control group) for maternal age, smoking during pregnancy, requirement for antepartum surgical procedure, and delivery < 37 weeks. Groups were compared using t-tests and Wilcoxon tests for continuous variables and Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests for nominal variables. Additionally, exact conditional logistic regression and linear mixed models were fit in order to account for matching. RESULTS A total of 28 patients receiving MET were identified, of whom 20 (71%) had urolithiasis documented on imaging and 23 (82%) demonstrated hydronephrosis. Median duration of in-utero exposure to tamsulosin was 3 days (range 1, 110), with timing of exposure in the first, second and third trimester in 3 (11%), 10 (36%), and 19 (68%) patients respectively. Surgical intervention was required for refractory renal colic in 13 (46%) patients (6 (21%) ureteral stent, 6 (21%) ureteroscopy, and 1 (4%) nephrostomy tube). Mean maternal age at delivery was 28.4 (SD 4.15) years at a mean gestational age of 38.2 weeks (SD 2.4); 4 infants (14%) were born preterm. The cesarean delivery rate was 43% (11 patients). Mean APGAR scores were 8.5 (1 minute) and 8.9 (5 minutes), and birthweight 3.47 kilograms (SD 0.88). All infants were considered appropriate for gestational age, and no cases of spontaneous abortion, intrauterine demise, and congenital anomalies were encountered. NICU or intermediate care nursery admission after birth was required for 2 infants (7%), and 2 (7%) infants ultimately died of SIDS. Infant outcome data was available for an average of 20.8 months (SD 18.8). Matched cohort comparison between the MET and control groups demonstrated no significant differences in maternal or infant outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Tamsulosin MET during pregnancy does not appear to be associated with adverse maternal or fetal outcomes, and may be considered as adjunctive therapy for symptomatic patients. © 2015 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 193Issue 4SApril 2015Page: e501 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2015 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information George Bailey More articles by this author Lisa Vaughan More articles by this author Eric Bergstralh More articles by this author Carl Rose More articles by this author Amy Krambeck More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract