Michielon and associates from Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesu, Rome, Italy, have presented their experience with surgical repair of anomalous coronary artery from the pulmonary artery using three different techniques from 1987–2002. Five had subclavian-to-coronary artery grafts, 12 had an intrapulmonary artery tunnel, and 14 had direct reimplantation. In general, this is a nicely researched and written manuscript that is largely confirmatory of a number of extant papers dealing with this subject [1Dodge-Khatami A. Mavroudis C. Backer C.L. Anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery: collective review of surgical therapy.Ann Thorac Surg. 2002; 74: 946-955Google Scholar]. The conclusions are simple and in accordance with numerous previous reports. However, the authors include two interesting components that are not commonly found in the other literature reports. The first is that the authors present a comparison of three different techniques from the same institution that is very useful. The second is that the authors have analyzed their data to determine the left ventricular recovery time as it relates to age at operation. This is important information. The comparison of these three techniques brings to light the superiority of the aortic implantation method, which as the authors conclude, can be used in the great majority of cases. Coronary mobilization techniques, stemming from the arterial switch operation experience, have allowed for this significant trend. Through their long-term followup the authors also document the problems that are associated with the Takeuchi intrapulmonary tunnel technique; namely that tunnel stenosis and supravalvar pulmonary artery stenosis occur in a high percentage of patients. Even so, the authors “still consider the modified Takeuchi procedure a valid alternative in case of leftward location of the coronary ostium, especially when extensive collaterals surround the pulmonary sinuses.” The problem of extensive collaterals on the surface of the pulmonary artery in this disease has not been discussed to any great degree in literature reports. In our practice we take great care to ligate and divide these vessels and to assure hemostasis before the coronary button dissection. Failure to do this in one of our patients required repeat cardiopulmonary bypass to control the bleeding. We do not believe that extensive surface pulmonary artery collaterals should mitigate against the coronary reimplantation technique as long as careful hemostasis is achieved. This leads to a further conclusion that the Takeuchi operation should only be used rarely and only in the most unusual cases. We have used the Takeuchi operation only once, early in our series [2Backer C.L. Stout M.J. Zales V.R. Muster A.J. Weigel T.J. Idriss F.S. Mavroudis C. Anomalous origin of the left coronary artery a twenty-year review of surgical management.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992; 103: 1049-1058Google Scholar] because of intellectual curiosity and not because of inability to transfer the artery to the aorta. This patient has supravalvar pulmonary stenosis, which we are following. Other than this patient, we have been able to transfer the anomalous coronary artery in all of our patients in the modern era [3Backer C.L. Hillman N.D. Dodge-Khatami A. Mavroudis C. Anomalous origin of the left main coronary from the pulmonary artery successful surgical strategy without assist devices.Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu. 2000; 3: 165-172Abstract Full Text PDF Google Scholar]. The authors have analyzed their data in a comprehensive manner to compare the three techniques. It comes as no surprise that (1) an earlier operation (less than 6 months) is better for long-term recovery, (2) that mitral insufficiency regresses in most cases, and (3) that coronary artery transfer yields superior long-term survival and freedom from reoperation. Nevertheless, their analysis, although confirmatory, is well executed and is welcomed as a very important contribution.
Read full abstract