You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Epidemiology and Natural History1 Apr 2011340 LONG-TERM RISK OF CLINICAL PROGRESSION AFTER BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: THE IMPACT OF TIME TO RECURRENCE Stephen Boorjian, R. Houston Thompson, Matthew Tollefson, Laureano Rangel, Eric Bergstralh, and R. Jeffrey Karnes Stephen BoorjianStephen Boorjian Rochester, MN More articles by this author , R. Houston ThompsonR. Houston Thompson Rochester, MN More articles by this author , Matthew TollefsonMatthew Tollefson Rochester, MN More articles by this author , Laureano RangelLaureano Rangel Rochester, MN More articles by this author , Eric BergstralhEric Bergstralh Rochester, MN More articles by this author , and R. Jeffrey KarnesR. Jeffrey Karnes Rochester, MN More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.424AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The natural history of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) is variable, and does not always translate into systemic progression (SP) or prostate cancer death. We evaluated long-term clinical outcomes of patients with BCR, and determined predictors of disease progression and mortality in these men. METHODS We reviewed our institutional registry of 14,632 patients who underwent RP between 1990–2006 to identify 2,427 men with BCR (PSA ≥ 0.4 ng/ml) who did not receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. Median follow-up was 11.5 years (interquartile range (IQR) 7.8, 14.7) after RP and 6.6 years (IQR 3.3, 10.1) after BCR. Patients were grouped into quartiles according to the time from RP to BCR. Survival after BCR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log rank test. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to analyze clinicopathologic variables associated with SP and death from prostate cancer. RESULTS Overall, 284 (11.7%) patients with BCR experienced SP and 556 (22.9%) died, with 140 (5.8%) dying from prostate cancer. A total of 399 (16.4%) men underwent salvage radiation (RT) and 209 (8.6%) received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) at BCR and before SP. Ten-year SP-free and cancer-specific survival for patients after BCR was 84% and 91%. The median time from RP to BCR was 3.1 years (IQR 1.2, 5.9). Cancer-specific mortality 10 years after BCR was 9.9%, 9.3%, 7.8%, and 4.7% for patients who experienced BCR <1.2 years, 1.2–3.1 years, 3.1–5.9 years, and > 5.9 years after RP, respectively (p=0.10). On multivariate analysis (Table), time from RP to BCR was not significantly associated with the risk of SP (p=0.15) or cancer-specific mortality (p=0.29). Older patient age, increased pathologic Gleason score, advanced tumor stage, and rapid PSA velocity did predict SP and death from prostate cancer. Multivariate Analysis for Predictors of Systemic Progression (left) and Death from Prostate Cancer (right) Following BCR. Variable HR 95% CI p Value HR 95% CI p Value Patient age 1.02 1.00,1.05 0.04 1.06 1.02,1.10 0.001 Year of RP 0.95 0.91,1.00 0.05 0.99 0.91,1.07 0.77 Pathological Gleason score 1.40 1.20,1.60 <0.0001 1.53 1.27,1.86 <0.0001 Pathological tumor stage 1.20 1.03,1.40 0.02 1.33 1.07,1.66 0.01 Time interval from RP to BCR 0.95 0.89,1.02 0.15 0.94 0.83,1.06 0.29 Log-linear PSA velocity 1.32 1.23,1.40 <0.0001 1.37 1.25,1.49 <0.0001 Receipt of salvage RT 0.91 0.60,1.40 0.68 0.87 0.47,1.63 0.67 Receipt of salvage ADT 0.62 0.33,1.18 0.15 0.98 0.45,2.12 0.95 CONCLUSIONS Although only a minority of men experience SP and death from prostate cancer following BCR, an increased interval from RP to BCR is not independently associated with diminished risks of progression or mortality. Regardless of the timing of BCR, then, the decision to institute secondary therapies must balance the risk of disease progression based on clinical parameters with the cost and potential morbidity of treatment. © 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 185Issue 4SApril 2011Page: e137 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Stephen Boorjian Rochester, MN More articles by this author R. Houston Thompson Rochester, MN More articles by this author Matthew Tollefson Rochester, MN More articles by this author Laureano Rangel Rochester, MN More articles by this author Eric Bergstralh Rochester, MN More articles by this author R. Jeffrey Karnes Rochester, MN More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract