Systemic Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Research Articles

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in chronic kidney disease and risk of acute adverse kidney events according to route of administration.

Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have lower risks for cardiovascular disease and gastrointestinal adverse effects compared to oral NSAIDs, but there are little data regarding their kidney risks in chronic kidney disease (CKD). We evaluated the risk of adverse acute kidney outcomes in CKD according to route of NSAID administration. Retrospective cohort study of adults with CKD (eGFR less than 60ml/min/1.73 m2) who received prescriptions between 2015 and 2017 from a major healthcare cluster in Singapore. The adverse acute kidney outcomes were acute kidney injury (AKI) and need for nephrology specialist consult within 30days. Among 6298 adults with CKD (mean age 72.1 ± 13.3years and eGFR 41.9 ± 12.2ml/min/1.73m2), systemic and topical NSAIDs were prescribed in 16.7% and 32.0%, respectively. Incident AKI (any severity), KDIGO Stage 2 or 3 AKI, and need for nephrology specialist consult occurred in 16.7%, 2.6%, and 10.6% of the study cohort, respectively. After adjusting for age, diabetes, recent cardiovascular hospitalization, baseline eGFR, RAAS blocker and diuretic, systemic NSAIDs, and topical NSAIDs, compared with the no-NSAID group, were independently associated with incident AKI [adjusted OR 1.77 (95% CI 1.46-2.15) and 1.38 (1.18-1.63), respectively]. Moderate and severe AKI (adjusted OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.09-2.58, p = 0.02) and need for nephrology consults (adjusted OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.09-1.82, p = 0.008) were also increased in systemic NSAIDs. Among adults with CKD, both systemic and topical NSAIDs were independently associated with acute adverse kidney outcomes.

Clinical characteristics, treatment and outcomes of acute postpartum inflammatory sacroiliitis: a retrospective study.

We performed this research to report the clinical characteristics and clinical therapeutic strategies of acute postpartum inflammatory sacroiliitis. We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients diagnosed with acute postpartum inflammatory sacroiliitis from 2014 to 2020. All their clinical details including clinical symptoms and signs, laboratory tests, radiologic examination, diagnosis and treatment process and clinical outcomes were obtained and analyzed in this retrospective analysis. Eleven patients diagnosed with acute postpartum inflammatory sacroiliitis complain of low back pain. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is useful in diagnosing acute postpartum inflammatory sacroiliitis. The systemic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) administration, sacroiliac joint injection, and physical therapy effectively alleviated the pain with symptoms disappearing, and the abnormal signal reduced in MRI. Acute postpartum inflammatory sacroiliitis is an uncommon disease with atypical symptoms. MRI examination may be the best diagnostic method. General NSAIDs and sacroiliac joint injections of local anesthetic plus corticosteroid under the guidance of fluoroscopy or ultrasound can achieve safe and effective treatment. This retrospective study was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of our hospital (No. 202101023). Trial registration was performed in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( http://www.chictr.org.cn , No. ChiCTR2100045656).

Algorithms for managing patients over 60 years old with chronic joint and back pain

Chronic pain syndrome is one of the most common geriatric syndromes. Chronic pain negatively affects the mobility and autonomy of the older person, reducing the quality of life and longevity. An active screening for chronic pain in the geriatric population improves the geriatric status. Treatment strategies for chronic pain in older patients include non-pharmacological measures as well as drug administration. However, advanced age is associated with high comorbidity, polypharmacy, and in some cases does not allow the active use of systemic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). In this connection, the use of parenteral symptomatic slow-acting drugs, the representative of which is chondroitin sulfate (CS), becomes an alternative. The efficacy and safety of CS has been proven by the mean of clinical studies meta-analysis data of osteoarthritis treatment effectiveness with parenteral chondroitin sulfate, including patients with back pain.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of acute adverse renal outcomes in diabetes and diabetic kidney disease.

Individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM) may be susceptible to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) but data on NSAID-related adverse renal events is sparse. We aimed to evaluate the risk of acute kidney injury and/or hyperkalemia after systemic NSAID among individuals with DM and diabetic chronic kidney disease (CKD). Retrospective cohort study of 3896 adults with DM with incident prescriptions between July 2015 and December 2017 from Singapore General Hospital and SingHealth Polyclinics. Laboratory, hospitalization and medication data were retrieved from electronic medical records. The primary outcome was the incidence of AKI and/ or hyperkalemia within 30 days after prescription. AKI and/or hyperkalemia occurred in 13.5% of all DM and 15.8% of diabetic CKD. The association between systemic NSAID >14 days and 30-day risk of AKI and/or hyperkalemia failed to reach statistical significance in unselected DM (adjusted OR 1.62, 95% CI 0.99-2.65, p =0.05) and diabetic CKD (adjusted OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.15-2.82, p =0.64), but the odds of AKI and/or hyperkalemia were markedly and significantly increased when NSAID was prescribed with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blocker (adjusted OR 4.17, 95% CI 1.74-9.98, p =0.001) or diuretic (adjusted OR 3.31, 95% CI 1.09-10.08, p =0.04) and in the absence of diabetic CKD (adjusted OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.16-3.36, p =0.01). NSAID prescription >14 days in individuals with DM with concurrent RAAS blockers or diuretics was associated with higher 30-day risk of AKI and/or hyperkalemia.

Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Local Anesthetic Wound Infiltration for Postoperative Analgesia in Adult Patients Undergoing Hernia Repair in Daycare Procedure: A Randomized Control Trial.

Introduction: Various modalities are now being used to manage postoperative pain, such as regional nerve blocks techniques, continuous epidural analgesia, patient-controlled analgesia, opioids, and systemic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. This study compared the mean postoperative pain score between ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and a local anesthetic wound infiltration at the surgical incision site.Methodology: A prospective, comparative, randomized controlled trial (RCT) was carried out from February 2021 to September 2021. The study was conducted in the anesthesia department of Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan. Patients aged 18-80 years presenting with elective surgery of (both direct and indirect) inguinal hernia repair were enrolled in the study. Participants were randomly assigned into one of the two groups that are local anesthetic wound infiltration (Group A) and TAP block (Group B). The mean pain score was assessed using a visual analog scale and compared between the two groups.Results: The study included 168 patients grouped in two different groups. The mean age in Group A was 43.87 (+17.21), and Group B was 47.01 (±15.37). Mean pain scores in groups A and B were 6.36±1.94 vs 4.51 ± 1.99 (p-value=0.001). The pain rescue medications were given to 57.14% of patients in Group A and 34.52% of patients in Group B, and it was significantly different in the two groups (p-value=0.003). It was found that patients in Group A reported more severe pain (41.67%) than patients in Group B (10.71%).Conclusion: When compared to local anesthetic wound infiltration, ultrasound-guided TAP block had better analgesic activity compared to local anesthetic wound infiltration.

Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Risk of Acute Kidney Injury and Hyperkalemia in Older Adults: A Retrospective Cohort Study and External Validation of a Clinical Risk Model.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used analgesics among older adults. Adverse effects may be avoided by careful patient selection. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and/or hyperkalemia, risk factors, and the accuracy of an NSAID risk prediction model in a cohort of Asian older adults. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of older adults, age 65years and above, who received prescriptions between March 2015 and December 2017 from Singapore's largest cluster of public healthcare institutions. Factors associated with 30-day incident acute kidney injury and/or hyperkalemia were evaluated with multivariable regression analysis. Calibration and discrimination of the Nash prediction model were assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test and C-statistic, respectively. The primary outcome occurred in 16.7% of 12,798 older adults. Topical NSAIDs (adjusted OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.15-1.45), systemic NSAIDs of 1-14 days' duration (adjusted OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.27-1.62), and systemic NSAIDs > 14 days (adjusted OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.37-2.49) were independently associated with the primary outcome, compared with no NSAID. Diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and diuretics were also independently associated with increased incident AKI and/or hyperkalemia. When applied to older adults with systemic NSAIDs > 14 days (n=305), the Nash risk model had poor calibration (p<0.001) and poor discrimination with C-statistic 0.527 (0.438, 0.616). Longer NSAID duration and systemic compared with topical route were associated with incremental odds for acute renal events. Further studies are required to improve the available risk model to guide NSAID prescriptions in older adults.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for acute gout.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for acute gout.

Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for management of pain syndrome

Chronic pain continues to remain one of the urgent problems of modern medicine. From 15 to 25% of the adult population suffers from chronic pain. Medical treatment includes the appointment of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and muscle relaxants. The greatestform for the appointment of NSAIDs is the topical form. According to the recommendations of International and National societies for the treatment of pain syndrome, osteoarthritis (OA) therapy are recommended to start with topical NSAIDs, as drugs with less systemic adverse side effects (NSAIDs).Topical NSAIDs have proven analgesic and antiinflammatory efficacy in the treatment of diseases of the musculoskeletal system, musculoskeletal pain, but have a low risk of developing systemic NSAIDs in comparison with oral forms, which expands the possibilities of their appointment in patients with comorbid pathology (diseases of the gastrointestinal tract, cardiovascular risks).Among NSAIDs, diclofenac is the "gold standard" of analgesia. After topical application, diclofenac penetrates through the skin and further into the deeper underlying tissues while maintaining sufficient concentration to provide a therapeutic effect. The topical form of diclofenac – diclofenac diethylamine 2%, when used correctly, can cause an analgesic effect comparable to the oral form. This topical form has a high clinical efficacy in the treatment of acute musculoskeletal pain (sprains), the course of therapy takes 1 week, for chronic pain syndromes (knee OA or hand) the course of therapy is from 2 to less than 6 weeks. The clinical efficacy of diclofenac diethylamine monotherapy is comparable to that for complex therapy in combination with oral forms of NSAIDs, while having good tolerability.

Perioperative systemic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in women undergoing breast surgery.

Perioperative systemic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in women undergoing breast surgery.

Mastitis in meat sheep

Mastitis in meat sheep occurs in all flocks, but incidence can vary. It can be a severe disease, resulting in ewe deaths, but chronic and subclinical cases also occur. It is a costly disease, but accurate assesments of the impact, especially of chronic and subclinical disease, are lacking. The most commonly involved pathogens are Mannheimia haemolytica and Staphylococcus aureus. The most important risk factors relate to compromise of teat defences, and increased transmission, but environmental cases do occur. Treatment of acute clinical cases requires systemic antibiosis and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug administration, and, where required, supportive care. Prevention involves tackling the risk factors, and using vaccination and breeding to reduce ewe susceptibility.

Factors affecting the resolution of acute non-infectious anterior scleritis

Background/aimsTumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-⍺) inhibitors are increasingly being used to treat scleritis, however, their efficacy has not been compared to older treatments. Additionally, few studies have assessed differences in...

Systemic Antibiotic and Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Treatment Decreases the Level of Endogenous Angiogenic Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Inflamed Human Periapical Tissues

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-induced angiogenesis contributes to inflammatory bone resorption in humans. Widely documented antagonists to resorption include antibiotics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of these drugs on proangiogenic VEGF levels in periradicular lesions. Periapical tissue biopsies were obtained from 42 patients with chronic periapical periodontitis. VEGF levels were measured using a commercial ELISA kit in patients divided into groups according to treatment: no drugs (control group, n = 25), NSAIDs (n = 7), antibiotics (n = 5), and NSAIDs and antibiotics (n = 5). Reverse transcriptase (RT) reaction was performed in all the samples under analysis. Presence of VEGFA and VEGFB gene expression was assessed using reverse-transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). ELISA analysis indicated that average VEGF levels in tissue samples of patients treated with NSAIDs (6.097 ± 1.930 ng/mL), antibiotics (5.661 ± 2.395 ng/mL), and NSAIDs and antibiotics (7.142 ± 2.601 ng/mL) were significantly lower than in samples of control patients (10.432 ± 4.257 ng/mL, ANOVA p = 0.008). The RT-PCR did not reveal VEGFA gene expression in any of the 42 samples. VEGFB gene expression was found in 26 of 42 samples (69.1%). The use of NSAIDs or antibiotics in patients with exacerbated chronic periodontitis decreases VEGF levels in periapical tissues. Pharmacotherapy may minimize the effects of VEGF on apical periodontitis progression in that way.

Pain Management in Children: NSAID Use in the Perioperative and Emergency Department Settings.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are often used for pediatric pain management in the emergency setting and postoperatively. This narrative literature review evaluates pain relief, opioid requirements, and adverse effects associated with NSAID use. A PubMed search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating the use of conventional systemic NSAIDs as pain management for children in the perioperative or emergency department (traumatic injury) setting. Trials of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors (“coxibs”) were excluded. Search results included studies of ibuprofen (n = 12), ketoprofen (n = 5), ketorolac (n = 6), and diclofenac (n = 4). NSAIDs reduced the opioid requirement in 10 of 13 studies in which this outcome was measured. NSAID use did not compromise pain relief; NSAIDs provided improved or similar pain scores compared with opioids (or other control) in 24 of 27 studies. Adverse event frequencies were reported in 26 studies; adverse event frequencies with NSAIDs were lower than with opioids (or other control) in three of 26 studies, similar in 21 of 26 studies, and more frequent in two of 26 studies. Perioperative and emergency department use of NSAIDs may reduce opioid requirements while maintaining pain control, with similar or reduced frequencies of opioid-associated adverse events.

Extending the safety profile of the post-operative administration of an intravenous acetaminophen/ibuprofen fixed dose combination: An open-label, multi-center, single arm, multiple dose study

PurposePostoperative pain is typically treated with multimodal analgesia, using systemic acetaminophen and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in conjunction with opioids as required. The present study aimed to determine the safety and tolerability of repeated doses of an intravenous fixed-dose combination (FDC) of acetaminophen and ibuprofen. MethodsThis multicenter, open-label, single arm, multiple dose study was conducted at 4 centers across New Zealand and the United States between July 2019 and July 2020. Adults (>18 years) requiring multiple doses of parenteral nonopioid analgesics over multiple days following non-laparoscopic general, plastic or orthopedic surgery were eligible. The study drug (acetaminophen 1000 mg+ibuprofen 300 mg) was administered 6-hourly as a 15 min infusion for between 48 h and 5 days. Adverse event data was collected throughout the study, in addition to scheduled vital sign assessments, laboratory tests and electrocardiograms. Participants completed a global evaluation of the FDC at the end of the treatment period. Findings232 participants received ≥ 1 dose of the FDC. Most were female (62.1%), White (56.5%) or Black or African American (39.2%), and had undergone orthopedic surgery (85.3%). There was a broad age range (19–87 years), with a mean age of 53.4 years, and 26.3% of participants aged ≥ 65 years. The FDC was safe when used for 48 h to 5 days. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) affected 56.0% of participants, the most common were infusion site pain, nausea, infusion site extravasation, constipation, and headache. Minimal changes in vital signs were observed at scheduled timepoints. No clinically significant changes in electrocardiogram assessments occurred. Transient elevations in the hepatic enzymes ALT and AST to < 3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) affected 10.5% and 9.6% of subjects, elevations to ≥ 3 times the ULN affected 2.6% and 2.2% of subjects, respectively. There were no apparent differences in the safety profile of the FDC in older participants. The FDC was well tolerated; most TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity. Five participants discontinued treatment due to TEAEs, none were considered treatment-related. The FDC was perceived well by study participants; the majority rated their experience as ‘excellent’ (40.1%) or ‘very good’ (35.3%). ImplicationsThe safety profile was comparable to previous studies with no novel safety concerns. The FDC was safe, well tolerated, and perceived positively by participants treated for acute pain between 48 h and 5 days following orthopedic or plastic surgery, supporting a favorable risk benefit profile.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and outcomes of COVID-19 in the ISARIC Clinical Characterisation Protocol UK cohort: a matched, prospective cohort study.

SummaryBackgroundEarly in the pandemic it was suggested that pre-existing use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) could lead to increased disease severity in patients with COVID-19. NSAIDs are an important analgesic, particularly in those with rheumatological disease, and are widely available to the general public without prescription. Evidence from community studies, administrative data, and small studies of hospitalised patients suggest NSAIDs are not associated with poorer COVID-19 outcomes. We aimed to characterise the safety of NSAIDs and identify whether pre-existing NSAID use was associated with increased severity of COVID-19 disease.MethodsThis prospective, multicentre cohort study included patients of any age admitted to hospital with a confirmed or highly suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection leading to COVID-19 between Jan 17 and Aug 10, 2020. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and secondary outcomes were disease severity at presentation, admission to critical care, receipt of invasive ventilation, receipt of non-invasive ventilation, use of supplementary oxygen, and acute kidney injury. NSAID use was required to be within the 2 weeks before hospital admission. We used logistic regression to estimate the effects of NSAIDs and adjust for confounding variables. We used propensity score matching to further estimate effects of NSAIDS while accounting for covariate differences in populations.ResultsBetween Jan 17 and Aug 10, 2020, we enrolled 78 674 patients across 255 health-care facilities in England, Scotland, and Wales. 72 179 patients had death outcomes available for matching; 40 406 (56·2%) of 71 915 were men, 31 509 (43·8%) were women. In this cohort, 4211 (5·8%) patients were recorded as taking systemic NSAIDs before admission to hospital. Following propensity score matching, balanced groups of NSAIDs users and NSAIDs non-users were obtained (4205 patients in each group). At hospital admission, we observed no significant differences in severity between exposure groups. After adjusting for explanatory variables, NSAID use was not associated with worse in-hospital mortality (matched OR 0·95, 95% CI 0·84–1·07; p=0·35), critical care admission (1·01, 0·87–1·17; p=0·89), requirement for invasive ventilation (0·96, 0·80–1·17; p=0·69), requirement for non-invasive ventilation (1·12, 0·96–1·32; p=0·14), requirement for oxygen (1·00, 0·89–1·12; p=0·97), or occurrence of acute kidney injury (1·08, 0·92–1·26; p=0·33).InterpretationNSAID use is not associated with higher mortality or increased severity of COVID-19. Policy makers should consider reviewing issued advice around NSAID prescribing and COVID-19 severity.FundingNational Institute for Health Research and Medical Research Council.

POS-036 TOPICAL NON-STEROIDAL ANTI-INFLAMMATORY DRUGS AND ACUTE ADVERSE RENAL EVENTS IN OLDER ADULTS

Prolonged systemic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) were associated with adverse renal outcomes among older adults. However, there is little data regarding the renal safety of topical and short-course systemic NSAID. We aimed to evaluate the risk of acute adverse renal outcomes among older adults prescribed topical and short-term systemic NSAID.

Controversy of indomethacin eye drops in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis-induced corneal ulceration: a case report

BackgroundPerforation of the cornea is a rare finding in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Addressing a perforated cornea associated with RA is challenging, since its pathogenesis is not fully elucidated. Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were developed to prevent cystoid macular edema following cataract surgery in patients at risk. Their prescription in inflammation of the anterior segment of the eye may induce negative effects on the ocular surface. We bring into focus a corneal perforation in a patient with RA who used indomethacin eye drops to treat corneal ulceration, but responded promptly to drug discontinuation and initiation of topical cyclosporine 0.1%. Our aim is to emphasize two issues: the contraindication of topical indomethacin in corneal defects, and the immediate positive impact of topical cyclosporine 0.1% on corneal healing.Case presentationA 73-year-old Caucasian woman with a 13-year history of RA was treated for corneal ulceration in her oculus sinister (OS) with topical indomethacin and gentamicin. The patient was being treated with systemic immunosuppression and NSAIDs for the underlying RA and artificial tears in both eyes. No bandage contact lens was used. After 3 weeks of treatment, perforation of the left cornea occurred and the patient was referred to our hospital. Upon admission, visual acuity (VA) in the OS was 20/630. Slit lamp examination of the OS revealed paracentral corneal perforation, iris plugging the perforation site, shallow anterior chamber, clear aqueous humor, and clear lens. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography showed the inclavated iris in the perforation site and minimum corneal thickness of 101 µm. Topical NSAIDs were discontinued and topical treatment was initiated with tobramycin, tropicamide 1%, phenylephrine 10%, and artificial tears five times a day, and occlusive patch. For 5 days, there was no improvement, so topical cyclosporine 0.1% was started, one drop every evening. Within 7 days, the cornea had healed, the iris was liberated from the perforation site, the minimum corneal thickness increased to 250 µm, VA improved to 20/25, and the patient was free of symptoms.ConclusionsThe main “takeaway” lessons from this case are that topical indomethacin should not be prescribed in cases of inflammation of the anterior segment of the eye, and that topical cyclosporine was efficacious in healing corneal perforation in our patient.

Real-world clinical efficacy assessment of Kapsikam a combined topical medication based on nonivamide synthetic capsaicin analog in patients with acute nonspecific musculoskeletal back pain: LOCUS observational study outcomes

Evaluation of the effect of local therapy with Kapsikam on the dynamics of clinical symptoms and indices of the disability scale, as well as on reducing the doses of systemic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) used in patients with acute back pain (LOCUS study). An observational study included 120 patients with nonspecific pain in the lower back and a verified diagnosis of Lumbodynia M54.5; «Lumbodynia with sciatica» M54.4, of which 78 received in addition to the basic treatment with systemic NSAIDs topical drug Kapsikam and 42 - only basic treatment.

Short-Course Systemic and Topical Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: Impact on Adverse Renal Events in Older Adults with Co-Morbid Disease.

Prolonged systemic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been associated with adverse renal outcomes among older adults. However, there is scant data regarding the renal safety of topical and short-course systemic NSAIDs. We aimed to evaluate the risk of acute adverse renal outcomes among older adults prescribed topical and short-term systemic NSAIDs. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all older adults, age 60 years and above, who received prescriptions between July 2015 and December 2017 from the largest tertiary hospital and a major public primary care institution in Singapore. Data from 6 months before until 30 days after the first prescription were retrieved from electronic medical records. The primary outcome was the incidence of acute kidney injury (serum creatinine increased >26.5 µmol/L or >50% from baseline) and/or hyperkalemia within 30 days. A multi-variate analysis taking into account age, sex, co-morbidities, baseline-estimated glomerular filtration rate and serum potassium, NSAID route of administration, and concurrent renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blocker and diuretic prescription was performed to evaluate factors associated with the primary outcome. We identified 12,773 older adults with incident prescriptions: 3982 (31.2%) received short-course systemic NSAIDs, 3784 (29.6%) received topical NSAIDs, and 5007 (39.2%) did not receive any NSAID. Both short-course systemic NSAIDs (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41-1.80, p < 0.001) and topical NSAIDs (adjusted OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.31-1.67, p < 0.001), compared with the no-NSAID group, were independently associated with the primary outcome. Among older adults with co-morbid conditions and prescribed NSAIDs, topical NSAIDs had a reduced odds of 30-day incident acute kidney injury and/or hyperkalemia in diabetes mellitus (adjusted OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.65-1.06, p = 0.007), chronic kidney disease (adjusted OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.60-0.90, p = 0.003), and cardiovascular disease (adjusted OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.37-0.79, p < 0.001), compared with short-course systemic NSAIDs. NSAIDs increased the risk of acute adverse renal events. Topical NSAIDs, compared with short-course systemic NSAIDs, were associated with a reduced incidence of acute kidney injury and/or hyperkalemia among older adults with additional risk factors.

Treatment and Healthcare Cost Among Patients with Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis: A Cross-sectional Study Using a Real-world Claims Database in Japan Between 2013 and 2019.

The guidelines for osteoarthritis (OA) treatment recommend different therapies including pharmacotherapy, and several analgesic options are available for pain management. In Japan, research on hip and knee OA treatment trends is scarce and OA-related healthcare costs are unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the treatment and healthcare cost trends among Japanese patients with hip or knee OA. This was a cross-sectional study held between 2013 and 2019, using a medical claims database. The demographic and treatment characteristics of hip or knee OA patients for each year were descriptively analyzed and the medians for healthcare utilization and all-cause healthcare costs were calculated. The yearly mean age of 59,218 hip OA and 270,722 knee OA patients ranged from 66.3 to 68.6years and 71.1 to 73.1years, respectively. The prevalence of comorbidities was higher in knee OA than hip OA. In both groups, > 70% of patients were female, and the most common treatment was pain-related medication. In hip OA, topical and systemic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were mostly used throughout the study period (34.1-41.4% and 32.0-40.3%, respectively). Similarly, in knee OA, topical and systemic NSAIDs were used in 58.3-63.3% and 36.5-46.0% patients, respectively. Increase in the use of acetaminophens (10.9% in hip OA and 10.2% in the knee OA) and weak opioids (3.7%, and 3.4%, respectively) from 2013 to 2019 were observed. Most patients were treated as outpatients in both groups. The median all-cause healthcare costs were approximately 35,000 JPY for hip OA and 74,000 JPY for knee OA. Although a considerable change in total healthcare cost was not observed in our study, the contents of medical treatment and cost breakdown were greatly altered due to the treatment and cost for OA itself, and the treatment and cost for comorbidities. Similar studies to investigate such a trend may help predict necessary resources and social needs. Thus, further investigation utilizing other databases is needed.