LETTERS TO THE EDITORReply to Young et al.Holly R. Middlekauff and Jeanie ParkHolly R. Middlekauff and Jeanie ParkPublished Online:01 May 2009https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00017.2009MoreSectionsPDF (30 KB)Download PDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesGet permissionsTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInEmailWeChat to the editor: We thank Drs. Young, Keller, Crandall, and Fadel (2) for their interest in our work (1), and their opinions regarding the impracticality of comparing skin sympathetic nerve activity (SSNA) between subjects in different groups. Since single SSNA bursts can include multiple small peaks, they ask, “Does a multiple peak burst represent one or more bursts?” In our study, such bursts were counted as one by the blinded investigator who analyzed all neurograms, thereby providing uniformity to burst quantification.Second, they correctly point out that the SSNA recordings may represent multiple fiber types and that any given neurogram may have varying contributions from each fiber type. They are concerned that in our multiunit recordings, we could miss the fiber type that potentially has elevated activity. Although this is true in theory, it is extremely unlikely. The SSNA neurogram is a random sample of total SSNA activity, and it is against the odds that during the 8 (or 16 total SSNA recordings if one includes healthy controls), we always missed the overactive skin fiber type. A more likely explanation for the absence of elevated SSNA in our recordings in end-stage renal disease patients is that it is not present.We invite Drs. Young, Keller, Crandall, and Fadel to review, once again, Fig. 1 in our paper. These representative neurograms lay to rest any real question whether SSNA is elevated in ESRD patients compared with healthy controls. In this case, a picture is truly worth a thousand words.REFERENCES1 Park J, Campese VM, Nobakht N, Middlekauff HR. Differential distribution of muscle and skin sympathetic nerve activity in patients with end-stage renal disease. J Appl Physiol 105: 1873–1876, 2008.Link | ISI | Google Scholar2 Young CN, Keller DM, Crandall CG, Fadel PJ. Comparing resting skin sympathetic nerve activity between groups: caution needed. J Appl Physiol; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.91538.2008.Link | ISI | Google ScholarAUTHOR NOTESAddress for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. Park, Emory Univ., Renal Division, WMRB, 1639 Pierce Drive, Suite 338, Atlanta, GA 30322 (e-mail: [email protected]) Download PDF Previous Back to Top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedInformation More from this issue > Volume 106Issue 5May 2009Pages 1753-1753 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2009 the American Physiological Societyhttps://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00017.2009History Published online 1 May 2009 Published in print 1 May 2009 Metrics
Read full abstract