When I (Allan) entered this field back 1972, it was unthinkable that teachers--like me--would somehow be involved in research. I was a new ABE teacher and, looking back, not a single ABE teacher I knew would have assumed to even consider conducting research. Research was for the researchers. For the experts, not us. In those days one thing was crystal clear: Experts thought; teachers taught. How things have changed. The early 1970s were the halcyon days of adult literacy and basic education. As a new ABE teacher, I was required to attend a three-week training course at the local university to learn how and what to teach. At the training course, we jealously guarded the latest teaching manuals, texts, reading series and placement tests. These were like the precious parts of a survival kit for a journey to the unknown. Throughout that course, we unquestioningly looked to the for the best materials. As the year went by, we had a few invited speakers at professional development workshops and an who gave the keynote at our annual conference. These were evidently the acknowledged experts, all from universities. Each spoke about topics supposedly of high relevance to us. What was odd, however, was that by the end of that first year, I had used virtually none of the experts' advice. And, I had amasseda large stockpile of carefully cultivated resources from other ABE teachers and from I found outside the ABE field. Curiously, most of the from the university training course were still in the file cabinet. Later, as an ABE director at a community college in the late 1970s and 1980s, I came to realize how the best ABE teachers all had their own cache of good materials stored away In addition, each had their own carefully developed repertoire of best methods for teaching, testing and counseling. As the years went by, I have had to wonder: Who are the real in adult education? How did these non-experts develop such expertise? How did they go about finding their unique stock of materials? How could newcomers to the field benefit more from the questioning, the findings and the experiences of those who had survived and flourished in the unknown? However, I have since come to ask if these questions go far enough? Considering the perennial issues that continue to plague adult literacy and basic education, I had to ask if enough truly critical questions were being posed on what was being done in this sub-field of adult education? I had to ask why the traditional researchers could not turn more of their attention to the issues that faced the field on a day-to-day basis? Through the late 1980s and early 90s, many were beginning to wonder what expert really meant after all? Today, as a professor of adult education, I could easily find myself typecast as one of those removed experts and would be deeply discouraged to think that I am as irrelevant as those I looked to from afar some 30 years ago. The fact is that this is not the same field I entered three decades ago. Today, new, exciting ways of understanding knowledge are emerging. Important new voices are helping build the world of research. Practitioners and university-based researchers are becoming increasingly involved in reshaping the concept of research. In my case (Karen), whether it was at Miami-Dade Community College in faculty and program development, or at The University of Texas at Austin conducting faculty development through the National Institute for Staff and Organizational Development, I worked with adults to bring about change or improvement. I found this work challenging and wanted to understand how to improve what I did. Sometimes it seemed we were dropping innovations on faculty like a scientist dropping some chemical on amoebae in a petri dish--to see how they would react, what would help, what would stick. Needless to say, this approach did not always lead to lasting change or improvement. …
Read full abstract