Surgical Treatment Of Idiopathic Scoliosis Research Articles

Biomechanical Comparison of Endplate Forces Generated by Uniaxial Screws and Monoaxial Pedicle Screws

Current surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis involves the use of various segmental instrumentation. Various pedicle screws have allowed for improved correction. Although monoaxial screws have improved rotational control compared with polyaxial screws, their use may increase screw-bone interface or vertebral endplate forces if not inserted in an exactly straight trajectory. Uniaxial screws potentially decrease these forces while retaining the advantages of monoaxial screws with respect to better rotational control. The purpose of this study was to compare the vertebral endplate forces with monoaxial or uniaxial screws when being reduced to a rod. Thirty-two plastic, surrogate T11 vertebrae were prepared with monoaxial (n=16) or uniaxial (n=16) screws. Screw angles relative to inferior vertebral endplates were assessed with lateral radiographs. The vertebrae were fixed to a load cell, and loads were measured as the screw was reduced to a rod. Monoaxial screws demonstrated a linear progression of endplate force with increasing screw angle. Uniaxial screws demonstrated minimal endplate force until approximately 20°, coinciding with screwhead excursion angle. As this maximum excursion angle was passed, uniaxial screws demonstrated a force slope similar to the monoaxial screws.The measured endplate forces should be equivalent to forces at the screw-bone interface. The reduced force with uniaxial screws is expected to have less cranial-caudal plow potential as the screw is coupled to a rod for deformity correction. This could have potential implications for screw failure, especially in less dense bone.

Erratum to: Anterior instrumentation (dual screws single rod system) for the surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in the lumbar area: a prospective study on 33 adolescents and young adults, based on a new system of classification

Erratum to: Anterior instrumentation (dual screws single rod system) for the surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in the lumbar area: a prospective study on 33 adolescents and young adults, based on a new system of classification

The use of perioperative physiotherapy methods in surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis – an analysis of the latest reports and scientific literature

Introduction. The term of idiopathic scoliosis refers to a change (deformity) of uncertain etiology related to improper setting of the spine, of a lateral curvature greater than 10 degrees by Cobb classification, with a characteristic image of abnormalities of the spine-chest axis and the topographic-anatomical axis. Some of such changes, particularly those characterized by a significant degree of progression or specific indication are reffered for a surgical correction. The perioperative use of physiotherapy methods is now one of the most important factors of a complex surgical treatment. The aim of this study was to present the applicability of the methods in the field of physical therapy in the perioperative surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Material and methods. The paper presents an analysis of the literature from the years 2000-2012 in the field of spinal surgery in terms of correction of idiopathic scoliosis. Materials were selected according to information about the use of perioperative physiotherapy methods in preparing the patient for surgery, and postoperative rehabilitation. Results. There are many physical therapy preoperative methods used in spinal surgery to support the process of idiopathic scoliosis correction. In all of the analyzed scientific materials and available guidelines, it is demonstrated a significant positive effect of the different methods used in the perioperative physiotherapy Intracorrection and the possibility of long-term results obtained after surgery. Conclusions. The use of modern methods of perioperative physiotherapy in surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis should be an important element of a comprehensive procedure. Methods of physiotherapy should be performed at a specified time prior to surgery and after surgery to ensure adequate, positive clinical results.

Anterior instrumentation (dual screws single rod system) for the surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in the lumbar area: a prospective study on 33 adolescents and young adults, based on a new system of classification

The choice of anterior instrumentation in the treatment of lumbar scoliosis in adolescents and young adults is not a new topic for the authors. The first results achieved using the Dwyer surgical modality were reported by one of the authors followed by the results achieved using Zielke (VDS) instrumentation. Today, new techniques and new instrumentations have been developed that challenge the instrumentation choices. Here we describe how the new system of classification of scoliotic curves we developed has been used as a basis for treating idiopathic scoliosis in lumbar area in adolescents and young adults using an anterior approach. A prospective study was carried out between 1998 and 2010 at two hospital centers on 33 adolescents and young adult with idiopathic lumbar scoliosis involving curves of three kinds, on whom surgical treatment was performed using a single solid rod. Topography of curves: our system of classification includes curves corresponding to the following three type of scoliosis: Type K I: double thoracic and lumbar curves (lumbar predominant) scoliosis (17 cases) mean age 16 years all female patients. Mean Cobb angle of lumbar curve 41°. Mean Cobb angle of thoracic curve 28°. The lumbar curve was left hand convex in 15 cases and right hand convex in 2 cases. Horizontal tilting of L4 mean value 22°. C7 offset mean value 3 cm. Type K IV A: unbalanced thoracolumbar scoliosis (13 cases) mean age 17 years, ten female patients and three male patients. Mean Cobb angle of thoracolumbar curve 39°. The thoracolumbar curve was left hand convex 4 times and right hand convex 9 times. Horizontal tilting of L4 mean value 18°. C 7 offset mean value 2.5 cm. Type K VI A: real lumbar (three cases). Age: 17, 15 and 13 years; all female patients. Cobb angle of the lumbar curve 66°, 29° and 70° (all LH convex). Horizontal tilting of L4: 40°, 20° and 46°. C 7 offset: 7 cm, 1 cm and 4 cm. Surgical instrumentation: We used the EUROS AZUR anterior instrumentation for all the procedures. Cages have been used on five patients at the lower stages. Number of vertebrae instrumented: mean five vertebrae. The patients did not wear postoperative orthosis. Mean duration of procedure: 3 h 50 min. Mean blood loss: 350 cm(3). Type K I scoliosis (17 cases): Mean follow-up: 6 years. Correction of the lumbar curve Cobb angle: the mean angle has been corrected from 41° to 21°. Number of vertebrae instrumented: 4:6 times and 5:11 times. Correction of the upper thoracic curve Cobb angle: mean angle corrected from 28° to 19°. Correction of L4 horizontal tilting: mean residual was 7°. Correction of C 7 offset: mean 0.7 cm. Type K IV A scoliosis (13 cases): mean follow-up: 4 years. Correction of the lumbar curve Cobb angle: the mean angle has been corrected from 39° to 16°. Mean number of instrumented vertebrae: 5 (4:4 times, 5:6 times and 6:3 times.) Correction of L4 horizontal tilting: mean residual 5°. Correction of C 7 offset: mean 0.7 cm. Type K VI A scoliosis (three cases): mean follow-up: 7, 2 and 4 years; Correction of the lumbar curve Cobb angle: the angles have been corrected from 66° to 15°, from 29° to 11° and from 70° to 28°. Number of instrumented vertebrae: 5, 4 and 6. Correction of L4 horizontal tilting: residual tilting of 8°, 7° and 17°. Correction of C 7 offset: 1 cm, 0 cm and 1 cm. There has been no report early or late septic or vascular or neurological complications. Instrumentation failure: there were three cases of screw breakage, all occurred on the lowest implant. Revision surgery was undertaken in both cases, only the last plate needed to be replaced and the rod could be kept without any other modification of the construct. In both cases, fusion has been achieved without any loss of correction. The mean loss of correction of the main curve was 2.5° for the three series. Anterior instrumentation of lumbar idiopathic scoliosis gives highly satisfactory morphological and functional results, since the lumbar musculature is spared and the instrumentation placed at the apex of the curvature has selective effects. Despite our preference and that of other surgeons throughout the world for anterior instrumentation, we are still a minority in comparison with the users of posterior instrumentation. There are several reasons for this reticence, including surgeons' training and ideas about pedicular screw fixation, but the main reason has been the lack of a sufficiently exact system of classification. Previous comparative studies between the anterior and posterior approaches have been biased by the use of an excessively restrictive mode of classification (lumbar/thoracolumbar) of the curves. Real lumbar scoliosis, unbalanced thoracolumbar scoliosis and thoracic and lumbar double curve (lumbar predominant) scoliosis should be properly defined before being compared.

特発性側弯症の手術法の検討

特発性側弯症に対しては種々の矯正法が報告されているが，フック，ロッド，サブラミナワイヤーおよび椎弓根スクリューを組み合わせたハイブリット法と主に椎弓根スクリューを多用するsegmental screw fixation法が代表とされる．両方法にはそれぞれ長所・短所があり，当科では症例毎に適応を考慮してきた．今回は同一術者による両術式の治療成績を比較検討した．症例は2007年7月から2011年8月に手術施行した36例（男性3例，女性33例）．平均年齢は15.7歳．ハイブリット法が24例，segmental screw fixation法が12例であった．術後平均矯正率はそれぞれ61.9％と67.8％であった．術後矯正率ではsegmental screw fixation法が若干良好ではあったが，術後の脊柱バランスは両術式ともに良好で，満足する結果であった．

キアリ奇形・空洞症を合併した側弯症2例の手術経験

キアリ奇形・空洞症を合併した側弯症2例の手術経験

The use of perioperative physiotherapy methods in surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis – an analysis of the latest reports and scientific literature

The use of perioperative physiotherapy methods in surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis – an analysis of the latest reports and scientific literature

Use of computed tomographic reconstruction to establish the ideal entry point for pedicle screws in idiopathic scoliosis

To determine the ideal entry point for individual pedicle screw in the surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis using computed tomographic (CT) three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction. Twenty patients with moderate or severe idiopathic scoliosis from two groups received surgical treatment using "Free Hand technique" and "Assisted Free Hand technique". Computed tomographic scanning with 3D reconstruction of the thoracic and lumbar spine was conducted to determine the entry point and to evaluate the placement accuracy. The accuracy of placement was 88.2% in convexity and 84.5% in concavity for the "Free Hand" group, and 94.1% in convexity and 94% in concavity for the "Assisted Free Hand" group. Evidence showed that "Assisted Free Hand" group had higher accuracy when screws were placed in the thoracic spine (P=0.02), while no obvious difference was seen in the lumbar spine placement (P=0.47). We conclude that in the surgical treatment of severe scoliosis, individual screw placement guided by entry points determined by CT reconstruction can result in improved accuracy and ease of the procedure.

Remote results of surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in adults

The article deals with results of remote surgical treatment of 57 adult patients with idiopathic scoliosis. All the patients underwent corrective and stabilizing surgical interventions with help of polysegmental fabricated metals on the base of screws and hooks. The analysis of the obtained results revealed that the main problems of adult patients with scoliotic deformities consisted in their pain syndrome and neurologic disturbances; the available polysegmental metals made it possible to achieve from 38% to 52% of the deformity correction in the frontal plane and preserve the sagittal contour of the vertebral column and the vertebropelvic balance both after the operation and during a remote postoperative period. Determination of intervertebral disk angles LIV-LV, as well as those of LIV-SI and LV-SI in the frontal and sagittal planes are significant radiological criteria for revealing the influence of the above metals on indices of the frontal and sagittal balance and prognosis of irregular loading of an intervertebral disk below the area of spondylodesis.

Selective fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a review of current operative strategy

Selective fusion of thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is a concept critically debated in the literature. While some surgeons strongly believe that a more rigid and straighter spine provides predictably excellent outcomes, some surgeons recommend a mobile and less straight spine. This topic is a crucial part of surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis, particularly in young patients who will deal with the stress of the fusion mass at the proximal and distal junctions over many years. This study will review the literature on various aspects of selective fusion.

Geographic and Demographic Variability of Cost and Surgical Treatment of Idiopathic Scoliosis

Retrospective database review. To determine the variability in cost and surgical technique by geographic region and patient demographic. Some patients with idiopathic scoliosis (IS) ultimately require surgical treatment. The costs associated with hospitalization can be substantial, yet it is unknown how these vary depending on geographic region. Patients aged 10 to 24 who underwent surgical fusion for idiopathic scoliosis from 2004 to 2006 were identified in a publicly available, searchable national database of insurance billing records for patients with orthopaedic diagnoses (PearlDiver Patient Record Database) by searching ICD-9 diagnosis and procedure codes. Inpatient hospital charges for the procedure, length of stay (LOS), and surgical procedure (anterior, posterior, anterior-posterior, posterior interbody) were recorded. Patients were stratified by geographic region (Northeast, South, Midwest, West) and age group (10-14, 15-19, and 20-24). Seventy-six thousand seven hundred forty-one patients had IS and 955 patients had spinal fusion procedure codes. Per patient average charge (PPAC) was $113,303 with average LOS 5.6 days. There was no significant difference in procedure type based on geographic region or age. The Northeast had the lowest rate of posterior surgery and highest rate of anterior only procedures. The Midwest had the highest rate of anterior-posterior surgery and Northeast had the lowest. Patients age 10 to 14 had the highest rate of posterior only procedures, those age 20 to 24 had the lowest. Patients age 15 to 19 were more likely to have anterior only procedures. Taken together, anterior-posterior and posterior interbody techniques were most common in patients age 20 to 24. Inpatient hospital charges varied significantly from region to region. Charges were highest in the West ($152,637) and lowest in the South ($103,256). There was no significant difference in PPAC based on age. LOS was significantly highest in the Midwest (6.5 days) and lowest in the South (5.2 days). LOS was significantly higher in the oldest age group compared with the younger groups. PPAC and LOS varied by region. Although there was no significant difference in treatment type based on age or region, older patients tended to have more complex procedures and a higher LOS. This did not translate into a significant change in PPAC based on age. These data point to the need for further studies examining reasons for geographic variability in idiopathic scoliosis surgeries.

Neurologic Injury in the Surgical Treatment of Idiopathic Scoliosis: Guidelines for Assessment and Management

Iatrogenic spinal cord injury resulting from surgical treatment of spinal deformity is a relatively uncommon but devastating complication. Publications on the prevalence of spinal cord injury following surgery are numerous, but no definitive review with clinically pertinent treatment guidelines exists. Methods to reduce the risk of neurologic complications with scoliosis surgery include adequate patient evaluation and preoperative planning, intraoperative preparation, intraoperative neuromonitoring, and postoperative management. Treatment algorithms may be useful in the clinical setting to manage intraoperative or postoperative neurologic injury.

Minimal important differences of the SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire following surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis

The responsiveness of an instrument measuring health-related quality of life is an important indication of its construct validity. The SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire has become the most widely used patient-reported outcome instrument in the clinical evaluation of patients with idiopathic scoliosis. The responsiveness of the SRS-22 following surgical treatment in patients with idiopathic scoliosis has not been fully assessed. The aim of this study is to evaluate this factor by calculating the minimal important differences (MIDs) of the SRS-22 Questionnaire. The study included 91 patients with idiopathic scoliosis (77 females and 14 males), who underwent surgical treatment; mean age at the time of surgery was 18.1 years. Patients completed the SRS-22 questionnaire before surgery and at a follow-up visit (mean follow-up, 45.6 months). At follow-up, patients rated their overall situation as related to before surgery with a four-point Likert scale: 1-Worse, 2-Same, 3-Better, 4-Much Better. This evaluation represented the global perceived effect (GPE) and served as the anchor criterion for calculating the MID. MIDs were calculated using two approaches. The anchor-based MID (MID-A) was defined as the mean preoperative/follow-up difference in SRS-22 scores in the group of patients who stated they were much better than before surgery (GPE = 4). Using the same anchor criterion, the optimal cut-off value able to identify patients that had clearly improved was determined on a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. In addition, the distribution-based MID (MID-D) was calculated by the standard error of measurement method. The MID-As found for the different subscales and the sum score were: pain 0.6, function 0.3, image 1.3, mental health 0.3, average sum score 0.6, and raw sum score 13.1. The cut-off values on the ROC curve were: pain 0.2, function 0.0, image 1.6, mental health 0.4, average sum score 0.4, and raw sum score 10. The MID-Ds were: pain 0.6, function 0.8, image 0.5, mental health 0.4, average sum score 0.5, and raw sum score 6.8. As was expected, the MID values differed according to the calculation method used. In light of the fact that the MID-As for the function and mental health subscales are below the measurement error of the instrument, it seems preferable to use the MID-D values for determining subscale changes. If the purpose is to analyze sum score changes (either the raw or average values), the MID-A is preferable because it includes the patient's evaluation of the results of surgery.

Selektive Fusionsmöglichkeiten der idiopathischen Skoliose unter kritischer Würdigung der Lenke-Klassifikation

Indications for surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis are progressive curves greater than 40-50 degrees. In most cases, fusion of only the primary (structural) curve(s) is sufficient due to the flexibility and spontaneous correction of the secondary curves. Therefore, it is crucial to identify both primary and secondary curves. According to the Lenke classification, all curves with a residual curve of more than 25 degrees on the bending films and those with a pathological kyphosis are regarded as structural and should be fused, whereas the nonstructural curves can be left unfused. However, according to reports in the literature and to the author's experience, clinical parameters such as shoulder level and rib or lumbar hump as well as radiometric criteria such as rotation are relevant as well. In summary, the Lenke classification is an important and helpful tool for analysing idiopathic curves and determining fusion length, even though each scoliosis case needs to be evaluated individually, especially taking clinical parameters into account.

Anterior Spinal Fusion Versus Posterior Spinal Fusion for Moderate Lumbar/Thoracolumbar Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

A prospective study. Comparison study of radiologic and clinical outcomes, efficiency, and cost between anterior spinal fusion (ASF) and posterior spine fusion (PSF) in surgical treatment of moderate lumbar/thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). ASF and PSF indicated for lumbar and thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgical treatment have respective advantages and disadvantages. However, up until today, a related prospective AIS comparative study has rarely been reported. Thirty-two cases in this prospective study with patients enrolled in either method A or B alternately in a sequence were divided into 2 groups. Group A underwent ASF with single solid rod and single screw constructs, and group B underwent PSF with segmental total pedicle screw system. Inclusion criteria were: (1) AIS diagnosis; (2) diagnosis classification as Lenke5CN type; (3) Cobb angles 35 degrees-60 degrees on anteroposterior view radiographs. Exclusion criteria were: (1) a history of spinal surgery; (2) age younger than 10 years; (3) Risser sign 0 degree; (4) lumbar/thoracolumbar kyphosis. All patients were observed with 2-year minimum follow-up (24-46 months). Clinical and radiologic outcomes of both groups A and B were analyzed. Statistical t test or Mann-Whitney U test demonstrated no significant difference in preoperative age (P = 0.380), Risser sign (P = 0.733), magnitude (P = 0.936), flexibility (P = 0.815), apical vertebra rotation (AVR, P = 0.756), and apical vertebra translation (AVT, P = 0.355) of the lumbar/thoracolumbar curves, trunk shift (TS, P = 0.448), sagittal kyphosis from T5-T12 (P = 0.792) and sagittal lordosis from L1-L5 (P = 0.299). Average coronal correction of thoracolumbar/lumbar curves was 83% after surgery and 77% at follow-up in group A and 87% after surgery and 82% at follow-up in group B (P = 0.236 and P = 0.138). No significant differences were observed regarding correction of sagittal alignment, TS, AVT, AVR and hospitalization days on last follow-up between both groups (P > 0.05). No pseudarthrosis, reoperation, neurologic complications, infection, and no other problems were observed. Excellent clinical fusion results were present in all patients on their last follow-up. However, significant differences were evident in group A in regards to reduced operative time (P = 0.046), reduced estimated blood loss (P = 0.003), decreased blood transfusion (P = 0.006), reduced implants cost and hospitalization expenses (P = 0.000). Additionally, group A had shorter fusion levels than group B (p50 = 4 vs. p50 = 5, P = 0.003). ASF versus PSF comparison in treating moderate lumbar/thoracolumbar AIS did not show significant differences in regards to safety or efficacy but demonstrated shorter fusion levels, reduced surgical trauma and costs in ASF.

Infection After the Surgical Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Retrospective case-control. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a single surgeon's experience with infection after surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, with a focus on the diagnosis, treatment, and impact on radiographic and patient-reported outcomes. Although previous studies have evaluated this postoperative complication, no studies to date have looked at the impact of this complication on both radiographic and patient-reported outcomes. From 1986 to 2004, 236 patients were identified who underwent surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and had at least 2-year follow-up. The medical records of patients who developed infection were retrospectively reviewed in detail. Preoperative and most recent postoperative radiographic parameters and Scoliosis Research Society 24 outcomes of both infected and noninfected patients were compared. Of 236 patients 7 (3%) developed an infection. One was acute (17 days postoperative), and 6 were delayed (average 34.2 months postoperative). The most common presenting complaints included back pain (5 of 7) and localized swelling (4 of 7). All patients with delayed infection were treated with 1 surgery (irrigation and debridement, instrumentation removal) and 6 weeks of intravenous antibiotics. Of 6 patients 3 had pseudarthrosis. Culture results were: Staphylococcus epidermidis (n = 2), Propionibacterium acnes (n = 1), Enterococcus faecalis (n = 1), Group A Streptococcus (n = 1), no growth (n = 1). The patient with acute infection required 6 surgical procedures and 16 weeks of antibiotics. Cultures were positive for methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Serratia marscesens. Revision fusion surgery was performed 5 months after the infection was treated. Compared with the noninfected patients, those with infection had lower percent thoracic (P = 0.01) and lumbar (P = 0.06) curve correction. There was no difference in the pain, function, self-image, satisfaction, or total Scoliosis Research Society 24 scores. Postoperative infection after the surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis can successfully be treated with irrigation and debridement, instrumentation removal, and a course of antibiotics. Although less curve correction was achieved in the infected group, there were no differences in patient-reported outcomes when compared with the noninfected group.

Operative Therapie der idiopathischen Skoliose mittels ventraler Doppelstabinstrumentation

In the surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis both anterior and posterior correction and instrumentation techniques are available. The aim of the present study was to analyse the results of a new anterior dual rod instrumentation. Prospective analysis of radiometric and clinical parameters of 93 patients operated on between 1996 and 2004 using the Münster Anterior Dual Rod System. The average curve correction was 65% (fusion length usually Cobb levels) with a preoperative Cobb angle of 59 degrees. Postoperative loss of correction amounted to 1.5 degrees (average follow-up of 36 months). Apical vertebral derotation averaged 45% in the thoracic and 53% in the lumbar spine with a subsequent correction of the rib hump of 66% and the lumbar hump of 81%. There were no revisions or neurological complications. Anterior dual rod instrumentation enables an effective and safe three-dimensional curve correction in single structural curves with only minimal loss of correction.

P33. Result of Intermittent Pedicle Screw Fixation in Surgical Treatment of Flexible Idiopathic Scoliosis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Segmental pedicle screw fixation is recognized as a very effective method in surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. However, many authors report that they insert pedicle screws in all segments of the corrective side without prior sufficient study of its efficacy.

Minimum 10 years follow-up surgical results of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with TSRH instrumentation

Last two decades witnessed great advances in the surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. However, the number of studies evaluating the long-term results of these treatment methods is relatively low. During recent years, besides radiological and clinical studies, questionnaires like SRS-22 assessing subjective functional and mental status and life-quality of patients have gained importance for the evaluation of these results. In this study, surgical outcome and Turkish SRS-22 questionnaire results of 109 late-onset adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients surgically treated with third-generation instrumentation [Texas Scottish Rite Hospital (TSRH) System] and followed for a minimum of 10 years were evaluated. The balance was analyzed clinically and radiologically by the measurement of the lateral trunk shift (LT), shift of head (SH), and shift of stable vertebra (SS). Mean age of the patients was 14.4+/-1.9 and mean follow-up period was 136.9+/-12.7 months. When all the patients were included, the preoperative mean Cobb angle of major curves in the frontal plane was 60.8 degrees +/-17.5 degrees . Major curves that were corrected by 38.7+/-22.1% in the bending radiograms, postoperatively achieved a correction of 64.0+/-15.8%. At the last follow-up visit, 10.3 degrees +/-10.8 degrees of correction loss was recorded in major curves in the frontal plane with 50.5+/-23.1% final correction rate. Also, the mean postoperative and final kyphosis angles and lumbar lordosis angles were 37.7 degrees +/-7.4 degrees , 37.0 degrees +/-8.4 degrees , 37.5 degrees +/-8.7 degrees , and 36.3 degrees +/-8.5 degrees , respectively. A statistically significant correction was obtained at the sagittal plane; mean postoperative changes compared to preoperative values were 7.9 degrees and 12.9 degrees for thoracic and lumbar regions, respectively. On the other hand, normal physiological thoracic and lumbar sagittal contours were achieved in 83.5% and 67.9% of the patients, respectively. Postoperatively, a statistically significant correction was obtained in LT, SH, and SS values (P<0.05). Although, none of the patients had completely balanced curves preoperatively, in 95.4% of the patients the curves were found to be completely balanced or clinically well balanced postoperatively. This rate was maintained at the last follow-up visit. Overall, four patients (3.7%) had implant failure. Early superficial infection was observed in three (2.8%) patients. Radiologically presence of significant consolidation, absence of implant failure, and correction loss, and clinical relief of pain were considered as the proof of a posterior solid fusion mass. About ten (9.2%) patients were considered to have pseudoarthrosis: four patients with implant failure and six patients with correction loss over 15 degrees at the frontal plane. About four (3.7%) patients among the first 20 patients had neurological deficit only wake-up test was used for neurological monitoring of these patients. No neurological deficit was observed in the 89 patients for whom intraoperative neurological monitoring with SSEP and TkMMEP was performed. Overall, average scores of SRS-22 questionnaire for general self-image, function, mental status, pain, and satisfaction from treatment were 3.8+/-0.7, 3.6+/-0.7, 4.0+/-0.8, 3.6+/-0.8, and 4.6+/-0.3, respectively at the last follow-up visit. Results of about 10 years of follow-up these patients treated with TSRH instrumentation suggest that the method is efficient for the correction of frontal and sagittal plane deformities and trunk balance. In addition, it results in a better life-quality.

COSTAL HUMPBACK RESECTION AS A FINAL STAGE OF IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS SURGICAL TREATMENT

Objective. To analyse results of multistage surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis including costal humpback resection. Material and Methods. From 1996 to 2005 twenty girls with idiopathic scoliosis underwent spine deformity correction with Harrington distraction rod with Drummond interspinous wires (Group I) or with Cotrel – Dubousset Horizon Instrumentation (Group II). The final long-dated stage after correction of deformity included the costal humpback resection at the convex side only. Radiologic and topographic examinations were performed, and lung vital capacity parameter was used for lung function assessment. Patients answered the Russian version of SRS-24 questionnaire after correction and at each follow-up examination. Results. In Group I the mean curvature was 81.7° ± 26.7° (range, 55–107°) before correction and 34.5° ± 13.1° after correction (primary curve correction 57.8 ± 14.1 %). Mean correction loss in dynamics before resection was 8°, after resection 4.3°. In Group II the primary curve magnitude before correction was 87.4° ± 27.1° (range, 48–126°), after correction 42.7° ± 16.9° (primary curve correction 51.9 ± 9.6 %). Average correction loss in dynamics before resection was 3.5°, after resection 2.4°. Spirometric findings presented the following dynamics: lung vital capacity before resection was 1980 ml with mean early postoperative decrease by 16.8 % and subsequent reversion to the preoperative level or increase to 2010 ml. According to the questionnaire survey 100 patients gave the consent for surgery. Conclusion. Costal humpback resection as a cosmetic intervention improves the patient’s assessment of spine deformity surgical correction result.