Surgery For Early-stage Cervical Cancer Research Articles

Modified abdominal radical trachelectomy used to spare fertility during surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: a case report

BackgroundCervical cancer is the fourth most common malignant tumor in childbearing-age women. To date, cervical resection and fertility-sparing surgery are the trends in the era of minimally invasive management. However, a proper management remains crucial. Hereby, we endeavor to underscore an uncommon case of early-stage cervical cancer receiving a tailored surgical technique of abdominal radical trachelectomy at our tertiary referral center and review literature.Case presentationA 33-year-old Vietnamese female patient (E1) was hospitalized for a diagnosis of cervical cancer classified as IB1 stage. The patient was treated with fertility-sparing modified abdominal radical trachelectomy surgery. The postoperative outcome was completely favorable. The patient was sent home after 5 days of hospitalization. In addition, she was monitored without complications.ConclusionFertility-preserving treatment could be effectively performed with a modified technique of abdominal radical trachelectomy among young women with early-stage cervical cancer. Interdisciplinary management is potentially necessary for favorable outcome. Further data are required for long-term outcomes of pregnancy, recurrent rate, and the risk of pelvic organ prolapse.

Fertility-sparing surgery versus standard surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: Five-year life expectancies by tumor size

Fertility-sparing surgery versus standard surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: Five-year life expectancies by tumor size

Long-term outcomes of sentinel lymph node navigation surgery for early-stage cervical cancer

BackgroundSentinel lymph node navigation surgery, which identifies the sentinel lymph node in early cervical cancers and omits systemic pelvic lymphadenectomy in cases where no lymph node metastasis is present, has recently gained attention. However, there are few reports on lymph node recurrence and the long-term outcomes of cervical cancer surgery performed using sentinel lymph node navigation surgery. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of sentinel node navigation surgery for early-stage cervical cancer.MethodsOne hundred thirty-eight patients with cervical cancer were enrolled. Sentinel lymph nodes were identified by injecting 99 m Technetium-labeled phytate and indocyanine green into the uterine cervix. Surgery and survival outcomes were also analyzed.ResultsThe median age and body mass index of the patients were 40 years (20–78) and 21.7 kg/m2 (16.5–50.4), respectively. Open surgery, laparoscopic surgery, and robotic surgery were performed in 77 (56%), 53 (38%), and 8 (6%) patients, respectively. The overall and bilateral detection rates of the sentinel lymph node were 100% and 94%, respectively. Only one case (0.7%) exhibited lower extremity lymphedema, and pelvic lymphocele was observed in three cases (2.2%). Four cases (3%) experienced recurrence over a median follow-up of 57.5 months (range, 2–115 months), with five-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates of 97% and 97.3%, respectively.ConclusionsOur results demonstrate that sentinel node navigation surgery may be safe and effective for early-stage cervical cancer.

Safety of vaginal surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: A retrospective multicenter cohort study

ObjectiveAbdominal Radical hysterectomy (ARH) with pelvic lymph node assessment is considered the standard treatment for early-stage cervical cancer. Accepted routes have previously included laparoscopic or robotic approaches (LRH). Laparoscopy-assisted vaginal or vaginal radical hysterectomy (LVRH) are performed in some centers. The objective of this study is to compare surgical and oncological outcomes of LVRH, to laparoscopic and abdominal approaches. Design patients settingA retrospective multicenter analysis of consecutive cervical cancer cases who underwent a radical hysterectomy between 2007 and 2017 in eleven regional cancer centers across Canada. MeasurementsA comparison of patients stratified by surgical technique was undertaken. T-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum and chi-square were used to compare patient characteristics. Log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models were employed to compare recurrence and survival across surgical groups. Main resultsA total of 1071 patients with cervical cancer stage IA1 with lymphovascular invasion to stage IIIC (FIGO 2018) <4 cm were identified. Postoperative complication rate was lowest for women undergoing LVRH (9.1 %, vs 18.3 % and 22.1 % for minimally invasive and open respectively). During follow up, 114 women recurred, and 70 women died. 5-year recurrence-free survival was 85.4 % for LRH, 89.4 % for ARH and 92.2 % for LVRH. LVRH was not found to be associated with a higher risk of recurrence or death than ARH on multivariable analysis (aHR for recurrence 0.62, CI 0.21–1.77; aHR for death 0.63, CI 0.14–2.77) ConclusionIn this retrospective study, vaginal or laparoscopy-assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer was associated with favorable perioperative and oncological outcomes.

Clinical Significance of Low Volume Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Single Centre Case Series

Background and Objectives: Lymph node involvement is uncommon in early-stage cervical cancer (7-20%), with low volume nodal disease (micrometastasis and isolated tumour cells) representing a further small subset (2-23%) of this small population. Fewer data are available on the impact of low volume metastasis in cervical cancer. The current consensus is to treat this group of patients in the same way as for nodal macrometastasis although the prognostic significance of low volume lymph node metastasis still remains contested. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze a cohort of patients who underwent primary surgery for early-stage cervical cancer and where the post operative histopathology report demonstrated low volume lymph node metastasis. The aim was to determine the frequency of recurrence and progression free survival in groups with isolated tumor cells (&lt;0.2 mm), micrometastasis (0.2 – 2 mm) and macrometastasis (&gt;2 mm). Methods: Retrospective review had identified 18 patients who underwent primary surgery in single Gynaecology Cancer Centre between 2007 and 2018 for cervical cancer with subsequent histologically demonstrated lymph node metastasis. Progression free survival curves were generated for each patient group based on their histological type of lymph node metastasis. Log rank, chi squared test statistic was calculated to test for statistically significant difference in survival between groups. Results: A total of 18 patients were identified as having isolated tumor cells (n=7), micrometastasis (n=5) or macrometastasis (n=6) on post operative lymph node histopathology. Follow up data demonstrated a total of 6 recurrences overall, with the highest number in the “macrometasitasis“ group (66.7%), followed by “isolated tumor cells” group (28.6%). No recurrence was observed in the “micrometastasis” group. The difference in progression-free survival between groups was not statistically significant at alpha = 0.05 (p=0.0685). Conclusion: Further research and larger studies are required to evaluate the prognostic significance and the overall outcome in patients with isolated tumor cell lymph node metastasis in early stage cervical cancer.

Fertility-sparing surgery vs standard surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: difference in 5-year life expectancy by tumor size

Cervical cancer incidence among premenopausal women is rising, and fertility-sparing surgery serves as an important option for this young population. There is a lack of evidence on what tumor size cutoff should be used to define candidacy for fertility-sparing surgery. We sought to describe how the association between fertility-sparing surgery (compared with standard surgery) and life expectancy varies by tumor size among patients with cervical cancers measuring ≤4 cm in largest diameter. Our secondary objective was to quantify the probability of undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy among patients who underwent fertility-sparing surgery as a function of tumor size. We identified patients in the National Cancer Database aged ≤45 years, diagnosed with stage I cervical cancer with tumors ≤4 cm between 2006 and 2018, who received no preoperative radiation or chemotherapy, and who underwent either fertility-sparing surgery (cone or trachelectomy, either simple or radical) or standard surgery (simple or radical hysterectomy) as their primary treatment. Propensity-score matching was performed to compare patients who underwent fertility-sparing surgery with those who underwent standard surgery. A flexible parametric model was employed to quantify the difference in life expectancy within 5 years of diagnosis (restricted mean survival time) based on tumor size among patients who underwent fertility-sparing and those who underwent standard surgery. In addition, among those who underwent fertility-sparing surgery, a logistic regression model was used to explore the relationship between tumor size and the probability of receiving adjuvant radiation. A total of 11,946 patients met the inclusion criteria of whom 904 (7.6%) underwent fertility-sparing surgery. After propensity-score matching, 897 patients who underwent fertility-sparing surgery were matched 1:1 with those who underwent standard surgery. Although the 5-year life expectancy was similar among patients who had fertility sparing surgery and those who had standard surgery regardless of tumor sizes, the estimates of life-expectancy differences associated with fertility-sparing surgery were more precise among patients with smaller tumors (1-cm tumor: restricted mean survival time difference,-0.10 months; 95% confidence interval,-0.67 to 0.47) than among those with larger tumors (4-cm tumor: restricted mean survival time difference,-0.11 months; 95% confidence interval,-3.79 to 3.57). The probability of receiving adjuvant radiation increased with tumor size, ranging from 5.6% (95% confidence interval, 3.9-7.9) for a 1-cm tumor to 37% (95% confidence interval, 24.3-51.8) for a 4-cm tumor. Within 5 years of diagnosis, young patients with stage I cancers measuring ≤4 cm had similar survival outcomes after either fertility-sparing surgery or standard surgery. However, because few patients with tumors >2 cm underwent fertility-sparing surgery, a clinically important survival difference could not be excluded in this population.

Challenges and perspectives on less invasive surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: a critical analysis of the SHAPE trial and its implications.

Challenges and perspectives on less invasive surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: a critical analysis of the SHAPE trial and its implications.

Fertility-sparing and minimally invasive surgery for early-stage cervical cancer.

Fertility-sparing and minimally invasive surgery for early-stage cervical cancer.

The influence of radical trachelectomy on endometrial thickness in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.

Both morbidity and mortality rates of cervical cancer are increasing, especially in reproductive-aged women. Radical trachelectomy (RT) is an effective fertility-preserving surgery for early-stage cervical cancer. This study aimed to determine the influence of RT on endometrial thickness during in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Forty-four patients had undergone RT, and 23 women undergoing IVF-ET treatment (105 ET cycles) were included. Endometrial thickness during hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was retrospectively evaluated and compared between patients with and without RT. Eleven patients (50 ET cycles) in the RT group and 12 (52 ET cycles) in the control group were investigated. Compared with the control group, higher ET cancellation rates were observed in patients in the RT group (1 of 52 cycles [control group] vs. 8 of 50 cycles [RT group], p < 0.01). Endometrial thinning was not affected by patient age at first IVF-ET treatment, history of artificial abortion, preservation of uterine arteries during RT, or postoperative chemotherapy (p = 0.27, 1, 1, and 1, respectively). Our data revealed that RT influenced endometrial thickness in IVF-ET. This was not affected by the background of the patients or perioperative management in this study. We could not reveal the underlying mechanism, but it is postulated that the transient postoperative uterine blood flow status and postoperative infections may have some effect on the endometrium. To resolve these issues, accumulation of evidences are required. We recommend informing patients about the impact of RT on IVF-ET before starting assisted reproductive technology (ART).

Robotic Vaginal Cuff Closure During Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: The Bruges Method.

The only randomized trial (LACC trial, Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer), published in 2018, comparing the oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive and open surgery in early-stage cervical cancer, has shown inferior disease-free and overall survival for minimally invasive surgery. Subsequent large retrospective cohort studies of centers with long-standing experience in minimally invasive surgery and large nationwide cohort studies have shown that both the laparoscopic and robotic approaches have similar survival outcomes as the open surgery group in the LACC trial. Important protective measures to avoid tumor spillage in the peritoneal cavity during colpotomy were the closure of the vaginal cuff and avoiding the use of a uterine manipulator. Several methods have been described to close the vaginal cuff, mainly by a vaginal approach. Here we describe with a video a new technique of vaginal cuff closure during a robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy. During the robotic procedure, a purse string barbed suture is placed through the vaginal walls in order to close the vagina prior to colpotomy. The technique is a feasible, relatively fast, and easy-to-learn addition to the robotic radical hysterectomy procedure in early-stage cervical cancer.

MILACC study: could undetected lymph node micrometastases have impacted recurrence rate in the LACC trial?

ObjectiveThe etiology of inferior oncologic outcomes associated with minimally invasive surgery for early-stage cervical cancer remains unknown. Manipulation of lymph nodes with previously unrecognized low-volume disease might explain this finding....

Twenty years of experience with less radical fertility-sparing surgery in early-stage cervical cancer: Pregnancy outcomes

IntroductionThe standard procedure in cervical cancer is radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND). Because of the increasing age of women bearing children, fertility has become a major challenge. We present pregnancy results after less radical fertility-sparing surgery in women with IA1, LVSI positive, IA2 and IB1 (<2 cm, infiltration less than half of the cervical stroma). Materials and methodAll women (n = 91) underwent laparoscopic sentinel lymph node mapping with frozen section followed by PLND and “selective parametrectomy” (removal of afferent lymphatic channels from the paracervix) if sentinel nodes (SLN) are negative. If lymph nodes were verified negative by definitive histopathology, patients were treated by simple trachelectomy (IB1) or large cone (IA1/IA2) biopsy 1 week after primary surgery. ResultsFrom 1999 to 2018, 91 women were enrolled in the study (median age 29.1 years, range 21–40). Fertility was spared in 76 (83.5%) women; 13 (17.1%) women did not plan future pregnancy and 63 (82.9%) had pregnancy desires. Fifty-four of 63 women conceived (pregnancy rate 85.7%) and 48 of 63 delivered 58 babies (delivery rate 76.2%). Thirty-nine women delivered in term (67.2%): 13 women between 32 and 36 + 6 weeks of pregnancy, 3 between 28 and 31 + 6 weeks and 3 between 24 and 27 + 6 weeks. Only one woman still plans pregnancy. One woman is currently pregnant. ConclusionThe goal of fertility-sparing surgery is to produce good oncological results and promising pregnancy outcomes. Pregnancy results after less radical fertility-sparing procedures show promise (pregnancy rate 82.9% and delivery rate 76.2%).

Surgical margin status in relation to surgical approach in the management of early-stage cervical Cancer: A Canadian cervical Cancer collaborative (4C) study

ObjectiveSurgical margin status in women undergoing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer is an important prognostic factor. We sought to determine whether close (<3 mm) and positive surgical margins are associated with surgical approach and survival. MethodsThis is a national retrospective cohort study of cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy. Patients with stage IA1/LVSI-Ib2(FIGO 2018) with lesions up to 4 cm at 11 Canadian institutions from 2007 to 2019 were included. Surgical approach included robotic/laparoscopic (LRH), abdominal (ARH) or combined laparoscopic-assisted vaginal/vaginal (LVRH) radical hysterectomy. Recurrence free survival(RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Chi-square and log-rank tests were used to compare groups. Results956 patients met inclusion criteria. Surgical margins were as follows: negative (87.0%), positive (0.4%) or close <3 mm (6.8%), missing (5.8%). Most patients had squamous histology (46.9%); 34.6% had adenocarcinomas and 11.3% adenosquamous. Most were stage IB (75.1%) and 24.9% were IA. Mode of surgery included: LRH(51.8%), ARH (39.2%), LVRH (8.9%).Predictive factors for close/positive margins included stage, tumour diameter, vaginal involvement and parametrial extension. Surgical approach was not associated with margin status (p = 0.27). Close/positive margins were associated with a higher risk of death on univariate analysis (HR = non calculable for positive and HR = 1.83 for close margins, p = 0.017), but not significant for OS when adjusted for stage, histology, surgical approach and adjuvant treatment. There were 7 recurrences in patients with close margins (10.3%, p = 0.25). 71.5% with positive/close margins received adjuvant treatment. In addition, MIS was associated with a higher risk of death (OR = 2.39, p = 0.029). ConclusionSurgical approach was not associated to close or positive margins. Close surgical margins were associated with a higher risk of death. MIS was associated with worse survival, suggesting that margin status may not be the driver of worse survival in these cases.

Should laparoscopy be revisited in the management of stage II endometrial cancer in the post-LACC era?

A recent randomized trial showed that laparoscopy had poorer outcomes compared with open surgery for early-stage cervical cancer. Whether this is of concern in endometrial cancer, when the cervix is involved has received little attention. This study aimed to investigate whether there is any difference on overall and cancer specific survival between patients treated with laparoscopy and laparotomy for stage II endometrial cancer. Data from patients with histologically proven stage II endometrial cancer who were treated between 2010 and 2019 in a single cancer center were reviewed. Demographic, histopathological characteristics and treatment modalities were recorded. Recurrence rate, cancer specific and overall survival were compared between patients that were treated with laparoscopic and open surgery. From 47 patients with stage II disease, 33 (70%) were treated with laparoscopy and 14 (30%) with open surgery. There was no difference on age (P=0.86), BMI (P=0.76), Comorbidity Index Score (P=0.96), upstaging/upgrading after surgery (P=0.41), performance of lymphadenectomy (P=0.74), histological type (P=0.32), LVSI (P=0.15), depth of myometrial invasion (P=0.07), postoperative hospital stay (P=0.18) and administration of adjuvant treatment (P=0.11) between the two groups. Recurrence rate (P=0.756), overall (P=0.606) and cancer specific survival (P=0.564) were also comparable between laparoscopy and laparotomy groups. Laparoscopic and open surgery seem to have comparable outcomes for stage II endometrial cancer. The oncological safety of laparoscopy for stage II endometrial cancer should be further investigated with a randomized controlled trial.

Tapeworm infection and secondary hemorrhagic shock found after cervical cancer surgery: a case report

Radical hysterectomy is an essential component of surgery for early-stage cervical cancer, and secondary hemorrhagic shock due to infection and vaginal stump necrosis after laparoscopic hysterectomy is very rare. Here we report a tapeworm infection and secondary hemorrhagic shock in a patient with cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy. On day two after cervical cancer surgery, this patient was found to have a long-term intestinal tapeworm infection and was discharged on postoperative day 11 after deworming on postoperative day 4. The patient entered the emergency operating room for hemorrhagic shock on day 15 after cervical cancer surgery; after hemodynamic resuscitation, gauze tamponade, and anti-infective treatment, the patient’s massive blood loss temporarily stopped. Two days later, the patient’s vaginal stump bled again repeatedly. Eventually, after 17 hours of surgery and hemodynamic resuscitation, the patient’s wound stopped bleeding profusely with ligation of the right internal iliac artery and branch arteries. This patient had a rare tapeworm infection that presented preoperatively but was detected only after cervical cancer surgery. We considered that preoperative anemia, long surgery time, surgical trauma, and intraoperative blood loss have significantly suppressed the patient’s immune response. A long-term intestinal tapeworm infection increased her susceptibility to bacteria, resulting in secondary pathogenic infection and postoperative blood loss. We advised that if a patient has combined parasitic infection and recurrent fever after a hysterectomy, it is necessary to prolong the hospital stay time, improve anemia, and increase immunity until the condition stabilizes before discharge.

Pneumovaginoscopy-assisted radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a novel bidirectional approach for tumor spillage prevention and R0 resection.

This study evaluated the feasibility and outcomes of pneumovaginoscopy-assisted radical hysterectomy (PVRH) for cervical cancer up to stage IIA using a bidirectional fascia-oriented and nerve-sparing surgical approach. This retrospective observational cohort study examined the operative outcomes and prognoses of patients who underwent PVRH (n=59) for up to stage IIA cervical cancer. The basic procedure was Kyoto B2 (Viper Type II nerve-sparing) radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy through simultaneous vaginal and abdominal (open or laparoscopic) approaches. In all cases, pneumovaginoscopy (PV) was used to create a vaginal cuff and dissect the paracolpium and paracervical endopelvic fascia to minimize nerve damage. Thirty-eight (64.4%) patients had stage IB1 cancer. Seven (11.9%) had vaginal invasion (stage IIA1, n=4; IIA2, n=3). The abdominal approach was open in 38 cases and laparoscopic in 21. Adjuvant therapy was administered to 24 patients (41%); one patient received concurrent chemoradiotherapy for gastric-type adenocarcinoma. There were three (6.1%) intraoperative complications (CO2 gas embolism [n=1], sigmoid colon musculosa injury [n=1], and ureteral injury [n=1]) and 8 (14%) postoperative complications (lymphedema with cellulitis [n=4], vaginal cuff dehiscence [n=1], sub-ileus [n=1], symptomatic lymphocyst [n=l], and ureterovaginal fistula [n=1]). The median urination recovery period was 3 days. Microscopic R0 was achieved in all cases. The median follow-up was 44.5 (2-122) months, and no recurrence occurred. PVRH is a new fascia-oriented and nerve-sparing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer. Further, it has favorable operative outcomes and good prognoses, similar to those of adjacent pelvic surgery such as trans-anal total mesorectal excision and radical prostatectomy.

A systematic review of the reproductive and oncologic outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer

In this review, we aim to evaluate the current literature on reproductive and oncologic outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer (stage IA1-IB1). This is a systematic review of the existing literature using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist to report on fertility-sparing surgery and its outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer. Outcomes of interest were subsequent clinical pregnancy rate, reproductive outcomes, and cancer recurrence outcomes. Included in this systematic review were 68 studies encompassing 3,592 patients who underwent fertility-sparing surgery. Of these, reproductive outcomes were reported in 1096 pregnancies. The mean clinical pregnancy rate was 53.2%. Those who underwent vaginal radical trachelectomy had the highest clinical pregnancy rate (67.5%). The mean live birth rate was 67.8% in our study. Twenty-one percent of pregnancies after fertility-sparing surgery required assisted reproductive technology. The mean cancer recurrence rate was 3.2%, and the cancer death rate was 0.6% after a median follow-up period of 40.1 months with no statistically significant difference across surgical approaches. Offering fertility-sparing surgery in early-stage cervical cancer is reasonable. Highest clinical pregnancy rate is associated with vaginal radical trachelectomy. Moreover oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive approaches were comparable with abdominal approaches. We encourage detailed preoperative counseling and multidisciplinary approach to achieve best outcomes.

The status of surgical margins in relation to the type of surgical approach in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Canadian Cervical Cancer Collaborative (4C) study (533)

<b>Objectives:</b> Surgical margin status in women undergoing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer is considered an important prognostic factor. We sought to determine if positive or close surgical margin status (<3mm) is related to the type of surgical approach and associated with worse outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> A national retrospective cohort study of cervical cancer treated with a radical hysterectomy was conducted. Patients with stage IA1 (LVSI positive) to IIIC2 (FIGO 2018) with lesions up to 4cm at ten Canadian institutions from 2007-2019 were included. Surgical approaches for the radical hysterectomy included robotic/laparo- scopic (RLRH), abdominal (ARH), or laparoscopic-assisted vaginal/ vaginal hysterectomy (LVVRH). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Chi-square and log-rank tests were used to compare between cohorts. <b>Results:</b> A total of 960 patients met the inclusion criteria. The majority of patients had squamous histology (470, 49%), while 343 (35.7%) had adenocarcinomas and 113 (11.8%) had adenosquamous. Most were stage IB (681, 70.0%) and 183 (19%) were IA. Mode of surgery included: 495 (51.6%) RLRH, 88 (9.2%) LVVRH and 376 (39.2%) ARH. Surgical margins were negative in 819 (85.3%), positive in 15 (1.6%) or close in 103 (10.7%) patients. Factors predictive of close/positive margins included stage, tumor diameter, vaginal involvement, and parametrial extension; the surgical approach was not a predictor of margin status (p=0.38). Close/positive margins were associated with a higher risk of death on univariate analysis (HR: 2.53; 95% CI: 0.78-8.22) for positive margins and 1.83 (95% CI: 1.04-3.24) for close margins, p=0.05), but margin status was not significant for OS or PFS when adjusting for stage, histology, surgical approach, and adjuvant treatment. Overall, 71% of patients with positive margins and 60% of patients with close margins received adjuvant treatment. One patient (6.7%) with positive margins recurred distantly, despite having received adjuvant chemoradiation; 16 patients (15.3%) with close margins recurred (p=0.023), with 73% having received either adjuvant radiation or chemoradiation. The surgical approach was not statistically associated with either OS (p=0.067) or PFS (p=0.06). <b>Conclusions:</b> Positive or close surgical margins were not found to be associated with the use of the minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approach. MIS approach did not appear to negatively impact outcomes. Positive or close surgical margins were not associated with worse outcomes, possibly due to adjuvant treatment.

Fertility-sparing surgery in early-stage cervical cancer: laparoscopic versus abdominal radical trachelectomy

BackgroundRadical trachelectomy is an acceptable alternative to radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer who wish to preserve reproductive function. This study is designed to compare the laparoscopic versus abdominal radical trachelectomy and provide oncological and obstetric outcome data on patients who have undergone fertility-sparing surgery.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed all early-stage cervical cancer patients who underwent abdominal radical trachelectomy (ART) or laparoscopic radical trachelectomy (LRT) between January 2005 and June 2017 in West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University. Patients' clinical details and follow-up were obtained from hospital records.ResultsA total of 33 patients (5 with IA1, 2 with IA2, and 26 with 1B1) were included, including 18 patients treated with ART and 15 patients treated with LRT. The median age at initial diagnosis was 30.00 ± 4.30 years (range 22–39). The mean follow-up time was 74.67 months. Among the 33 patients, 2 patients (6.06%, 1 abdominal/1 laparoscopic) developed recurrence, and there are no evidence of disease for the remaining 31 patients till now. The overall survival rate 96.99% (32/33). The LRT group had a shorter hospital stay (P = 0.01) and less blood loss (P < 0.01) than the ART group. There is no significant difference in the length of operative time (P = 0.48) between the two surgical routes. Overall, 15/33 patients (45.45%) have tried to conceive. 6 (40.00%) patients were pregnant and 6 (40.00%) patients were infertility. The ART group had a higher clinical pregnancy rate (P = 0.03) than the LRT group.ConclusionsThere is no statistically significant difference in oncological outcome between the two surgical approaches. The clinical pregnancy rate in the ART group was significant higher than that in the LRT group. However, LRT resulted in less blood loss and decreased length of hospital stay.

The Relationship Between Parametrial Involvement and Parametrial Tissue Removed in Radical Surgery in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.

BackgroundThe study aims to evaluate the effect of parametrial dimensions on the prognosis of cases who underwent type 3 radical hysterectomy or radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer (stage I - IIa).MethodsMedical reports of patients with early-stage cervical cancer who have undergone surgery between 1998 and 2020 in Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine Gynecological Oncology Clinic were reviewed retrospectively. A total of 292 cases were identified and included in the study. Demographic characteristics, preoperative examination findings, operation records, and pathology results of the cases were reviewed.ResultsParametrial involvement was found histopathologically negative in 244 out of 292 patients included in our study, the remaining 48 (16.4%) patients were found to be positive. The mean length of the right and left parametrium in the group with negative parametrium invasion, who had an average follow-up of 131.2 (0.57 - 268.2) months, was 3 cm, while the mean volume of the right and left parametrium was 7.2 (0.52 - 32) cm3 and 6 (0.48 - 34) cm3, respectively. On the other hand, the mean length of the right and left parametrium was 3 (1.5 - 5.5) cm and 3 (1.4 - 7) cm, respectively, while the mean volume of the right parametrium was 5.55 (1.37 - 22) cm3, and the mean volume of the left parametrium was 7.5 (1.35 - 24) cm3 in 48 patients with positive parametrial invasion. No statistically significant difference was detected between the two groups when compared in terms of parametrial sizes and volumes (P values of 0.061, 0.262, 0.391, and 0.468, respectively).ConclusionsRadical surgical approach is necessary to obtain a tumor-free surgical margin in the surgical treatment of early cervical cancer, but the complications leading to morbidity and mortality are also increasing with this radicality. For this reason, we consider that it is important to adapt the dimensions of the removed parametrium according to the factors affecting recurrence in cervical cancer to obtain more appropriate surgical margins with the least complications.