Operative Surgeon Research Articles

Low-Volume Surgeons Operating at High-Volume Hospitals Have Low Rates of Periprosthetic Joint Infection after Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

IntroductionThe relationship between surgeon and hospital case volumes and postoperative risk following total hip and total knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA) has been described independently. This study aimed to assess the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following primary TKA and THA to determine if lower volume surgeons operating at higher volume centers would have lower rates of complications compared to lower volume surgeons operating at lower volume hospitals. MethodsA healthcare database was used to retrospectively identify all primary, and elective total joint arthroplasties (TJAs) from October 2015 to December 2021. Using restricted cubic splines, high-volume hospitals were defined using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation, which identified a volume beyond which PJI rates no longer decreased significantly with increasing hospital volume. A similar methodology was used to identify low-volume surgeons operating in high- and low-volume hospitals. There were 605,254 patients who underwent TJA (total hip arthroplasty [THA]: 37.71%; total knee arthroplasty [TKA]: 62.29%) by low-volume surgeons (< 57 THAs and < 68 TKAs) identified and divided into high-volume and low-volume hospital cohorts. High-volume hospitals were defined as > 508 THA and > 812 TKAs per year, and low-volume hospitals were defined as < 145 THAs and < 243 TKAs per year. Multivariable models accounting for potential confounding covariates were created to determine the odds of PJI between cohorts. ResultsAfter taking confounding variables into account, low-volume surgeons at high-volume hospitals had lower rates of PJI relative to their counterparts at low-volume hospitals (THA 0.67 versus 0.80%, aOR [adjusted odds ratio] = 0.69 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.54 to 0.88], P = 0.002; TKA 0.51 versus 0.69%, aOR = 0.73, [95%-CI = 0.61 to 0.87], P = 0.007). ConclusionIncreasing institutional case volume may mitigate the increased risk of PJI associated with low annual surgeon case volume.

A comparative study of two different doses of dexmedetomedine as an adjuvant to lignocaine in infiltration block for tympanoplasty: a triple-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial.

The ideal anesthetic drug choice for local infiltration anesthesia under monitored anesthesia care must provide analgesia and patients' comfort along with a bloodless surgical field for patients. We hypothesized that dexemedetomidine can provide better visibility of the surgical field at a higher dose of 1 µg/kg than 0.5 µg/kg, along with providing sedation and analgesia. After institutional ethics committee clearance and written informed consent, this prospective, randomized, triple blind study was conducted on ninety patients, between 18- 65 years who were scheduled for tympanoplasty. The patients were randomly assigned to either the dexmedetomidine (DEX) 0.5 group or the DEX 1.0 group, and received 10 ml solution containing 2% lignocaine with 0.5 µg/kg dexmedetomidine, or the 1 µg/kg dexmedetomidine. The operative surgeon performed local infiltration using standardized 5-point infiltration technique around the auricle. The primary objective was to compare the intraoperative bleeding at the surgical site. The comparison of normally distributed variables was conducted using the Student's t-test, whereas non-normally distributed variables was compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. The analysis of qualitative data was conducted using the chisquare/Fisher's exact test. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The overall bleeding score was significantly higher in the DEX 0.5 group (3.21 ± 0.727) than the DEX 1.0 group (1.43 ± 0.661) (P value < 0.001). The time to first analgesic requirement and surgeon satisfaction score were also significantly higher in the DEX 1.0 group. Combining dexmedetomidine at a dose of 1 µg/kg with 2% lignocaine for infiltration provided improved analgesia and improved the surgical field during tympanoplasty performed under monitored anesthesia care.

Practice Patterns Vary Widely in the Care of Pediatric and Adolescent Pelvic and Acetabular Fractures: A CORTICES Survey.

Pediatric pelvic and acetabular fractures are rare but potentially devastating injuries and significant management variation exists across the United States. This study sought to elucidate treatment decision-making trends, involvement of adult trauma fellowship-trained surgeons in pediatric care, and pre- and postoperative transfer patterns. Pediatric orthopaedic surgeons who serve as trauma liaisons at 20 PTCs were surveyed regarding training, practice volume, and factors contributing to institutional management of pelvic and acetabular injuries. Five clinical scenarios of pelvic ring and acetabular fractures that varied by injury pattern, age, and sex were presented. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the results. Eighteen institutions responded to the survey (90% response rate, 16 Level, 1 PTC). All surgeons were pediatric fellowship-trained (77.7% in practice >5y). The four most common factors affecting whether surgeons independently managed both pelvic ring and acetabular fractures were patient age, fracture characteristics, displacement and need for surgery. The majority reported managing <10 acetabular (72.2%) but >10 pelvic ring (77.8%) injuries per year. In the clinical scenarios, patients <10 were more likely to have treatment decisions made by a pediatric orthopaedic surgeon. Older patients were more likely to be transferred to another institution for surgery but were often transferred back to the PTC postoperatively. In all clinical scenarios other than posterior hip dislocation, a trauma fellowship-trained surgeon was more likely to be the operative surgeon, even when the patient was not transferred. There is substantial variation in the management of pediatric and adolescent pelvic and acetabular fractures. Even at tertiary care PTCs, volumes are low, and trauma fellowship-trained surgeons are often involved in decision-making and operative management. Age and injury pattern seem to play a large role in variation, and patient transfers between facilities are common. V.

What if You Could Treat the Same Patient Again, Would You do the Exact Same Spine Surgery? A Multi-Surgeon Survey of Their Own Revisions.

Case-based survey. This study aims to investigate what a group of surgeons learned from their own revisions, and what they would do differently today. A multi-center database of ASD surgical patients was queried to identify those with at least 2 surgical procedures performed by the same surgeon between 2009 and 2019. A clinical vignette was created for each case including demographics, a timeline of events, radiographs/measurements, patient-reported outcomes, complications, and surgical strategies used for the index and revision surgeries. The operative surgeon was then asked to fill out a five-question survey aimed at determining factors that contribute to operative decision-making and planning. 86 patients were operated on by 6 participating surgeons for both index and revision ASD surgery. The revised patients had similar follow-up compared to the non-revised group (P = 0.73), with the most common complications indicating a need for revision surgery being proximal junctional failure (42%) and pseudoarthrosis (28%). Surgeons reported that they would not change their surgical strategy in 52.3% of the cases. The leading cause for revision was hardware/instrumentation issues (24.4%). Learning points included rod-related choice (23.3%), level selection (19.8), PJF prophylactic strategy (15.1%), and sagittal alignment objective (11.6%). Surgeons saw opportunity in nearly half of the cases to improve outcomes by changing something in the original surgery. While 40% of the failures remained unexplained from the surgeons' perspective, this study highlights the capacity for adopting changes in adult spinal deformity surgery and illuminates the reasoning behind certain surgical decisions.

Automated robotic systems in surgical practice

The use of robotic systems has long gone beyond experimental medicine. More than 200 thousand operations per year are carried out with the use of just the most popular robotic complex Da Vinci. Further development of robotics will contribute to improvement of quality and accuracy of surgical interventions. Even now, it enables reduction of postoperative complications to almost zero. This review presents the analysis of the results of introducing robots into surgery. An overview of the data presented in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Science Direct and eLIBRARY was performed.

Ergonomic practices and interventions in plastic and reconstructive surgery: A systematic review

IntroductionErgonomics has significant implications for a surgical workforce that performs at the interface between human-operated equipment and patient anatomy to achieve operative results. This systematic review evaluated literature discussing ergonomics in plastic surgery to discuss current knowledge, evaluate trends, and identify gaps prime for future study. MethodsA systematic search strategy was developed with a licensed librarian and plastic surgeon to query all manuscripts evaluating ergonomics in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts, evaluated full texts, and extracted data. ResultsForty-six studies were ultimately included. The number of published studies increased significantly over time when evaluated by year (ρ = 0.660, p < 0.001), with 17 (36.9%) written since 2020. Studies more commonly discussed musculoskeletal pain/disorders (n = 23) compared to surgical instrumentation or technology (n = 18, p = 0.390), operative posture (n = 14, p = 0.041), surgical technique (n = 6, p = 0.002), peri-surgical practices (n = 5, p < 0.001), and surgeon physiology (n = 3, p < 0.001). Of the 19 studies including interventions, approaches more frequently involved novel instrumentation or technology (n = 14, 73.4%) compared to peri-surgical practices (n = 3, 6.5%, p < 0.001) or operative posture (n = 2, 4.3%, p < 0.001). ConclusionsErgonomics in plastic surgery has gained significant interest over time, with recent years representing a large proportion of published literature. Although most studies discuss musculoskeletal pain, the proportion of studies addressing posture and surgical practices are comparatively underrepresented, suggesting a welcome opportunity for future intervention.

Factors Associated With Adverse Radiographic Outcomes Following Operative Management of Ankle Fractures: A Single-Center Study.

Introduction Ankle fractures arecommonly encountered fractures in emergency departments worldwide. These fractures often have significant articular involvement that requires anatomic surgical reduction and stabilization. Radiographs can be used in everyday practice to evaluate ankle fractures utilizing various parameters to assess reduction quality intraoperatively and postoperatively. Several factors have been found to influence the reduction quality of fractures across body regions.This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the influence of several factors on the reduction quality of ankle fractures in a tertiary care center in the Kingdom of Bahrain. Materials and methods A total of 462 records were identified during the search, and 68 records were excluded. A total of 394 ankle fractures met the inclusion criteria for the study. Five orthopedic surgeons then evaluated the operative films in accordance with the Delphi consensus parameters for evaluating ankle fractures, and the reductions were graded as good, adequate, or poor. Results The study included 394 ankle fractures that met the inclusion criteria, and four significant associations were notedto affect the quality of reduction. Ankle fractures with posterior malleolus involvement (PMI) were significantly associated (p = 0.001) with fragments smaller than 15% and larger than 20% having decreased outcomes. The number of daysfrom admission to operation was also significant (p = 0.009), with the best reductions observed between zero and one day from admission. Operating surgeon was also a significant factor (p = 0.038), with inferior reductions noted in specialist surgeons compared to trainees. The last significant association was the number of malleoli (p = 0.001), with an inferior reduction with a larger number of malleoli involved. Conclusion Ankle fractures are a common and significant orthopedic injury. Reduction quality is important for optimal outcomes after surgical stabilization. Various factors including the number of malleoli, the grade of the operating surgeon, and the time of surgery were significantly related to the quality reduction in this single-center study. Expedited surgical management of fractures that are amenable to early fixation, careful assessment, and meticulous technique in fixation offractures with multiple fractured malleoli is indicated to reduce the chance of malreduction particularly in complex injuries.Further assessment of factors related to reduction quality with large-scale prospective studies would provide orthopedicsurgeons with insights into the identification and optimal treatment of such fractures.

Re-appraisal of bronchus-first right upper lobectomy as an alternative routine procedure.

Postoperative air leakage is a major complication of lung resection, particularly right upper lobectomy. However, various surgical procedures can reduce postoperative complications and shorten the drainage period. The current study aimed to analyse the utility of bronchus-first right upper lobectomy as an alternative routine procedure. We retrospectively analysed the data of 225 (53.7%) patients who underwent bronchus-first right upper lobectomy and 194 (46.3%) patients who underwent the conventional bronchus-last right upper lobectomy at our institution from 2015 to 2022. In patients with incomplete fissures who underwent bronchus-first right upper lobectomy, the bronchus was dissected 1st, followed by the pulmonary artery and vein, and then, the interlobar fissure was divided. We compared the outcomes of 2 procedures and analysed the surgical utility of bronchus-first right upper lobectomy. The surgical outcomes and postoperative morbidity comparing bronchus-first and bronchus-last procedure were as follows: median operation time (min) 103/126 (P < 0.001), median bleeding amount (ml) 28/55 (P = 0.003), incomplete lobulation rate (%) 35.1/24.2 (P = 0.02), incidence of prolonged air leakage (%) 2.2/3.1 (P = 0.76) and rate of fellow surgeon's operation (%) 28.0/4.6 (P < 0.001). The procedure was associated with a decreased incidence of prolonged air leakage. The 4-year overall survival rates did not significantly differ between the 2 groups (P = 0.24). Bronchus-first right upper lobectomy can prevent postoperative air leakage in patients with incomplete fissure. Additionally, as an alternative routine procedure, it is associated with a shorter surgical duration and a lower volume of blood loss regardless of interlobar fissure and operator's experience.

Handheld robotic device for endoscopic neurosurgery: system integration and pre-clinical evaluation.

The Expanded Endoscopic Endonasal Approach, one of the best examples of endoscopic neurosurgery, allows access to the skull base through the natural orifice of the nostril. Current standard instruments lack articulation limiting operative access and surgeon dexterity, and thus, could benefit from robotic articulation. In this study, a handheld robotic system with a series of detachable end-effectors for this approach is presented. This system is comprised of interchangeable articulated 2/3 degrees-of-freedom 3 mm instruments that expand the operative workspace and enhance the surgeon's dexterity, an ergonomically designed handheld controller with a rotating joystick-body that can be placed at the position most comfortable for the user, and the accompanying control box. The robotic instruments were experimentally evaluated for their workspace, structural integrity, and force-delivery capabilities. The entire system was then tested in a pre-clinical context during a phantom feasibility test, followed up by a cadaveric pilot study by a cohort of surgeons of varied clinical experience. Results from this series of experiments suggested enhanced dexterity and adequate robustness that could be associated with feasibility in a clinical context, as well as improvement over current neurosurgical instruments.

Advantages of the 3- vs. the 2-Dimensional Laparoscopic Technology in Bariatric Surgery

Abstract Background Bariatric surgery procedures as the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y-Gastric Bypass (RYGB) are highly standardized procedures. The difficulty in two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopic surgery is the loss of the depth perception which complicates surgical techniques as suturing and knotting. The development of three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy has been shown to reduce operative times and surgeons’ performances errors. Aims To compare operative times, post-operative complications and the lengths of hospital stay of patients having undergone laparoscopic RYGB before and after the introduction of the 3D-technology. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study including patients having undergone RYGB (without cholecystectomy) at our institution by the same surgical team before and after the introduction of the 3D-laparoscopic technology (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany). The primary outcome was the operative time, the secondary outcomes the post-operative complications and lengths of hospital stay. Results 100 consecutive patients, operated on 2019-2021 were included; 50 were operated utilizing the 2D- and 50 the 3D laparoscopic technology. There were no statistically significant differences in age, gender, body mass index or comorbidities, however, patients in the 3D-group had significantly more previous interventions. Operative time and hospital length of stay were significantly reduced in the 3D-group (83 (± 20.8) vs. 91 (± 13.5) minutes; p &amp;lt; 0.05 and 2.1 (± 0.4) vs. 2.7 (± 1.1) nights; p &amp;lt; 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences found between groups concerning post-operative complications and re-interventions. Conclusion 3D technology may help reducing the operative time and length of hospital stay in laparoscopic RYGB surgery with similar post-operative complications. We cannot completely exclude reduced operative times by the still growing experience of the surgical team.

Assessing the variation and drivers of cost in 1-level lumbar fusion: a time-driven activity-based costing analysis

Background ContextAs value-based health care arrangements gain traction in spine care, understanding the true cost of care becomes critical. Historically, inaccurate cost proxies have been used, including negotiated reimbursement rates or list prices. However, time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) allows for a more accurate cost assessment, including a better understanding of the primary drivers of cost in 1-level lumbar fusion. PurposeTo determine the variation of total hospital cost, differences in characteristics between high-cost and nonhigh-cost patients, and to identify the primary drivers of total hospital cost in a sample of patients undergoing 1-level lumbar fusion. Study Design/SettingRetrospective, multicenter (one academic medical center, one community-based hospital), observational study. Patient SampleA total of 383 patients undergoing elective 1-level lumbar fusion for degenerative spine conditions between November 2, 2021 and December 2, 2022. Outcome MeasuresTotal hospital cost of care (normalized); preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative cost of care (normalized); ratio of most to least expensive 1-level lumbar fusion. MethodsPatients undergoing a 1-level lumbar fusion between November 2, 2021 and December 2, 2022 were identified at two hospitals (one quaternary referral academic medical center and one community-based hospital) within our health system. TDABC was used to calculate total hospital cost, which was also broken up into: pre-, intra-, and postoperative timeframes. Operating surgeon and patient characteristics were also collected and compared between high- and nonhigh-cost patients. The correlation of surgical time and cost was determined. Multivariable linear regression was used to determine factors associated with total hospital cost. ResultsThe most expensive 1-level lumbar fusion was 6.8x more expensive than the least expensive 1-level lumbar fusion, with the intraoperative period accounting for 88% of total cost. On average. the implant cost accounted for 30% of the total, but across the patient sample, the implant cost accounted for a range of 6% to 44% of the total cost. High-cost patients were younger (55 years [SD: 13 years] vs 63 years [SD: 13 years], p=.0002), more likely to have commercial health insurance (24 out of 38 (63%) vs 181 out of 345 (52%), p=.003). There was a poor correlation between time of surgery (ie, incision to close) and total overall cost (ρ: .26, p<.0001). Increase age (RC: -0.003 [95% CI: -0.006 to -0.000007], p=.049) was associated with decreased cost. Surgery by certain surgeons was associated with decreased total cost when accounting for other factors (p<.05). ConclusionsA large variation exists in the total hospital cost for patients undergoing 1-level lumbar fusion, which is primarily driven by surgeon-level decisions and preferences (eg, implant and technology use). Also, being a “fast” surgeon intraoperatively does not mean your total cost is meaningfully lower. As efforts continue to optimize patient value through ensuring appropriate clinical outcomes while also reducing cost, spine surgeons must use this knowledge to lead, or at least be active participants in, any discussions that could impact patient care.

Evolution of Surgical Robot Systems Enhanced by Artificial Intelligence: A Review

Surgical robot systems (SRS) represent an innovative cross‐disciplinary research field using robotic technology to assist surgeons in operations. Current bottlenecks in SRS, such as the limited ability to process complex information and make surgical decisions, have not been effectively solved. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a valuable technique for simulating and extending human intelligence. AI offers a new direction and impetus for SRS by enhancing performance in areas such as perception, navigation, surgical planning, and control strategies. This review introduces the developmental history of AI‐aided SRS, summarizes the basic SRS architecture, and analyzes how AI can improve SRS performance. Classical cases of AI‐aided SRS, the impact of evidence in clinical settings, and associated ethical and legal considerations are explored. Finally, the challenges in AI‐aided SRS are discussed, including algorithm development, surgical data science, human–robot coordination, and trust building between humans and robots.

An inferior vena cava-priority approach in laparoscopic isolated hepatic caudate lobectomy.

Laparoscopic isolated caudate lobectomy is still a challenging operation for surgeons. The access route of the operation plays a vital role during laparoscopic caudate lobectomy. There are few references regarding this technique. Here, we introduce a preferred inferior vena cava (IVC) approach in laparoscopic caudate lobectomy. Twenty-one consecutive patients with caudate hepatic tumours between June 2016 and December 2021 were included in this study. All of them received laparoscopic caudate lobectomy involving an IVC priority approach. The IVC priority approach refers to prioritizing the dissection of the IVC from the liver parenchyma before proceeding with the conventional left or right approach. It emphasizes the importance of the IVC dissection during process. Clinical data, intraoperative parameters and postoperative results were evaluated. Sixteen patients were performed pure IVC priority approach, while 5 patients underwent a combined approach. We subsequently compared the intraoperative and postoperative between the two groups. All 21 patients were treated with laparoscopic technology. The operative time was 190.95 ± 92.65min. The average estimated blood loss was 251.43 ± 247.45ml, and four patients needed blood transfusions during the perioperative period. The average duration of hospital stay was 8.43 ± 2.64 (range from 6.0 to 16.0) days. Patients who underwent the pure inferior vena cava (IVC) approach required a shorter hepatic pedicle clamping time (26 vs. 55min, respectively; P < 0.001) and operation time (150 vs. 380min, respectively; P = 0.002) than those who underwent the combined approach. Hospitalization (7.0 vs. 9.0days, respectively; P = 0.006) was shorter in the pure IVC group than in the combined group. Laparoscopic caudate lobectomy with an IVC priority approach is safe and feasible for patients with caudate hepatic tumours.

Surgical Regret and Intraoperative Decision-Making: A Living Donor Kidney Case.

Surgical regret often experienced at times of a great loss may cause a surgeon to reflect on their practice and intraoperative decision-making. It is inevitable that in the surgical profession, both in training and practice, a surgeon's decisions will be questioned by themselves, peers, and possibly patients. Here, we explore a case of living donor kidney donation in which the surgeon chooses to discontinue the operation for an incidental finding. Ultimately, this is against the patient's wishes and a decision over which both the surgeon and patient experience moral hazard and regret. This article explores surgical regret from the lens of an altruistic donor case and a surgeon's inaction, discussing the ethics of the operative decision-making and surgeon's viewpoint intra- and post-operatively.

A Retrospective Comparative Analysis on the Effect of Tranexamic Acid to Reduce Perioperative Blood Loss in Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery.

Retrospective Cohort Study. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of intravenous TXA on blood loss outcomes in anterior, posterior, and combined approaches for elective cervical spine surgery. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been shown to reduce blood loss in a variety of operations, such as lumbar spine surgery. However, limited studies have evaluated the efficacy of TXA in cervical spine surgery. We performed a retrospective review of a single surgeon's elective cervical spine operations between September 2011 and March 2017. Patients were divided into 3 groups: anterior approach, posterior approach, or combined approach. Patients were then further subdivided into TXA versus control groups based on whether they received TXA treatment. We performed multiple linear regressions to assess the relationship between the use of TXA and other dependent variables (number of vertebral levels treated, need for a vertebral corpectomy) on total perioperative blood loss, intraoperative estimated blood loss, postoperative drain output, total operative time, postoperative change in hemoglobin, and occurrence of transfusion and/or postoperative deep venous thrombus (DVT). We found that the use of TXA statistically significantly reduced total perioperative blood loss ( P =0.04) and postoperative drain output ( P =0.004) in posterior surgical approach cervical spine surgery but did not statistically significantly impact any blood loss variables in anterior or combined surgical approaches to elective cervical spine surgery. The use of TXA was a significant predictor for a decrease in intraoperative ( P =0.02) and postoperative ( P <0.01) blood loss. This study found that TXA statistically significantly decreased total blood loss and postoperative drain output when controlling for multiple confounding factors. Level III.

A user-friendly system for identifying the optimal insertion direction and to choose the best pedicle screws for patient-specific spine surgery

Background and objectiveMany diseases of the spine require surgical treatments that are currently performed based on the experience of the surgeon. The basis of this study is to deliver an automatic and patient-specific algorithm able to come to the aid of the surgeons in pedicle arthrodesis operations, by finding the optimal direction of the screw insertion, the maximum screw diameter and the maximum screw length. ResultsThe paper introduce an algorithm based on the reconstructed geometry of a vertebra by 3D-scan that is able to identify the best introduction direction for screw and to select, from commercial and/or personalised databases, the best screws in order to maximize the occupation of the bone while not intersecting each other and not going through the walls of the pedicle and the bounds of the vertebral body. In fact, for pedicle arthrodesis surgery, the incorrect positioning of the screws may cause operating failures, an increase in the overall duration of surgery and, therefore, more harmful, real-time X-ray checks. In case of not availability on market, the algorithm also suggests parameters for designing and manufacturing an ‘ad hoc’ solution. The algorithm has been tested on 6 vertebras extracted by a medical database. Furthermore, the algorithm is based on a procedure through which the surgeon can freely choose the entering point of the screw (based on his/her own experience and will). A real patient vertebra has been processed with almost 400 different entering point, always giving a feedback on the possibility to use the entering point (in case of unavailability of a good trajectory) and on the individuation of the right trajectory and the choose of the better screws. ConclusionsIn very recent bibliography, several papers deal with procedure to screw’ trajectory planning in arthrodesis surgery by using Computer Aided surgery systems, and some of them used also modern methodologies (KBE, AI, Deep learning, etc.) methods for planning the surgery as better as possible. Nevertheless, no methodologies or algorithm have been still realized to plan the trajectory and choose the perfect fitting screws on the basis of the patient-specific vertebra. This paper represents a wind of novelty in this field and allow surgeons to use the proposed algorithm for planning their surgeries. Finally, it allows also the easy creation of a customized surgical template, characterized by two cylindrical guides that follow a correct trajectory previously calculated by means of that automatic algorithm generated on the basis of a vertebra CAD model for a specific patient. The surgeon will be able to set the template (drilling guides) on the patient's vertebra and safely apply the screws.

Evidence-Based Complementary Benefit of the Vascular Surgeon Among the Team of Renal Transplantation; a Single Center Experience

In a kidney transplant tertiary referral center; we compared 3 operating team configurations of different surgical specialties to highlight the effect of the operating surgeon's specialty on various operative details and procedural outcome. A total of 50 cases of living donor transplantations were divided into 3 main groups according to the operating surgeons' specialty, the first group (A) includes 12 patients exclusively operated on by urologists with advanced training in transplantation, the second group (B) includes 35 patients operated by combined surgical specialties; a urologist and a vascular surgeon both with advanced transplantation training, and a third group (C) includes 3 cases where the transplant operation commenced with operating urologists as in group (A) but required intraoperative urgent notification of a vascular surgeon to manage unexpected intraoperative technical difficulties or major complications. Cases were studied according to operative details, anastomosis techniques, ischemia times, total procedure time, recovery of urinary output, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, postoperative surgical complications and serum creatinine level for up to 3years of follow-up. Study of operative details revealed that total duration of graft ischemia was significantly shorter in group (B) and significantly longer in group (C) (P value 0.001), Total procedural duration also varied significantly between the 3 groups, group (B) being the shortest while group (C) was the longest (P value less than 0.001). Technically; group (A) used only end to end arterial anastomosis as a standard technique, while group (B) used both end-to-end and end-to-side anastomoses as required per each case. End to side anastomosis in group (B) yielded better immediate graft response in the form of change in color, texture, earlier and more profuse postoperative urine volumes (P value 0.025). Furthermore, anastomosis to common and external iliac arteries (group B) yielded earlier and higher urine volumes than the internal iliac artery (P values 0.024 and 0.031 respectively). Group (B) recorded significantly less postoperative perigraft hematomas and lymphoceles compared to the other 2 groups. Equal rates of urine leaks, ICU stay, creatinine levels, patient and grafts survival rates among groups (A) and (B), while postoperative recovery and ICU stay duration were more lengthy in the complicated group (C). A vascular surgeon operating in a transplantation team would deal comfortably and efficiently with various vascular related challenges and complications, thus avoiding unnecessary time waste, complications and costs.

Practices and Attitudes of Surgeons With Regard to Spilled Gallstones During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Cross-Sectional Study From Saudi Arabia.

Gallbladder perforation and gallstone leakage are frequent complications following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Failure to remove gallstones may result in several issues that manifest immediately or years later. The goal of this study was to evaluate the attitudes of surgeons and the procedures used by them to deal with gallstone spillage during LC. A cross-sectional design was followed. Surgeons in nine healthcare facilities in the Qassim region of Saudi Arabia were approached through non-probability convivence sampling and the survey was distributed in each of the general surgery divisions. The study included general surgeons who currently performed LC and incomplete responses and interns were excluded. A self-administered questionnaire was developed with 18 questions regarding demographics, center, and designation at the hospital, surgeons' experience of LC, and exposure to gallstone spillage. Furthermore, items regarding knowledge, attitude, and self-reported practices related to gallstone spillage such as incidence, complications, and intervention taken to prevent gallstone spillage were also included. The level of significance was set at P <0.05. There were 82 participants of both genders, including consultants, specialists, and residents. While only 23 (28%) participants had actually observed patients with complications from spilled stones, 46 (56.1%) participants were aware of this possibility, 53 (64.6%) deemed it inappropriate to bring up gallstone spillage when securing consent for LC, and 67 (81.7%) believed that such an incident needed to be documented in the operation notes. Only 11 (13.4%) thought that the complications arising out of the unretrieved gallstones should fall under the legal purview of the operative surgeon. There were very few complications of spilled gallstones that the participants were aware of, and none of them anticipated problems to arise more than three years after LC. Awareness of the risks associated with gallstone spillage during LC needs to be raised, and it is imperative to standardize the practices related to their management.

Surgical repair of congenital aural atresia

Despite the ease, efficacy, predictability, and widespread availability of osseointegrated bone conduction hearing devices, surgical repair of congenital aural atresia (CAA) remains a viable and rewarding operation for patients, parents, and surgeons. Careful selection of patients using appropriate audiometry, detailed radiographic interpretation, and assessment of family understanding and child cooperability are the first steps toward a successful outcome. Intimate knowledge of outer, middle, and inner ear anatomy – both in the normally and abnormally developed ear - coupled with meticulous technique at each stage of the operation can yield outstanding hearing results with a clean, skin-lined, dry, patent ear canal. This chapter reviews the preoperative evaluation and steps of the atresia repair operation, including postoperative management, and provides both predictive and published data on hearing outcomes.

Ergonomics in Craniofacial Surgery: Can We Do Better? A Quality Improvement Study.

Many plastic surgeons experience musculoskeletal strain and injury from poor ergonomics during surgery. This is associated with reduced performance, shortened careers, and decreased quality of life. This study compared the ergonomics of the conventional operating table headrest and the Mayfield headrest in craniofacial surgery. A prospective cohort study of patients undergoing craniofacial operations between November 20, 2022 and April 26, 2023, within a single craniofacial surgeon's practice. The authors obtained data on the total duration of the operation and Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) scores for the primary surgeon and assistant. Four operations (mean: 147 ± 60.9 min) were included in the regular headrest group, and 8 in the Mayfield headrest group (mean: 61±53.4 min). Four hundred fifty-five regular headrest time points and 851 Mayfield time points were recorded. Eight hundred thirty-five regular headrest time points and 538 Mayfield time points were recorded. The mean REBA score for the regular headrest was 5.79 ± 1.9, which was higher than the Mayfield (5.01 ± 2.0; P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis showed the mean REBA score for the primary surgeon (5.89 ± 2.0) was higher than the assist (5.48 ± 1.6) in the regular headrest group (P < 0.0001), whereas the converse was true for the Mayfield headrest (primary surgeon: 4.67 ± 1.8, assist: 5.65 ± 2.15, P < 0.0001). Ergonomic scores were better using the Mayfield headrest than the regular headrest. The primary surgeon scored better with the Mayfield headrest, whereas the assists had better scores with the regular headrest.