Pavement performance evaluation with respect to fatigue cracking has seen a major shift toward more rigorous mechanistic models that can capture the complex damage response of the mixtures more accurately. This study utilized two mechanistic methods (cohesive zone [CZ]-based fracture modeling and continuum damage [CD] modeling) to study the cracking behavior of asphalt mixtures and subsequently predict the damage-associated performance of pavements. A Superpave mixture designed for Brazilian highway conditions was selected to evaluate the two modeling approaches for the performance of the mixture when utilized as a surface course within typical Brazilian highway pavements. The mixture was first evaluated for its linear viscoelastic properties, and then the damage characteristics of the mixture were obtained through two different experiments: the semi-circular bending (SCB) beam test and the cyclic fatigue (CF) test. The SCB tests performed at different loading rates were used to obtain the model parameters of the nonlinear viscoelastic CZ model with a Gaussian damage evolution criterion, while the CF tests were performed at different strain amplitudes, and the mixture-specific damage characteristic curve and the fatigue failure criterion were obtained using the simplified-viscoelastic continuum damage model. From a design perspective, three pavement structures that varied in geometry (pavement layer thickness) and underlying layer properties were selected while retaining the same asphalt mixture. The three pavement scenarios were evaluated for the fatigue cracking performance from each of the mechanistic modeling methods. The results indicate that both methods rank the performance of the pavement structures in a similar manner, while the damage initiation and progression were seen to be different because of the different mechanics in modeling cracks.
Read full abstract