This paper begins with an overview of the fundamental conceptions of the German Doctrine of Command Responsibility with the objective to highlight the jurisprudence of the Brazilian Superior Courts. The analytical perspective of this paper about the decisions of the Brazilian Superior Courts is inaugurated with a view on the leading case AP n° 470 judged by the Brazilian Supreme Court - STF. After this initial analysis, this investigation sheds light on the problem of generic charging instrument and the difficulties of individualizing and proving the criminal act executed in a commited corporate crime. A special attention is given to the jurisprudence of the Brazilian Superior Court – STJ for the period 2019-2020 with an objective to clarify whether in the jurisprudence of the STJ, the generic charging instrument of a corporate crime and the Brazilian version of the Doctrine of Command Responsibility become or not the same being endowed with two faces that works as a fast track to overcome evidentiary challenges.