Strong Nucleosomes Research Articles

A study of strong nucleosomes in the human genome

SummaryMicrococcal nuclease (MNase) is widely used to map nucleosomes. However, nucleosomes are highly dynamic and susceptible to experimental conditions, resulting in extreme variability across nucleosome maps, which complicates the generation of accurate nucleosome organization data. We mapped nucleosomes from different individuals using improved MNase-seq. The improvements included setting different digestion levels (low, medium, high) and naked DNA correction to remove the noise caused by experimental manipulation and comparing maps to obtain the accurate position and occupancy of strong nucleosomes (SNs) in the whole genome. In addition, the characteristics of SNs were further excavated. SNs were enriched in Alu elements and near the centromere of Chr12. SNs contain some specific sequences, and the GC content of SNs is different from that of dynamic nucleosomes. The findings suggest that nucleosome location in the genome and the DNA sequence may affect nucleosome stability.

Nucleosome positioning stability is a modulator of germline mutation rate variation across the human genome

Nucleosome organization has been suggested to affect local mutation rates in the genome. However, the lack of de novo mutation and high-resolution nucleosome data has limited the investigation of this hypothesis. Additionally, analyses using indirect mutation rate measurements have yielded contradictory and potentially confounding results. Here, we combine data on >300,000 human de novo mutations with high-resolution nucleosome maps and find substantially elevated mutation rates around translationally stable (‘strong’) nucleosomes. We show that the mutational mechanisms affected by strong nucleosomes are low-fidelity replication, insufficient mismatch repair and increased double-strand breaks. Strong nucleosomes preferentially locate within young SINE/LINE transposons, suggesting that when subject to increased mutation rates, transposons are then more rapidly inactivated. Depletion of strong nucleosomes in older transposons suggests frequent positioning changes during evolution. The findings have important implications for human genetics and genome evolution.

Sequence structure of Lowary/Widom clones forming strong nucleosomes

Lowary and Widom selected from random sequences those which form exceptionally stable nucleosomes, including clone 601, the current champion of strong nucleosome (SN) sequences. This unique sequence database (LW sequences) carries sequence elements which confer stability on the nucleosomes formed on the sequences, and, thus, may serve as source of information on the structure of “ideal” or close to ideal nucleosome DNA sequence. An important clue is also provided by crystallographic study of Vasudevan and coauthors on clone 601 nucleosomes. It demonstrated that YR·YR dinucleotide stacks (primarily TA·TA) follow one another at distances 10 or 11 bases or multiples thereof, such that they all are located on the interface between DNA and histone octamer. Combining this important information with alignment of the YR-containing 10-mers and 11-mers from LW sequences, the bendability matrices of the stable nucleosome DNA are derived. The matrices suggest that the periodically repeated TA (YR), RR, and YY dinucleotides are the main sequence features of the SNs. This consensus coincides with the one for recently discovered SNs with visibly periodic DNA sequences. Thus, the experimentally observed stable LW nucleosomes and SNs derived computationally appear to represent the same entity – exceptionally stable SNs.

Review fifteen years of search for strong nucleosomes

Don Crothers, Mikael Kubista, Jon Widom, and their teams have been first to look for strong nucleosomes, in a bid to reveal the nucleosome positioning pattern(s) carried by the nucleosome DNA sequences. They were first to demonstrate that the nucleosome stability correlates with 10-11 base sequence periodicity, and that the strong nucleosomes localize preferentially in centromeres. This review describes these findings and their connection to recent discovery of the strong nucleosomes (SNs) with visibly periodic nucleosome DNA sequences.

Strong nucleosomes of yeasts

Yeast genome lacks visibly periodic sequences characteristic of strong nucleosomes (SNs) originally discovered in A. thaliana, C. elegans, and H. sapiens. Yet, the sequences with good match to the (RRRRRYYYYY)n consensus of the SNs do show preference to centromere regions of Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Cryptococcus neoformans – property characteristic of SNs of higher eukaryotes. Candida albicans is the first exception detected so far, where their SNs do not have any affinity to the centromeres, nor pericentromeric regions. Three of the four yeast genomes analyzed possess unique repeating centromere-specific SN sequences (C. albicans, again, is an exception). The results firmly indicate that centromeres of plants, animals, and yeasts in general have special chromatin structure, favoring SNs.

TA-periodic (“601”-like) centromeric nucleosomes of A. thaliana

The bulk of strong nucleosomes (SNs, with visibly periodic DNA sequences) is described by consensus pattern of 5 or 6 base runs of purines alternating with similar runs of pyrimidines – RR/YY SNs. Yet, the strongest known nucleosome positioning sequence, the 601 clone of Lowary and Widom, is rather periodic repetition of TA dinucleotides following one another every 10 bases. We located “601”-like TA-periodic sequences in the genome of A. thaliana. Several families of such sequences are discovered repeating almost exclusively in centromeres. Thus, while A. thaliana SNs of RR/YY type have strong affinity to pericentromeric regions, as it has been previously found, the SNs of TA periodic type concentrate rather in centromeres.

Reading sequence-directed computational nucleosome maps

Recently developed latest version of the sequence-directed single-base resolution nucleosome mapping reveals existence of strong nucleosomes and chromatin columnar structures (columns). Broad application of this simple technique for further studies of chromatin and chromosome structure requires some basic understanding as to how it works and what information it affords. The paper provides such an introduction to the method. The oscillating maps of singular nucleosomes, of short and long oligonucleosome columns, are explained, as well as maps of chromatin on satellite DNA and occurrences of counter-phase (antiparallel) nucleosome neighbors.

Strong nucleosomes of mouse genome including recovered centromeric sequences

Recently discovered strong nucleosomes (SNs) characterized by visibly periodical DNA sequences have been found to concentrate in centromeres of Arabidopsis thaliana and in transient meiotic centromeres of Caenorhabditis elegans. To find out whether such affiliation of SNs to centromeres is a more general phenomenon, we studied SNs of the Mus musculus. The publicly available genome sequences of mouse, as well as of practically all other eukaryotes do not include the centromere regions which are difficult to assemble because of a large amount of repeat sequences in the centromeres and pericentromeric regions. We recovered those missing sequences using the data from MNase-seq experiments in mouse embryonic stem cells, where the sequence of DNA inside nucleosomes, including missing regions, was determined by 100-bp paired-end sequencing. Those nucleosome sequences, which are not matching to the published genome sequence, would largely belong to the centromeres. By evaluating SN densities in centromeres and in non-centromeric regions, we conclude that mouse SNs concentrate in the centromeres of telocentric mouse chromosomes, with ~3.9 times excess compared to their density in the rest of the genome. The remaining non-centromeric SNs are harbored mainly by introns and intergenic regions, by retro-transposons, in particular. The centromeric involvement of the SNs opens new horizons for the chromosome and centromere structure studies.

Strong nucleosomes reside in meiotic centromeres of C. elegans

Recently discovered strong nucleosomes (SNs) are characterized by strongly periodical DNA sequence, with visible rather than hidden sequence periodicity. In a quest for possible functions of the SNs, it has been found that the SNs concentrate within centromere regions of A. thaliana chromosomes . They, however, have been detected in Caenorhabditis elegans as well, although the holocentric chromosomes of this species do not have centromeres. Scrutinizing the SNs of C. elegans and their distributions along the DNA sequences of the chromosomes, we have discovered that the SNs are located mainly at the ends of the chromosomes of C. elegans. This suggests that, perhaps, the ends of the chromosomes fulfill some function(s) of centromeres in this species, as also indicated by the cytogenetic studies on meiotic chromosomes in spermatocytes of C. elegans, where the end-to-end association is observed. The centromeric involvement of the SNs, also found in A. thaliana, opens new horizons for the chromosome and centromere structure studies.

Strong nucleosomes of A. thaliana concentrate in centromere regions

Earlier identified strongest nucleosome DNA sequences of A. thaliana, those with visible 10–11 base sequence periodicity, are mapped along chromosomes. Resulting positional distributions reveal distinct maxima, one per chromosome, located in the centromere regions. Sequence-directed nucleosome mapping demonstrates that the strong nucleosomes (SNs) make tight arrays, several ‘parallel’ nucleosomes each, suggesting a columnar chromatin structure. The SNs represent a new class of centromeric nucleosomes, presumably, participating in synapsis of chromatids and securing the centromere architecture.

Visible periodicity of strong nucleosome DNA sequences

Fifteen years ago, Lowary and Widom assembled nucleosomes on synthetic random sequence DNA molecules, selected the strongest nucleosomes and discovered that the TA dinucleotides in these strong nucleosome sequences often appear at 10–11 bases from one another or at distances which are multiples of this period. We repeated this experiment computationally, on large ensembles of natural genomic sequences, by selecting the strongest nucleosomes – i.e. those with such distances between like-named dinucleotides, multiples of 10.4 bases, the structural and sequence period of nucleosome DNA. The analysis confirmed the periodicity of TA dinucleotides in the strong nucleosomes, and revealed as well other periodic sequence elements, notably classical AA and TT dinucleotides. The matrices of DNA bendability and their simple linear forms – nucleosome positioning motifs – are calculated from the strong nucleosome DNA sequences. The motifs are in full accord with nucleosome positioning sequences derived earlier, thus confirming that the new technique, indeed, detects strong nucleosomes. Species- and isochore-specific variations of the matrices and of the positioning motifs are demonstrated. The strong nucleosome DNA sequences manifest the highest hitherto nucleosome positioning sequence signals, showing the dinucleotide periodicities in directly observable rather than in hidden form.

Nuclease-hypersensitive Chromatin Formed by a CpG Island in Human DNA Cloned as an Artificial Chromosome in Yeast

CpG islands are mostly unmethylated GC-, and CpG-rich chromosomal segments overlapping promoter sequences in all housekeeping and many tissue-specific genes in vertebrates. Typically, these islands show an open chromatin structure, low in histone H1 and rich in acetylated histones. We have previously found that the island-like CGCG-rich sites in human DNA are hypersensitive to DNase I upon cloning in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here we studied, with a higher resolution, the chromatin formed in yeast by one such site, the CpG island accompanying the human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase gene. We have found two strong hypersensitive sites and several positioned nucleosomes flanking the island despite the absence in yeast of such chromatin fiber-shaping factors as histone H1, methyltransferase, and the tissue-specific transcription factors. This finding, together with similar observations from our laboratories and others supports the idea that variations in GC and/or CpG content substantially contribute to the DNA sequence features modulating the structure of the chromatin. The composition-dependent fluctuations in the accessibility of DNA in the chromatin may constitute an evolutionary advantage and may explain the surprising compositional selection that acts in both the coding and non-coding segments of some genes during mammalian evolution.