Abstract Under what circumstances do belligerents succeed in increasing their imports during wartime? This research seeks to answer that question by addressing contradictory findings in the literature on the relationship between trade and war. We propose that the answer depends on two factors that have not been examined together: the value of the imports for the battlefield and the intensity of the war. These two factors influence the willingness of belligerents to reprioritize their import preferences based on strategic considerations. However, they also influence exporters’ willingness to signal their dissatisfaction, as well as the extent of the damage to the belligerent’s economy. To test this contention, we classified 96 commodities as strategic or nonstrategic using the HS02 classification, and then employed gravity models to analyze dyadic import flows from 168 countries to Israel between 1980 and 2014. The findings reveal that the relationship between war and imports varies with the intensity of the conflict. Strategic commodities are associated with a stronger positive relationship between war and imports when the intensity of the conflict does not exceed 1,000 casualties. In contrast, when casualties surpass 1,000, war is associated with a sharper decline in strategic imports, suggestive of economic damage and exporters’ dissatisfaction with war.
Read full abstract- All Solutions
Editage
One platform for all researcher needs
Paperpal
AI-powered academic writing assistant
R Discovery
Your #1 AI companion for literature search
Mind the Graph
AI tool for graphics, illustrations, and artwork
Journal finder
AI-powered journal recommender
Unlock unlimited use of all AI tools with the Editage Plus membership.
Explore Editage Plus - Support
Overview
6552 Articles
Published in last 50 years
Articles published on Strategic Importance
Authors
Select Authors
Journals
Select Journals
Duration
Select Duration
6471 Search results
Sort by Recency