Introduction: The straight handpiece is one of the most commonly used instruments in third molar surgeries. However, its use has been suggested to carry a potential risk of soft tissue injury, possibly due to its design limitations leading to direct positioning and excessive heating, which could contribute to soft tissue damage. Direct positioning can sometimes cause excessive heating, leading to potential soft tissue damage. Additionall its design might limit accessibility in the confined surgical area, making it more difficult to maneuver effectively. This study aims to evaluate whether using an angled handpiece enhances accessibility and reduces the risk of soft tissue damage during surgical procedures. AIM: Comparison and evaluation of the use of straight and angled handpieces on perioperative outcomes in operative removal of obstructed lower third molars. Materials and Methods: This research included 30 healthy participants aged 18 to 40, all of whom were undergoing extraction of impacted lower third molars at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups.: Group A, where the extraction was carried out using an angled handpiece, and Group B, where a straight handpiece was employed. Results: No statistically significant differences were found in postoperative pain, edema, mouth opening, or surgical time between the angled and straight handpiece groups. Conclusion: The findings of our research indicate that there were no notable statistical differences observed between the two groups in relation to post-operative outcomes such as pain, edema, mouth opening, or surgical time. The lack of statistical significance may be attributed to the small sample size, emphasizing the importance of larger cohorts for a more accurate assessment of the clinical impact. However, operator comfort was reported to be better with angled handpieces in certain cases. Category: Dentistry, Pain Management, Patient Care
Read full abstract