Storage of large quantities of various gasses - including hydrocarbons, carbon dioxide and hydrogen - is going to be increasingly important as the energy transition progresses. Large scale gas storage capacity, which will require some form of underground (geological) storage, will be critical. The necessity to finance various storage schemes requires rigorous estimation of ‘bookable’ storage capacity using recognised, auditable standards that a financial institution can depend on. Ostensibly, the requirements of any underground store of gas are similar. However, there are key differences between the requirements of an underground store for carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) in perpetuity when compared to the requirements of an underground ‘energy store’ (where the ability to inject and recover the gas cyclically to meet demand is critical) whether that be natural gas, hydrogen or even, compressed air. The purpose of this paper is threefold: a) to highlight certain key aspects of existing storage guidelines, the CO 2 Storage Resources Management System, SRMS (SPE 2017), which were developed specifically for CO 2 , b) to highlight key differences between CO 2 storage in perpetuity and underground ‘energy storage’, and c) to discuss whether the guidelines in the SRMS may be applicable to other types of gas storage such as ‘energy storage’. Similar to hydrocarbon Reserves classification (the Petroleum Resource Management System, PRMS (SPE 2018), the SRMS is a project-based system that rigorously defines CO 2 storage in major storage resource classes: Stored, Capacity, Contingent Storage Resources, and Prospective Storage Resources, as well as Inaccessible Storage Resources. The basic classification requires establishment of criteria for the discovery of storable quantities, and thereafter, the distinction between commercial and sub-commercial projects (and hence between Capacity and Contingent Storage Resources). Again, as with the PRMS there is a range of uncertainty in volume assigned to each class. In all cases, the key attributes of the geological store are the ability to receive the gas efficiently and to trap it effectively. For both natural gas and hydrogen, the ability to recover the stored gas efficiently, and economically, is an imperative. In all cases, understanding the characteristics of the host rock (whether a depleted hydrocarbon reservoir, saline aquifer or salt cavern) and modelling the flow of gas and/or fluids through the porous and permeable host is critical. A further key difference is the likely efficiency requirements to inject CO 2 as a super-critical fluid even though it is extracted from the atmosphere as a gas.
Read full abstract- All Solutions
Editage
One platform for all researcher needs
Paperpal
AI-powered academic writing assistant
R Discovery
Your #1 AI companion for literature search
Mind the Graph
AI tool for graphics, illustrations, and artwork
Unlock unlimited use of all AI tools with the Editage Plus membership.
Explore Editage Plus - Support
Overview
170 Articles
Published in last 50 years
Articles published on Guidelines For Storage
Authors
Select Authors
Journals
Select Journals
Duration
Select Duration
158 Search results
Sort by Recency