Stimulus-response Correspondence Effects Research Articles

Working memory load and its impact on space-based and motion-based stimulus-response correspondence (SRC) effects

ABSTRACT If spatial stimulus-response correspondence (SRC) effect results from automatic processes, cognitive load should not affect this effect. However, if spatial SRC effect is based on the interference of cognitive codes, cognitive load should influence it. Furthermore, the motion-based SRC effect should be affected by the cognitive load, as this SRC effect is related to the cognitive codes interference. In this study, participants performed combined tasks for space-based and motion-based SRC effects without working memory load (WML), or under spatial and verbal WML to see if cognitive load affects both SRC effects or just one. Results demonstrated that space-based SRC remained intact from WML, while the motion-based SRC was influenced by WML, although only in limited degree. This supports the notion that automatic processes underlie space-based SRC effect, whereas the motion-based SRC effect is related to cognitive codes interference, but the latter requires further investigation.

Taking into consideration explanations of perception-action interactions that may be “less dramatic, but more reflective of what happens in the real world”

Bruce Bridgeman and colleagues reported the first experiments providing evidence of two functionally distinct visual-processing systems. We summarize that work and subsequent research that resulted in modifications of this view. Then, we describe studies of stimulus-response correspondence effects that provide evidence for distinct representations of responses. More recently, Bridgeman and colleagues examined whether "action affects perception", concluding that the phenomena can be more accurately construed as "information affects memory". Although unconvinced about claims of action-affects-perception and embodied cognition, Bridgeman and colleagues concluded that processing of visual information in hand-space is facilitated and cited a phenomenon as supporting evidence. We discuss findings indicating that this phenomenon is due to general spatial coding principles. We think that all researchers should proceed in the manner of Bridgeman of developing novel explanations, devising critical tests between them and alternative possible explanations, and accepting the explanation that best conforms to the results, even if that explanation is a "less dramatic" option.

Stimulus-response correspondence effect as a function of temporal overlap between relevant and irrelevant information processing.

The stimulus-response correspondence (SRC) effect refers to advantages in performance when stimulus and response correspond in dimensions or features, even if the common features are irrelevant to the task. Previous research indicated that the SRC effect depends on the temporal course of stimulus information processing. The current study investigated how the temporal overlap between relevant and irrelevant stimulus processing influences the SRC effect. In this experiment, the irrelevant stimulus (a previously associated tone) preceded the relevant stimulus (a coloured rectangle). The irrelevant and relevant stimuli onset asynchrony was varied to manipulate the temporal overlap between the irrelevant and relevant stimuli processing. Results indicated that the SRC effect size varied as a quadratic function of the temporal overlap between the relevant stimulus and irrelevant stimulus. This finding extends previous experimental observations that the SRC effect size varies in an increasing or decreasing function with reaction time. The current study demonstrated a quadratic function between effect size and the temporal overlap.

The impact of response frequency on spatial stimulus–response correspondence effects

The present study explored how response preparation, varied by relative response frequency, affects response conflict as expressed in the Simon effect. Previous studies showed that valid response cues, when presented before the imperative stimulus, increase rather than decrease the Simon effect. This finding was explained by the hypothesis that response cues trigger shifts of attention to the side of the prepared response, and that these attention shifts modulate processing of the imperative stimulus. We investigated whether cues are necessary for inducing shifts of attention and thereby modulating the Simon effect, or whether response preparation without cues is sufficient. In two experiments, participants performed a Simon task with one response being more frequent than the other. Results showed larger Simon effects for the more frequent (i.e. prepared) response than for the less frequent (i.e. unprepared) response. These results suggest that response preparation (rather than the cue that induces the preparation) triggers a shift of spatial attention which modulates the Simon effect.

Spatial and motion stimulus-response correspondence effects under cognitive load

Spatial and motion stimulus-response correspondence effects under cognitive load

Stimulus-response correspondence in go-nogo and choice tasks: Are reactions altered by the presence of an irrelevant salient object?

In 2-choice tasks, responses are faster when stimulus location corresponds to response location, even when stimulus location is irrelevant. Dolk et al. (J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 39:1248-1260, 2013a) found this stimulus-response correspondence effect with a single response location in a go-nogo task when an irrelevant Japanese waving cat was present. They argued that salient objects trigger spatial coding of the response relative to that object. We examined this claim using both behavioral and lateralized readiness potential (LRP) measures. In Experiment 1 participants determined the pitch of a left- or right-positioned tone, whereas in Experiment 2 they determined the color of a dot within a centrally located hand pointing left, right, or straight ahead. In both experiments, participants performed a go-nogo task with the right-index finger and a 2-choice task with both index fingers, with a left-positioned Japanese waving cat present or absent. For the go-nogo task, the cat induced a correspondence effect on response times (RT) to the tones (Experiment 1) but not the visual stimuli (Experiment 2). For the 2-choice task, a correspondence effect was evident in all conditions in both experiments. Cat's presence/absence did not significantly modulate the effect for right and left responses, although there was a trend toward increased RT and LRP for right responses in Experiment 1. The results imply that a salient, irrelevant object could provide a reference frame for response coding when attention is available to process it, as is likely in an auditory task (Experiment 1) but not a visual task (Experiment 2).

Space positional and motion SRC effects: A comparison with the use of reaction time distribution analysis.

The analysis of reaction time (RT) distributions has become a recognized standard in studies on the stimulus response correspondence (SRC) effect as it allows exploring how this effect changes as a function of response speed. In this study, we compared the spatial SRC effect (the classic Simon effect) with the motion SRC effect using RT distribution analysis. Four experiments were conducted, in which we manipulated factors of space position and motion for stimulus and response, in order to obtain a clear distinction between positional SRC and motion SRC. Results showed that these two types of SRC effects differ in their RT distribution functions as the space positional SRC effect showed a decreasing function, while the motion SRC showed an increasing function. This suggests that different types of codes underlie these two SRC effects. Potential mechanisms and processes are discussed.

When the voluntary mind meets the irresistible event: Stimulus–response correspondence effects on task selection during voluntary task switching

In the present study, we investigated how task selection is biased by inherent stimulus characteristics in the voluntary task-switching paradigm. We used digits as the task stimuli, since they may automatically induce spatially horizontal representations of numbers. Specifically, we examined whether an irrelevant spatial representation of a number coincides with its associated response codes and whether such a stimulus-response (S-R) correspondence effect biases task selection for a digit. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two different action code layout conditions: Two numerical tasks were arranged as inner/outer in the horizontal layout condition or as upper/down in the vertical layout condition. Participants in the horizontal layout condition were more likely to choose a task when the task's action code and the digit's spatial representation corresponded, as compared with when they did not. On the other hand, no selection bias was observed in the vertical layout condition, since there was no overlapping spatial representation between the stimulus and response. The present study extends previous findings by considering the influence of the stimulus-driven effect on task selection with regard to the S-R correspondence effect.

Unimanual SNARC Effect: Hand Matters

A structural representation of the hand embedding information about the identity and relative position of fingers is necessary to counting routines. It may also support associations between numbers and allocentric spatial codes that predictably interact with other known numerical spatial representations, such as the mental number line (MNL). In this study, 48 Western participants whose typical counting routine proceeded from thumb-to-little on both hands performed magnitude and parity binary judgments. Response keys were pressed either with the right index and middle fingers or with the left index and middle fingers in separate blocks. 24 participants responded with either hands in prone posture (i.e., palm down) and 24 participants responded with either hands in supine (i.e., palm up) posture. When hands were in prone posture, the counting direction of the left hand conflicted with the direction of the left–right MNL, whereas the counting direction of the right hand was consistent with it. When hands were in supine posture, the opposite was true. If systematic associations existed between relative number magnitude and an allocentric spatial representation of the finger series within each hand, as predicted on the basis of counting habits, interactions would be expected between hand posture and a unimanual version of the spatial–numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect. Data revealed that with hands in prone posture a unimanual SNARC effect was present for the right hand, and with hands in supine posture a unimanual SNARC effect was present for the left hand. We propose that a posture-invariant body structural representation of the finger series provides a relevant frame of reference, a within-hand directional vector, that is associated to simple number processing. Such frame of reference can significantly interact with stimulus–response correspondence effects, like the SNARC, that have been typically attributed to the mapping of numbers on a left-to-right mental line.

Executive control over response priming and conflict: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study

In the present study repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) was utilised to interrupt neural activity in selected cortical areas at several different time periods while participants performed a stimulus-response correspondence (SRC) task. Responses are usually faster and less error-prone when stimulus (S) and response (R) features correspond than when they do not. Dual-route models of response preparation account for such SRC effects by postulating an indirect route performing S-R selection and a parallel direct route where S features prime their corresponding responses. SRC effects have recently been shown to depend on the preceding trial type, that is, SRC effects are largely reduced when preceded by a non-corresponding trial as compared to a preceding corresponding trial. Present results show that this context dependency of the SRC effect was hindered when rTMS was applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) 500-300 ms before the onset of the next trial. Moreover, the SRC effect was reduced overall when applying rTMS volleys to the right posterior parietal cortex (PPC) for 200 ms with the onset of the visual stimulus. We conclude that the left DLPFC is involved in the context-dependent control of response conflicts, whereas the right PPC serves early visuomotor transformations and is, therefore, related to direct route priming.

Sequential modulations of stimulus-response correspondence effects depend on awareness of response conflict.

In two experiments, sequential modulations of prime-target correspondence effects were investigated in a metacontrast paradigm. Primes were either unmasked and thus consciously discriminable, or entirely masked and thus indiscriminable. Mirroring similar findings from Eriksen- and Simon-type tasks, the influence of prime-target correspondence was reduced in trials that followed a noncorresponding prime-target pair, which suggests that prime-induced response activation can be temporarily suppressed after an incompatible trial. This sequential modulation was independent of prime discriminability in the current trial, but it occurred only when the prime, and thus a conflict between the prime-induced and the deliberately to-be-selected response, was consciously experienced in the preceding trial. This suggests that the suppression of automatic response priming is not an immediate consequence of response conflict, but an intention-mediated strategy.

Visual Motion Induces Effector Movement

A left-hand response to a left-hand stimulus is faster than a right-hand response to the same stimulus, even when spatial location is irrelevant to the task at hand. The existence of this spatial stimulus-response correspondence effect suggests that spatial properties of actions to be performed can be pre-specified by spatial properties of perceived events, so that actions are induced by perceptual content. If this view is correct, one should be able to show that not only spatial positions of actions can be pre-specified by properties of perceived events, but other features of actions as well. Specifically, I attempt to show that the direction of a to-be-executed movement can be specified by the direction of a moving stimulus. To study this question a variant of the Simon paradigm was developed: subjects were required to monitor a spot-like stimulus moving from left to right or from right to left on a display. At some point in time the spot would change its colour (from white to blue or red) and the subject had to respond differentially to the respective colour. Two aspects of this situation were varied. First, the type of the action-relevant signal was varied: it could either be a dynamic moving signal or a static non-moving one. Second, the type of response was varied: subjects were required to respond to the colour either with a dynamic response (moving a stylus to the left or right) or with a more static response (pressing a button on the left or on the right).