Previous article No AccessPrey Encounter Rate by Predators: Discussing the Realism of Grid‐Based Models and How to Model the Predator’s Foraging Mode: A Reply to Avgar et al.Inon Scharf, Ofer Ovadia, Amos Bouskila, Associate Editor: Volker Grimm, and Editor: Donald L. DeAngelisInon ScharfDepartment of Life Sciences, Ben‐Gurion University of the Negev, 84105 Beer‐Sheva, Israel*Corresponding author; e‐mail: [email protected]. Search for more articles by this author , Ofer OvadiaDepartment of Life Sciences, Ben‐Gurion University of the Negev, 84105 Beer‐Sheva, Israel†E‐mail: [email protected]. Search for more articles by this author , Amos BouskilaDepartment of Life Sciences, Ben‐Gurion University of the Negev, 84105 Beer‐Sheva, Israel‡E‐mail: [email protected]. Search for more articles by this author , Associate Editor: Volker Grimm Search for more articles by this author , and Editor: Donald L. DeAngelis Search for more articles by this author Department of Life Sciences, Ben‐Gurion University of the Negev, 84105 Beer‐Sheva, IsraelPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 172, Number 4October 2008 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/591676 Views: 53Total views on this site Citations: 4Citations are reported from Crossref HistoryReceived October 29, 2007Accepted April 14, 2008Published online September 12, 2008 Keywordsencounter ratemovement directionalityforaging modetorus model© 2008 by The University of Chicago.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Laia Mestre, Nijat Narimanov, Florian Menzel, Martin H. Entling, Natalie Clay Non-consumptive effects between predators depend on the foraging mode of intraguild prey, Journal of Animal Ecology 89, no.77 (Apr 2020): 1690–1700.https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13224Jacinto Benhadi‐Marín, José A. Pereira, José P. Sousa, Sónia A. P. Santos Functional responses of three guilds of spiders: Comparing single‐ and multiprey approaches, Annals of Applied Biology 175, no.22 (Jul 2019): 202–214.https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12530Jacinto Benhadi-Marín, José Alberto Pereira, David Barreales, José Paulo Sousa, Sónia A.P. Santos A simulation-based method to compare the pest suppression potential of predators: A case study with spiders, Biological Control 123 (Aug 2018): 87–96.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.05.007M. S. deVries, E. A. K. Murphy, S. N. Patek Strike mechanics of an ambush predator: the spearing mantis shrimp, Journal of Experimental Biology 215, no.2424 (Dec 2012): 4374–4384.https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.075317