To investigate the performance of extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) in remote sensing image classification tasks, XGBoost was first introduced and comparatively investigated for the spectral-spatial classification of hyperspectral imagery using the extended maximally stable extreme-region-guided morphological profiles (EMSER_MPs) proposed in this study. To overcome the potential issues of XGBoost, meta-XGBoost was proposed as an ensemble XGBoost method with classification and regression tree (CART), dropout-introduced multiple additive regression tree (DART), elastic net regression and parallel coordinate descent-based linear regression (linear) and random forest (RaF) boosters. Moreover, to evaluate the performance of the introduced XGBoost approach with different boosters, meta-XGBoost and EMSER_MPs, well-known and widely accepted classifiers, including support vector machine (SVM), bagging, adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), multi class AdaBoost (MultiBoost), extremely randomized decision trees (ExtraTrees), RaF, classification via random forest regression (CVRFR) and ensemble of nested dichotomies with extremely randomized decision tree (END-ERDT) methods, were considered in terms of the classification accuracy and computational efficiency. The experimental results based on two benchmark hyperspectral data sets confirm the superior performance of EMSER_MPs and EMSER_MPs with mean pixel values within region (EMSER_MPsM) compared to that for morphological profiles (MPs), morphological profile with partial reconstruction (MPPR), extended MPs (EMPs), extended MPPR (EMPPR), maximally stable extreme-region-guided morphological profiles (MSER_MPs) and MSER_MPs with mean pixel values within region (MSER_MPsM) features. The proposed meta-XGBoost algorithm is capable of obtaining better results than XGBoost with the CART, DART, linear and RaF boosters, and it could be an alternative to the other considered classifiers in terms of the classification of hyperspectral images using advanced spectral-spatial features, especially from generalized classification accuracy and model training efficiency perspectives.
Read full abstract