Previous article No AccessSearch and Seizure: An Empirical Study of the Exclusionary Rule and Its AlternativesJames E. SpiottoJames E. Spiotto Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Legal Studies Volume 2, Number 1Jan., 1973 Sponsored by The University of Chicago Law School Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/467498 Views: 36Total views on this site Citations: 16Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1973 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Siyu Liu, Esther Nir Mission Impossible? Challenging Police Credibility in Suppression Motions, Criminal Justice Policy Review 33, no.66 (Nov 2021): 584–607.https://doi.org/10.1177/08874034211057612Esther Nir Empowering the Exclusionary Rule: Using suppression motion data to improve police searches and searches in the United States, International Journal of Police Science & Management 22, no.11 (Dec 2019): 96–107.https://doi.org/10.1177/1461355719888945Ethan D. Boldt and Michael C. Gizzi The Implementation of Supreme Court Precedent: The Impact of Arizona v. Gant on Police Searches, Journal of Law and Courts 6, no.22 (Jul 2018): 355–378.https://doi.org/10.1086/698535John Eterno Zero Tolerance Policing in Democracies, (May 2012): 49–76.https://doi.org/10.1201/b12153-5Max Minzner, Christopher M. Anderson Do Warrants Matter?, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2007).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1073142JON B. GOULD, STEPHEN D. MASTROFSKI SUSPECT SEARCHES: ASSESSING POLICE BEHAVIOR UNDER THE U.S. CONSTITUTION*, Criminology <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Public Policy 3, no.33 (Jul 2004): 315–362.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2004.tb00046.x Raymond A. Atkins and Paul H. Rubin Effects of Criminal Procedure on Crime Rates: Mapping Out the Consequences of the Exclusionary Rule Atkins/Rubin, The Journal of Law and Economics 46, no.11 (Jul 2015): 157–179.https://doi.org/10.1086/345582EVAN OSBORNE IS THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE WORTHWHILE?, Contemporary Economic Policy 17, no.33 (Jul 1999): 381–389.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.1999.tb00690.xRaymond A. Atkins, Paul H. Rubin Effects of Criminal Procedure On Crime Rates: Mapping Out the Consequences of the Exclusionary Rule, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 1998).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.140992Gregory D. Russell The political ecology of police reform, Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management 20, no.33 (Sep 1997): 567–589.https://doi.org/10.1108/13639519710180231Candace McCoy Congress is (Not) Repealing the Exclusionary Rule! Symbolic Politics and Criminal Justice (Non)Reform, Criminal Justice Review 21, no.22 (Sep 2016): 181–196.https://doi.org/10.1177/073401689602100205Judy Hails Kaci The Exclusionary Rule in the Year 2000: Due Process Reborn?, Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 3, no.33 (Jul 2016): 30–42.https://doi.org/10.1177/104398628700300305Thomas Y. Davies A Hard Look at What We Know (and Still Need to Learn) About the “Costs” of the Exclusionary Rule: The NIJ Study and Other Studies of “Lost” Arrests, American Bar Foundation Research Journal 8, no.33 (Nov 2018): 611–690.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1983.tb00887.xFrank G. Carrington Good faith mistakes and the exclusionary rule, Criminal Justice Ethics 1, no.22 (Sep 2010): 35–40.https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.1982.9991704Lawrence Baum Police Response to Appellate Court Decisions: Mapp and Miranda, Policy Studies Journal 7, no.s1s1 (Dec 1978): 425–431.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1978.tb01788.xJohn Hagan, Jeffrey Leon Philosophy and Sociology of Crime Control., Sociological Inquiry 47, no.3-43-4 (Jul 1977): 181–208.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1977.tb00798.x
Read full abstract