This article examines the relationship between neoliberalism and legal culture in South Africa, focusing on how the neoliberal paradigm influences legal interpretation and the adjudication of socio-economic rights. It explores how neoliberalism, defined as the dominance of capitalist forces over weaker oppositional interests, permeates judicial decision-making, shaping how courts address issues of inequality and social justice. The article argues that neoliberalism, in prioritizing market interests, has contributed to a conservative legal inertia that prevents transformative legal outcomes. This dynamic has entrenched existing socio-economic disparities, especially as state power continues to serve the interests of capital, reinforcing apartheid-era economic structures. Despite the transformative potential embedded in South Africa's constitutional framework, the legal system remains constrained by what Karl Klare terms as professional sensibilities, codes, and values, many of which are influenced by neoliberalism. Drawing on theoretical insights of Karl Klare, the article calls for a rethinking of legal culture and a shift towards more relational, metaphorical approaches that challenge hegemonic narratives. Only by resisting these metanarratives can meaningful transformation be achieved in the pursuit of equality and justice.
Read full abstract