In 1904 Bashford and Murray (1) showed that tumor transplantation could be successfully performed in mice in which Jensen mouse carcinoma had already developed fourteen days to ten weeks after the first effective transplantation. Two years later Ehrlich (2) reported that the presence of actively growing transplanted mouse carcinoma or sarcoma prevented the growth of secondary implants in a majority of cases. He explained this by assuming that special nutritive substances are required for the growth of neoplastic cells and that these cells take up such food stuffs more rapidly than do normal somatic cells. The limited amount of growth-promoting substances is all taken up by the first implant, thus preventing the development of the secondary implant. From this observation Ehrlich declared his athreptic theory of the growth of cancer. Later Bashford, Murray and Haaland (3) suggested that the degree of resistance of the host to the secondary implantation depends upon the degree of resorption of the first tumor tissue implants. Thus the percentage of the positive reinoculations in animals which received a larger initial dose is much less than those which received a smaller initial dose, because in the latter case less tumor material was reabsorbed than in the former. Where the initial dose for each animal was the same, animals with the more slowly growing tumors have a higher grade of resistance than animals with actively growing tumors, presumably because the animals carrying smaller tumors had re-absorbed a larger amount of tumor tissue than had those with larger tumors.
Read full abstract