Abstract Surgical mitral valve repair is the most common, feasible and preferred procedure to treat primary and secondary mitral regurgitation (MR). However, 30% of patients suffer from residue severe regurgitation 10 years after surgical intervention, resulting in a considerable number of Redo procedures. In elderly and high–risk patients with major comorbidities medical treatment is the only and often insufficient option for symptoms’ relief. Percutaneous Transcatheter Edge to Edge repair technique (TEER) with MitraClip system is emerging as an off–label valid alternative to successfully treat severe mitral regurgitation after surgical valvuloplasty failure. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is essential in diagnosis, planning, intraprocedural device placement, and follow up. In the peculiar setting of failed annuloplasty, with small residual valve area, the main risk is the creation of a gradient across the mitral valve. We present two cases of severe mitral regurgitation after surgical annuloplasty with ring placement, carefully evaluated for TEER and successfully treated with this procedure: 1) a 79–year–old man presented with exertional dyspnea and orthopnea in the setting of previous surgical mitral Annuloplasty (2003) with a 32–mm Carpentier Ring. Transesophageal echocardiography demonstrated severe mitral regurgitation due to P2 prolapse and central V–shaped cut of the valve, mean diastolic gradient 1.8 mmHg. 2) a 83 year–old woman presented with dyspnea (NYHA functional class III) and severe mitral regurgitation after previous Annuloplasty with a 34–mm Edwards Ring and placement of Goretex artificial Chordae (2016). TEE showed prolapse of P2 and P3 leaflets, mean diastolic gradient 2.17 mmHg, valvular area 3.5 cmq. Both patients underwent transfemoral and transseptal implantation of one MitraClip device (XTw and XT, respectively) under Transesophageal echocardiography guidance with successful reduction of mitral regurgitation to mild level and symptoms relief. In the first case post procedural mean diastolic gradient was 3.7 mmHg, in the second case it was 3.16 mmHg.
Read full abstract