To evaluate the impact of different types of pencil beam scanning proton accelerators and spot sizes on interplay effects, mitigations, and plan quality for lung cancer patients treated with SBRT. Twenty lung cancer patients (ten peripheral and ten central tumors) treated in our institution with photon SBRT were selected to represent varying tumor volumes and respiratory motion amplitudes for this retrospective study. The respiratory motion amplitude ranged from 0.1 to 1.0 cm with compression. For each patient, plans were created using: 1) cyclotron-generated proton beams (CPB) (σ: 2.7-7.0 mm); 2) linear accelerator proton beams (LPB) (σ: 2.9-5.5 mm); and 3) linear accelerator proton minibeams (LPMB) (σ: 0.9-3.9 mm). Plans were robustly optimized on the GTV using each individual 4DCT phase. Single-filed optimization (SFO) plans were the first attempt, and if the plan quality did not meet the dosimetric requirement, multi-field optimization (MFO) was used. MFO plans were created for all patients for comparison. For each patient, all plans were normalized to have the same dose to 99% of the GTV. Interplay effects were evaluated for ten scenarios of treatment delivery starting in ten breathing phases using machine generic time models and a constant breathing period of 4 seconds. Volumetric repainting (VR) was performed 2-6 times for each plan. To assess plan quality in the nominal scenario, we compared the conformity index (CI), R50, and the percentage of lung volume receiving 20 Gy (RBE) (V20Gy). CI is defined as the ratio of the 100% isodose volume to the GTV. R50 is defined as the 50% isodose volume divided by the GTV. Dmax and V18Gy of the proximal bronchial tree (PBT) were evaluated for central tumors. Twelve of 20 plans can be optimized sufficiently with SFO. In interplay effect evaluation, the mean V100%RX values of the GTV were 99.42±0.6%, 97.52±3.9%, and 94.49±7.3%for CPB, LPB, and LPMB plans respectively. After VR 2/3/5 times, the V100%RX values were improved (on average) by 0.13%/1.84%/4.63% for CPB/LPB/LPMB plans. The delivery time for VR plans was the lowest for LPB plans, while delivery time for LPMB was on average 1 minute longer than CPB plans. VR showed no effect on lung V20Gy, Dmax and V18Gy of the PBT. SFO plans were more robust against the interplay effect compared with MFO plans for LPB and LPMB. Average CIs of 1.88±0.4, 1.79±0.4, and 1.75±0.4; average R50s of 7.99±4.0, 6.68±3.0, and 5.70±2.6; and average lung V20Gy values of 2.81±1.5, 2.26±1.3, and 1.85±1.1 were obtained for CPB, LPB, and LPMB plans, respectively. Dmax and V18Gy of the PBT decreased with decreasing spot sizes. LPMB, with the smallest spot size, produced superior plan quality. In the absence of VR, proton machines with large spot sizes generated more robust plans against interplay effects. VR improved the plan robustness against interplay effects for modalities with small spot sizes and fast energy changes, preserving the low dose sparing aspect of the LPMB, even when motion is included.
Read full abstract