Single Oral Dose Of Omeprazole Research Articles

Effects of elagolix on the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole and its metabolites in healthy premenopausal women.

This study evaluated the effect of repeated doses of elagolix on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of omeprazole and its metabolites in healthy premenopausal female subjects. Adult premenopausal female subjects (N = 20) received a single oral dose of omeprazole (40 mg) on day 1 and day 11 and oral doses of elagolix (300 mg) twice‐daily on days 3–11. Serial blood samples for assay of omeprazole and its metabolites were collected for 24 h after dosing on days 1 and 11. PK parameters were calculated for omeprazole, 5‐hydroxyomeprazole and omeprazole sulfone; and were compared between day 1 and day 11. Pharmacogenetic testing was performed for CYP2C19 variant alleles and the results were used to compare the magnitude of elagolix–omeprazole drug–drug interaction (DDI) between the different genotype subgroups. Administration of elagolix 300 mg twice‐daily for 9 days increased omeprazole exposure by 1.8‐fold and decreased the metabolite‐to‐parent ratio for 5‐hydroxyomeprazole by ~60%. Conversely, there was an increase in the metabolite‐to‐parent ratio for omeprazole sulfone by 25%. Elagolix increased omeprazole exposures by 2‐ to 2.5‐fold in CYP2C19 extensive (EM) and intermediate (IM) metabolizer subjects, but decreased omeprazole exposures by 40% in poor metabolizer subjects. Exposures of 5‐hydroxyomeprazole decreased by 20%–30% in all genotype subgroups, and omeprazole sulfone exposures increased by ~3‐fold in EM and IM subjects. Elagolix is a weak inhibitor of CYP2C19 and exposure of CYP2C19 substrates may be increased upon coadministration with elagolix. Omeprazole may exhibit drug interactions due to multiple mechanisms other than CYP2C19‐mediated metabolism; complicating the interpretation of results from omeprazole DDI studies.

1122. Effect of Aluminum Hydroxide/Magnesium Hydroxide/Simethicone and Omeprazole on the Pharmacokinetics of Tebipenem Pivoxil Hydrobromide (TBP-PI-HBr) in Healthy Adult Subjects

BackgroundTebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide (TBP-PI-HBr) is an oral prodrug that is converted to tebipenem (TBP), the active moiety being developed for treating complication urinary tract infections. Antacids and proton pump inhibitors are known to change gastric pH after administration, which could affect the absorption of oral medications. This study evaluated the effect of a single dose of aluminum hydroxide/magnesium hydroxide/simethicone and the effect of multiple doses of omeprazole on the PK of TBP, following a single dose of TBP-PI-HBr.MethodsThis was an open-label, 3-period, fixed sequence drug-drug interaction study. On Day 1, Period 1, subjects received a single oral dose of TBP-PI-HBr 600 mg (2 x 300 mg tablets) at Hour 0. On Day 1, Period 2, subjects received a single oral 20 mL dose of aluminum hydroxide 800 mg/magnesium hydroxide 800 mg/simethicone 80 mg suspension per 10 mL (Maalox® Advanced Maximum Strength oral suspension) with a single oral dose of TBP-PI-HBr 600 mg at Hour 0. In Period 3, on Days 1 through 5, subjects received a single oral dose of omeprazole 40 mg (Prilosec®) once daily (QD), at Hour -2. On Day 5, a single oral dose of 600 mg TBP-PI-HBr was administered at Hour 0. Whole blood sampling for TBP PK occurred pre-dose and up to 24 hours post dose. Whole blood samples were assayed for TBP by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.ResultsTwenty subject were enrolled and completed the study. Geometric mean ratios for AUC indicated mean TBP exposure (AUC) was approximately 11% lower and mean Cmax was 22% lower for TBP-PI-HBr combined with aluminum hydroxide/magnesium hydroxide/simethicone vs. TBP-PI-HBr alone (Figure). Similarly, geometric mean ratios for AUC indicated mean TBP exposure (AUC) was approximately 11% lower and mean Cmax was 43% lower for TBP-PI-HBr in combination with omeprazole vs. TBP-PI-HBr alone. Because the PK/PD driver for TBP efficacy is AUC dependent, concomitant administration is not expected to impact the efficacy of oral TBP-PI-HBr. Figure 1. Arithmetic mean plasma TBP concentrations following a 600 mg dose of clinical study drug product (A1 and A2) and registrational drug product (B) – PK population.ConclusionAdministration of TBP-PI-HBr combined with aluminum hydroxide/magnesium hydroxide/simethicone or omeprazole QD had no meaningful effect on plasma TBP exposure; Cmax decreased with both agents. Co-administration was generally safe and well tolerated.Disclosures Vipul K. Gupta, Ph.D., Spero Therapeutics (Employee, Shareholder) Gina Patel, PhD, Spero Therapeutics, Inc. (Consultant) Leanne Gasink, MD, Spero Therapeutics, Inc. (Consultant) Floni Bajraktari, MSc, Spero Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee) Yang Lei, PhD, Spero Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee) Akash Jain, PhD, Spero Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee) Praveen Srivastava, MS, BS, Spero Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee) Angela Talley, MD, Spero Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee)

Clinical treatment for hepatitis C reverses CYP2C19 inhibition.

Infection by the hepatitis C virus (HCV) generates inflammatory response selectively modulating cytochrome P450 protein (CYP) activities. This study assessed the effect of chronic hepatitis C on CYP2C19 activity in patients with HCV. Patients with HCV infection (n = 23) at different fibrosis stages were allocated into groups 1 (F0/F1 and F2, mild to moderate fibrosis) and 2 (F3 and F4, advanced fibrosis stages). Phase 1 was conducted before the treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) and phase 2 after the sustained virological response. Participants were administered 2mg of a single oral dose of omeprazole (OME) as probe drug in both phases. Metabolic ratios (MRs) (plasma samples collected at 4h after OME administration) were calculated by dividing plasma concentrations of 5-hydroxyomeprazole by OME. The MRs for group 1 were 0.45 (0.34-0.60, 90% confidence interval) and 0.69 (0.50-0.96) for phases 1 and 2, respectively, while the MRs for group 2 were 0.25 (0.21-0.31) and 0.41 (0.30-0.56) for phases 1 and 2, respectively. MRs were different (P < .05) between phases 1 and 2 for both groups, as well as between groups 1 and 2 in phase 1, but not in phase 2 (P > .05). Both groups presented different MRs before and after treatment with DAAs, evidencing that CYP2C19 inhibition during inflammation was at least partially reversed after DAA treatment. Groups 1 and 2 were also found to be different in phase 1 but not phase 2, showing that CYP2C19 metabolic activity does not differ between groups after DAA treatment.

Clopidogrel Inhibits CYP2C19‐Dependent Hydroxylation of Omeprazole Related to CYP2C19 Genetic Polymorphisms

This study explores the impact of clopidogrel on the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole related to CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms. Twelve healthy volunteers (6 CYP2C19*1/*1, 5 CYP2C19*2/*2, and 1 CYP2C19*2/*3) are enrolled in a 2-phase randomized crossover trial. In each phase, the volunteers are administered a single oral dose of omeprazole 40 mg after pretreatment of either placebo or clopidogrel (300 mg on the first day and then 75 mg once daily for 3 consecutive days). Plasma concentrations of omeprazole and its metabolites are quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection. After clopidogrel treatment, the AUC(0-infinity) of omeprazole increases by 30.02% +/- 18.03% (P = .004) and that of 5-hydroxyomeprazole decreases by 24.30% +/- 11.66% (P = .032) in CYP2C19*1/*1. The AUC(0-infinity) ratios of omeprazole to 5-hydroxyomeprazole increase by 74.98% +/- 35.48% (P = .001) and those of omeprazole to omeprazole sulfone do not change significantly (P = .832) in CYP2C19*1/*1. No significant alteration is observed in CYP2C19*2/*2 or *3. Clopidogrel inhibits CYP2C19-dependent hydroxylation of omeprazole in CYP2C19*1/*1 and has no impact on CYP3A4-catalyzed sulfoxidation of omeprazole.

Different inhibitory effect of fluvoxamine on omeprazole metabolism between CYP2C19 genotypes

Omeprazole is mainly metabolized by the polymorphic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19. The inhibitory effect of fluvoxamine, an inhibitor of CYP2C19 as well as CYP1A2, on the metabolism of omeprazole was compared between different genotypes for CYP2C19. Eighteen volunteers, of whom six were homozygous extensive metabolizers (EMs), six were heterozygous EMs and six were poor metabolizers (PMs) for CYP2C19, participated in the study. A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study was performed. All subjects received two six-day courses of either daily 50 mg fluvoxamine or placebo in a randomized fashion with a single oral 40 mg dose of omeprazole on day six in both cases. Plasma concentrations of omeprazole and its metabolites, 5-hydroxyomeprazole, omeprazole sulphone, and fluvoxamine were monitored up to 8 h after the dosing. During placebo administration, geometric means of peak concentration (C(max)), under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 h (AUC(0,8 h)) and elimination half-life (t(1/2)) of omeprazole were 900 ng ml(-1), 1481 ng ml(-1) h, and 0.6 h in homozygous EMs, 1648 ng ml(-1), 4225 ng ml(-1) h, and 1.1 h in heterozygous EMs, and 2991 ng ml(-1), 11537 ng ml(-1) h, and 2.8 h in PMs, respectively. Fluvoxamine treatment increased C(max) of omeprazole by 3.7-fold (95%CI, 2.4, 5.0-fold, P < 0.01) and 2.0-fold (1.4, 2.6-fold, P < 0.01), AUC(0,8 h) by 6.0-fold (3.3, 8.7-fold, P < 0.001) and 2.4-fold (1.7, 3.2-fold, P < 0.01), AUC(0, infinity ) by 6.2-fold (3.0, 9.3-fold, P < 0.01) and 2.5-fold (1.6, 3.4-fold, P < 0.001) and prolonged t((1/2)) by 2.6-fold (1.9, 3.4-fold, P < 0.001) and 1.4-fold (1.02, 1.7-fold, P < 0.05), respectively. However, no pharmacokinetic parameters were changed in PMs. The AUC(0,8 h) ratios of 5-hydroxyomeprazole to omeprazole were decreased with fluvoxamine in homozygous EMs (P < 0.05) and heterozygous EMs (P < 0.01). Even a low dose of fluvoxamine increased omeprazole exposure in EMs, but did not increase omeprazole exposure in PMs after a single oral dose of omeprazole. These findings confirm a potent inhibitory effect of fluvoxamine on CYP2C19 activity. The bioavailability of omeprazole might, to some extent, be increased through inhibition of P-glycoprotein during fluvoxamine treatment.

Stereospecific analysis of omeprazole in human plasma as a probe for CYP2C19 phenotype

Omeprazole is a class referred to as proton pump inhibitor; it acts to regulate acid production in the stomach and is used to treat various acid-related gastrointestinal disorders. In the liver, it is metabolized to varying degrees by several cytochrome P-450 (CYP) isoenzymes which are further categorized into subfamilies of related polymorphic gene products. The metabolism of omeprazole is to a large extent dependent on CYP3A4 and CYP2C19. Omeprazole is metabolized to two major metabolites, 5-hydroxyomeprazole (CYP2C19) and omeprazole sulfone (CYP3A4). Minor mutations in CYP2C19 affect its activity in the liver and, in turn, the metabolic and pharmacokinetic profiles of omeprazole. The frequency of CYP2C19 poor metabolizers in population of Asian descent has been reported to range from 10 to 20%. Accordingly, results from population studies indicate that omeprazole can be used as a probe drug for phenotyping CYP2C19. The optical isomers of omeprazole show a clear difference in their metabolism by human liver microsomes. This study demonstrates the stereospecific analysis of omeprazole in human plasma as a probe drug of CYP2C19 phenotyping. The chiral separation of omeprazole was achieved on a chiral column with circular dichroism (CD) detection and LC/MS. A good resolution of enantiomers was obtained. The column used for chiral separation was CHIRALPAK AD-RH column (4.6×150 mm) using phosphate buffer and (or ammonium acetate) acetonitrile as an eluent. After a single oral dose of omeprazole (20 mg), the plasma concentrations of the separate enantiomers of omeprazole were determined for 3.5 h after drug intake. The present study is useful because of the part polymorphism plays in the therapeutic effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors during the treatment of acid-related diseases.

Optimal dose of omeprazole for CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers in anti-Helicobacter pylori therapy: pharmacokinetic considerations.

In anti-Helicobacter pylori therapy using omeprazole and antimicrobials, the efficacy can be related to the CYP2C19 genotype groups; the eradication rates were 83% in extensive metabolizers and 100% in poor metabolizers. The present study was undertaken to help predict the optimal dosage of omeprazole for extensive metabolizers in this therapy. Seven healthy Japanese subjects, classified based on the CYP2C19 genotype into extensive metabolizers (n=4) and poor metabolizers (n=3), participated in this study. Each subject received a single oral dose of omeprazole 20, 40, and 80 mg, with at least a 1-week washout period between each dose. Plasma concentrations of omeprazole and its two metabolites were monitored for 12 h after each dose of medication. After each dose was administered, the pharmacokinetic profiles of omeprazole and its two metabolites were significantly different between extensive metabolizers and poor metabolizers. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of omeprazole in extensive metabolizers was disproportionally increased 3.2- or 19.2-fold with dose escalation from 20 to 40 or 80 mg omeprazole, respectively. In contrast, the AUC of omeprazole was proportionally increased with the higher dose in poor metabolizers. The AUC of omeprazole after 20 mg administration to poor metabolizers was almost equal to the AUC in extensive metabolizers after 80 mg administration. In anti-H. pylori therapy, the recommended dose of omeprazole for extensive metabolizers is suggested to be a maximum of 80 mg x 2/d based on pharmacokinetic considerations.

Bantu Tanzanians have a decreased capacity to metabolize omeprazole and mephenytoin in relation to their CYP2C19 genotype.

To investigate the CYP2C19 polymorphism in Tanzanians because this enzyme shows large interindividual differences in activity and metabolizes several drugs of importance in Africa, especially the antimalarial agent chloroguanide (INN, proguanil). Two hundred fifty-one Tanzanian healthy volunteers were phenotyped with respect to CYP2C19 with use of a single oral dose of mephenytoin (n = 106), a single oral dose of omeprazole (n = 207), or both. Sixty-two were phenotyped with both probe drugs. The urinary 0- to 8-hour S/R-mephenytoin ratio and the plasma omeprazole metabolic ratio (MR) (omeprazole/hydroxyomeprazole) 3 hours after drug intake were determined. The genotype was determined by analysis for CYP2C19*1 (wt), CYP2C19*2 (m1), and CYP2C19*3 (m2). Ten subjects with high omeprazole MR were screened for new mutations in the CYP2C19 gene by searching for single-strand conformation polymorphisms (SSCP). Eight subjects were classified as mephenytoin poor metabolizers (7.5%). Only 5 of these were homozygous for mutated alleles. The S/R ratio was skewed to the right (lower CYP2C19 activity) compared with other ethnic groups studied previously. No new mutations were found with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-SSCP. We found 30 volunteers (14.5%) with an MR > 7, which is the antimode found previously in white subjects and Asian subjects. Of the 251 volunteers genotyped, 3.2% were homozygous for mutated alleles and 66.1% were homozygous for the wild-type allele. The allele frequencies of CYP2C19*1, *2, and *3 were 81.5%, 17.9%, and 0.6%, respectively. The correlation between the S/R-mephenytoin ratio and the omeprazole MR was significant (Spearman r = 0.59; P < .01). Tanzanians have a decreased capacity to metabolize both omeprazole and mephenytoin when their genotype is compared with metabolic capacity and genotype in other previously studied populations. We identified a low frequency of the Asian allele (CYP2C19*3). Although we did not find any new mutations, our results may be consistent with the presence of yet-unidentified mutations of CYP2C19 that causes decreased CYP2C19 activity in the Tanzanian population.

The hydroxylation of omeprazole correlates with S-mephenytoin and proguanil metabolism.

This pharmacogenetic study was aimed at studying the pattern of oxidation of omeprazole in a Turkish population and testing whether omeprazole metabolism cosegregates with the genetically determined metabolism of mephenytoin and proguanil in Turkish subjects. The hydroxylation of omeprazole was measured in 116 unrelated healthy Turkish subjects after administration of a single oral dose of omeprazole (20 mg), using the ratio of omeprazole to 5-hydroxyomeprazole in plasma 3 h after dosing. To 31 subjects, who were phenotyped with omeprazole, mephenytoin (100 mg, p.o.) or proguanil (200 mg, p.o.) were administered at least 1 week apart. The S/R ratio of mephenytoin and the ratio of proguanil to cycloguanil were determined from an 8-h urine collection. Based on the distribution of the log (omeprazole/hydroxyomeprazole) values and using the antimode value of 0.8, the frequency of poor metabolizers of omeprazole was estimated to be 7.7% (95% confidence interval 3-18%) which was similar to that in the other Caucasian populations (P = 0.54, Fisher's exact test). Three poor metabolizers of omeprazole were also classified as poor metabolizers of both mephenytoin and proguanil and no misclassification occurred with three phenotyping methods. All three methods separated poor or extensive metabolizer phenotypes with complete concordance. The ratio of omeprazole to hydroxyomeprazole correlated with the S/R ratio of mephenytoin and the ratio of proguanil to cycloguanil. These results support the hypothesis that the oxidative metabolism of three different drugs may be catalyzed by the same cytochrome P450 enzyme.

Enantioselective hydroxylation of omeprazole catalyzed by CYP2C19 in Swedish white subjects.

Stereoselective disposition of omeprazole and its formed 5-hydroxy metabolite were studied in five poor metabolizers and five extensive metabolizers of S-mephenytoin. After a single oral dose of omeprazole (20 mg), the plasma concentrations of the separate enantiomers of the parent drug and the 5-hydroxy metabolite were determined for 10 hours after drug intake. In poor metabolizers, the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve [AUC(0-8)] of (+)-omeprazole was larger and that of the 5-hydroxy metabolite of this enantiomer was smaller than the AUC(0-8) values in extensive metabolizers (p < 0.001). The mean AUC(0-8) of the (-)-enantiomer of omeprazole was also higher in poor metabolizers than in extensive metabolizers, but only 3.1-fold compared with 7.5-fold for (+)-omeprazole. The rate of formation of the hydroxy metabolite from (-)-omeprazole was low and not significantly different in poor and extensive metabolizers. These results show that (+)-omeprazole is to a major extent hydroxylated by CYP2C19. Also (-)-omeprazole may partly be metabolized by this enzyme but is mainly metabolized by another enzyme, presumably CYP3A4, to the achiral sulfone metabolite. The plasma concentration ratio of omeprazole to 5-hydroxyomeprazole obtained 3 hours after the drug intake has been used to distinguish between extensive and poor metabolizer phenotypes. With use of the ratio between the (+)-enantiomers of the parent drug and the metabolite, a better discrimination between phenotypes was obtained. The ratio between the (-)-enantiomers also separated the phenotypes but was less discriminatory. For the future, measurement of total concentrations will suffice for phenotyping.

Acid aspiration prophylaxis in elective biliary surgery A comparison of omeprazole and famotidine using manually aided gastric aspiration

We have compared the effects of single oral doses of omeprazole 40 mg, famotidine 40 mg or placebo on gastric secretion in 45 non-obese patients the night before elective biliary surgery. After stable anaesthesia had been established, a Salem orogastric tube was introduced and gastric contents were aspirated by a blinded observer. The volume and pH were noted. After the abdomen was opened aspiration was repeated but on this occasion with the surgeon's manual assistance. We found that the initial aspirate volume underestimated total gastric volume by an average (SD) of 7.1 (6.6) ml. Famotidine, but not omeprazole, produced a significant decrease in gastric volume and acidity. Patients were considered to be at risk if pH < 2.5 and volume > 0.4 ml.kg-1. Three patients in the omeprazole group, three in the placebo group and none in the famotidine group came into this category. We conclude that a single oral dose of omeprazole 40 mg given the night before surgery does not afford adequate prophylaxis for acid aspiration syndrome.

Pharmacokinetics of oral and intravenous omeprazole in patients with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral and IV omeprazole after a single dose were studied in 9 patients with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome to determine whether the increased dose required to control gastric acid hypersecretion could be explained on the basis of altered pharmacokinetics. Each patient was studied both after receiving a single IV bolus of omeprazole (40 mg) and after receiving a single oral dose of omeprazole (80 mg). Intravenous and oral omeprazole doses were administered 1 week apart. Gastric acid secretion and plasma concentrations of omeprazole after drug administration were determined in each patient. The area under the plasma concentration curve, clearance, and volume of distribution after IV omeprazole administration and the area under the plasma concentration curve, peak plasma concentration, and time required to reach the peak after oral omeprazole administration were not different from those reported previously for normal subjects and patients with peptic ulcer disease. Mean (±SEM) bioavailability of oral omeprazole for all patients was 68% ± 16%, which was similar to the bioavailability reported previously for normal subjects. Three patients had a significantly lower bioavailability (20% ± 8%) than the others, and their basal acid outputs were significantly higher than those of the other 7 patients. For all patients there was an inverse correlation between bioavailability and basal acid output (r = 0.76; P < 0.02). The mean (±SEM) elimination half-lives of IV and oral omeprazole were not different (2.3 ± 0.4 vs. 2.4 ± 0.5 hours) but were significantly longer than those reported previously for normal subjects (P < 0.02). The duration of action correlated with the elimination half-life of the drug (r = 0.87; P < 0.003) and area under the plasma concentration curve (r = 0.72; P < 0.03). The mean durations of action of IV and oral omeprazole were not significantly different (34 ± 7.2 vs. 35 ± 6.2 hours). It was concluded that altered pharmacokinetics do not account for the increased drug requirement of omeprazole in patients with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. In contrast to a previous study, the oral and IV omeprazole had the same duration of action, suggesting that intermittent bolus administration of parenteral omeprazole will obviate the need for continuous infusion of histamine H2-receptor antagonists in patients requiring parenteral antisecretory drugs. Furthermore, an IV dose every 12 hours controlled acid secretion in all patients, suggesting this as the recommended dose interval in patients requiring parenteral drug therapy.

Omeprazole for Prophylaxis of Acid Aspiration in Elective Surgery

The aim of the study was to determine whether a single oral dose of omeprazole 40 mg is effective in increasing the pH of gastric residue above 2.5 at the time of anaesthetic induction in adult patients scheduled for elective gynaecological surgery. The patients were allocated to receive either chlorazepate dipotassium 25 mg alone or omeprazole 40 mg and chlorazepate dipotassium 25 mg on the night before surgery. Gastric volume and pH were measured after induction of anaesthesia. Patients who received omeprazole had a higher mean pH than control patients (p less than 0.001). The pH was less than 3.5 in 50% of patients in the control group, but in only 4.5% of those who received omeprazole (p less than 0.01). Mean (SEM) volume of gastric fluid was 15.2 (2.7) ml in the control group and 9.2 (1.8) ml in the omeprazole group, but the results were not statistically significant. A single dose of 40 mg omeprazole significantly decreased the number of patients at risk of aspiration pneumonitis.

Omeprazole for prophylaxis of acid aspiration in elective surgery

The aim of the study was to determine whether a single oral dose of omeprazole 40 mg is effective in increasing the pH of gastric residue above 2.5 at the time of anaesthetic induction in adult patients scheduled for elective gynaecological surgery. The patients were allocated to receive either chlorazepate dipotassium 25 mg alone or omeprazole 40 mg and chlorazepate dipotassium 25 mg on the night before surgery. Gastric volume and pH were measured after induction of anaesthesia. Patients who received omeprazole had a higher mean pH than control patients (p less than 0.001). The pH was less than 3.5 in 50% of patients in the control group, but in only 4.5% of those who received omeprazole (p less than 0.01). Mean (SEM) volume of gastric fluid was 15.2 (2.7) ml in the control group and 9.2 (1.8) ml in the omeprazole group, but the results were not statistically significant. A single dose of 40 mg omeprazole significantly decreased the number of patients at risk of aspiration pneumonitis.

Effect of Omeprazole on Gastric Emptying in Patients with a History of Duodenal Ulceration

Omeprazole, a substituted benzimidazole, inhibits basal and stimulated gastric acid secretion in animals and humans in a dose dependent fashion, for long periods after oral administration. This antisecretory effect is probably due to non-competitive inhibition of the H+K+ATPase proton pump which has been identified in the secretory membrane of the parietal cell. Preliminary data from animal experiments have indicated that oral omeprazole, 400 μmol/kg, also delays gastrin emptying but intravenous omeprazole, 80 μmol/kg, does not, As the plasma concentrations of omeprazole following administration by both routes were similar, a local rather than a systemic effect was suggested. Therefore, in this study the effect has been evaluated of a single oral dose of omeprazole, 90 mg, given as a buffered, uncoated granulate, on gastric emptying of a mixed liquid and solid meal in patients with duodenal ulcer disease.

The effect of omeprazole on gastric emptying in patients with duodenal ulcer disease.

The effect of a single oral dose of omeprazole (90 mg) on gastric emptying was assessed with a dual isotope scintigraphic technique in eight patients with a history of duodenal ulcer disease. Omeprazole had no significant effect on solid or liquid gastric emptying. The bioavailability (AUC0-2 h) of omeprazole in all patients was greater than that required for total suppression of acid secretion. No adverse clinical or laboratory effects were observed.