The genera Costesia Ther. and Neosharpiella Robins. & Delg. are- transferred from the Funariaceae to the Gigaspermaceae. Neosharpiella turgida (Mitt.) Robins. & Delg. is reported for the first time from Chile. The morphology of the six genera currently placed in the Gigaspermaceae is compared and generic inter-relationships discussed. SEM micrographs of the spores of four genera are given. In the revised sense presented, the Gigaspermaceae have a widely scattered, predominantly Southern Hemispheric distribution. Nomenclatural notes on several taxa are appended and several lectotypes are proposed. In the course of revisionary study on the Funariaceae, I have had occasion to examine material of the Central and South American genus Neosharpiella Robins. & Delg. and the South American genus Costesia Ther., as well as type material of most of the species currently placed in the Gigaspermaceae. This paper presents evidence that Neosharpiella and Costesia are improperly placed within the Funariaceae and that they are better placed in the Gigaspermaceae sensu Brotherus. The Funariaceae and the Gigaspermaceae were both placed in the Funariales by Broth- erus (1924). The Funariaceae may be characterized by the following set of characters: 1. annual or biennial habit; 2. erect, little-branched stems (very rarely prostrate and more or less rhizomatous); 3. leaf cells thin-walled and without thickened corners; 4. costae well developed, very rarely absent; 5. usually autoicous sexual condition; 6. perigonial pa- raphyses with globose terminal cells; 7. capsules various, with stomata enclosed by a single guard cell and a slit-like pore; and 8. spores relatively large, though usually less than 50 gm in diameter. The Gigaspermaceae, on the other hand, may be characterized by: 1. apparently perennial habit; 2. prostrate, rhizomatous stems giving rise to erect branches; 3. leaf cells thin- or firm-walled, often undulate in outline and usually with thickened corners; 4. costae variously developed; 5. usually synoicous or paroicous sexual condition; 6. perigonial paraphyses filiform, without inflated terminal cells; 7. capsules gymnostomous, with stomata enclosed by two guard cells (rarely imperfectly formed); and 8. spores large, usually in excess of 50 gm diam. Collectively, Costesia and Neosharpiella are known from South America and Mexico where they grow as weeds on soil. Although appearing acrocarpous, the plants exhibit an unusual growth habit similar to that of the unrelated genus Drummondia and to which neither the term acrocarpous nor pleurocarpous can be applied without qualification. They proliferate by fragile, nearly hyaline rhizomes that give rise to the more visible erect branches. The apices of the leafy shoots give rise to sporophytes with exserted, broadly obovoid capsules resembling those of some Physcomitrium species, but which have a characteristic strongly wrinkled appearance when dry. Costesia was described by Theriot (1917) on the basis of two Chilean specimens col- lected by N. Costes in 1915. To my knowledge, the sole representative of the genus, C. 007-2745/80/466--476$1.35/0
Read full abstract