SummaryDifferent forms of turbo codes (TCs) have already been used in the contemporary message transferring system for transmission of the protected information because of their astonishing bit error rate (BER) behavior. However, it suffers from poor “flattening effect” performance. To overcome this limitation, component encoders having higher memory elements or more number of component encoders may be considered. At the initial segment of this article, the proposal of binary 4‐dimensional turbo code (4D‐TC) with appropriate “generator polynomial” combination and suitable interleaver arrangement has been abridged in Third‐Generation Partnership Project standard. This is an amended form of 3‐dimensional turbo code where some part of the “parity bits” is re‐encoded by the third encoder, and rest part is re‐encoded by the fourth encoder consisting of single memory component. Afterwards, performance of the proposed structure has been assessed by varying block length, number of component encoders, puncturing rate, and channel condition. At the consequent segment, “constricted upper bound” on the BER performances of the 4D‐TC has been assessed by adopting an approach called simplified augmented state diagram. Moreover, an exhaustive analysis has been performed on the novel simplified augmented state diagram approach–based 4D‐TC by fluctuating several internal parameters of the code structure like generator polynomial combination, block length, puncturing rate, interleaver combination, and permeability rate. In this regard, the existing augmented state diagram approach has been considered for comparative analysis as well.
Read full abstract