Significant Reduction In In-stent Restenosis Research Articles

In vivo evaluation of a pro-healing polydopamine coated stent through an in-stent restenosis rat model.

Drug-eluting stents have demonstrated efficiency in in-stent restenosis (ISR) but induced a risk of late acute thrombosis by delaying strut re-endothelialization. Polydopamine (PDA), a biocompatible polymer inspired from adhesive proteins of mussels, has been reported to promote endothelial cell (EC) proliferation while limiting SMC proliferation in vitro, thus suggesting the pro-healing potential. This study aimed at evaluating in vivo the impact of the pro-healing PDA-coated stent on ISR and on the quality of the strut re-endothelialization in a rat model. PDA-coated stents demonstrated a significant reduction in ISR in vivo compared to bare metal stents (ratio neointima/media = 0.48 (±0.26) versus 0.83 (±0.42), p < 0.001). Western blot analyses identified a trend towards an increased activation of p38 MAPK phosphorylation and its anti-proliferative effects on vascular SMC that could explain the results observed in morphological analyses. This bioinspired and biocompatible polydopamine layer could intrinsically limit ISR. In addition, according to its latent reactivity, PDA offers the possibility to immobilize some relevant drugs on the PDA-functionalized stent to provide potential synergistic effects.

Different Effects of Thiazolidinediones on In-Stent Restenosis and Target Lesion Revascularization after PCI: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

In-stent restenosis (ISR) remains the leading problem encountered after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) has been shown to be associated with reduced ISR and target lesion revascularization (TLR); however, the results are inconsistent, especially between rosiglitazone and pioglitazone. In this study, fourteen RCTs with a total of 1350 patients were finally included through a systematical literature search of Embase, Pubmed, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to January 31, 2017. The follow-up duration of the included trials ranged from 6 months to 18 months. The results demonstrated that TZDs treatment is associated with significantly reduced risk of TLR (RR:0.45, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.67 for pioglitazone, RR:0.68, 95%CI 0.46 to 1.00 for rosiglitazone). Pioglitazone is associated with significantly reduced risks of ISR (RR:0.47, 95%CI 0.27 to 0.81), major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (RR:0.44, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.64) and neointimal area (SMD: −0.585, 95%CI −0.910 to −0.261). No significant relationship was observed between rosiglitazone and ISR (RR:0.91, 95%CI 0.39 to 2.12), MACE (RR:0.73, 95%CI 0.53 to 1.00) and neointimal area (SMD: −0.164, 95%CI −1.146 to 0.818). This meta-analysis demonstrated that TZDs treatment is associated with significant reduction in ISR, TLR and MACE for patients after PCI. Pioglitazone treatment seems to have more beneficial effects than rosiglitazone and no significantly increased cardiovascular risk was detected for both agents.

Diagnosis and management challenges of in-stent restenosis in coronary arteries.

Over the course of the 3 decades, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation transformed the practice of cardiology. PCI with stenting is currently the most widely performed procedure for the treatment of symptomatic coronary disease. In large trials, drug-eluting stents (DES) have led to a significant reduction in in-stent restenosis (ISR) rates, one of the major limitations of bare-metal stents. Due to these favorable findings, DES was rapidly and widely adopted enabling more complex coronary interventions. Nevertheless, ISR remains a serious concern as late stent complications. ISR mainly results from aggressive neointimal proliferation and neoatherosclerosis. DES-ISR treatment continues to be challenging complications for interventional cardiologists.

Rationale and design: Impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance on long-term clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting stents in long coronary lesions

BackgroundAlthough the use of drug-eluting stents (DESs) in patients with coronary artery disease has contributed to a significant reduction in in-stent restenosis and repeat revascularization, treating diffuse long lesions using DESs remains challenging due to the high rates of in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) provides tomographic images of coronary vascular structure and is useful for evaluating lesion morphology and stent optimization during percutaneous coronary intervention. However, it remains controversial whether IVUS guidance in DES implantation for long coronary lesions could reduce adverse clinical outcomes. HypothesisWe hypothesize that the long-term clinical outcomes of IVUS-guided DES implantation would be superior to those of angiography-guided DES implantation in a subset of patients with long coronary lesions. Study designThis study is a randomized, prospective, multi-center trial comparing the long-term clinical outcomes of IVUS-guided and angiography-guided everolimus-eluting stent implantation in patients with long coronary lesions (implanted stent ≥28mm in length). The primary end point is a composite of major adverse cardiac events, including cardiac death, target lesion-related myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization at 1year following intervention. A total of 1,400 patients will be required to be enrolled according to sample size calculations. ConclusionThis study will test the hypothesis that IVUS guidance improves long-term clinical outcomes in patients treated with everolimus-eluting stents for long coronary lesions compared with angiographic guidance.

Myokardrevaskularisation

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in western countries and is of significant socio-economic importance due to its increasing prevalence. Until percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) were established, CAD could only be treated by surgical revascularization or pharmacological therapy. In-stent restenosis remains a major problem after stent implantation. However, the use of new materials and stent coatings have led to a significant reduction in in-stent restenosis. Thus, surgical revascularization and PCI are currently of equal value for the treatment of CAD. The decision-making for PCI or surgical revascularization depends on various factors such as number of diseased vessels, complexity of the coronary stenoses, concomitant diseases, and the patient's general condition. The therapeutic regime of every patient should be adjusted to the recommendations of the European and German Society for Cardiology, while controversial and complex cases should be discussed in an interdisciplinary case conference ("heart team").

Myokardrevaskularisation

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in western countries and is of significant socio-economic importance due to its increasing prevalence. Until percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) were established, CAD could only be treated by surgical revascularization or pharmacological therapy. In-stent restenosis remains a major problem after stent implantation. However, the use of new materials and stent coatings have led to a significant reduction in in-stent restenosis. Thus, surgical revascularization and PCI are currently of equal value for the treatment of CAD. The decision-making for PCI or surgical revascularization depends on various factors such as number of diseased vessels, complexity of the coronary stenoses, concomitant diseases, and the patient's general condition. The therapeutic regime of every patient should be adjusted to the recommendations of the European and German Society for Cardiology, while controversial and complex cases should be discussed in an interdisciplinary case conference ("heart team").

Drug eluting versus bare metal stents in cardiac allograft vasculopathy

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a distinct pathological condition characterized by diffuse and progressive arteriopathy and it is an important determinant of long-term graft survival. Definitive CAV treatment is retransplantation but palliation with stenting might temporarily alleviate it. The benefit of drug eluting stents (DES) over bare metal stents (BMS) in the treatment of such lesions is debatable. We therefore sought to do a literature search to review the available evidence comparing DES to BMS. We conducted Pub Med, EMBASE, Cochrane database review, Web of Science search of studies comparing DES with BMS in CAV. Available studies were retrospective in nature with either direct comparison groups (n = 5) or historical controls (n = 1). The main outcomes analyzed were in stent restenosis (ISR) during follow-up and clinical outcomes. A total of 312 patients from six studies were included in the review (1995-2007). Most commonly used DES were sirolimus eluting stent. DES appeared to reduce the long-term risk of ISR compared with BMS. Three of the five studies showed a statistically significant reduction in ISR at 12 months while the one study assessing ISR at 6 months showed no significant difference. Clinical endpoints such as death and major adverse cardiac events were not statistically different. DES appear to reduce the incidence of ISR in CAV as compared with BMS. Prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to determine the clinical benefit of DES beyond a reduction in ISR.

Role of Pioglitazone in the Prevention of Restenosis and Need for Revascularization After Bare-Metal Stent Implantation: A Meta-Analysis

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of pioglitazone in the prevention of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and need for revascularization after bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation. BMS use is associated with a significant incidence of restenosis. Pioglitazone, a thiazolidinedione (TZD), has been shown in small studies to be associated with decreased neointimal formation after BMS implantation. The meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials that randomized patients undergoing BMS implantation into pioglitazone treatment in combination with standard treatment or standard treatment only. All randomized controlled trials followed patients for 6 months with baseline and follow-up angiographies. The ISR and revascularization rate were considered primary outcomes. We identified 6 eligible studies involving 373 patients (187 in the pioglitazone group and 186 in the control group). Use of pioglitazone was associated with decreased late loss, a larger minimal lumen diameter, and a lower percentage diameter stenosis (p < 0.01). The angiographic ISR rate was decreased with pioglitazone (p < 0.01), and patients who received pioglitazone were significantly less likely to undergo revascularization (p < 0.01). Intravascular ultrasound analysis also demonstrated decreased neointima formation in the pioglitazone group. Subgroup analysis showed significant reduction in ISR and need for revascularization for studies involving only diabetic patients, whereas analysis of the remaining studies demonstrated nonsignificant reduction. This meta-analysis suggests that treatment with pioglitazone is effective in decreasing ISR and need for revascularization after BMS implantation in patients with diabetes. A randomized clinical trial evaluating the hypothesis that administration of pioglitazone reduces restenosis in diabetic patients after BMS implantation seems warranted.