Sentinel Node Navigation Surgery Research Articles

Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery for early gastric cancer: Five-year results of SENORITA trial.

4050 Background: A phase III multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial (SEntinel Node ORIented Tailored Approach [SENORITA] trial) has been performed to confirm the oncologic safety of laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery (LSNNS) for early gastric cancer (EGC). The results did not show the non-inferiority of LSNNS relative to laparoscopic standard gastrectomy (LSG) in terms of 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), the primary endpoint of the SENORITA trial even though the improved quality of life (QOL) in the LSNNS group. However, the long-term oncologic outcomes of LSNNS have not been compared with conventional surgery. This study was planned to investigate the comparison of LSG and LSNNS for EGC in terms of 5 years survival. Methods: We collected 5-year follow-up data of 527 patients recruited in the SENORITA trial. The overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence pattern were evaluated in full analysis sets of both LSG (n = 269) and LSNNS (n = 258). Results: The mean follow-up period was 58.5 and 57.7 months in LSNNS and LSG groups. There was no statistically significant difference in 5-year OS (p = 0.7403) and DFS (p = 0.0561) between LSG and LSNNS. In terms of DFS, additional five events in the LSG group and 7 in LSNNS occurred after a 3-year follow-up until 5-years. Primary site recurrence in 1 LSNNS, and metachronous gastric cancer occurred in one LSG and two in LSNNS were diagnosed from 3 to 5-year follow-up period. Other organ cancer developed in two vs. three and other deaths occurred in two v s. one in each group, respectively, from 3 to 5-year follow-up. Overall survival events were 6 in LSG and 7 in LSNNS, and disease-specific death events were two patients in both groups until five years. Conclusions: Although the SENORITA trial did not show non-inferiority of LSNNS in the primary endpoint, 3-year DFS relative to LSG, the 5-year DFS and OS did not reveal the statistical difference between the two groups. Considering the benefit of LSNNS regarding the postoperative QOL, LSNNS could be recommended as an alternative treatment option of LSG for EGC. Clinical trial information: NCT01804998.

Sentinel node navigation surgery in cervical cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

Sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS) is used in clinical practice for the treatment of cervical cancer. This study aimed to elucidate the appropriate sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping method and assess the safety and benefits of SNNS. We searched the PubMed, Ichushi, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials (RCT) and studies on SLN in cervical cancer from January 2012 to December 2020. Two authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. We quantitatively analyzed the detection rate, sensitivity/specificity, and complications and reviewed information, including the survival data of SLN biopsy (SLNB) without pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND). The detection rate of SLN mapping in the unilateral pelvis was median 95.7% and 100% and in the bilateral pelvis was median 80.4% and 90% for technetium-99m (Tc) with/without blue dye (Tc w/wo BD) and indocyanine green (ICG) alone, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of each tracer were high; the area under the curve of each tracer was 0.988 (Tc w/wo BD), 0.931 (BD w/wo Tc), 0.966 (ICG), and 0.977 (carbon nanoparticle). Morbidities including lymphedema, neurological symptoms and blood loss were associated with PLND. One RCT and five studies all showed SNNS without systematic PLND does not impair recurrence or survival in early-stage cervical cancer with a tumor size ≤ 2-4cm. Both Tc w/wo BD and ICG are appropriate SLN tracers. SNNS can reduce the morbidities associated with PLND without affecting disease progression in early-stage cervical cancer.

190: ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION (ESD) AND ROBOTIC SENTINEL NODE NAVIGATION SURGERY FOR EARLY GASTRIC CANCER: FIRST EXPERIENCE AND PRELIMINARY RESULTS

Abstract Background and aim Early gastric cancer (EGC) is defined as a cancer limited to mucosa (T1a) and submucosa (T1b). The 5-year survival rates are respectively 96% and 83% for T1a and T1b. Despite endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is considered the standard treatment for EGC, literature reports a quite considerable rate of lymph-node metastasis (2% to 18%). Combined surgical-endoscopic treatment can achieve accurate resection of EGC, solving the problem of lymphadenectomy which cannot be performed endoscopically. Near infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green (ICG) was recently introduced for lymphatic mapping in several tumors. The aim of the study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of ESD in combination with robotic ICG guided sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS). Methods ICG was endoscopically injected intraoperatively into the submucosal layer around the tumor. Intraoperative NIR imaging with ICG was carried out with a near-infrared camera system built into the robotic platform. The first lymph node which had taken up ICG appeared as a green spot and was identified as the sentinel node (SN). SN was then sent for extemporaneous histopathological examination. When ICG fluorescence extended to the second nodal stations a ICG guided robotic basin lymphadenectomy was performed. Basin lymph nodes were sent for definitive histopathological analysis. If no tumoral cells were identified in the SN, an ESD with standard technique was conducted. If the SN pathological examination revealed tumoral cells, a robotic radical resection and D2 lymphadenectomy was completed. Results Seven ESDs with SNNS and basin lymphadenectomy basin were performed. No gastric perforations or other intraoperative complications were registered. Mean operative time was 148.6 minutes. All the procedures histologically resulted in complete excisions. No lymph nodes metastasis was demonstrated in either the SN or the basin lymph nodes. A mean of 12 lymph-nodes was collected. Mean hospitalization time was 2.8 days. Conclusion In our preliminary experience, combined ESD and SNNS could be recommended as a safe and effective treatment for EGC in patients with potential risk of LN metastasis or in patients with multiple comorbidity in order to avoid more invasive organ resections.

Laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery in gastric cancer to reduce surgical radicality

Laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery in gastric cancer to reduce surgical radicality

Laparoscopic Sentinel Node Navigation Surgery for Stomach Preservation in Patients With Early Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

PURPOSETo compare postoperative complications, long-term survival, and quality of life (QOL) after laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery (LSNNS) and laparoscopic standard gastrectomy (LSG).METHODSFive hundred eighty patients with preoperatively diagnosed stage IA gastric adenocarcinoma (≤ 3 cm) were assigned to undergo either LSG or LSNNS. Observers were not blinded to patient grouping. The primary outcome was 3-year disease-free survival (3y-DFS). Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, QOL, 3-year disease-specific survival (3y-DSS), and 3-year overall survival (3y-OS).RESULTSIn total, 527 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis population for the primary outcome (LSG, 269; LSNNS, 258). Stomach-preserving surgery was performed in 210 patients (81%) in the LSNNS group. During the median follow-up duration, the 3y-DFS rates in the LSG and LSNNS groups were 95.5% and 91.8%, respectively (difference: 3.7%; 95% CI, –0.6 to 8.1). Three patients with recurrence and five with metachronous gastric cancer in the LSNNS group underwent standard surgery. Two patients with distant metastasis in both groups were treated with palliative chemotherapy. The 3y-DSS and 3y-OS rates in the LSG and LSNNS groups were 99.5% and 99.1% (P = .59) and 99.2% and 97.6% (P = .17), respectively. Postoperative complications occurred in 19.0% of the LSG group and 15.5% of the LSNNS group (P = .294). The LSNNS group showed better physical function (P = .015), less symptoms (P < .001), and improved nutrition than the LSG group.CONCLUSIONLSNNS did not show noninferiority to LSG for 3y-DFS, with a 5% margin. However, the 3y-DSS and 3y-OS were not different after rescue surgery in cases of recurrence/metachronous gastric cancer, and LSNNS had better long-term QOL and nutrition than LSG.

Characteristics of lymph node stations/basins metastasis and construction and validation of a preoperative combination prediction model that accurately excludes lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer.

To explore the candidate indications for function-preserving curative gastrectomy and sentinel lymph node navigation surgery in early gastric cancer (EGC). The clinicopathological data of 561 patients with EGC who underwent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer at Peking University Cancer Hospital from November 2010 to November 2020 with postoperative pathological stage pT1 and complete examination data, were collected. Pearson's Chi-square test was used and binary logistic regression was employed for univariate and multivariate analyses. Combined analysis of multiple risk and protective factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) of EGC was performed. A negative predictive value (NPV) combination model was built and validated. LNM occurred in 85 of 561 patients with EGC, and the LNM rate was 15.15%. NPV for LNM reached 100% based on three characteristics, including ulcer-free, moderately well differentiation and patient <65 years old or tumor located at the proximal 1/3 of the stomach. Regarding lymphatic basin metastasis, multivariate analysis showed that the metastatic proportion of the left gastric artery lymphatic basin was significantly higher in male patients compared with female patients (65.96% vs. 38.89%, P<0.05). The proportion of right gastroepiploic artery lymphatic basin metastasis in patients with a maximum tumor diameter >2 cm was significantly greater than that noted in patients with a maximum tumor diameter ≤2 cm (60.78% vs. 28.13%, P<0.05). Characteristics of lymph node stations/basins metastasis will facilitate precise lymph node resection. The NPV for LNM reaches 100% based on the following two conditions: young and middle-aged EGC patients, well-differentiated tumors, and without ulcers; or well-differentiated tumors, without ulcers, and tumors located in the proximal stomach. These findings can be used as the recommended indications for function-preserving curative gastrectomy and sentinel lymph node navigation surgery.

Sentinel node navigation surgery as a diagnosis and treatment tool to find occult metastasis for early oral cancer

Sentinel node navigation surgery as a diagnosis and treatment tool to find occult metastasis for early oral cancer

Life prognosis of sentinel node navigation surgery for early-stage gastric cancer: Outcome of lymphatic basin dissection.

BACKGROUNDLymphatic basin dissection is a sentinel node biopsy method that is specific for gastric cancer. In this method, the dyed lymphatic system is dissected en bloc, and sentinel nodes are identified at the back table (ex vivo). Even with lymphatic basin dissection, blood flow to the residual stomach can be preserved, and function-preserving curative gastrectomy can be performed. The oncological safety of function-preserving curative gastrectomy combined with lymphatic basin dissection has not yet been fully investigated. We hypothesized that the oncological safety of sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS) is not inferior to that of the guidelines.AIMTo investigate the life prognosis of SNNS for gastric cancer in comparison with guidelines surgery.METHODSThis was a retrospective cohort study. Patients were selected from gastric cancer patients who underwent sentinel node biopsy from April 1999 to March 2016. Patients from April 1999 to August 2008 were from the Department of Surgery II, Kanazawa University Hospital, and patients from August 2009 to March 2016 were from the Department of Surgical Oncology, Kanazawa Medical University Hospital. Patients who were diagnosed with gastric cancer, which was preoperatively diagnosed as superficial type (type 0), 5 cm or less in length, clinical T1-2 and node negative, and underwent various gastrectomies guided by sentinel node navigation were retrospectively collected. The overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) of these patients (SNNS group) were investigated. Patients with gastric cancer of the same stage and who underwent guidelines gastrectomy with standard nodal dissection were also selected as the control group.RESULTSA total of 239 patients in the SNNS group and 423 patients in the control group were included. Pathological nodal metastasis was observed in 10.5% and 10.4% of the SNNS and control groups, respectively. The diagnostic abilities of sentinel node biopsy were 84% and 98.6% for sensitivity and accuracy, respectively. In the SNNS group, 81.6% of patients underwent modified gastrectomy or function-preserving curative gastrectomy with lymphatic basin dissection, in which the extent of nodal dissection was further reduced compared to the guidelines. The OS rate in the SNNS group was 96.8% at 5 years and was significantly better than 91.3% in the control group (P = 0.0014). The RFS rates were equal in both groups. After propensity score matching, there were 231 patients in both groups, and the cumulative recurrence rate was 0.43% at 5 years in the SNNS group and 1.30% in the control group, which was not statistically different.CONCLUSIONThe oncological safety of patients who undergo gastrectomy guided by sentinel node navigation is not inferior to that of the guidelines surgery.

Function-Preserving Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer.

Simple SummaryFor patients with early gastric cancer (EGC), a good prognosis is achieved by conventional standard gastrectomy with radical lymphadenectomy. However, postgastrectomy syndrome is often inevitable and results in decreased quality of life (QOL). To improve patients’ QOL, proximal gastrectomy instead of total gastrectomy and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy instead of distal gastrectomy have been widely accepted as function-preserving gastrectomies. Recently, personalized, minimized gastrectomy with sentinel node navigation surgery has been developed and is expected to be an ideal treatment option for patients with EGC. Herein, we review the indications, surgical techniques, and postoperative outcomes of function-preserving gastrectomy.Recently, minimally invasive (endoscopic or laparoscopic) treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC) has been widely accepted. However, a standard gastrectomy with radical lymphadenectomy is generally performed in patients with EGC who have no indications for endoscopic resection, and postgastrectomy dysfunction is one of the problems of standard gastrectomy. Function-preserving gastrectomy, such as proximal gastrectomy and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy, can be considered when attempting to preserve the patient’s quality of life (QOL) postoperatively. In addition, sentinel node navigation surgery for EGC has been applied in clinical practice in several prospective studies on function-preserving personalized minimized gastrectomy. In the near future, the sentinel lymph node concept is expected to form the basis for establishing an ideal, personalized, minimally invasive function-preserving treatment for patients with EGC, which will improve their postoperative QOL without compromising their long-term survival. In this review article, we summarize the current status, surgical techniques, and postoperative outcomes of function-preserving gastrectomy for EGC.

Exploratory analysis of lateral pelvic sentinel lymph node status for optimal management of laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection in advanced lower rectal cancer without suspected lateral lymph node metastasis

BackgroundTotal mesorectal excision (TME) and lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) without radiotherapy (RT) are standard treatment for lower cT3/4 rectal cancers in Eastern countries. In comparative studies, both TME + LLND and RT + TME yield good local control. Although Japanese guidelines recommend LLND for locally advanced rectal cancers below the peritoneal reflection, LLND dissection of clinically negative lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPLN) is controversial, and laparoscopic TME + LLND is technically challenging and time-consuming. New optical instruments for laparoscopy allow easy perioperative sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification using ICG. The SLN concept may facilitate accurate diagnosis of LPLN involvement, and thus reduce LLND in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Here we investigated lateral pelvic SLN navigation surgery for SLN detection during laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.MethodsThis study included 21 patients with clinical StageII/III lower rectal cancer without LPLN enlargement, who underwent curative laparoscopic surgery. All patients underwent TME, followed by lateral SLN identification and biopsy using ICG, and then laparoscopic LLND. ICG fluorescence imaging was conducted using the laparoscopic near-infrared camera system.ResultsLateral SLNs were successfully identified in 16 (76.2%) of the 21 patients. Among the 15 patients without SLN tumor metastasis, the dissected lateral non-SLNs were all negative.ConclusionsA lack of metastasis in the lateral pelvic SLN seems to reflect a lack of metastases to all lateral LNs. Our present results suggest that this laparoscopic ICG-guided SLN strategy may be a low-risk and time-saving method to prevent laparoscopic LLND in cases with negative lateral pelvic lymph nodes.

Feasibility of sentinel node navigated surgery in high-risk T1b esophageal adenocarcinoma patients using a hybrid tracer of technetium-99\xa0m and indocyanine green

BackgroundMinimally invasive esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy is standard of care for T1b esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) with a high risk of lymph node metastasis. Sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS) is a well-known concept to tailor the extent of lymphadenectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of SNNS with a hybrid tracer (technetium-99 m/indocyanine green/nanocolloid) for patients with high-risk T1b EAC.MethodsIn this prospective, multicenter pilot study, 5 patients with high-risk T1b EAC were included. The tracer was injected endoscopically around the endoscopic resection scar the day before surgery, followed by preoperative imaging (lymphoscintigraphy/SPECT-CT). During surgery, first the SNs were localized and resected based on preoperative imaging and intraoperative gammaprobe- and fluorescence-based detection, followed by esophagectomy. Primary endpoints were the percentage of patients with detectable SNs, concordance between preoperative and intraoperative SN detection, and the additive value of indocyanine green.ResultsSNs could be identified and resected in all patients (median 3 SNs per patient, range 2–7). There was a high concordance between preoperative and intraoperative SN detection. In 2 patients additional peritumoral SNs were identified with fluorescence-based detection. None of the resected lymph nodes showed signs of (micro)metastases and no nodal metastases were detected in the surgical resection specimen.ConclusionsSNNS using technetium-99 m/indocyanine green/nanocolloid seems feasible and safe in patients with high-risk T1b EAC. Indocyanine green fluorescence seems to be of additive value for detection of peritumoral SNs. Whether this approach can optimize selection for esophagectomy needs to be studied in future research.

Long-term quality of life and nutritional results after laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery versus laparoscopic standard gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: Secondary outcomes of a multicenter, randomized phase 3 trial (SENORITA).

4054 Background: Laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery (LSNNS) has been suggested as an alternative to laparoscopic standard gastrectomy (LSG) in early gastric cancer patients to improve long-term quality of life (QOL) and nutritional outcomes. Here, we present 3-year results of patient-reported quality of life (QOL) and nutrition, secondary endpoints of SENORITA trial. Methods: SENORITA is a prospective multicenter randomized phase 3 trial. Patients diagnosed with early gastric cancer of 3 cm or less were randomly allocated (1:1) to LSNNS for stomach preservation or LSG. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival. In this study, we analyzed QOL assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EORTC stomach module (STO22) and nutritional parameters at 3, 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery. Linear mixed model analyses was used to evaluate differences between the two groups. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01804998. Results: From March 2013 to March 2017, a total of 580 patients were randomly assigned and 527 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis population (258 in LSNNS and 269 in LSG group). QOL questionnaires were available for 99.4% of patients at baseline and then for 92.2%, 83.2%, 72.8%, and 66.9% at 3, 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery, respectively. The LSNNS group had higher physical function score than the LSG group at all time points (p = 0.002). However, there were no significant differences in other scales of EORTC QLQ-C30. Regarding EORTC QLQ-STO22, pain, eating restriction, anxiety, and taste scores were lower (better QOL) at all time points in the LSNNS group than in the LSG group (p = 0.002, &lt; 0.001, &lt; 0.001, and &lt; 0.001, respectively). The summary score of EORTC QLQ-STO22 was also higher in the LSNNS group representing better QOL (p &lt; 0.001). Body mass index, hemoglobin and total protein were significantly higher in the LSNNS group compared with the LSG group. Conclusions: The LSNNS group had better physical function and less symptoms, including pain, eating restriction, anxiety, and taste change compared with the LSG group. Moreover, the nutritional parameters were better maintained in the LSNNS group than in the LSG group. These findings showed benefits of stomach preserving surgery in LSNNS and can be used to help decision making about treatment for patients with early gastric cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT01804998.

Prospective evaluation of sentinel node navigation surgery in Japanese patients with low-risk endometrial cancer-safety and occurrence of lymphedema.

The present study aimed to clarify the occurrence rate of lymphedema and prognosis in patients with endometrial cancer according to sentinel lymph node biopsy alone with intraoperative histopathological examination. The study included 45 consecutive patients with endometrial cancer treated at Tohoku University Hospital between October 2014 and August 2017. All patients had endometrial carcinoma with endometrioid histology Grade 1 or Grade 2 confirmed by biopsy and stage I on magnetic resonance imaging and/or computed tomography at their preoperative evaluation. Sentinel lymph node detection was performed by radioisotope and dye. Patients who were diagnosed intraoperatively as negative for sentinel lymph node metastasis did not undergo further systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy. The occurrence rate of lymphedema and prognosis was evaluated. Bilateral sentinel lymph nodes were detected in 44 of 45 patients (97%). Forty-three patients underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy alone, and only two patients underwent systematic lymphadenectomy. Sentinel lymph node metastases were detected in one patient intraoperatively and two patients postoperatively as ITCs. No patients experienced recurrence. New symptomatic lower-extremity lymphedema was identified in one of 43 patients (2.3%) who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy alone. Sentinel lymph node biopsy alone with intraoperative histopathological diagnosis appears to be a safe and effective strategy to detect lymph node metastasis and to reduce the number of patients with lower-extremity lymphedema among patients with endometrial cancer.

Quality of life after laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery in early gastric cancer: a single-center cohort study.

To investigate the quality of life (QOL) of patients after laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS) compared to conventional laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) in early gastric cancer patients. Patients recruited for laparoscopic SNNS surgery between July 2010 and April 2013 were assessed for their QOL. A historical control group was established, consisting of patients who underwent conventional LADG with radical lymphadenectomy from the same institution. QOL questionnaire was taken serially from preoperative week 1 until 12months postoperatively (1, 3, 6, and 12months) using the Korean version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QOL questionnaire-core (QLQ-C30) and gastric cancer-specific questionnaire (STO22). A total of 80 prospectively gathered patients who received SNNS were categorized into the comparison group (SNNS group). The QOL was compared with 78 patients identified to have received LADG from the gastric cancer database of our institution and were sorted into the control group (LADG group). In QLQ-C30, SNNS group showed better functioning scales in all except role functioning and better scores from the symptom scales in fatigue, insomnia, and diarrhea compared to the LADG group. In QLQ-STO22, scores on dysphagia, eating restriction, anxiety, and body image disturbance were better in SNNS group. Postoperative QOL in laparoscopic gastrectomy combined with SNNS is superior compared to conventional laparoscopic distal gastrectomy in patients with stage I gastric cancer.

Recent updates and current issues of sentinel node navigation surgery for early gastric cancer.

With the increase in the incidence of early gastric cancer (EGC), several endoscopic and laparoscopic approaches, such as endoscopic submucosal dissection and function-preserving gastrectomy, have been accepted as standard treatments. Sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS) is an ideal surgical option for preservation of most parts of the stomach and consequent maintenance of normal gastric function to improve quality of life in patients with EGC. Although many previous studies and clinical trials have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of the sentinel node concept in gastric cancer, the clinical application of SNNS is debatable. Several issues regarding technical standardization and oncological safety need to be resolved. Recently several studies to resolve these problems are being actively performed, and SNNS might be an important surgical option in the treatment of gastric cancer in the future.

Current status and challenges in sentinel node navigation surgery for early gastric cancer.

As an optimal surgical procedure to accurately evaluate lymph node (LN) metastasis during surgery with minimal surgical resection, we have been developing sentinel node (SN) biopsy for early gastric cancer since the 1990s. Twelve institutions from the Japanese Society of Sentinel Node Navigation Surgery (SNNS), including Keio University Hospital, conducted a multicenter prospective trial to validate the SN concept using the dual-tracer method with blue dye and a radioisotope. According to the results, 397 patients were included in the final analysis, and the overall accuracy in detecting LN metastasis using SN biopsy was 99% (383 of 387). Based on the validation study, we are targeting cT1N0 with a primary tumor of ≤4 cm in diameter as an indication for SN biopsy for gastric cancer. We are currently running a multicenter nonrandomized phase III trial to assess the safety and efficacy of SN navigation surgery. The Korean group has reported the result of a multicenter randomized phase III trial. Since meticulous gastric cancer in the remnant stomach was rescued by subsequent gastrectomy, the disease-specific survival was comparable between the two techniques, implying that SN navigation surgery can be an alternative to standard gastrectomy. With the development of SN biopsy procedure and treatment modalities, the application of SN biopsy will be expanded to achieve an individualized minimally invasive surgery.

Feasibility and validity of sentinel node navigation surgery in patients with stage IA endometrial cancer

Feasibility and validity of sentinel node navigation surgery in patients with stage IA endometrial cancer

Lymph Node Mapping in Gastric Cancer Surgery: Current Status and New Horizons

Gastric cancer (GC) remains one of the most important malignant diseases with significant geographical, ethnic, and socioeconomic differences in distribution. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping is an accepted way to assess lymphatic spread in several solid tumors; however, the complexity of gastric lymphatic drainage may discourage use of this procedure, and the estimated accuracy rate is, in general, reasonably good. This study aimed at reviewing the current status of SLN mapping and navigation surgery in GC. SLN mapping should be limited to tumors clinically T1 and less than 4 cm in diameter. Combination SLN mapping with radioactive colloid and blue dye is used as the standard. Despite its notable limitations, SLN mapping and SLN navigation surgery present a novelty individualizing the extent of lymphadenectomy.

Laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery versus laparoscopic standard gastrectomy with lymph node dissection in early gastric cancer: Final three-year survival results of multicenter randomized controlled phase III trial (SENORITA trial).

4510 Background: The benefits and hazards of laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery (LSNNS), compared with laparoscopic standard gastrectomy (LSG) with lymph node dissection in early gastric cancer (EGC), are unknown. The SENORITA trial investigated the clinical impact of LSNNS in EGC in terms of short-term surgical outcomes, long-term survival and quality of life. Methods: This study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial. Patients with preoperatively diagnosed gastric adenocarcinoma with T1N0 of 3 cm or less in diameter, regardless of histology, except absolute indication for endoscopic resection were eligible. Patients were randomized to LSG or LSNNS using dual tracers. The primary endpoint is 3-year disease-free survival (3yDFS). Planned sample size per arm is 290 patients with the non-inferiority margin of 2.737 in hazard ratio (HR) assuming that LSG achieve 97% 3yDFS, 5% of type 1 error and 80% of power. Three-year recurrence-free survival (3yRFS), overall survival (3yOS) and disease specific death rate (3yDSDR) were evaluated as secondary endpoints. Results: From March 2013 to December 2016, 580 patients were randomized (LSG arm 292 vs. LSNNS arm 288). After 53 patients dropped out before surgery, operation was performed in 527 patients (269 vs. 258), representing the full analysis set. LSG was performed in 266 according to the protocol excluding 3 open conversion. After exclusion of 13 without LSNNS due to various reasons, LSNNS was performed in 245 patients according to the protocol. After median follow up of 47.5 months, 3yDFS were 95.5% and 91.8% (HR 1.901, CI 0.911 – 3.967), respectively. The 3yRFS was 98.9% and 95.2% (p=0.019), and 3yOS was 99.2% and 97.6% (p=0.166), and 3yDSDR was 99.5% and 99.1% (p=0.591), respectively. Conclusion: LSNNS in EGC did not show non-inferiority compared with LSG in terms of 3yDFS. However, 3yOS and 3yDSDR of LSNNS were comparable to LSG by the rescue surgery of recurrence. LSNNS might be an alternative surgical option instead of LSG in selected EGC patients. Clinical trial information: NCT01804998 .

Risk factors for lymphatic complications following lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer

ObjectiveLymph node (LN) metastasis is among the important prognostic factors for survival in endometrial cancer (EC). This study aimed to evaluate the occurrence of lymphatic complications following lymphadenectomy in patients with EC. Materials and methodsEC patients were retrospectively evaluated. Lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) and pelvic lymphocele (PL) were evaluated according to the International Society of Lymphology guidelines and the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, respectively. ResultsA total of 289 patients were enrolled. Surgery was performed via laparotomy and laparoscopy in 200 (69.2%) and 89 (30.8%) patients, respectively. LEL and PL occurred in 43 (14.9%) and 33 (11.4%) patients, respectively. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, circumflex iliac node (CIN) removal (odds ratio [OR]: 3.22; 95% CI: 1.43–7.98; P = 0.004) was an independent risk factor for LEL, while the surgical approach (OR: 4.46; 95% CI: 1.13–29.9; P = 0.004) was an independent risk factor for PL. ConclusionCIN dissection was a significant risk factor for LEL, while laparotomy was an independent risk factor for PL compared to laparoscopy in EC patients. This suggests that laparoscopic surgery combined with sentinel lymph node navigation surgery will prevent lymphatic complications in low-risk EC patients.