OPEN ACCESSDecember 15, 2010”Sensitive” Examination Workshop for Medical Clerkship Students Glenn Posner, MD, FRCSC, MEd Glenn Posner, MD, FRCSC, MEd University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.7936 SectionsAbout ToolsDownload Citations ShareFacebookTwitterEmail Abstract Introduction: When students practice rectal or pelvic examinations on patients, it is difficult for teachers to guide them because the structures being examined cannot be seen. There is also a tendency for students to perform these exams hastily and awkwardly, since they are concerned about causing patient discomfort. At many institutions, part of this training is accomplished using paid gynecologic teaching associates (GTAs), women who allow students to perform pelvic exams on them and teach them how to do so in a respectful manner. A curriculum was designed for a workshop during the preclerkship period to instruct students in the proper technique of physical exam of the breast, female pelvis, male genitalia, and rectum (the “sensitive” exams). Methods: The workshop consists of five small-group sessions covering the bimanual pelvic exam, speculum exam and Pap test, breast exam and catheterization, digital rectal exam, and male genitalia exam. The workshop can be administered to approximately 45 students, with each small group containing seven or eight students. The session begins as a large-group session where videos are presented to provide a uniform base of knowledge. The small-group sessions then involve hands-on learning. Results: Using a 7-point Likert scale (7 = outstanding), 169 students rated the presenters, the content and the process of the session. Over 70% of students rated each characteristic as a 6 or 7, and over 92% rated each characteristic as a 5 or above. Written comments indicated that the sessions were appreciated and offered constructive feedback to guide future improvements. We then evaluated the effectiveness the female pelvic examination component. 151 students were tested on the bimanual and speculum exams using an objective structured clinical examination. The mean score was 76% with a range of 32%-100%, and only 18 students failed to achieve a score of 60%. Discussion: Simulation cannot replace the experience gained from examining a real patient, but given a proper knowledge base, a proper approach to the patient, and extensive practice on models, students will be more comfortable when they do examine real patients. Medical students at our university are now instructed in these sensitive exams using medical simulation models rather than GTAs. Educational Objectives By the end of this session, learners will be able to: Explain the techniques of physical examination of the breasts, female pelvis, male genitalia, and rectum.Discuss the sensitive nature of these exams and how to carry them out with professionalism while preserving patient dignity.Confidently and comfortably develop their abilities to navigate the sensitive parts of the physical exam. Sign up for the latest publications from MedEdPORTAL Add your email below FILES INCLUDEDReferencesRelatedDetails FILES INCLUDED Included in this publication: SOGC Policy Statement.pdf Sensitive Examination Session Evaluation (Master).doc Sensitive Examination Workshop Student Information.doc Sensitive Examination Intro.ppt Sensitive Examination Curriculum Tutors 2009.doc Curriculum Document Sensitive Exam GDP.doc To view all publication components, extract (i.e., unzip) them from the downloaded .zip file. Download editor’s noteThis publication may contain technology or a display format that is no longer in use. CitationPosner G. ”Sensitive” Examination Workshop for Medical Clerkship Students. MedEdPORTAL. 2010;6:7936. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.7936 Copyright & Permissions© 2010 Posner. This is an open-access publication distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike license.KeywordsGenital ExaminationDigital Rectal ExaminationPhysical ExaminationBreast ExaminationPelvic Examination Disclosures None to report. Funding/Support None to report. Loading ...
Read full abstract