AbstractReducing the uncertainty of reservoir characterization requires to better identify the small‐scale structures of the subsurface from the available data. Studying the seismic response of meter‐scale, stratigraphic heterogeneities typically relies on the generation of reservoir models based on outcrop examples and their forward seismic modelling. To bridge geological information and seismic modelling, these methods allocate values of acoustic properties, such as mass‐density and P‐wave velocity, according to discretized properties like layer‐type lithology or facies units. This strategy matches the current workflow in seismic data inversion in industry, where modelling workflows are based on lithofacies distributions. However, from stratigraphic modelling, we know that meter‐scale heterogeneities occur within certain facies and lithologies. Here, we evaluate the difference on the seismic response between allocating acoustic properties in a grain size–based, semi‐continuous manner versus discretized manners based on lithology and facies classifications. To do so, we generate a reference geological simulation that we populate with acoustic properties, mass‐density and P‐wave velocity, using three different strategies: (1) based on grain size distribution; (2) based on facies distribution; and (3) based on lithology. The method we propose includes the generation of realistic geological simulations based on stratigraphic modelling and the transformation of its output into acoustic properties, honouring the intra‐lithology and intra‐facies, small‐scale structures. We, then, generate seismic data by applying a forward seismic modelling workflow. The synthetic data show that the grain size–based simulation allows the identification of small‐scale, stratigraphic heterogeneities, such as beds with strong density and velocity contrasts. These stratigraphic structures are smoothened or may completely disappear in the facies and lithology discretized simulations and, therefore, are not (well) represented in the synthetic seismic data. Recognizing meter‐scale, stratigraphic heterogeneities is relevant for the characterization of the fluid flow in the reservoir. However, current discrete and lithology‐based strategies in seismic inversion are not able to resolve such heterogeneities because real subsurface properties are not discrete properties but continuous, unless there are stratigraphic discontinuities such as erosional surfaces or faults. This research works towards a better understanding of the relationship between changes in these continuous properties and the observed seismic data by introducing greater complexity into the discretized geological simulations. Here, we use synthetic seismic images with the goal of eventually aiding in fine‐tuning seismic inversion methodologies applied to real seismic data. One pathway is to foster the development of inversion approaches that can leverage stratigraphic modelling to get stronger geological priors and replace the standard but inadequate multi‐Gaussian prior.
Read full abstract