Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes 1. A commission established jointly by the Scottish Executive and the Scotland Office to consider the implications of having different boundaries for Scottish Parliament and House of Commons elections also gave serious consideration to recommending STV (Arbuthnott 2006 Arbuthnott, Sir J. chmn. 2006. Putting citizens first: Boundaries, voting and representation in Scotland, Edinburgh: The Stationery Office. [Google Scholar]). However, it eventually came down in favour of trying to improve the existing AMS system rather than switching to STV at this stage at least. 2. However, we should note that the incidence of spoilt votes fell back to 2.1 per cent in the 2005 Northern Irish elections, which were once again held on the same day as a UK general election (Electoral Office for Northern Ireland 2005 electoral office for northern ireland. 2005. General statistics, 2005 local government election Available online at www.eoni.org.uk [Google Scholar]). 3. In contrast the introduction of a new ballot paper for the Scottish Parliament election caused considerable confusion. No less than 4 per cent of the constituency votes and a little under 3 per cent of the list votes cast in that election were ruled invalid (see http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/6637387.stm). 4. For example, in the 2001 general election, just 0.3 per cent of the votes in Scotland were ruled invalid, and in 2005, 0.4 per cent. In the first two Scottish Parliament elections these figures were 0.4 per cent and 0.8 per cent, respectively (Curtice and Fisher 2003 Curtice, J. and Fisher, S. 2003. Scottish Parliament Election 2003: Analysis of turnout, Edinburgh: Electoral Commission. Available online at www.electoralcommission.org.uk [Google Scholar]; Rallings and Thrasher 2005 Rallings, C. and Thrasher, M. 2005. The 2005 general election: Analysis of the results, London: Electoral Commission. Available online at www.electoralcommission.org.uk [Google Scholar]). 5. The author is conducting a survey based study of voting behaviour in the local and parliamentary election in collaboration with David McCrone (Edinburgh) and Michael Marsh (Trinity College, Dublin) as part of the 2007 Scottish Social Attitudes survey.
Read full abstract