Advancing open science across the complex and decentralized research ecosystem remains challenging to fully enact for a variety of reasons. Specific open science initiatives, including journal policy changes, preregistration, and Registered Reports represent existing opportunities for publishers, societies, institutions, funders, and researchers to contribute to more coordinated culture change across research communities. In a November 2021 post1 in The Scholarly Kitchen, Roger Schonfeld suggested that the current model for scientific scholarly communication may be ill-suited to improve and sustain public confidence and trust in science as it moves toward greater openness and transparency. The increasing politicization of science,2–4 along with related challenges in effectively managing the public communication of science, intensifies the need to build and sustain trust in the scientific process. After outlining proposed priorities for the scholarly communications community to contribute to trust-building in science, Schonfeld ultimately points to the need for greater coordination and collaboration across stakeholders in the global knowledge system—publishers, senior research officers, policy makers, institutions, funders, and libraries—to sustain a trusted information environment. System-level coordination and collaboration is a convergent theme across the open science reform movement.5–7 The recent adoption8 of UNESCO’s Recommendation of Open Science9 by all 193 member states offers a new signal of intentionality and a normative framework for global system coordination. The COVID-19 pandemic spurred coordination and implementation of open initiatives among various stakeholders across the scholarly communications system who aligned to thwart a global crisis. Specifically, the statement issued in January 2020 by the Wellcome Trust on “Sharing […]