You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022MP16-07 FRAILTY AS A PREDICTOR OF SACRAL NEUROMODULATION OUTCOMES Colby Souders, Mary Enoh Adakama, Allison Sih, Seth Cohen, Maude Carmel, Jennifer Anger, Karyn Eilber, and Kai Dallas Colby SoudersColby Souders More articles by this author , Mary Enoh AdakamaMary Enoh Adakama More articles by this author , Allison SihAllison Sih More articles by this author , Seth CohenSeth Cohen More articles by this author , Maude CarmelMaude Carmel More articles by this author , Jennifer AngerJennifer Anger More articles by this author , Karyn EilberKaryn Eilber More articles by this author , and Kai DallasKai Dallas More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002549.07AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Geriatric patients with overactive bladder or urge incontinence (UUI) are often medically under-treated. Concerns regarding anticholinergic side effects, polypharmacy, and cost of beta-3 agonists result in limited treatment options. Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is a minimally invasive and non-pharmacological option. Geriatric patients considered frail may not be offered SMN due to concerns of surgery complications, treatment efficacy, and complexity of device operations. Thus, the purpose of this study is to investigate SNM outcomes in geriatric patients who meet frailty criteria. METHODS: We reviewed California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) from 1/1/2012-12/31/2018. Using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, we identified patients who underwent Stage 1 (CPT:64581) and Stage 2 (CPT:64590) SNM surgery. Treatment was considered successful if a patient proceeded to Stage 2 from Stage 1. Patient age, gender, ethnicity, academic status surgery facility, and payor status were obtained. The SNM patient population was then analyzed using a validated claims-based frailty index (Kim, 2018). Univariate (chi-square/ T-test) and multivariate analysis were performed to assess for associations between variables of interest and completion of Stage 2. RESULTS: We identified 2,400 patients who underwent Stage 1, and 1,132 patients successfully proceeded to Stage 2. Rates of Stage 2 were higher in females compared to males (36.6% vs. 50.5%, p<0.001), those who had surgery at academic medical centers (58.6% vs. 20.8%, p<0.001), and those with a diagnosis of urgency (52.1% vs. 45.3%, p=0.003). These findings remained significant with multivariate analysis. Of the 2,400 patients identified 363 (15.1%) met frailty criteria and 165 (45.5%) underwent Stage 2. For non-frail patients, SNM success rate was 47.5% (p=0.514) (Table 1). There were no significant associations between patient age, ethnicity, payor status, and completion of Stage 2. CONCLUSIONS: Our work demonstrates that frailty had no significant adverse impact on success of SNM treatment. However, female gender, surgery at an academic center, and a diagnosis of UUI were more likely to have treatment success than patients with other indications. This data supports recommendation of SNM to older, frail patients, especially those with UUI. Source of Funding: The Medical Student Training in Aging Research Program and the National Institute on Aging (T35AG026736) © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e277 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Colby Souders More articles by this author Mary Enoh Adakama More articles by this author Allison Sih More articles by this author Seth Cohen More articles by this author Maude Carmel More articles by this author Jennifer Anger More articles by this author Karyn Eilber More articles by this author Kai Dallas More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...
Read full abstract