REVIEWS 357 for concerts in Russia and abroad. This is decidedly not a portrait of a composer putting his affairs in order; it is a professional artist actively occupying himself with the future’ (p. 180). Bullock, following Chaikovskii, does not assume that there is ‘complete harmony between musician and man, of which you [Von Meck] dream’ (Chaikovskii, quoted p. 86). There is slippage between musician and person, as Chaikovskii himself often noted in correspondence, particularly when critics tried to tie down music’s effects too tightly or narrowly (pp. 41, 106, 146). Thus, within the ‘intimate world’ (pp. 9, 18, 43) that the Sixth Symphony embodied through formal innovation, through ‘Tchaikovsky’s ability to translate personal predicaments into artistic form’ (pp. 135, 193), and through musically ‘extreme emotional intensity and even suffering’ (p. 173), all three of which remain easily mis-readable as psychopathological symptoms, it is no surprise that Bullock, like many earlier listeners and critics, turns to the music’s ‘sense of speaking, of somehow communicating a truth inexpressible through mere verbal language’ (pp. 14, 58): the ‘voice’ trope (pp. 43, 52). He frequently describes Chaikovskii’s music as ‘sincere’ (though ‘authentic’ is his final word — p. 193), and the music’s distracting call as ‘inviting audiences to engage in acts of speculative and imaginative interpretation of their own’ (pp. 173, 21). Two minor points. It would have been good to read more about Chaikovskii’s love of the eighteenth century (pp. 80, 127, 132, 141) and his veneration of Mozart (pp. 98, 130); the latter figure could (without technical language) help to unpack key aspects of Chaikovskii’s aesthetic ideology. There are three typos (pp. 128, 149, 166). Final mention must go to a scene from Saint-Saëns’ visit to Moscow in 1875 that would have been worth witnessing: Chaikovskii and Saint-Saëns dancing an improvised ballet, with Nikolai Rubinstein on the piano (p. 28). Royal Academy of Music Anthony Gritten Titus, Joan. The Early Film Music of Dmitry Shostakovich. The Oxford Music/ Media Series. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York, 2016. xv + 253 pp. Illustrations. Music examples. Notes. Bibliography. Index. £37.99. Studies of Shostakovich’s life and music have continued apace in the period since the composer’s death, and although it is well known that in his early years he earned money in the cinema and, later (in 1954) expressed clear and indeed pioneering views on the nature and demands of film music, relatively little is known about the nature of his early work in this genre. Joan Titus’s monograph is the first thorough attempt to describe the music with which he played a part in six well-known Russian films from 1928 to SEER, 96, 2, APRIL 2018 358 1936. This comprehensively annotated volume is rich in musical examples and photographic illustrations of contemporary documents and scores. A unique and particularly valuable addition is of periodically signalled references to a companion website providing material unavailable in book form, such as, for instance, video clips: . The selection of early movies and music discussed are: the silent New Babylon (1928–29); an early example of sound film Alone (1929–31); an example of the new Soviet sound film Golden Mountains (1931); a Socialist Realist movie, Counterplan (1932); a minimal score film, The Youth of Maxim (1934–35); and finally Girlfriends (1935–36) about the girls of the future, as envisioned in Soviet society. A chapter is devoted to each film, preceded by an introduction that lays out the author’s main concepts behind her approach to Shostakovich’s film music, and the historical background to such studies beginning with Asaf´ev, and including several of the Titus’s own articles. An Epilogue attempts to assess the times in which these scores were written, their relation to his other music, and his significance as a pioneer who introduced a new era of Soviet film music. It also serves as a concise summary of the main contents of the monograph. Amongst the book’s many merits is the way Titus relates the writing of music for film to the narrative strand that many listeners seem to find in Shostakovich’s symphonic and chamber...
Read full abstract