Confrontation and Conciliation Under the Socialist State:Peasant Resistance to Agricultural Collectivization in China in the 1950s Huaiyin Li (bio) Peasant protest and unrest, ubiquitous and chronic in imperial and Republican China, continued into the 1950s during the transition to socialism and, after three decades of overall silence under the agricultural collectives that effectively controlled the rural population and resources, resurfaced in the 1980s in the wake of decollectivization. Past studies have well documented the riots and rebellions against the state and local authorities in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.1 Recent literature on reform-era China has further brought to light peasant disgruntlement against abuses in taxation and village administration.2 What remains largely obscure is popular resistance to agricultural collectivization (nongye jitihua) in the 1950s, when villagers were grouped into different organizations of agricultural production. Conventional wisdom has it that the collectivization drive, beginning with the creation of mutual-aid teams (huzhu zu) and culminating in the creation of advanced-stage cooperatives (gaoji hezuoshe), encountered little resistance from poor and lower-middle peasants owing to the government's eco-nomic and financial measures that benefited the majority of rural residents and the effective working of the Communist Party's grassroots organizations.3 The resistance, if any, came primarily from "class enemies" in the countryside, namely former [End Page 73] landlords and rich peasants. Elizabeth Perry, for example, demonstrated how the landlords and rich peasants, who controlled various kinds of local sects, prevented their followers from joining the collectives or instigated them to rebel against local governments.4 Needless to say, government newspapers and other official sources, which informed much of the earlier generation of rural China studies, necessarily spoke for the policies and ideology of the socialist state, which assumed the class struggle between peasants and landlords to be the major contradiction in the countryside. To accentuate the role of the "class enemies" in rural discontent was in perfect accordance with that ideology. Sabotage and uprisings of the former landlords and rich peasants, to be sure, did occur and in certain areas were serious as those sources revealed. But those examples were far from representing the overall picture of rural resistance in the 1950s. As we will find in this study, the vast majority and the most active of the participants in the resistance to collectivization, in both the country as a whole and the localities under examination, were ordinary peasants rather than their instigational class enemies. Drawing on government archives from Dongtai () and Songjiang () counties in Jiangsu Province as well as recently released official documents that reflect the nationwide situation, this article examines continuity and change in peasant resistance to collectivization in the two counties.5 Rural disgruntlement before the communist revolution usually took the form of either "collective violence," such as riots and rebellions that openly challenged the state or local power holders, or "everyday resistance," in which the individuals vented their anger against, or sought protection from, the powerful with "weapons of the weak," including rumors, curses, and sabotage, or, alternatively, bribes, illicit sex, fictive kinship, and so forth.6 Both types of resistance, however, were rooted in the values and shared assumptions innate to the villagers, as manifested in their sense of right and wrong, collective memories, popular cults, folklore, or social practices, and therefore was believed to be moral and just in their opinions. Together, these forms of actions constitute what we may call "righteous resistance." The deprived and dislocated villagers in Qing China, for example, joined rebels of various "heretic" organizations because "the officials compel the people to rebel (guan bi min fan );" rebellion was the only option for them to escape the government's unscrupulous [End Page 74] exaction and outrageous cruelty.7 Likewise, the hungry villagers in southern Jiangsu felt it righteous to "eat the great households (chi dahu)" in the early 1930s when the prices of rice had reached such a level that looting rice shops was no longer simply the action of bandits, and indeed the rioters made every effort to distinguish themselves from true bandits.8 In both cases, the peasants invariably resorted to the right to survival to justify their claims and actions. The villagers...
Read full abstract